Sober Times Ahead: The End of the Altar Girl.

Less endangered than "Altar Girls".

Three cheers for Fr John Lankeit, the rector of the Cathedral of Ss. Simon and Jude, Phoenix, and also echoed by Father Z.

Father Lankeit had the lucidity and courage to say out loud that what is wrong can’t be right; not even then, when this wrong is very dear to secular minds. I wish the Conciliar fathers had had the same courage when subversive tendencies appeared in their respective diocese; but this obviously didn’t happen, seen that the subversive tendencies had been encouraged and abetted by those same bishops who should have suffocated them.

Fr Lankeit decided, then, to say what rather everyone well underway on his process of sobering – or who never got drunk in the first place – knows: there can be no place in the Church for so-called “altar girls”. He doesn’t say it with these words of course, but the message is clear enough. It was more than a mistake, it was a liturgical abuse to which Rome caved in out of sheer cowardice; a cowardice that has made incalculable damage, the rubble only in the last years being seriously, if slowly, removed. What is wrong doesn’t become right merely because it’s been approved.

Allow me to let Fr Lankeit speak:

“If you look around the Church — and I’m talking about the overall Church — if you look at dioceses, if you look at religious orders and you look at parishes where they have the clear honoring of the distinction and the complementarity of men and women, you see both vocations flourish,” Fr. Lankeit said. “And when I say both vocations, I mean to the priesthood as well as vocations to the consecrated religious life.”

Look – the man is saying – when you do things the proper way, you have more vocations among people of both sexes!

“Vocation crisis” is just another word for “liberal madness”: when you had the former you unavoidable got the latter; as the latter goes away the former will unavoidably disappear.

Fr Lankeit has others, long-forgotten or long-ignored truths to say. Try this:

“Prior to my ordination, as a single, Catholic man, I had no right whatsoever to the priesthood. And so when I went into the seminary, I was determining whether or not Jesus Christ was calling me to be a priest, but the Church was likewise discerning me and the ultimate decision was the Church’s,” Fr. Lankeit said. “Even if I felt very, very strongly at the bottom of my heart that I was called to be a priest and the Church didn’t recognize that, I had to accept that.”

I wonder how you can explain this to the modern feminazis: that there is no right to priesthood, no matter how strong you “feeeel”. No, it’s not about your feelings and no, you are not God and are not authorised to change His rules, though you may “feel” you are. I am afraid that allowing girls to become “altar boys” hasn’t helped to get this simple facts straight.

“The Church was likewise discerning me”. Thank God for Fr Lankeit, and please let your Hail Mary for him be a beautiful one.

Or try this one:

Q: Do young girls who serve at the altar become nuns?

A: “I haven’t seen that evidence”

You weren’t being inattentive, Father. The only vocation of “altar girls” which seems to work very well is the one to sanctimonious, secretly mocked, bossy old ugly feminist. No vocation crisis there I am afraid. Well, not yet; but given time and undertakers, tutto si aggiusta….

Out of tune, I must say, is the close of the article, with the mother of two siblings (one a boy, already an altar server; the other a girl, apparently aspiring to become one) who thinks that she must “understand where it’s coming from” and says “I would want to know more about the reasons for the change before having an opinion about it.” I hope that after the knowing will come the understanding, but the rather unpleasant impression remains that what counts in the journalist’s mind is what the mother thinks, rather than what the Church has done these two thousand years. I wasn’t entirely surprised in discovering that I was very interested to know what Fr Lankeit’s motives are, but really couldn’t care less of what opinion the lady will have.

Insensitive, isn’t it?

Mundabor

Posted on August 24, 2011, in Catholicism and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.

  1. Something, especially in the United States, is clearly starting to change. It may be that in the next decades a genuine renewal, that is a renaissance, a restoration, of Catholicism will come from the USA – a country that was founded on a mixture of Protestantism and Lockean Liberalism that stayed more religious than most of Europe in part because of its stauch Protestant heritage.
    In the end, God brings forth good out of evil and True Faith out of Heresy and Apostasy. This we must never forget, even when the night is darkest.
    Catocon.

  2. Yes, no wonder there is no vocations. John Paul II initially opposed altar girls but caved in after the 1994 interpretation — another example of papal weakness corroding the Church. (I’m beginning to think that weakness — rather than positive evil —- is what really has destroyed the Church.)

  3. I agree Catocon. Something is moving. We are still at the beginning of a process I think, but if continued it will bring a lot of fruits in the next decades.

    Michael Voris was in London a couple of days ago. He is another clear sign of the times.

    Mundabor

  4. Shane,
    you meant “attempted to destroy”, surely?

    The building is not well kept and needs extensive restoration work. But it’s still there, as Jesus intended.

    M

    • You know, sometimes I fear to appear pedantic, but if one believes that the Church is destroyed the “extremist” SSPX – or sedevacantist – positions are not far away, which is why I preferred to clarify what, I was sure, you wanted to say anyway….

      M

  5. Mundabor, don’t worry. We Irish have a habit for hyperbole.

%d bloggers like this: