Searchlight Can’t See The Light

Wild Ass.


If you want to have a laugh, go on Father Ray Blake's blog and enjoy the press release sent to him about an imminent coup of the friends of Bishop Williamson, apparently ready to oust Bishop Fellay and, one must conclude, at least 80% of the Society. More, actually.

The problem with the stupid is that they can't think. If they can't think, they will publish whatever rubbish they think serves their cause, or at least gives them some notoriety; or slanders those they dislike.

These people obviously do not know how the Society is organised. If they knew, they would avoid making asses of themselves. But again, asses generally do not know they are making asses of themselves.

Enjoy the press release on Father Blake's blog.

Mundabor

 

Posted on May 28, 2013, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, FSSPX, Traditional Catholicism and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. 6 Comments.

  1. quiavideruntoculi

    I am often alarmed at the apparent willingness of Neo-Conservatives to believe any nonsense about the SSPX, the more outrageous the better. I am afraid it bespeaks a shameful desire to justify their own desperate defence of the indefensible Vatican II.

    • Well, Searchlight can’t be called “Neo-Conservative” by any stretch of the imagination. Father Blake is one of the good ones, I can’t believe he gave any credibility to the story; his reporting it to the nuncio is, I think, rather a matter of formality or “just so you know”.

      The story is actually hilarious.

      M

    • quiavideruntoculi

      Ah – that’s reassuring.

  2. Mundabor, Thank you for informing us of this. I actually sent the Telegraph a copy of the transcript of Bishop Williamson’s interview with the Swedish reporter where he supposedly denied the Holocaust. It is below. As you can tell, he did no such thing. The Telegraph made it quite easy for readers to jump to conclusions when Damian Thompson used hate-evoking words like “Nazi sympathizers”, “Fascist”, “Far-Right”, “disgraced”, “ultra-traditionalist”, “convicted Holocaust denier”, etc. Most people tend to fall for that stuff.

    Here is the transcript (probably too long for you to print):

    Transcription of the interview on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbxKHJDCduk
    entitled therein as: “001 Video Bishop Richard Williamson Not 6 million Jews, No Gas Chambers, Is the Truth an Anti Semitism”
    ………………………

    means “Interviewer”

    means “Bishop Williamson”

    means “Both are speaking at the same time”

    >>>>>>>> The transcription follows >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    Bishop Williamson, are these your words. “There was not one Jew killed by the gas chambers. It was all lies, lies, lies.” Are these your words?

    You are quoting from Canada, I believe yes, many years ago. Um, I believe that the historical evidence, the historical evidence is strongly against… is hugely against… 6 million Jews having been deliberately gassed in gas chambers as a deliberate policy of Adoph Hitler.

    But you say not one Jew was killed.

    In gas chambers.

    Bishop: I think… Interviewer: So there was no gas chambers.

    … I believe there were no gas chambers, yes. I think the… as far as I have studied the evidence – I’m not going by emotion, I’m going by

    Interviewer: unintelligible Bishop: as far as I’ve

    understood the evidence. I think, for instance, people who are against what is very widely believed today about “the holocaust”, I think that people …um… those people conclude – the Revisionists, as they’re called – uh, I think the most serious conclude that between two and three hundred thousand Jews perished in Nazi concentration camps, but not one of them by gassing in a gas chamber. The… You may have heard of the Leuchter Report? Well, Fred Leuchter was an expert in gas chambers. He designed three gas chambers for three states – three of the fifty United States – for the execution of criminals. So he knew what’s involved. And he studied what the supposed gas chambers in Germany – at some point in the 1980s – what remains of the supposed gas chambers – the crematoria at Birkenau-Auschwitz, for instance. And his conclusion – his expert conclusion – was it’s impossible that these could ever have served for the gassing of large numbers of people. Because Cyanide gas is very dangerous, if you… if you… let’s supposing you gas 300 people that you’ve crowded into one chamber, and you gas them – they are all wearing some clothes… for instance, if they are wearing any clothes, it’s very dangerous to go in and pull out the corpses. Because one whiff of the gas that’s trapped in the clothing that stays in the clothing, will kill the person. It’s extremely dangerous. In order to … once you’ve gassed people, you’ve got to get rid of the… you’ve got to evacuate the gas to be able to get into the chamber again to use it. To evacuate the gas, you need a high chimney. If it’s a low chimney, the gas goes onto the pavement and kills anybody walking by. You need a high chimney, right? I forget how high he says it must be. If you… if there was a high chimney, then the shadow… then at most times of the day, the shadow would have fallen on the ground and the Allied aerial photographers that flew over the camps would have picked up the shadow of this chimney. There were never any such shadows. There was no such chimney. Which, as according to Fred Leuchter’s testimony, there can’t be any gas chambers. He looks at the doors, and he says, the door has to be absolutely airtight. Otherwise, again, the gas escapes and kills the people that are outside. The doors of the gas chamber that is shown to tourists at Auschwitz is absolutely not airtight. Absolutely not. So, you know it…

    What you are saying now is that the holocaust never occurred. Not in the way

    Interviewer: history is (unintelligible) today Bishop: I’m saying that…

    I’m going by what I judge to be the historical evidence according to people who have observed and examined that evidence. I believe that what they conclude… I would follow … if they change their conclusion, I would be liable to follow their conclusion … because I think they judge by the evidence. I think that two to three hundred thousand Jews perished in Nazi conc…. in Nazi concentration camps, but nothing like … that none of them by a gas chamber. I don’t…

    Bishop: if you know… Interviewer: If this is not

    anti-semitism, what is anti-semitism?

    Anti-semitism… if anti-semitism is bad, it’s against truth. If something is true, it’s not bad. I’m not interested in the word “anti-semitism”. I mean, you know, the word is very

    Bishop: dangerous Interviewer: The Bishop calls you

    anti-semi….

    The Bishop can call me… he can call me a dinosaur, he can call me an idiot, he can call me what he likes. I… I’m…This is not a question of name-calling. This is a question of historical truth. Historical truth goes by evidence and not by emotion.

    … break (the picture goes black and the Bishop is back, having moved from his original position)

    There has certainly been a huge exploitation. Germany has paid out billions and billions of Deutchmarks and now the Euros because the Germans have a guilt complex about their… their having gassed 6 million Jews. But I don’t think 6 million Jews were gassed. Now, be… be careful, I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German, somebody that’s of the German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany. I hope that’s not your intention.

    END OF INTERVIEW on YouTube

    • I gladly publish this as I find it unspeakable to call Williamson an Holocaust denier when this is obviously not the case for everyone who can read and wants to be informed.

      Thompson is a bad ‘un.

      M

  3. Mundabor, I think my formatting using the greater-than signs messed up the copy as it is printed. Here is a copy where I omitted all those and you can read it much better. Can you replace it?

    Transcription of the interview on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbxKHJDCduk
    entitled therein as: “001 Video Bishop Richard Williamson Not 6 million Jews, No Gas Chambers, Is the Truth an Anti Semitism”
    ………………………

    .I… means “Interviewer”

    .BW… means “Bishop Williamson”

    .BOTH… means “Both are speaking at the same time”

    >>>>>>>> The transcription follows >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    .I… Bishop Williamson, are these your words. “There was not one Jew killed by the gas chambers. It was all lies, lies, lies.” Are these your words?

    .BW… You are quoting from Canada, I believe yes, many years ago. Um, I believe that the historical evidence, the historical evidence is strongly against… is hugely against… 6 million Jews having been deliberately gassed in gas chambers as a deliberate policy of Adoph Hitler.

    .I… But you say not one Jew was killed.

    .BW… In gas chambers.

    .BOTH… Bishop: I think… Interviewer: So there was no gas chambers.

    .BW… … I believe there were no gas chambers, yes. I think the… as far as I have studied the evidence – I’m not going by emotion, I’m going by

    .BOTH… Interviewer: unintelligible Bishop: as far as I’ve

    .BW… understood the evidence. I think, for instance, people who are against what is very widely believed today about “the holocaust”, I think that people …um… those people conclude – the Revisionists, as they’re called – uh, I think the most serious conclude that between two and three hundred thousand Jews perished in Nazi concentration camps, but not one of them by gassing in a gas chamber. The… You may have heard of the Leuchter Report? Well, Fred Leuchter was an expert in gas chambers. He designed three gas chambers for three states – three of the fifty United States – for the execution of criminals. So he knew what’s involved. And he studied what the supposed gas chambers in Germany – at some point in the 1980s – what remains of the supposed gas chambers – the crematoria at Birkenau-Auschwitz, for instance. And his conclusion – his expert conclusion – was it’s impossible that these could ever have served for the gassing of large numbers of people. Because Cyanide gas is very dangerous, if you… if you… let’s supposing you gas 300 people that you’ve crowded into one chamber, and you gas them – they are all wearing some clothes… for instance, if they are wearing any clothes, it’s very dangerous to go in and pull out the corpses. Because one whiff of the gas that’s trapped in the clothing that stays in the clothing, will kill the person. It’s extremely dangerous. In order to … once you’ve gassed people, you’ve got to get rid of the… you’ve got to evacuate the gas to be able to get into the chamber again to use it. To evacuate the gas, you need a high chimney. If it’s a low chimney, the gas goes onto the pavement and kills anybody walking by. You need a high chimney, right? I forget how high he says it must be. If you… if there was a high chimney, then the shadow… then at most times of the day, the shadow would have fallen on the ground and the Allied aerial photographers that flew over the camps would have picked up the shadow of this chimney. There were never any such shadows. There was no such chimney. Which, as according to Fred Leuchter’s testimony, there can’t be any gas chambers. He looks at the doors, and he says, the door has to be absolutely airtight. Otherwise, again, the gas escapes and kills the people that are outside. The doors of the gas chamber that is shown to tourists at Auschwitz is absolutely not airtight. Absolutely not. So, you know it…

    .I… What you are saying now is that the holocaust never occurred. Not in the way

    .BOTH… Interviewer: history is (unintelligible) today Bishop: I’m saying that…

    .BW… I’m going by what I judge to be the historical evidence according to people who have observed and examined that evidence. I believe that what they conclude… I would follow … if they change their conclusion, I would be liable to follow their conclusion … because I think they judge by the evidence. I think that two to three hundred thousand Jews perished in Nazi conc…. in Nazi concentration camps, but nothing like … that none of them by a gas chamber. I don’t…

    .BOTH… Bishop: if you know… Interviewer: If this is not

    .I… anti-semitism, what is anti-semitism?

    .BW… Anti-semitism… if anti-semitism is bad, it’s against truth. If something is true, it’s not bad. I’m not interested in the word “anti-semitism”. I mean, you know, the word is very

    .BOTH… Bishop: dangerous Interviewer: The Bishop calls you

    .I… anti-semi….

    .BW… The Bishop can call me… he can call me a dinosaur, he can call me an idiot, he can call me what he likes. I… I’m…This is not a question of name-calling. This is a question of historical truth. Historical truth goes by evidence and not by emotion.

    … break (the picture goes black and the Bishop is back, having moved from his original position)

    .BW… There has certainly been a huge exploitation. Germany has paid out billions and billions of Deutchmarks and now the Euros because the Germans have a guilt complex about their… their having gassed 6 million Jews. But I don’t think 6 million Jews were gassed. Now, be… be careful, I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German, somebody that’s of the German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany. I hope that’s not your intention.

    END OF INTERVIEW on YouTube

%d bloggers like this: