The Bishops And The Sack

When even a rather well-known Catholic blogger – up to now known for defending the indefensible on a couple of issues – starts to admit that ++ Vin “Quisling” Nichols has not performed according to the expectations, one understands that the inability of said ++ Vin “Quisling” Nichols to deliver even a modicum amount of Catholicism starts to be more than a disappointment and that it starts to be, in fact, rather a scandal een in the eyes of those who see themselves as moderates.

In fact, the tragedy of said archbishop is the tragedy of most of the Western and of the totality of the E&W hierarchy: the utter inability to be Catholic and to think and speak like one. Our contemporary bishops are rather a strange mixture between the hollow rhetoric of a David Cameron (more exactly: the pathetic attempts at rhetoric of a Gordon Brown) and the amusing exercises of Jim Hacker, the unforgettable “Minister/ Prime Minister”.

Bishops don’t talk about Catholicism anymore. ++ Vin “Quisling” Nichols might even have forgotten altogether what Catholicism is (which, by the way, would be rather good for his souls’ chances the day he kicks the buckets, as we all must). You don’t hear him thundering against homosexuality and in fact he continues to tolerate the unspeakable scandal of the homo masses in Soho; but hey, talk to him about bankers and see how he gets all excited…..

We live in times (as one of my idols, “Sir Humphrey Appleby”, famously said) when politicians talks like religious leaders and religious leaders talk like politicians. Both talk nonsense of course, but I’m sure it sounds well and in the end this is what counts. I blame Kennedy’s inaugurations speech, the first time a politician dared to say to his electors that they shouldn’t pose any obligation on him and became extremely famous in the process.

++ Vin “Quisling” Nichols lives in a world where abortion kills 200,000 a year and the womb has become the most dangerous place to be, easily eclipsing war zones. He has witnessed the disintegration of British society through the widespread recourse to divorce and easygoing, taxpayer-financed, future securing teenage pregnancy. He has seen the mockery of the family through the legalisation of so-called civil partnerships and has ad the nerve to say that he was not against, and that the Church’s opinion on the matter is “nuanced”. He presides over a society where no Hollywood comedy thinks it can do without the obligatory faggot and the BBC even has the temerity to re-write the recent rendition of Evelyn Waugh’s “Brideshead revisited” in very pink tones. He sees every day how every kind of monstrosity (from old couples, let alone old men, adopt children to the renting of uterus to the slow crumbling of opposition to euthanasia) gets a foot in the door of British society, and he complains about ……bankers! Again, this is a religious wanting to be a politician at a time in which politicians want to speak like religious (our unforgettable “Clown in Chief” clearly leads the way, as to equate the protection of family with the protection of homosexual unions surely must take the biscuit).

The simple truth is that the bishops of E & W deserve the sack. All of them, with no exception. Here in Blighty there is no bishop of whom you could say that he isn’t a coward, and no bishop you would trust with the nerve of starting a battle like, say, the Italian church has started about Euthanasia. Or take the buses with the atheist advs: a huge controversy in Italy and something our English and Welsh bishops wouldn’t even considering worthy of a serious discussion. in the end, it all comes down to the cojones and our bishops’ lack of the necessary material is both very sad and rather remarkable.

“Unfit for purpose”, I think is the technical term. At this point, they don’t deserve our sympathy anymore.

They deserve the sack.


Posted on March 7, 2011, in Catholicism and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1. This needs to be said. Thanks.
    In the U. S. (probably because there are so many more of them) there are a handful trying to do well by their consecration, but, otherwise, most of them ought to be doing penance in a monastery in Tierra del Fuego.
    The materialist, ego-centered world view of the Enlightenment has triumphed in every sphere throughout the world. Only divine intervention can avail at this point. You have a good insight with the interchangeability of bishops and politicos–they’ve both absorbed the same lies.

    • Yes 308s,

      in the old U S of A you are still in a much better situation than us here in Blighty. You have half a dozen of hardliners making some headlines every now and then and at least trying to keep Catholicism alive; by us institutionalised cowardice is everywhere.


  2. There maybe one exception amongst the English bishops, although it is too soon to be sure.

    Here, in the diocese of Shrewsbury, we have a new bishop, Mark Davies – and there are hopeful signs that he may be considerably better than any of the others. Already, he has declared his first year in office to be a “Marian year” for the diocese. He has also preached convincingly on the sanctity of marriage.
    On a local level, he has cancelled an arrangement made by his predecessor that one of the parishes here, whose church had been closed, should share the premises of an anglican church. This church-sharing had caused some distress to the parishioners, as you can imagine. He has also expressed disapproval at refreshments being served at the back of a church in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament and insisted that the Blessed Sacrament be first removed.

    Our priest from the Institute of Christ the King has met the bishop and told us that he was impressed by his being “truly Catholic”. I am hoping that this promising start may continue!

    • Nice little signals, misericordia.

      But you see, when things happen like the one of my post of yesterday regarding Cameron, in my book every bishop that doesn’t shoot on Cameron with all cannons is a goddamn coward, “Marian year” or no “Marian year”.

      Having said that, perhaps he’ll improve. There were timesr when priests made a huge mess because ONE couple had dared to marry in the town hall. Those were priests.


  3. ooooooooooooooh you’ll love this

%d bloggers like this: