“Daily Telegraph” Taken Over By Gay Mafia

What she says…

You only need to click on this article to understand what is wrong with today’s “Telegraph”.

1) The Photo

Taken by Alamy, a professional Data bank, it has clearly been chosen to convey a positive image of sodomy: smiling, likely staged young faces surrounded by the support of the present, and a festive atmosphere. The “Homograph” clearly approves. Faggots.

2) The Caption

Read the usual homosexual language: “gay” instead of sodomite or homosexual; “gay right” as if they existed in the first place; “pioneer” as if the insitutionalisation of sodomy were anything worth “pioneering”. Faggots.

3) The Article

Whilst the article reports some of the criticisms, it has at least two big faults:

a) it does not condemn in the least. Just imagine an article writing about combined marriages in some Muslim country, where the  interviewed says “we’re so proud our human right to decide the fate of our children has been recognised”, or the like.  There is no distancing whatever. The very pretence of just being “describing the facts” is negated by the photo, the caption, the short presentation of the article. Faggots.

b) It gives the impression the ruling will now apply to everyone, and even the (only) Church will be obliged to comply with the diktat of the Government.  The article says verbatim:

Homosexual couples in Denmark have won the right to get married in any church they choose, even though nearly one-third of the country’s priests have said they will refuse to carry out the ceremonies.

It is clear both the writer and the editor of this article want to describe a great victory for sodomites, a game-changing event. (You guessed it…:) Faggots.

But is it really as the “Daily Homograph” says? Not really. Go and visit Cranmer for explanations.  Still, I am not persuaded this is merely (as Cranmer says) “utter nonsense and very poor journalism”.  This is much more than that; this is utter faggotry and very bent journalism instead. 

This used to be a conservative newspaper. It has now become the transvestite prostitute of the Prime Minister.

For shame.

Mundabor

P.s. I had read this article the day it came out. I decided to write about it only if the world press would pick the news, as the matter seemed truly far too absurd to be true. It turned out these people are both faggots and very bad journalists. I’m glad I have not been led by these perverted amateurs to write an article about the impending danger of perverts demanding to “marry” in a Catholic church!