After The Mid-Term Elections, “Change We Can Believe In”

Emotional, sincere Catholic. More like him, please.

I tend not to have too many hopes in the collective future, as years and experiences have made me rather disillusioned. I also tend not to salute a “new era” every time that a new face (or a new skin colour) is elected in some important office, persuaded as I am that democracies can’t work in a radically different way than they do now, otherwise they’d just be doing it now. Thirdly and lastly, I always thought that it was not in order to end an expression with a preposition; but hey, people get elected to President of the United States with that, and who am I to object.

Having said all that I can’t avoid the delicious impression that yesterday’s mid-term elections represent a turning of the tide; that a great offensive in defence of Christian values has now officially started to make itself heard in the ballot box and in the next decades will spread all over the Western world.

I am trying to digest some facts, and present them to you in no particular order.

1) The marijuana proposition in California has been defeated; so soundly in fact, that it will be fun to see in what other states it will be defeated in 2012. I see in this a clear signal that the electorate has boundaries. Even – would you believe it – in California, the State who gave humanity Nancy Pelosi and Judge Walker.

2) Catholic activism starts to bite. Catholic Vote Action has endorsed nine candidates; seven were elected, some of them with rather spectacular victories (check out the boot for the founder of “Catholic in Alliance for the Common Good”, kicked out by a candidate supported by… real Catholics). Many other Catholics entered the House and Thomas Peters maintains that they are now, incredibile dictu, the majority in the Congress. This is, if not a legislative – abortion legislation is state matter, AFAIK – a cultural shift of great importance; may it still be that many of them are cafeteria Catholics, the number of really pro-life Representatives is most certainly on the rise. Ten or twenty years of this, and an awful lot can be achieved.

3) It would appear that six US States now have both houses with a Pro-Life majority. This can have truly major consequences. Let us hope that the walk follows the talk.

4) The fight against judicial activism trying to demolish the very basis of Christian society takes a rather aggressive form. In Iowa, three judges of the Iowa Supreme Court ruling in favour of homo couples have been unceremoniously kicked out. I do not think many States have laws similar to those in Iowa, but the message is loud and clear anyway.

5) The soon-to-be speaker of the House, Boehner, is a Catholic and the first Republican Catholic to such an office. This is another sign of the times: when a mickey mouse Catholic a’ la Pelosi is replaced by a person unable to refrain his emotions at a pro-life rally – and second of twelve sons – you know something’s happening…

This is, of course, only the beginning. The way is very long and many other battles will have to be fought, and some of them lost.
But today, I sense that something is changing. That the American voters have said “enough”, and the echo will not fail to resound in the benches of the judiciary besides among the rank of the elected politicians.

Today, we might be at the beginning of real change not only the other side of the Pond but, in time, all over the Western civilisation.


Posted on November 3, 2010, in Catholicism and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1. From your lips to God’s ears, Mundabor! 😉

  2. Unfortunately, my long-time Congressman, who is about as big of a leftist as they come in America, was re-elected.

    I think we need to be cautious about this being considered a victory for social conservatism. Rather, I think the election was primarily about money and size-of-government issues. Thankfully most people in the US who are pro small government are also social conservatives, so hopefully they will take this opportunity to nudge the nation in the right direction.

    A small question: there has been hardly any coverage here in the US about the riots & picketing in France over the plan to raise the retirement age from 60 to 62. Have they ended? Did the government there put through the reform or was it defeated?

    • NSS,
      I do think that the one goes, by and large, with the other though they must not correspond. There is now a larger number of Pro-lifers in both Congress and state houses, but what impressed me most was that two pro-life candidates (though in various degrees) like Fiorina and Whitman were in a position to fight with good chances to the very end in a state like California; and with Fiorina, whom I understand has the harder stance on abortion of the two, truly dangerous for Boxer. To me this is a sign of changing times, though I think we’ll need many more years and – this must be stressed – many more good bishops.


    • Sorry I forgot to mention the French. As far as I know the french parliament (or senate) has approved and the law is now going to be challenged in front of the constitutional court. Riots in France don’t make great news, as they have a long tradition of hard and violent protests. In France, if a protest is not violent it isn’t really one.


%d bloggers like this: