Evangelii Gaudium: Random Snippets.

reducethepapermountain_c794

So, let us plunge into the paper lake and see where our eye falls.

Very randomly taken:

If something should rightly disturb us and trouble our consciences, it is the fact that so many of our brothers and sisters are living without the strength, light and consolation born of friendship with Jesus Christ, without a community of faith to support them, without meaning and a goal in life.

More disturbing still is when a Pope gives an interview to an atheist journalist for a secular newspaper and sends to them the message that if they follow their conscience they'll be fine.

The worship of the ancient golden calf (cf. Ex 32:1-35) has returned in a new and ruthless guise in the idolatry of money and the dictatorship of an impersonal economy lacking a truly human purpose. The worldwide crisis affecting finance and the economy lays bare their imbalances and, above all, their lack of real concern for human beings; man is reduced to one of his needs alone: consumption.

This is not a man very versed in history. The modern capitalistic societies have far less poverty, and far more abundance for the generality of people than every – and I mean: every – economic society of the past. Not only that: western capitalism keeps entire continents from dire need, providing a substantial part of the GDP out of pure transfer in many countries, particularly African ones.

As even a man who considers Beethoven a luxury for Renaissance Prince should know, “idolatry of money” has been there in every age, and will be with us as long as the sun shines. But notice, only one who has lost his faith or never had it can make of money his idol. These are exactly the people Francis deems fine not to convert.

A financial reform open to such ethical considerations would require a vigorous change of approach on the part of political leaders. I urge them to face this challenge with determination and an eye to the future, while not ignoring, of course, the specifics of each case. Money must serve, not rule! The Pope loves everyone, rich and poor alike, but he is obliged in the name of Christ to remind all that the rich must help, respect and promote the poor. I exhort you to generous solidarity and a return of economics and finance to an ethical approach which favours human beings.

” I have no idea what I am talking about, nor have I to offer any solution besides some trite slogan. Let's try this: “money must serve, not rule!””. Please applaud. I am so 'umble.

It would show a lack of trust in his free and unstinting activity to think that authentic Christian values are absent where great numbers of people have received baptism and express their faith and solidarity with others in a variety of ways.

It shows a great lack of reality not to understand that many who are baptised do not even know hot to make the Sign of the Cross, have no idea of even the Ten Commandments, and think Jesus is a, like, cool guy.

In the case of the popular cultures of Catholic peoples, we can see deficiencies which need to be healed by the Gospel: machismo, alcoholism, domestic violence, low Mass attendance, fatalistic or superstitious notions which lead to sorcery, and the like.

“Machismo” is there with alcoholism and domestic violence, and akin to sorcery. This is one for the dykes and the all-out feminists out there. Spoken like a true nun on the bus.

Out of respect for the office, I will stop here, though I will still say that Francis should spend less time with his “gay” (his word) buddy, Monsignor Ricca.

Cattive compagnie, queste frocette. Eh? Ah? No?

At times our media culture and some intellectual circles convey a marked scepticism with regard to the Church’s message, along with a certain cynicism. As a consequence, many pastoral workers, although they pray, develop a sort of inferiority complex which leads them to relativize or conceal their Christian identity and convictions. This produces a vicious circle. They end up being unhappy with who they are and what they do; they do not identify with their mission of evangelization and this weakens their commitment. They end up stifling the joy of mission with a kind of obsession about being like everyone else and possessing what everyone else possesses. Their work of evangelization thus becomes forced, and they devote little energy and very limited time to it.

This is very well said. The ghost writer is a smart guy. He describes the Vatican II mentality in a beautiful way. By the by, the sentences apply wonderfully to the vast majority of priests in the West.

There are Christians whose lives seem like Lent without Easter.

There are Popes who make clowns of themselves without running a circus. Give me the dour Pope and the severe old woman every day. And no, I am not one of those. Just so you know, I am an extremely funny guy.

A second area is that of “the baptized whose lives do not reflect the demands of Baptism”,[12] who lack a meaningful relationship to the Church and no longer experience the consolation born of faith. The Church, in her maternal concern, tries to help them experience a conversion which will restore the joy of faith to their hearts and inspire a commitment to the Gospel.

This would be the right time to invite them to repentance and warn them about the consequence of disobedience. Not a word. Instead, a sort of inferiority complex which leads him to relativise or conceal his Christian identity and convictions. Wait, where have I read this…?

Lastly, we cannot forget that evangelization is first and foremost about preaching the Gospel to those who do not know Jesus Christ or who have always rejected him. Many of these are quietly seeking God, led by a yearning to see his face, even in countries of ancient Christian tradition. All of them have a right to receive the Gospel. Christians have the duty to proclaim the Gospel without excluding anyone. Instead of seeming to impose new obligations, they should appear as people who wish to share their joy, who point to a horizon of beauty and who invite others to a delicious banquet. It is not by proselytizing that the Church grows, but “by attraction”

The hardened atheist is put in the same boat with the poor chap who does not know Christianity, as if their situations would not be radically different both as regards their earthly prospects (the second is possibly fertile ground, the first an arid desert) and their heavenly ones (the ignorant chap might bank on the invincible ignorance and save his backside, the willful atheist is more screwed than Elton). Clearly, atheism is made harmless here. A problem of lack of information. Perhaps if we were more “joyous” the atheists would be converted? How about a red nose?

Not one word about the dangers of damnation. If not here when, then…

—————————————-

As a rule, I would say some good formulations are overshadowed by the omnipresent stink of Vatican II.

Not a fruitful reading.

Spend time on your Garrigou-Lagrange instead.

Mundabor

 

Posted on November 29, 2013, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 9 Comments.

  1. Evangeli Gaudium is a treasury of irresistibly ludicrous pontifications. Take the following as a random example:

    246. If we really believe in the abundantly free working of the Holy Spirit, we can learn so much from one another!

    One starts to chuckle, and finds one cannot stop.

  2. We are grateful to God that you are a very funny guy.
    Also, here is a nice link to a page of Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P. http://www.christianperfection.info/

  3. The New Evangelization is doomed to fail if Christians are to listen to Francis.

    I believe you are a funny, loving, merciful, generous man–without a red, rubber nose, BTW. You truly love, and identify fraud, the counterfeit. I’m sure you are kindly to the turban-ed, veiled, yarmulka-ed person on the street and given the opportunity would engage them in a lively and loving conversation about your allegiance to Christ. You would exude joy. In a more formal setting you would proclaim the Good News with joy but would not exclude the great responsibilities that Christianity entails. If you were a catechist you would form rock-solid soldiers for Christ. Francis’ formula is a dismal failure.

    • Thanks to you too, Akita-ette.
      I actually do know and engage with the people you mention, but I am very much the “in your face” guy, the more so when Christ is on the conversational plate.
      But I am an amiable Italian, and people of good will understand immediately where I come from, and do not hate me for that. Besides, I am a fearful debater, and those who try either sarcasm or mockery are humiliated without regard for their face and reputation. The bad ones – generally atheists; never Muslims, I must say – learn after the first two words they are gonna get hurt, and think otherwise.

      On the flip side, my ideas have cost me some good acquaintances, more than a couple in fact. So be it. Nothing is free on this planet, and it wouldn’t be beautiful if Christ were. Good friends will stay friends.

      M

  4. Mea culpa, but I have a hard time getting my conscience to be troubled by the lack of faith of others; my charity, yes, as I wish all to belong to, and ardently follow, the One Holy Catholic Apostolic and Roman Church for the sake of their own souls. But the Faith has been preached effectively everywhere or lamost everywhere by this 21st Century, and they know we are here. If they do not come to us, whose fault is that? Maybe the fault of those churchmen who have adulterated at least the outward forms of the Faith, most importantly the liturgy, over the last 50 years, no?

    • Fair enough. One might be troubled, but the prayer of Fatima and the knowledge Predestination is at work – I have written about that; fascinating stuff – should put everyone at ease.

      I am far more troubled for loved ones and, naturally, myself. But in this I have recourse to prayer.

      M

  5. Thanks Maria.
    Keep me posted.
    If any links to official sources should be available, I would be extremely grateful.
    M

  6. I think this one of the most dangerous papal documents ever. It is saturated with modernist ambiguity and will only lead to greater confusion and harm. I say this not because many will read this sea of verbiage but rather because it will lend succour to all those disaffected priests and bishops who will now consider their liberal agenda sanctioned and feel unfettered to spread and promote their poison unchecked. Already dissident clerics are heralding this Apostolic ‘Extermination’ as just the ticket. It seeks to desensitise the Catholic faithful to things that are alien to the Faith, by suggesting tolerance, then acceptance, and finally the embracing of things repugnant. Now that Francis’ heresies are finding a place in the official organs of papal teaching, albeit at the lower levels, I think we can now expect to see this terrible crisis escalate.

%d bloggers like this: