Thank God, No Papal Encyclical On Poverty.

The Text:

Vatican official says not to expect papal encyclical on poverty

VATICAN CITY (CNS) — An official at the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace said that, despite widespread news reports and the statement of an Italian bishop, he does not expect Pope Francis to write an encyclical on the subject of poverty. “If you asked (the pope) he would probably say to you, ‘Why do we need an encyclical? What is the encyclical supposed to tell us that we don’t already know?'” said Jesuit Father Michael Czerny. In May, Bishop Luigi Martella of Molfetta, Italy, wrote that the pope had recently told him and other bishops of Italy’s Puglia region that he was planning an encyclical on poverty, “understood not in an ideological and political sense, but in an evangelical sense.” The bishop said the encyclical would be called “Beati Pauperes” (“Blessed Are the Poor”). But Father Czerny told Catholic News Service the church is still digesting retired Pope Benedict XVI’s major contribution to the church’s teaching on the subject. “Less than five years ago, we had a superb social encyclical, ‘Caritas in Veritate,’ and I’m sure that Pope Francis agrees with every word of it. There is an amount of material in it that we could work on,” Father Czerny said. “It would keep us busy for 20 years.”

Mundabor’s interpretation of Father Czerny’s words:

Evangelii Gaudium has shown such an incompetence, and has drawn such an amount of criticism, that the Pope has decided he will leave his Peronist rants to other kind of communications or documents, but will not face the unprecedented flak and the years of mockery that are sure to follow a Peronist Encyclical. Go and read Pope Ratzinger instead. Semel in anno, let’s play it safe”.

Well done, Your Holiness!

Silence is golden!

Mundabor

Posted on December 14, 2013, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.

  1. ‘Why do we need an encyclical? What is the encyclical supposed to tell us that we don’t already know?’

    Do you think Francis might follow this reasoning to its logical end and simply shut up altogether? I mean, why does he have to babble to us every week? Don’t we “already know” what the Church teaches on every subject? And aren’t we always being assured that “this is nothing new” whenever he blurts out some embarrassing inanity? So maybe he can just stand at the window and wave once a week and we can forget all about him. Seriously, though, a few months ago, when his unscripted ramblings were being reported every week, I said that I think he might simply be incapable of writing an encyclical on any subject. He doesn’t have the disciplined mind of a scholar, let alone a writer.

  2. I hope I don’t go to hell for laughing at this…

    had some trouble commenting, sorry if there are multiples.

  3. “Do you think Francis might follow this reasoning to its logical end and simply shut up altogether?”

    We can always hope!

  4. And what about remarried divorcees?

    Pope Francis: “The exclusion of divorced people who contract a second marriage from communion is not a sanction. It is important to remember this. But I didn’t talk about this in the Exhortation.”

    http://www.lastampa.it/2013/12/14/esteri/vatican-insider/en/never-be-afraid-of-tenderness-5BqUfVs9r7W1CJIMuHqNeI/pagina.html

    yep…guess I can get remarried and take communion since there is no sanction against it….what??

    I asked about this on my blog just now…

  5. Quiltwallah’s line is indeed priceless—my best chuckle of day…

    Mary K

%d bloggers like this: