Daily Archives: May 16, 2011

Universae Ecclesiae And Catholic Bloggers

Hopefully, people like him will make us superfluous: Cardinal Burke.

Browsing around the Internet in search of reactions to Universae Ecclesiae, I was once again struck by a very clear phenomenon: the absolute, stunning, annihilating prevalence of Conservative Catholics in the blogosphere. Their dominance is now so marked, that one is not even surprised at finding one conservative blog after the other anymore; it is more so, that this is now so natural and so expected, that the chance encounter with a liberal blog would have been – if I had had such encounter – a rather shocking experience.

This reflection should make us proud (I mean with “us” not only the cohorts of bloggers, but the legions of readers who, with their contributions and encouragements, make the entire world of Catholic blogging so interesting and instructive), if it weren’t the case that our existence is, in fact, very bad news.

It is a common fact that people don’t talk much of shared ideas or common values. There are no debates about the influence of pedophilia on society, because there is nothing much to debate. Similarly, there are – after the communist madness shot itself in the genitals – no discussion anymore about whether private property be a theft, and the like. Shared values are, by and large, shared silently.

Similarly, if in the Italy of sixty years ago you would have started a debate about whether it be good to abort or to practice euthanasia, the reaction would have been a non-discussion for the evident unworthiness of the proposer, it being generally understood and universally accepted that legalised abortion and euthanasia were a distinctive trait of the Nazi regime, and such things unthinkable in a Christian and halfway decent society.

And this is the entire point. Western societies have become so indecent, so accepting of typical Nazi values, that what two generations ago would have caused open mockery or ironic commiseration, nowadays causes savage discussions. The same goes for Catholic issues, with your typical aunt of, say, 1942 smilingly dismissing as in great need of rest whoever would have told her that two generations later, millions of words would have been written about the necessity of …….. kneeling before Communion.

Our very existence is, therefore, bad news, because our existence is the clear result of the most elementary common sense having been thrown to the dogs by the senseless pot-generation of the Sixties; a generation still spreading its poison in the form of senior clergymen and senior politicians, roaming throughout the world and seeking the ruin of souls to this very day.

As it is now, hundreds of millions of Catholics can’t remember the last time their bishop has said anything meaningful against abortion or divorce; they can’t, actually, not remember when their bishop has said anything meaningful at all, vague blathering about social justice and environ-mental issues obviously not qualifying. It’s not surprising that such faithful spend part of their evening reading Catholic blogs.

If, on the other hand, the bishops were firing daily from all cannons against modern abominations and the desertion of Christian values, Catholics wouldn’t be here in the evening reading what other Catholics think; you yourself, dear reader, would just be doing something else, needing this blog no more than you need to be informed about pedophilia, or incest, or “proletarian expropriations”. Shared values are taken for granted, and one feels comfortable in the very fact that they are no object for discussion (think about a world where vast masses think that pedophilia is all right: appalling, right?).

The day the Catholic clergy starts doing its job properly and assertively, Catholic blogging will stop being a phenomenon so vast as to even attract the attention of the Vatican. That day, million of fathers and husbands will start dedicating more time to their wives or domestic occupation and less to following endless discussion on the Internet. That day, Catholic blogging will become a far more subdued activity, because the nourishment and instruction the reader seek on the net is just there, available and propagated from the friendly priest near them, as it should have been all the time.

I firmly believe that the Liturgy is the Church. You can’t corrupt the Liturgy without corrupting the Church, and you can’t improve the Liturgy without improving the Church.

Let us hope that Universae Ecclesiae will grow to become an important step toward the end of the massive phenomenon called “Catholic blogging”.


Universae Ecclesiae: Modernist Reaction Is A Non Sequitur

Italy, "where the sweet "si" sounds" and, sometimes, screams.....

I simply love Messa In Latino. Besides being so instructive, it is so…. Italian! There you can find passionate, rather abrasive blog posts and long lists of comments going from the openly aggressive to the extremely well-educated (not that the educated are less aggressive, mind……), but all talking and screaming together in best Italian style.

I envy that happy troop a bit, because if among Italians you can be… Italian without even noticing what you are doing – or without even noticing how special this mixture of sarcasm and folly, erudition and frontal assault is  – if you behave in the same way in an Anglo-Saxon context the wolves will be upon you, bombarding you with accusations of being “uncharitable”, “not inclusive”, and the like. Blessed be Italy, its love for frank speaking and its absence of politically correct tosh.

This time, Messa In Latino gives us a special treat: the inordinate rant of a liberal theologian basically claiming that Universae Ecclesiae is an absurdity because…… the 1962 rite has been abolished.

The article is too long for it to be translated, and the arguments too cretinous to deserve translation. But it seems to me that if the liberal camp has reduced itself to the point of having to claim that the Tridentine is nothing more than an absurd attempt to resuscitate a rite caduto dalla vigenza (“fallen out of legal validity”), then it is fair to say that liberals are now truly in dire straits.

The other argument, less legal but not more intelligent, is that this instruction be, as Summorum Pontificum before it, divisive. One can’t avoid smiling at the fact that those same people who have raped the Tridentine Mass in just a few years, imposing a sweeping wind of change on everything that was sacred, should now call this very prudent and slow process of recovery of, well, liturgical sanity divisive.

I also wonder where such arguments, if continued or taken seriously, might lead: will we have a sedevacantism from the left? A sort of “Society of Paul The Sixth”?

Still, this is where we are now and in fact, I think that the wailings of the liberal will cease only through the tireless work of the Tridentine’s best friend: the undertaker.


Universae Ecclesiae And The Internet

Palermo, the seat of a beautiful Cathedral, and of entrepreneurial Catholics.

A beautiful example of how the internet is changing the way faithful organise themselves from the always excellent Messa in Latino.

Just a couple of days after Universae Ecclesiae, a reader is published with a public invitation to those living in and near Palermo to write to him to organise a stable group for the Tridentine Mass.

Mind, though, that in Palermo the Tridentine Mass is already available (in Italy the situation is, whilst patchy, certainly better than in the UK) and the scope of the faithful is simply to have more of them.

The internet (blogs, meetup, twitter, facebook, and the like) now allows conservative minded Catholics to rapidly get in touch with each other and make their voices heard. Whilst the gathering together of like-minded people has always been possible, it is fair to say that it has never been as easy as today; similarly, exposing the boycott of a bishop has never been so easy, too.

Universae Ecclesiae is going to give another spallata, a powerful shoulder’s push to the resistance of liberal bishops and now that it is explicitly said that no minimum number is necessary for a stable group, the boycott of the Tridentine Mass will become more and more difficult. Young priests able and willing to celebrate will certainly be available and their number will, in the next years, certainly increase.

Better times ahead.


%d bloggers like this: