Daily Archives: July 10, 2013
My twelve – well, perhaps at this point twenty-four – readers might have noticed the reblogged SNAP post. In this blog post I point out to a thing or two concerning this funny bunch of reverse geniuses.
It seems now the chaps and chappettes at SNAPS are even worse than we thought, as I am informed from Father Z’s blog the International Court of Justice in The Hague – those who have put on trial, among others, the late Slobodan Milosevic and now Ratko Mladic – has decided they will not prosecute the Pope for crimes against humanity.
The translation in proper English of the court motivation can be given with “children, please go play in the park, the adults have important things to do”, or alternatively “we do not examine bogus claims of time wasters in search of an ego trip”.
I must have read somewhere these people say they are Catholics. Don’t shoot on me, though. Relata refero.
Still, the life of a Catholic is certainly made more interesting by this kind of news…
The SNAP Reblog
You won’t be surprised to know that I don’t like the SNAP.
The so-called “Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests” (most of the victims are obviously killed, you know; hence “survivors”…) pretends to provide “support” for the victims of abuse by (mostly: homosexuals like this one) pedophile priests, but in fact promote the usual disgusting anti-Catholic, leftist, “liberal Catholics, dissenting, contraceptive, satanic agenda.
Now, the SNAP would obviously not let the Conclave go without making asses of themselves. This time, they have done it in two press releases: with the first they have informed us of which twelve Cardinals they truly do not want to see as Pope (Scola, Ouellet, and Turkson among them). With the second, they have informed us of which candidates they consider their favourites…
No wait! these people truly hate the Church! So they have called…
View original post 315 more words
The Pelosi reblog…
There is no denying if Bishop Jenky of Peoria, Illinois occupied the place of, say, Archbishop Niederauer of San Francisco a couple of things would go differently in the old U S of A.
As things stand, Bishop Jenky cannot excommunicate that walking joke of a soi-disant Catholic answering to the name of Nancy Pelosi; nor can he do the same with Sebelius, though the latter is – if memory serves – excluded from communion anyway.
What Bishop Jenky did do, though, is to clearly warn the two aged witches their behaviour is putting their salvation at risk, the day will come when they have to give account, and it won’t be funny. Considering none of the two ladies is in her first bloom, the warning assumes an even more significant meaning.
With the occasion I must admit I learned only today Sebelius is in the business of “human services”…
View original post 215 more words