The Female Doth Protest Too Much, Methinks.

I suggest a carrot, and hitting the gym.

What about a carrot and hitting the gym instead?

I thought this is a parody of feminism. It isn’t.

Some interesting tenets of feminism are exposed here with a candor that allows us a deep – if deeply disgusting – look at the moral desert that is a modern feminist – nay: a feminist of all ages; the word itself should be banned from neutral conversation and land in the region of mocking words, like “dyke” and “faggot”-. 

Some of the pearls of wisdom:

“Every time I hear someone say that feminism is about validating every choice a woman makes I have to fight back vomit.”

Curiously, I have the same reaction whenever I hear the word “feminism”. Whenever something is said that is in contrast with God’s command that the woman be first mother and nurturer, and the husband first protector and provider – for which respective role God has provided them in a clearly distinct way -, we are deep in feminist territory; though admittedly many do not smell the stench anymore, or they think there might be a “good feminism” and a “bad feminism”. And yes, a woman may obviously work if circumstances allow. Heck, Joan of Arc was a working girl, and men were ready to go to march to their death for her.

But God’s plan first.    

“Do people really think that a stay at home mom is really on equal footing with a woman who works and takes care of herself? There’s no way those two things are the same”?

For whom should the doctors, then, care? Is a woman so good for caring for the health of children on whose mothers she looks down as “not taking care of themselves”? What is the good in caring for the product of other people’s vomiting-inducing behaviour?

“Oh, but life is important”. Well, then…

Besides: how does a mother not take care of herself? Because she follows God’s and Nature’s call and works in a partnership with her husband, where the dignity is the same, though the roles are different? And why exactly would a woman who does not want to do what is most obviously natural in a woman – giving birth – be on a superior footing?  And if she does – so if she thinks it is important – why should this obviously very important role cause her not to be on an equal footing?

Boy, this dyke here must be an Anglo. Try this in Catholic countries and hear (most) people laugh at you.

“We have baby showers and wedding parties as if it’s a huge accomplishment and cause for celebration to be able to get knocked up or find someone to walk down the aisle with”.

Being knocked up is not so difficult, and one thinks even the ugliest feminist – if she finds a man horny and drunk enough on the occasion – might accomplish this feat. Some men aren’t very discerning and, like dogs, if there’s no alternative they will eat the scraps. Still, what is astonishing is that even the fundamental basis of society, marriage, should be looked down upon. Not, mind, in favour of “free couples” who still care for raising children. This female here doesn’t want even that.

Boy, that must be an ugly one. She certainly doth protest too much.

“I want to have a shower for a woman when she backpacks on her own through Asia, gets a promotion, or lands a dream job”

Eh? Ah? What?

Sound the Dyke Alarm. This is the complete negation of nature’s obvious design. It shows an utter inability to understand how God shaped the world, and why. It is denial of the very fabric of humankind.

On the contrary, I say that the woman who backpacks through Asia, gets the “promotion” (wow, are we spiritual) and lands the “dream job” (ditto) will deeply regret wasting her life with trifles when she realises this cost her the chance of a happy, fulfilling, God-given family life. Not many men would even consider a romantic relationship with such a drake. Women are supposed to be sweet, nurturing, forgiving, wonderfully giving beings. Not backpacking career freaks.

Unless, of course, the female in question is a feminist so rabid and so ugly she doesn’t have any chance at all, then no sane or insane man would ever tie his destiny with hers.Or else, obviously, a dyke. Then she can go backpacking, and good riddance. Afghanistan is beautiful, they say.

 “I hear women talk about how “hard” it is to raise kids and manage a household all the time. I never hear men talk about this.”

You don’t say? Astonishing! And I bet they do not talk about “women’s issues”, either! 

Sports, cars, politics, and women. That’s it. Oh what a disgrace, a man! Why, oh why are they not like women!

Thanks, dear Lord, that in your Goodness you have given me a wonderful mother; the utter and complete opposite of this wretch here.

Mundabor

Posted on January 27, 2014, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 6 Comments.

  1. I have been reading your blog for some time now…and there are some things you say that I agree with and others not….but ooooh how much I agree with this one! Surely God made men and women different to have complimentary roles??? And you know, it takes brains and guts and love and hard work to be a proper mum and to look after a family and a home (including a husband). Why do they look down on us and think us lazy? Is prestige and/or money the only thing that makes us worth anything? Why can’t we be respected for doing a good job in the home? I am not necessarily against women working in some circumstances, but I really think when they are married with children that should be the priority. I also think this affects unemployment. Feminists have ruined things not just for men but for women and children too. Of course men have some responsibility in this too…they need to respect their womenfolk as women.

    • Only rabid feminists who have never been around a baby think that raising one – or more than one – is a relaxing and comfortable activity.
      M

  2. ‘We have baby showers and wedding parties as if it’s a huge accomplishment and cause for celebration to be able to get knocked up or find someone to walk down the aisle with”.’

    No cause of celebration for bearing life? No cause of celebration for union? Only cause of celebration is for a career, a meaningless speck of dust that bears no meaning whatsoever?
    God save us from selfish cows.

  3. Thank you for the great laugh at your suggestion of locale for backpacking:+) When I hear this spew from women all I hear is narcissism…it’s all about “me” and what “I” want to do…and how much I can puff myself up in the eyes of the world. These women are morons…they have no idea what love looks like…for love is OTHER centered and sacrificial. And per comparing stay at home moms vs careerists? It’s MUCH more difficult to stay at home, sacrifice everything you have to raise, love and form the beautiful souls entrusted to you by God. Stay at home mothers are the pinnacle of true feminine society. God bless~

  4. Thanks for the defense, Mundabor. It’s especially nice coming from a man. 🙂

%d bloggers like this: