The Malevolent Pope

Big, big Pharisee, says Francis

Once again, The Most Astonishing Hypocrite In Church History (TMAHICH) has produced himself in one of the circus numbers for which he will, when sanity goes back to the Church, be mocked and condemned until Judgment Day.

This time, he plants a series of bombs unusual – in the same homily, I mean – even for him. Let us see at least some of them.

The first bomb is the comparison of Pharisees with good Christians. The argument runs so: Pharisees were wrong in defending their customs against God Incarnate, therefore Christians are wrong in defending the rules – and the Church Christ gave us – against Francis and the new “church of mercy”. This basically declares Christianity wrong and pharisaical en bloc. It beggars belief.

The second bomb is the open invitation to a direct attack on doctrine and discipline, mentioned verbatim as something whose defence is wrong. This evil man is advocating the dismantling of Church Discipline and Doctrine. In more Christian times, he would have been burnt at the stake.

The third bomb is the generalised insult thrown to more than sixty generations of good Christian men and women; fallible and weak all of them, but certainly knowing the meaning of the words: “if you love me, keep my commandments”. In the Gospel According To Frankie, the words are reported as: “if you keep my commandments, you are Pharisees”. In a blanket statements, he indicts all of them, twenty centuries of good, observant Christians, including all Saints. Pharisees, all of them, with their clinging to doctrine and discipline!

This, from the man who said: “who am I to judge?” It beggars belief… again.

The fourth bomb – and this is, as far as I know, of a new type – is the truly malevolent, spiteful desire that people he doesn't like may fall in sin very hard, so that they may, in this way, learn humility. Pretty much like wishing that the good wife may go away with another man, or become a prostitute, so that her good Christian life may cease to be an offence to Francis, who will then enjoy her fall and patronise her with his “mercy” when she has become a whore. This kind of envious, malevolent, bilious Schadenfreude is masked only by the thinnest of veils – which isn't one: God allows the evil, he never wants it; therefore, God may never want for anyone to fall from grace -, but is still there in all its ugliness, for everyone to see, and it is proclaimed openly as something resulting from Francis' oh so good heart.

I will stop here with the bombs, because time is a tyrant.


If you let an old drunkard make your daily homily, you would very probably hear much better homilies than with Francis. Because it is to be assumed that even the old drunkard would not encourage you to belittle Church Doctrine and Discipline, would not wish for people to fall in grave mortal sin, and would not insult, more or less directly, all those who live and have lived according to the Commandment as much as they can. Sinner as he is, the drunkard would still encourage you to be as good as you can, and to follow the path of Christ to the best of your ability.

Not so with Francis, who encourages you to go against Church Doctrine and Discipline, and calls you a Pharisee if you defend them.

This Pope is an old, lewd, evil man. An enemy of Christ and His Church. A man whose arrogance is only surpassed, perhaps, by his own resentful mind. Thankfully, the Evil is so strong in him that it becomes very easy to see on which side he is. Which also means that those who still defend his antics are clearly endangering their souls, because at this point no thirteen year old boy could believe that if he is on the side of the Pope he can't be wrong.

Rotten through and through. This is the Pope we have.

May the Lord free us from this scourge this very day; for the good of the Church and of the many souls this man is accompanying all the way to hell.



Posted on December 17, 2014, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. 11 Comments.

  1. Just heard the breaking news that the US is resuming relations with the evil Red country of Cuba. Then I went to an event and sat next to an elderly Sister in an order that wears civilian clothes, etc, and has no postulants or novices–so it will no longer exist after this group of sisters die.

    She informed me with a big smile and much pleasure that the wonderful Pope helped broker this deal! Ewww! I wonder if my fellow Americans who kept Marxist Clown Obama in the Presidency realized he would be aided in his machinations by the Marxist Clown Pope the Church has been punished with? God help us.

  2. Get me a “barf bag”. Sorry to put it so earthily, but this sermon is so childishly transparent. Under the guise of trying to elicit outrage because as a tender young child poor Georgio was coerced into confessing that he swallowed a drop of water when tooth brushing during a pre communion fast, the pope strains credulity. He really does have a barely masked agenda, no?! Equating acceptance of concubinage, maybe even sodomy, with a child swallowing a drop of water during the communion fast. Mustn’t be too rigid! Can you imagine being around this man for any length of time? As an Argentine said, you will lose your reason! The adage “inmates running the asylum” comes to mind. Why is there not amass uprising among even the most moderate of bishops?

  3. “Evil”: bingo. Worse, Frankie seems to be going at the destruction of the Church at Warp Overdrive Speed; he quickens the pace daily as he runs his thoroughbred from hell around St. Peter’s.

  4. So these faithful Catholic priests, who would say three long Masses before breaking their fast (let’s use St John Marie Vianney as an example here), these men were “Pharisees…rotting in the heart, weak, weak to the point of rottenness”, because they had (for some reason known only to the omniscient Bergoglio) hearts “not fixed on Jesus”.

    Meanwhile “the simple people,” (and I take this to mean the adulterers, the aborters, the transvestites, the homosexuals, the thieves, the blasphemers, and those who excuse all of this – let’s use Msgr Ricca as the example here), these people “do not err,” despite the words of these doctors of the law, “because the people know, they have a ‘flair’ for the faith.”

    What this man is teaching is an inversion of Christianity. What’s good is evil, and what’s evil is good. A faithful priest is in grave error as a result of his faithfulness, the common sinner “does not err”, by virtue of his commonness and “flair”. This is simply diabolical.

    What sort of Christian could ever hope for another to fall?

    And how are we finally instructed? “Never to condemn, never to condemn. If you have wanted to condemn, you condemn yourself…” Sheer. Madness..

    • Ah, the inerrancy of the simple people was another bomb, but again how can one find the time to deal with all the rubbish?

      Francis means by that the rule of the mob. What the mob says, must be true, because “Che” Jesus is on their side…


  5. I really, really wish I didn’t think you were right. I’ve been burying it down deep for months. I’ve been fighting against what I felt were people wantonly disrespecting the honor of the Papacy. I’ve been fighting under the notion that there was some good to this man, and he simply wasn’t to my taste. I was just a man with a different style and tastes; he was perfectly orthodox if not Traditional. He had a different set or priorities than us, but he wasn’t going to be a total disaster, right?

    Now I don’t know what to think, because thinking that Rome might be lost is unthinkable in Catholicism’s long history and to me open rebellion is simply not an option. Even at the lowest point, the Jewish people never rebelled against the King and the Priesthood. It was unthinkable.

    To think things are how they appear to be, it’s enough to drive a man like me mad.

  6. If a Saint be Pharisee
    Where does that leave you and me
    In outer darkness to be sure
    With no hope of being pure
    It’s so Sadducee.

  7. That “swallowed some water” confession story (and I seriously doubt he was raised with that level of piety) had the same ring of truth to me as his ridiculous recent anecdote of a woman bringing an audience and cameras to a priest as she made some significant donation to the poor, which donation turned out later to have been only a couple of $.. I get the feeling this bloke just makes stuff up, especially when on his favourite theme – attacking faithful, devoted Catholics as big-noting, hollow liars and Pharisees.

    • Same here.

      Nothing in his demeanour indicates the man was raised up with such a level of rigidity. Much in his demeanour indicates this is one with a very, very uncontrolled mouth.


%d bloggers like this: