The Monstrous World Of Dyke Adoption
It is truly a sign of the stupidity of our times that the world keeps bowing in front of a bunch of perverts without noticing how completely bonkers – besides pervert – they are.
The news reach us about the “comedian” Dyke who “adopted” a girl in 2013. Two years later she is already divorced and in a battle for the custody of the poor girl with her previous dyke “lover” (perhaps “hater” is more appropriate here).
Interestingly, it turns out “comedian” Dyke wanted to “adopt” a second child from the biological mother of the first, but backpedaled when she knew the baby ( a boy, this time; what a life…) would be born with health issues.
The way these people live and think is sheer unbelievable. Hugely pumped dyke egos “marry”, “adopt” children as if they were puppies for the gratification of their own ego, “divorce”, “fight for custody” just as a way to carry on their stupidly pumped ego to its probable destination: a life of misery and possibly self-destruction on this world, and damnation in the next.
In just a couple of years we have a fake marriage, a monstrous adoption, a planned second monstrous adoption, a “divorce”, and the revelation the second “puppy” wasn’t according to normal specification and had therefore been rejected.
Nor should you think the “biological mother” is in any way better than the dykes.
This is a mother ready to nurture a baby for nine months inside her, in order to give it away to a couple of dykes. Go figure. Also note the casual way of the woman: “When I later found out I was carrying a boy, I emailed them to say I needed to know they were on board, because otherwise I would have an abortion.”
“You’ve got mail, dykes! Yes, I have “found out” there’s another puppy on the way. Do you want it or shall I discard it?”
Then the monstrous mother finds the gut to complain: “Rosie and Michelle weren’t the warm people I thought they were… I just felt like I was a dog breeding puppies for Rosie.”
Rosie O’Donnell “warm”? On which planet? And why, exactly, the ugly dyke was simply breeding puppies, and the monstrous mother wasn’t?
The last question is very tragic: was the baby boy aborted? I very much fear so, then Monstrous Mother does not say she gave birth to the baby and had the poor boy adopted. It seems to me rather an attempt to justify why (and I must use a strong image here) she smashed this “puppy” to a tree, and gave the other to a couple of dykes. But I might be wrong.
So, let us recapitulate what happens in the world of dykes and their liberal, slutty donors.
1. The dykes consider the baby like a puppy. If it’s fine, they’ll take. Otherwise, they’ll pass.
2. The monstrous mother is not really different. If dykes want the puppy, fine. Otherwise, she’ll smash it to the tree.
Why monster number 2 thinks she is better than monster couple number 1 is not entirely clear to me, but then my readers may help me in that.