What Would Satan Do? Francis And The Condemnation Of Catholic Apologetics
Today, Kindergarten Pope has given us another little sermon about how bad we are when we insist on being Catholics. Not only conversion (we knew that already), but even honest to God Catholic apologetics is now clearly a no-no. Shut up already, will you? Your Catholicism is “self-enclosed”, “exclusive”. It creates “competition”. It is divisive. It does not do anything for the unity of the Christians. You are bad. Don’t ya know that “all of us are at the service of the one Gospel!”?
Whenever you hear some off-the-cuff comment ask yourself: what would Satan do? You will notice he would probably do just like TMAHICH.
Religions are made of differences. Religions are differences. What defines us as Catholics is not what we have in common with other religions or with other Christians. What makes us Catholics as opposed to everyone else is exactly that in which we are different from all the others.
When we stand up in Church and recite the Creed, we do nothing else than stand up and state our difference, solemnly proclaiming what divides us from others. Actually, and if we really want to be authentically Catholic, we are stating what divides the others from us, from the One True Church of Christ. If we did not do so, we would simply not deserve to be called Catholics.
What Francis’ true stance is concerning the Creed, the Dogmas specific to Catholicism, and the entire patrimony of unique Catholic Truth is very easy to grasp: to him, they are obstacles in that they “divide” Christians; and we are “bent on imposing a uniformity based on merely human calculations”. Therefore, in so far as they lead to Catholic apologetics (which, by their very nature, they must necessarily do) these Truths of the Church must be, according to Francis, an enemy to “peace” among the Christians, to this famed “union” of people just meeting and discussing of … what is utterly obvious to all of them.
A union, this, which – like the rest of Francis’ thinking, talking and acting – is clearly perverted. The “union” that Francis has in mind does not consist in others becoming Catholics (and how could they, if the attitude to conversion is “no, no, no!”? How can this happen even by a happy, subtle, gradual process, if even apologetics is not desired?), rather this “union” seems to consist in Catholics and all the others “meeting” somewhere “out there”, in a vague and utterly undefined region where Truth just does not count and which can, therefore, only be in hell.
To “focus on what unites us” is just a hypocritical, subtle, satanic way of saying that we should “forget the truths for which we stand”. There can be no other meaning, then we have to deal with Truth here, not with the pitiful decision to avoid football talk in the home of the fresh Champions League Final losers.
Did Jesus focus on what “united” him to the Pharisees and Sadducees? Did he say to us that He is the Son of Man but hey, chill out dude, whatever, the most important thing is to get along? Did He ask Peter to focus on what unites him to, say, the Essenes? What does Francis think, that Jesus’ Cross is the product of ecu-maniacal thinking and “meeting the other half way”?
This man is subversive every day. Every thought of his is profoundly anti-Catholic. He appears so festered, so rotten in his hate for the Church that – as “Rabbitgate” clearly showed – he is even unable to realise how easily and naturally he goes against Her all the time. The man truly has no clue even when he is faking it. He is an amateur even at being a Jesuit.
——-
Forget what unites us. Focus on what divides us instead. “Unity” away from Truth means being disunited from God, and united with the world and his false promises of cheap mutual delusion. The only thing that stays between us and Francis’ “unity” is… Christ. We stand by Christ’s Truth, we stand by His Cross. This is what counts. But hey: the moment you are ready to forget Christ everything falls into place, becomes so easy, and becomes so… Francis. I love vanilla, you love chocolate, let’s not quarrel about that…
We are different. And we are, by the by, the only shop in town. We proudly proclaim what separates us from every other religion or “denomination”. We proudly proclaim the Truth of this difference, make of it our banner, and move to the conquest – that is: the conversion – of those who are wrong. Which is: all others.
When I am so old and gone in the head that I am unable to eat anything else than semolina, the stupid kindergarten “wisdom” of Francis might – just might, and according to brain function decay – make an impression on me. But certainly not before. This rhetoric is at the cheapest level of stupidity imaginable in a Pope. It is the negation of what a Pope is. It is good for the little children and those who have returned to that state. It should deeply offend everyone else.
——-
Francis should consider resigning and wheelchairing off to Venezuela as a defrocked layman. His being Pope is, ipso facto, a huge statement of the Catholic difference, as the Petrine Office is possibly the most immediate, planetary known symbol of what divides us from everyone else. There is nothing else that screams “self-enclosed” and “exclusive” like it. And being a Cardinal, a Bishop or simply a priest means also shouting an entire world of thinking, living and believing in utter contrast to the secular mentality out there.
If Francis were, therefore, coherent, he would resign and abandon the habit, practising what he preaches to his kindergarten audience and becoming just another preacher of good-ism.
But he will not, because by all rhetoric of union he bloody well likes to be the Pope, and savours every minute. TMAHICH.
We are different. We are different from non-Catholics, and we are very different from Francis.
Pray for him that he may discover it before he dies, and acts accordingly. Nothing is impossible to God. But the odds are that he will spend eternity in the company of Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, and Martini. He will have plenty of time to play the “what unites us” game with them, then.
Though I doubt he would like it.
M
Posted on January 28, 2015, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged False ecumenism, Pope Francis. Bookmark the permalink. 14 Comments.





















The singular authority (i.e. unity + truth) of the Church, as the Body of Christ, is directly related to the singular authority of Christ Himself. To undermine the exclusive truth of the Church’s teaching is to undermine the unique Lordship of Christ. This is how far we have come–the Roman pontiff equates Catholic teaching (i.e. doctrinal differences [from error!]) with one set of Christian “opinions” among many, based, note well, on purely human calculations. This man is the most flagrant Modernist I have ever seen, precisely because he cloaks himself so well with periodic bromides to keep the hens sleeping atop their ultramontane eggs. How long, O Lord?
Very well said.
Yes. He needs to shut up. On the up side, if he keeps going on like this, it will become steadily more apparent to most what his true colors are.
I really shouldn’t laugh when I read your posts, but it’s all so ridiculous, and you call him out with such precision, sometimes I just have to laugh out loud, sad as the whole situation is.
Thank you for your candor, M.
BTW… a theological question. I know the SSPX has said we should continue to pray for the Pope’s intentions, and I understand that they’re supposed to be a fixed set of intentions for the Church, but I’m having such a hard time saying it. Frankly, the kids are always asking me why we would want to pray for his intentions, rather than praying *for* him. What do you suggest?
It’s fine to laugh, LoQ.. 😉
The “intentions” are published every month, and are supposed to be orthodox. They actually always were whenever I checked up. You can’t go wrong with that because in any way the Pope is supposed to be good and you are praying for, so to speak, the good intentions of the Church.
Praying for him is a different matter and it involves the personal matter of Francis’ salvation and conversion.
I’d say one prays for the Pope (that he may change his ways and convert to Catholicism), and one prays for the intention of the Pope separately.
I do not pray much for the intentions of the Pope, but often for the Pope himself. Not that it’s easy, mind. But I am a Christian.
I always try to focus on his poor Guardian Angel. Makes things much easier.
M
Dear Ladyofquality,
We felt the same reluctance regarding the Pope’s intentions, so we took to praying for “all the intentions of the Holy Father which are in accord with Thy Will, oh Lord.”
We figure that covers both the official AND unofficial ones he may have in his modernist head.
🙂 🙂
It’s one of God’s ‘mysterious ways’, but there is ‘no neutrality in Christ’. He said it Himself – ‘for or against’. Bergoglioism is refried schism/heresy/apostasy/new-agism/abrahamism/freemasonry/antichristism – it tastes foul; but then foul is fair, right? It has been done before just not quite so thoroughly from one claiming to be the mouthpiece of the Holy Ghost, with so many palettes that should know better swallowing the ‘rap.
Pope Francis calls himself a true child of VII, and claims to follow the same Spirit that led it.
========
–So why does he say this: “Christian unity, we are convinced, will not be the fruit of subtle theoretical discussions in which each party tries to convince the other of the soundness of their opinions.” and “So many past controversies between Christians can be overcome when we put aside all polemical or apologetic approaches, and seek instead to grasp more fully what unites us.
========
–While the Council’s Decree on Ecumenism says this:
-“Love for the truth is the deepest dimension of any authentic quest for full communion between Christians.
-” Without this love it would be impossible to face the objective theological, cultural..social difficulties which appear when disagreements are examined.”
-“Above all, these disagreements should be faced in a sincere spirit of fraternal charity”
-“Full communion of course will have to come through the acceptance of the whole truth..
-“Hence all forms of reductionism or facile “agreement” must be absolutely voided.”
– “Serious questions must be resolved.”.
-“Dialogue puts before the participants real and genuine disagreements in matters of faith”
-“The Council requires that the whole body of doctrine be clearly presented.”
========
Most obvious answer: One more example of TMAHICH
This piece of yours reminds me one of Bishop Sheen’s great talks entitled “A Plea for Intolerance”. Francis should be forced to read it every day.
Dear arwiv,
Good idea. Thanks. Here’s a link:
http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2012-1130-fulton-sheen-Plea-For-Intolerance.htm
We shall see the sickening extent of false ecumenism when the 500th anniversary of Luther’s revolt against the Church in 2017. I have little doubt that more importance will be given to this scandal than will be given to the Fatima centenary. I hope that Francis will have retired by then and been replaced by a Catholic.
Francis and Kasper may both well spend 2017 in the company of Luther himself.
Now that would be a celebration…
M
When someone says dogma divides us, what unites us is more important, they are actually proclaiming a dogma of their own, moreover, it is a dogma that divides them from me.
Regards: Graham
and them from Christ.
Woe to the pastors, that destroy and tear the sheep of my pasture, saith the Lord…You have scattered my flock, and driven them away …behold I will visit upon you for the evil of your doings…(Jer.23.1,2 )