Truth And Convenience

Francis shows how to deal with homosexual priests...

The Most Astonishing Hypocrite In Church History (to us: TMAHICH) now says we “must find ways” to deal with the “unusual situation” of pervs in the family.

Your humble correspondent allows himself some observations, and some suggestions.

Homosexuality isn't new. Francis would know it, if he read the Bible every now and then. If he read it cum grano salis – which might be too much to ask – he would realise that the “pastoral approach”, the “finding ways”, the “charitable” attitude was, rather, the way used in Sodom. The rest of the world, however, never thought there were any “special ways” to be found, much less have they ever thought that perversion in one particular century be anything different than in any other one.

Why is it so? Because the sound Catholic world starts from the truth and lets the appropriate patterns of behaviour derive from it, rather than deciding first what they would want to say and then state that we must “find ways” to adapt reality to our wishful thinking.

The truth of the matter is that homosexuality is a sexual perversion, and the offences against God committed through it are among the very worst. That's it. No amount of pastoral-ing, Mercy-ing, Jesuit-ing and, in general, Francis-ing will ever change a iota of the truth.

The “pastoral” approach must, if it is to be truly pastoral, derive from truth, and from truth only. The mother and father of the homosexual person must be told what a hideous sin homosexuality is. They must be told that to die with mortal sins on one's soul assuredly leads to hell. They must be told that the homosexual who accepts his perversion as something normal – and the more so if he even acts upon his perversion, which very many do – is already in a state of grave rebellion to God. They must be told that they duty is in warning their wayward son or daughter about the fact that they are on the path to hell, pray for them intensely that they may find reason, not despair but also not encourage in the least such a perversion. They must also be told that to admonish the sinner is a work of mercy, and to encourage him in any way in his sin is the work of the devil.

How to act in the single situation should be left to the prudent judgment of the parents; always, though, bearing in mind that Jesus will not be fooled, and hell may well await those who call their complicity and convenience “prudence”. But it boggles the mind that in more Christian times women were, at times, thrown on the street for one act of fornication, and nowadays people who call themselves Christian discuss whether the partner in sodomy should be invited for Christmas. This is, truly, the kind of “charity” the inhabitants of Sodom would practice. I do not doubt most of them felt very holy, and very special.

Those who think that truth must be adapted to their problems put their convenience first and Christ not even second or third, but nowhere. May God have mercy on them and their disgraceful offspring, as they help each other on the way to hell.

What I am writing here is nothing more than what would have been considered obvious, too banal to waste time on, since Old Testament times and, obviously, since the dawn of Christianity. The very basics are being forgotten, because in the Age Of Stupid Popes convenience is the new religion, only this time it is falsely called “mercy”. When the Antichrist comes it will be, no doubt, an orgy of mercy.

Human nature does not change. Sexual perversion isn't any more new than gluttony or envy. The “solutions” to it can't be any different from the ones always applied. There's no way truth can be reshaped. The only thing that can be done – and rather easily – is to send oneself to hell in the attempt to do so.

In the last activity at least, Francis clearly leads the way.



Posted on December 10, 2014, in Traditional Catholicism. Bookmark the permalink. 13 Comments.

  1. Dear Mundabor, another one that you have hit out of the ball park! Pope Frankie seems to be one of the greatest enablers of the “gay” lifestyle. BTW, you have probably seen the two other scandalous photos of Francis with priests who support the sodomites’ lifestyle:

    1) Pope Francis holds hands with Don Luigi Ciotti as he arrives for a meeting in Rome’s St. Gregorio VII church, just outside the Vatican, Friday, March 21, 2014. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini; and

    2) On May 6, 2014, Pope Francis kissed the hand of notorious 93-year-old Salesian Fr. Michele de Paolis, who is a proponent of liberation theology and whose “gay-friendly” ministry also includes unbelievers, the unchurched, the divorced, and “marginalized” persons.

    Source: L’immediato (screenshot) according to Eponymous Flower post on May 9, 2014,

  2. The thing is, it is so much easier to deal with the ‘pervs’ in a stern and supportive way in the family if most of the family aren’t living in sin, divorced and remarried, or have just bunked off to become hippies in the name of a thousand demons. But now that Catholics embrace those living in sin, divorced and remarried or who’ve just bunked off to become hippies in the name of a thousand demons in an unconditionally supportive way, what possible recourse could there be to tut-tut over one or two more pervs? But then I guess that’s satan’s point.

  3. Have you watched the latest Remnant Underground? Akin to corprophagia, we learn of urophagia, a propensity of Robert Mapplethorpe, former lover of seemingly unrepentent Patti Smith who will sing at the Vatican @ Christmas.

  4. I am sure – as sure as I can be – that Frank is a sodomite. This “man” is very close to the devil.

    • Well I am not sure, at all.
      But one does not want to be blind, either.
      No one I know would want to live in a place like that, particularly knowing about the fags going in and out of the Vatican.

  5. He seems to appreciate women quite a lot.

    • Well, according to photos and sources from Vatican he was quite, quite pleased when he met the Jordan Queen. And recently, when he was presented to some Anglican female pastors and
      ” bishops”, he made such comments as a normal man would have done (” questa e ‘ propriocarina, ma quella la’ e’ veramente racchia”).
      So, I believe he’ s straight, he knows “i peccati della carne” and for that he’ s generous with other sinners in the flesh.
      Furthermore he has been elected by the Vatican homomafia, or homolobby, if you prefer. And, as you know, when they ask you something, you cannot refute.

    • Yes, but even a fag would be able to tell “carina” from “racchia”.

      Summa summarum, he might not be a queen, but he sure likes them…


%d bloggers like this: