Hollywood: Is The Gaystapo Retreating?


I have written on several occasions on how societal trends move like a pendulum, with an issue slowly developing, then exploding – greatly helped by the media, who love these things – in a collective craze, and after a while deflating again. Sometimes the process takes a long time, on other occasions the pendulum swings more rapidly. To make some example, Roe vs Wade is now clearly under attack, and I seriously doubt it will survive another 40 years, whilst – to mention just some other cases – the AIDS-craze, the Mad-Cow madness and the Environ-mentalism all were much more short-lived.

On a smaller scale, perhaps another pendulum is slowing starting to swing the other way: the intimidation of Hollywood through the Homomafia.
I have just seen “Seven Psychopats” (a brilliant movie, if you like black humour) and couldn’t avoid thinking this will have the queens up in arms, screeching like it’s the first day of sales at Bloomingdale’s. What makes the (several) jokes more relevant is that the film has its first ending (yes, there are two of them…) with a joke so obviously uncaring of the screeching of the homo-lobby I can’t believe this was done by coincidence. On the contrary, the impression I had is that the message here is very clear: we’ve had enough of being intimidated and won’t put up with this anymore.

You could obviously say this is just one movie, and a swallow does not a summer make; but this is a $15m movie, not an indie aiming at Sundance Film Festival glory.

I couldn’t avoid thinking that just a couple of years ago a famous actor (Vince Vaughn, if memory serves) had to make a public apology because he had one line in which he said the Toyota Prius is “gay” (which it clearly is; readers of this blog obviously excluded). Heavens, if the Gaystapo gets bitchy because of a line like this, ” Seven Psychopats” will be bad for their coronaries.

I will continue to follow the trend, but I hope the  infamous “Friends With Benefits” will be remembered as the low point, a romantic – if rather immoral for Catholic standards; most romantic movies today are – comedy utterly raped by the presence of the homosexual “friend of the lead character”, interpreted by a rather improbable Woody Harrelson. Interestingly, Woody Harrelson – whom I had not seen for a while before  his homo role, and I suspect had to accept it to get back in the big game – now gives an excellent, gritty interpretation in “Seven Psychopats”, and I can well assume the man is trying to get rid of the bad odour left by his homo character; still, the man is clearly a liberal, so I might be wrong on this.

We will see how this pans out; but I must say I was so surprised I thought I would share this with you. More of this, please, and let us put an end to this insufferable climate of bitchy intimidation.


Posted on December 19, 2012, in Catholicism and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. You have a stronger stomach than I have, friend Mundabor. I cannot sit through any Hollywood drek any more, none at all. “Brilliance” has vanished from cinema screens at least since the 1960s.

    Regarding the subject of sodomy as such, a subject which fills me with revulsion, the main worry in my mind is the lack of firmness in dealing with it vis-a-vis the Vatican. Today I read this from Mr Damien Thomson:

    “The Catholic Church’s teachings about homosexuality may (and I think will) evolve.”

    I’ve stopped reading the rather strange Mr Thomson for a long time now because his wrists seem to be a little too limp for my tastes, but what he says is troubling. Of course the Church will not change its teachings on this sordid mortal sin, as Mr Thomson appears to hope, but there are are far too many clerics and Bishops who talk as if it will and they go on undisciplined by Rome.

    As always, I’m afraid, a Church ungoverned by the Pope will descend into anarchy.

%d bloggers like this: