Synod: Francis And Satan Are Dancing The Tango, Part One.

Hyeronimus bosch



Today, the 13 October 2014, nineteen months exact in this disgraceful pontificate, will probably remain in history as one of the darkest days in the history of the Church. 

I welcome anyone who could point out to a precedent in which not from a Luther or Arius, but from a Synod very heavily influenced by the Pope such astonishingly satanical expressions have been produced, as the ones below.

Here a little choice.  More on this as time allows.

In considering the principle of gradualness in the divine salvific plan, one asks what possibilities are given to married couples who experience the failure of their marriage, or rather how it is possible to offer them Christ’s help through the ministry of the Church. In this respect, a significant hermeneutic key comes from the teaching of Vatican Council II, which, while it affirms that “although many elements of sanctification and of truth are found outside of its visible structure … these elements, as gifts belonging to the Church of Christ, are forces impelling toward Catholic unity” (Lumen Gentium, 8).

Translation: in the same way as we have polluted the Church for now 50 years with unspeakable bollocks about all the “good” residing among heretics and infidels qua heretics and infidels, now we can, if we make another little step, make the same with marriage, and proceed to utterly demolish Our Lord’s message on marriage by stating how many good elements of sanctification are present in people who are living in mortal sin. Which is new, and daring. Lumen Gentium already told us that the beheading of Christians is a force impelling toward Catholic unity

In this light, the value and consistency of natural marriage must first be emphasized. Some ask whether the sacramental fullness of marriage does not exclude the possibility of recognizing positive elements even [in] the imperfect forms that may be found outside this nuptial situation, which are in any case ordered in relation to it. 

In this light, after we have paid some lip tribute to what the Church has always said, some ask whether two concubines who live together more uxorio, and clearly  in mortal sin for all the world to see, should not be seen in the positive elements of their sinful, adulterous union, in their scandal, and in their mortal sin. Let us see: perhaps they have a great sense of humour?  Do they love dogs? Are they not sweet, as they hold hands seeing  “Notting Hill”, or “About a Boy”? How valuable is that? This is like Mastercard: priceless!  

The doctrine of levels of communion, formulated by Vatican Council II, confirms the vision of a structured way of participating in the Mysterium Ecclesiae by baptized persons.

The doctrine of levels of communion, of which no one had ever heard anything before Vatican II, can be applied here too: some people are in communion because they are married; and some other people are in another (lesser! Lesser! Of course!) degree of communion because they are concubines living in mortal  sin; a fact in which we, who are far more tolerant than Jesus, see an awful lot of good. Think of it as “cool” and “premium” membership. The members must be inspired to upgrade. But they are already at the “cool” level. Vatican II taught us so. 

Realizing the need, therefore, for spiritual discernment with regard to cohabitation, civil marriages and divorced and remarried persons, it is the task of the Church to recognize those seeds of the Word that have spread beyond its visible and sacramental boundaries. Following the expansive gaze of Christ, whose light illuminates every man (cf. Jn 1,9; cf. Gaudium et Spes, 22), the Church turns respectfully to those who participate in her life in an incomplete and imperfect way, appreciating the positive values they contain rather than their limitations and shortcomings.

Therefore, we, who are lurid underworld figures sucking it up to the world like whores on cocaine, manage to see “seeds of the Word” even in what goes frontally again the very words of Our Lord. Because, you see, we are just whores of Satan. What Satan wants, we will call “recognising [those] seeds of the Word”. 

The Gospel of the family, while it shines in the witness of many families who live coherently their fidelity to the sacrament, with their mature fruits of authentic daily sanctity must also nurture those seeds that are yet to mature, and must care for those trees that have dried up and wish not to be neglected.   

A concubinage, adulterous or not, is not a mortal sin and a scandal. It is a tender plant that we must nurture. The concubines are not at immediate risk of eternal damnation. They are plants in need of watering. We have been, for 2,000 years, such bad gardeners!

In this respect, a new dimension of today’s family pastoral consists of accepting the reality of civil marriage and also cohabitation, taking into account the due differences. Indeed, when a union reaches a notable level of stability through a public bond, is characterized by deep affection, responsibility with regard to offspring, and capacity to withstand tests, it may be seen as a germ to be accompanied in development towards the sacrament of marriage.

In this respect, a modern bishop-whore of the XXI century “accepts” civil marriage and also cohabitation. This is a new dimension of being pastoral, because up to now being pastoral meant being a good shepherd, and leading people to God. Indeed, indeed we do not care a straw for Jesus! For us, if two concubines in mortal sin reach a notable level of stability in their mortal sin, what’s not to like? Do they not raise their children, like every couple of savages would do? Where’s your beef, then? Indeed, indeed we do not care a fig for the Lord! For us, when an adulterer has been very constant in his betrayal of his only spouse, it may be seen as a germ to be accompanied in development toward the sacrament of marriage? Again: an  upgrade, so to speak.

Please, former spouse, die soon! Can’t you accept the reality of civil marriage and cohabitation? 


 This, concerning those who are not perverts. 

The perverts, and more general consideration about these little whores of Satan,  are for another post.

Now it’s very late, and I am very tired.

Today we have seen satanical material to last for a long time.

From today, one can safely say he who still insists in not seeing the evil of Francis has completely and utterly deserved every punishment that God throws his way. I mean, obviously every punishment of God is always deserved; but in this case is deserved because no one has the right to say he is so stupid he couldn’t see.  

This is to such an astonishing extent the exact contrary of what the Church has always held sacred, that to profess allegiance to this rubbish can only mean to profess allegiance to Satan. 

And the worst (if possible) must still come. Then only pedophiles and child-rapists are, for now, excluded from this madness. 

Very probably, Satan has thought the time is not ripe, yet, for that. 



Posted on October 13, 2014, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 17 Comments.

  1. And on the anniversary of the Fatima vision….

    I can’t wait to see how the usual suspects try to color this one with cheery colors! These vile characters deserve the strictest punishment the Church would have formerly given them (if the crowds didn’t get to them first). You would have to be stark raving mad to think that this is OK! Lurid underworld figures sucking up to the world, indeed!

    I admire your great restraint!

  2. I too pondered that today is the end of the world as I formerly knew it. Funny, a coworker, giddy with delight told me she married her girlfriend over the weekend now that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against states prohibiting same sex “marriage”. As she prattled on I looked her in the eye and proceeded to tell her how I took a trip to the desert. I did not acknowledge such unreality. The persecutions are coming.

  3. It seems to me that Archbishop Lefebvre was right all along. And I am stupid for not seeing that until now.

    • RevDrG, I pray that many thousands, or millions even, will share your sentiments. For a breath of clean air, check out the 6 minute video on the ‘Harvestingthefruit’ page. I can’t believe the good God would leave us totally stranded.

  4. It is slightly after 4.30am in Rome as I write this. The Holy Father – an early riser – has no doubt finished his daily 15 decades of the Rosary, including the Fatima prayers (he has a special devotion, you see), and will be sitting at his desk penning a devastating condemnation of the work of the Synod. I know that he will come out swinging. He will back his few faithful bishops to the hilt, he will cut down this heresy in its tracks – and he will confirm the faithful!

    I’m holding my breath, his epochal rebuke is coming – an assault of orthodoxy on these devils inside the gates of the City, one which will ring through the ages. But my goodness, I just hope he’s not “mistranslated”. I can hear the crickets… it’s early… but I know Pope Francis is coming to save his sheep… just you wait, you’ll see… still holding breath…

    Yesterday’s disgrace happened on the 97th anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun. I don’t believe in coincidence. I dread to think what the next three years has in store. God help us.

  5. Mundabor, if you haven’t got as far yet as John L. Allen’s piece on “lifestyle ecumenism” (the “real breakthrough” of the Sinod, according to his news site), you’re in for a treat. The man correctly finds in yesterday’s disgraces an “absolute novelty”, but is so caught up in the moment he forgets to alert his readership that within the Catholic Faith such is an “absolute impossibility”. Then there are the calls for “santo subito” and “St Francis of Buenos Aires” in the comments thread. Truly another religion.

    Meanwhile, at the BBC: “Vatican synod: Victory for Pope Francis on gay issues..”

  6. Weep, Babylon, weep.

    Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat!

  7. You are right, Mr. M – it is truly another religion. It’s not Catholicism, it’s frankenchurch and in more ways than one. I have some co-workers who not only voted for Obama twice, but think Francis is the best thing ever, and I work for a Catholic Parish in New York! What dark, twisted times we’re living in. Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us and save us.

  8. Truly, an evil “religion”! Reparation!

  9. After my saying that the report was a disgrace, Father Z said that saying so does notmmakemit a fact!

    • No.
      It being a fact is what it makes a fact.
      Father Z is dancing around the subject. He says and does not say, talks of wolves but not of why there should be all those wolves around.
      Father Z has very insightful commentaries on the Mass, and says a lot of intelligent things.
      But when it comes to defense of orthodoxy, The Traditional Catholic Priest (Father Carota) and the “Catholic Collar” (Father Dickson) are miles ahead.

  10. Notmmakemit – my autocorrect was taking a break and your “m” decided to have some fun.😄

%d bloggers like this: