The Absurdity Of “Who Am I To Judge”

Ultimately, only God judges. We all know that; particularly Catholics, who are able to pray even for dead heretics. About this, there can be no discussion.

Astonishingly, though, cafeteria Catholics – including some priests – want to do away with the very same concept of “judging” as evaluation of the sinfulness of a certain behaviour. The absurdity of this is apparent.

Thinking – nay, Life itself – is made of judging. I cannot try to keep myself on the straight and narrow, let alone raise a child, without a continuous evaluation of the sinfulness of mine and other people's actions.

Only an extremely stupid father would not “judge” the bad company his son or daughter is getting attracted to. Judgment is part of the very act of social living, from the friends we choose to the job we make. Again, our very existence is a moral judgment.

Some bishops try to water down the “do not judge” mantra whilst staying orthodox, and say that whilst the Church cannot judge individuals, she can and must judge behaviour. Obviously, this refers to the fact that God only “judges” in the sense of “pronounces a sentence of salvation or perdition”, but this way of looking at things also avoids the point. It is not enough to point out to a wrong behaviour. If a person gives public scandal, he himself must be the object of the Church's – and every Catholic's – public reproach. The Church has always done so, and good Christians have always done so.

How could one “admonish the sinner” – a work of mercy, remember! – without having, ahem, “judged” him as such? How blind, how stupid, how unchristian, how uncharitable is it to just shut up under the pious excuse that one does not judge? Isn't silence a way to be accessory to another's sin?

It appears, though, that for some people, and even priests – I do not link the article – even only judging a behaviour would be bad, and unchristian, and uncharitable! Then they reason, if Titius is a faggot and a Pope condemns faggotry, how can this not be a “judgment” of the faggot? It must, therefore, even be wrong to “judge” faggotry, lest the faggot should feel “judged”!

Seriously, these people can't think.

If a Christian is expected to “not judge” anything, then Christianity must simply vanish. Either is it true that a death in mortal sin leads to damnation, or it isn't. If it is true, then there is no logical alternative to the condemnation not only of scandalous behaviour, but also of the people who give scandal. Conversely, the refusal to condemn can only mean that it is not true that death in mortal sin leads to damnation. Tertium non datur.

I doubt the modern apostles of this Anti-Christianity think their rubbish to the end; but if they did, they would probably in their majority conclude that yes, they do not think damnation is a real, serious, concrete possibility, and therefore any attempt to avoid damnation – either for the sinner or for those misled by him – is totally uncalled for.

Again, this seems to be the thinking not only of very deluded men, but even of people – some priests – whose very profession rests on the necessity to care for the sheep so that they do not go astray. What use is a priest in this constellation, is beyond me.

We see here once again how easy it is to use – I do not say “abuse” – Francis' words to promote something that cannot be recognised as Christianity anymore, but lets people feel good with themselves.

What Bishop Francis is not devastating directly, he is devastating indirectly. An army of nutcases will serve themselves of his words to ravish Catholicism; words Francis throws around exactly for this purpose.

We are all saved. Have a nice life.

Make a mess.

And most of all, do not “judge”.



Posted on August 7, 2013, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 6 Comments.

  1. Yes, isn’t it a ludicrous distortion of the meaning of Christ’s words? Any decent Catholic theogian knows that judging is the second act of the intellect whereby we attain to reality. Without judgement we are lost in a world of make believe where know truth can be known. I suppose this suits the agenda of many today who want to live as they would like and to have a Church carved in their own image.

    • I couldn’t possibly have put it as well as this. Judgement is intrinsic to our nature as beings endowed with an intellect. We can as little live without judging as we can without seeing and sensing.

    • Oh well: such a compliment, coming from Augustine, is praise indeed! 😉

      Welcome to the blog.


    • Seriously, I try not to be surprised anymore, but Bergoglio’s gay lobby gets more shameless every day.

      I hope no one will post here that Bergoglio wasn’t informed of he pathetic “flash mob” (that wasn’t one).

      Hey, who is he to judge?


  2. Written at the turn of the 19th century by a Catholic poet.

    The Newer Vainglory

    Two men went up to pray;
    and one gave thanks,
    Not with himself — aloud,
    With proclamation,
    calling on the ranks
    Of an attentive crowd.

    “Thank God, I clap not my own humble breast,
    But other ruffians’ backs,
    Imputing crime — such is my tolerant haste —
    To any man that lacks.

    “For I am tolerant, generous, keep no rules,
    And the age honours me.
    Thank God, I am not as these rigid fools,
    Even as this Pharisee.”

    (Alice Meynell)

%d bloggers like this: