Two Words About Sexual Orientation
You would have thought that the catalogue of horrors perpetrated by a nazi culture which thinks nothing of killing babies in the mother’s womb (apologies, I must correct myself: that considers it a woman’s right to be able to kill a baby in her mother’s womb) would have, in the meantime, presented you with all the abominations it could possibly think of: women “married” with women; ditto men with men; surrogate wombs for poofs eager of motherhood (or whatever-hood they call it); abortion on demand; day after pill for forgetful women and, of course, “emancipation” galore. The poor women are not even free to feel and behave like women anymore, with “big sister” always watching them and carefully checking their degree of (how was that? ah….) “emancipation”.
But if you had thought that the catalogue of horrors be complete, you’ll have to rethink after reading this
You would think that when, say, a boy of twelve is uncertain of his sexuality, his parents would lovingly support him in the gradual discover of the sexual orientation God has made him with. But you would be wrong. Eager parents of the S-generation (yes, you know what S stands for) are extremely eager to refuse any common sense and sensible thinking; instead, they yearn for hormones to be given to their poor boy (let us repeat here: if he has a little friend, boy; otherwise, girl; tertium non datur!) so that his sexual growth may be more or less stopped and the poor chap may “make his own choice” as to, well, what he wants to be when he grows up. You couldn’t make it up.
That it is exactly the duty of the parents to guide their offspring toward a harmonious development of their sexuality, is not mentioned in the least; that it is, moreover, the exact duty of the parents to do so from the tenderest age instead of waiting for this poor boy to grow amidst a forest of confusing messages, in a world where every abomination is considered normal, is not considered at all; that a clear separation of roles, and of attitudes, between father and mother is the best way to encourage a natural assimilation of gender-typical roles from the side of the children is, obviously, too fascist to be even hinted at.
But look for one moment at traditionally Catholic societies, those islands of mental sanity where political correctness is, according to the moment, either joke or insult. Over there men are men, and women are women. From men it is expected that they behave like men, and from women that they behave like women. This happens from the tenderest age, and if you haven’t had the privilege of growing up in a traditionally Catholic society (for which fact the author doesn’t envy you) just notice the behaviour of boys and girls by your next holiday and you’ll start to get the gist of the matter. Please also be informed that these boys and girls grow in intact families in much bigger numbers than their English counterparts; that they generally have one father and one mother, who even are their biological parents; and that in general, they grow and behave as if growing up in an intact family – where men are men and women are women – were the most natural thing on earth.
Which it is. Outside of England, that is.
Instead, what we have more and more often in our de-Christianised societies (and far too often anyway even in those traditional Catholic societies; certainly more often than this used to be the case) is eunuchs married to witches of whom they are terrified; witches often working and earning more than their husbands do, spending less time at home than them, and carrying the trousers in every conceivable ways. When this confusion in turn generates confusion in the children (children growing up without clear orientation; with a father who thinks and behave like a woman and a mother who thinks and behaves like a man), the poor idiots find nothing better to do than to chemically stop the sexual development of their offspring, perhaps with a view of ruining them forever by “embracing” whatever perversion they may decide to follow, and perhaps even following this madness up with the surgical, irreparable removal of their manhood.
Simply and utterly monstrous. Monstrous in a way that follows from the utter subversion of the very simple basis of every working society: that men are men, women are women, and that from each of them that mentality and behaviour are expected, that are aligned to their sex and to their profound nature. Too many people have simply forgotten – or are, astonishingly, unable to grasp – that God doesn’t do perversions, Satan does. Is this so difficult to understand for one who says that he believes in God? And if one doesn’t understand this, does he really believe in God?
What next: that God makes people pedophiles?
You will probably not know him but some years ago, a once-leftist Italian composer and singer, Roberto Vecchioni, shocked the champagne-sipping leftist Italy with a rather brutally conservative song against “manly” women (“manly”, of course, for the Italian standard; I will stop here out of sheer charity…….), declaring that he wants “a woman with the rock”. Scandal and anger ensued, of course. But it was scandal and anger the Italian way. Traditional societies know very well where the truth lies; even the leftists, in their own way.
Traditional societies, traditional roles, traditional women and traditional men; in turn, little boys growing and trained to become men and little girls growing and trained to become women. You do that and you’ll see that there is no need for legalised abominations; let alone hormone-fueled ones.
Posted on April 19, 2011, in Catholicism and tagged Catholic, Catholicism, Conservative Catholic, conservative catholicism, Emancipation, Eunuchs, Feminism, Hormones, Poofs, Witches. Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.
Please forgive my stupidity, but I do not understand what you mean here:
“You would think that when, say, a boy of twelve is uncertain of his sexuality, his parents would lovingly support him in the gradual discover of the sexual orientation God has made him with. But you would be wrong. Eager parents of the S-generation (yes, you know what S stands for) are extremely eager to refuse any common sense and sensible thinking; instead, they yearn for hormones to be given to their poor boy (let us repeat here: if he has a little friend, boy; otherwise, girl; tertium non datur!) so that his sexual growth may be more or less stopped and the poor chap may “make his own choice” as to, well, what he wants to be when he grows up. You couldn’t make it up.”
It’s hard to follow what you are saying. Please do correct me if I am misinterpreting this, but are you saying that young people “discover” their sexual “orientation”? Having raised in my inadequate way six girls and four boys I’m not sure any of them were “discovering” any odd sort of “orientation.” They were just growing up, simply, and my wife and I did our best to steer them into being good Catholics.
Again, forgive me if I don’t understand your use of the cant word “orientation”. Surely you are not suggesting that the insidious term “sexual orientation” has any validity? We are taught by the Church that one can sin in three ways: by thought, word or desire, not to mention acting on those thoughts, words or desires. Given that simple teaching, where does the word “orientaion” fit in? Does one have a murderous orientation? A felonious one? An adulterous one? I really do believe that that weasel phrase “sexual orientation” was cooked up by homo proagandists to lay the groundwork for their hilarious claim that homosexuals are “born that way.”
Don’t take this as carping criticism; I’m just trying to understand what you mean.
Also, what was your point about the hormones? Who is giving hormones to who for what purpose? Sorry to be obtuse about this.
the message is very simple: if you had seen that your child has the tendency to be deviant, you would have – I hope – lovingly helped him to discover the oreientation God has made him with, that is: the orientation towards women if he is a man, and vice versa.
Both the expression “God has made him with” and the equally obvious reference that God doesn’t do perversion might, I think, have put you on the right direction and frankly the idea that I might consider sexual orientation a free choice is rather extraordinary. Of course a person can always decide whether to yield to his perversion (as the pedophile does), but this doesn’t mean that he is authorise to “choose” like I choose between pizza ai funghi and pizza ai quattro formaggi….
I do not know what people say in the US, but I don’t see in the word “sexual orientation” any implicit “right to choose”, as you seem to consider. Men’s sexual orientation is to be attracted by women, women’s sexual orientation is to be attracted by men. The god-given sex gives the god-given sexual orientation.
As to the hormones, they are given by liberal parents to their children in order to stop their sexual development and so that the said children can have a couple of years more to decide whether they want to have a change of sex, or not. This is so monstrous, that has prompted me to write the blog post in the first place. But I see now that the link doesn’t work properly, hence the confusion….
Et voila, I have repaired the link using a similar article.
Hope this is all clearer now and thank you for pointing out to the technical blunder….