Daily Archives: February 4, 2015
The Hidden God
(Can’t make Vimeo embedding work, so please click the link below)
“Darwin’s Doubt” with Stephen Meyer from Socrates in the City on Vimeo.
Some days ago I posted a blog post about the absurdity of atheism, based on the examples of the mechanical watch and the starry sky. On that occasion, a commenter was kind enough to post a link to a presentation of “Intelligent Design”, a scientific (as in: scientific) refutation of the Theory of Evolution as commonly intended. It is not, mind, that the Theory of Evolution is not compatible, unless it becomes Darwinism, with Catholicism (I have written on this in the past); rather, the issue here is that in the light of the advancements in microbiology of the last decades, and particularly of the last couple of decades, the Theory of Evolution is becoming simply untenable even as a perfectly Catholic explanation of how God might have chosen to proceed in His creative work.
The video is very relevant to us for the following reasons:
1) Whilst the Theory of Evolution can degenerate into Darwinism, Intelligent Design is inescapably linked to a Creator. Basically, it leaves Atheists simply nowhere to hide.
2) It provides an extremely fascinating insight into the world of microbiology, opening horizons of wonderment at God’s work in the tiniest little thing of which I and, I am sure, many others were largely unaware. The progress in Microbiology shows that even the smallest particles, like bacteria, have a degree of complexity infinitely vaster than what was supposed only a few years ago. And it also shows that this complexity cannot have “evolved” from lesser complexity more than an aeroplane without wings could fly. Some of the examples (like the DNA, and the microorganisms mentioned) will blow your mind.
3) It makes clear that we have been dished at school knowledge that was clearly obsolete and untenable even at the time; and I cannot avoid thinking that this was done largely not for the sake of “simplification”, but of indoctrination. Indoctrination which failed with believers, but certainly made it more difficult for many, deprived of Christian education, to seriously confront the question of God’s existence. Not excusing, of course. Merely stating a fact.
4) It makes clear that the theory of Evolution fails to persuade when the same scientific principles used by Darwin are applied to it. And it also makes clear that the obstacles Darwin himself saw to the functioning of his theory have not been eliminated by archaeological research – as he hoped – but have been, actually, greatly increased.
5) Finally, the main obstacle of the theory of evolution is also touched: from less cannot evolve more, from less sophistication does not evolve something new and more sophisticated, that wasn’t there before and suddenly appears. Mutation cannot explain Creation. We have no scientific evidence at all, after 150 years, that DNA can create from itself new and more evolved forms of itself, adding out of thin air something that was just not there. Rather, we know that this DNA is so astonishingly complex that it, itself, cannot have “evolved” from anything “less complex”, which the scientific observation of now around 60 years of the working of the DNA also shows.
In short, the video explains in a very humorous and entertaining way that the immense complexity we see above our heads on a summer night is also present, in the most wondrous ways, in the tiniest particles like, say, bacteria, and in the very DNA of even extremely small, and supposedly very simple, forms of life.
Mind, I knew already some of this, though not from school material. I knew, for example, that the human hair and the human skin have a degree of sophistication (the lightness and robustness, or the self-healing qualities) that vastly exceed what modern technology can produce. But you see: I can see and touch my skin and my hair, and so I can relate to that in a visual, sensory way. But to discover the astonishing, astonishing complexity of a microbe, which I was always told is an extremely simple form of life, is a completely new ballgame.
You can do worse than listen to the video. The time you devote you it will be amply rewarded with fascinating insights into God’s wonderful work. It is instructing as it is edifying. And it goes head on against the secular and materialistic thinking of our age, which is the icing on the cake.
The Francis Archipelago
The “Mercy” Reblog…
The shocking news, published on Rorate, of the suspension a divinis of some FFI priests looking for a new religious order is a faithful mirror image of the “mercy” of this Pontificate. A Pontificate which is rapidly distinguishing itself for the brutal illegality of his main actor as much as for the obvious ignorance – or worse – of all things Catholic. And no, for the umpteenth time: a Pope is bound by the rules as long as he does not – if he is allowed in the first place, of course – change them. He is a Pope, not a Satrap.he is bound by the rules as long as they are there. He is the one who is supposed to behave exemplarily in the first place.
Mr Beria – or shall I say Father Volpi – is acting with the brutality of a Soviet Communist Party enforcer, and to…
View original post 652 more words
FFI: How It Was
A bit late, I know, but I want to also publish and help publicise this beautiful video about the life of the former seminary of the FFI, now brutally persecuted by the Humble Stalin (Francis) and his Ugly Beria (Volpi). The video appeared on Rorate Caeli. On the same page, please note Rorate’s comments about the persecution that is taking place as I write this.
By watching the video, thoughts and comments come to mind which are not fit for publication. Therefore, I will leave them to your imagination, or righteous anger.