Mohammed’s Trojan Horse: Playing The Blasphemy Game

There is from some quarter the call to institute blasphemy laws to avoid – or so it is thought – the explosion of Muslim fanaticism or just because hey, we are such sensitive sissies and we suffer if the Mohammedans are upset.

In order to understand how wrong this would be we must merely reflect that this legislation is envisaged now, when Muslims complain about what they call blasphemy. You wouldn't hear much of it if French journalists weren't massacred by the dozen. But let us see this in good order.

Would you support a legislation that bans blasphemy and at the same time legalises child rape, because our religion obviously forbids blasphemy? Certainly not. You wouldn't pave the way for such an evil, so that something good may also happen.

The problem is that as things stand now, any anti-blasphemy law that were to be passed would have less chances than a snowball in hell of being something useful to Christianity, but would help to 100% to islamise the legal framework of European societies. In addition, it would put an immense amount of power in the hand of the European governments and judges, both of which would not hesitate to make a very PC, and very deleterious to us, use of it.

“Blasphemy” is, for us, something different than for Muslims. To them, it means an awful lot of things, including every picture of their fracking child-rapist, let alone calling him a fracking child-rapist. If they were to succeed in introducing such measure, we would have a good chunk of Sharia Law introduced in Europe in order to… well, in order not to displease the Muslims. You got to be kidding me.

Now, grievous as it is that the True God be insulted by blasphemers, it is not a duty of Christians to press for blasphemy to be made a criminal offence no matter what the consequences (see the example at the start of this post). Necessarily, every such legislation must be assessed according to what it does for Christianity, including in that the possibly unintended, but very massive consequences.

Apart from this, such a law would present conflicts that would be left to the legislation and judiciary to solve, which is tantamount to playing Russian roulette with our religious freedom (remember: religious freedom is not the best, but it is preferable to persecution). It would be a Pandora's box with no end to the possible devastation.

Countless Saints have said things about the Mohammedans and the fracking child-rapist that orthodox Muslims would certainly consider blasphemous, and that are in print as I speak. Should these books be banned? The Catechism of the Catholic Church denies that Mohammed is a prophet, and Allah a true god. Shall it be banned? What else does Islam consider blasphemous? I don't know exactly. But I am sure it's an awful lot.

The blasphemy game helps only one side: the Muslims. It introduces a good chunk of Sharia Law within our shores. It can be even used for a gruesome persecution of, at the very least, Christian thinking and speaking, if not worshipping (and who knows about that).

We must face reality, and act with the wisdom the Church has often showed in the past. Never in Her long history did the Church ask for the islamisation of Western laws so that atheism might be countered.

You counter atheism with your faith, with your logic, with your prayers, even with your tears. You use the democratic system at our disposal to obtain as much Catholicism as you can. You push for – ideally – Catholicism as State Religion; for blasphemy laws insofar as they only protect the True Faith; for Sunday shop closures, and the like.

But most certainly! You do not give the Mohammedans a Trojan Horse to enter our citadel. If this were to happens, we would seriously run the risk of ending up like Troy.

No, thanks. For as long as no better result can be obtained, leave it to God to deal with blasphemers. His Justice is perfect anyway. But do not help your enemies in pursuit of an ill-advised, extremely counterproductive, and outright dangerous religious zeal.

M

 

Posted on January 15, 2015, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 9 Comments.

  1. Dear M,
    Europe should just spread this advice and be done with it. But they probably won’t.
    http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/1/64/120295/Egypt/Politics-/AlAzhar-calls-on-Muslims-to-%e2%80%98ignore%e2%80%99-new-Charlie-H.aspx

  2. It was notable that Ireland’s blasphemy was hailed by some sadistic Moslem states. A Catholic should really counter the blasphemer with arguments or ignore him, whichever seems appropriate. A Catholic using a blasphemy law would be assailed by leftist dhimmis while a Moslem could legitimately and without much leftist criticism bring the power of the state down on opponents, one by one. You are right. Blasphemy laws are largely tools for Moslem entry-ists. It would be of slight or no benefit, or perhaps even of harm to Christians, while the Moslem could use the power of the state to terrorise, with only their opponents facing any threat of imprisonment.

    • The right answer is, I right, try to do our best so that the ground is created which will allow, one day, to reinstate blasphemy laws properly intended (eg which consider blasphemy only the offence to the True God).
      I doubt it will be in our generation, or in the next.
      M

  3. And Bishop Bergoglio adds insult to injury by comparing mass murder to an insult to his mother, which of course will cause him to punch you in the face.

    Is he all there? I mean for the love of God who do we have as a pope?

    • I have had no time to comment on this.
      This was another example of “Francispeak”, as he puts insult and murder in the same phrase.
      We have an evil idiot as a Pope.
      M

  4. Well done Mundy:+) How is it blasphemy to mock a demonic spirit i.e. Islam? We need to get back to true blasphemy laws i.e. mocking Our Lord. Mocking Islam and other demonic deities should be a year round sport:+) God bless~

    • We do need to get back to *real* blasphemy laws. We do no need to get back to sodomy laws. We do need to get back to Catholicism as State Religion.

      What we can never do, is to allow Muslims to profit from fake “blasphemy” laws which protect the lie, instead of the truth; embolden Islam; make Europe a better place to live in for Muslims; and will most certainly used to muzzle Christians before long.

      There is a long-term goal that we must not lose from sight. But we must realistically see things as they are, and recognise that in our generation, bar miraculous interventions, we must defend the ground we have instead of giving ground to Muslims and play with bombs that would explode in our face.

      M

%d bloggers like this: