Daily Archives: September 2, 2015
The New York Times has just another story about young women refusing to cope with the new reality of gender madness. Yours truly can only shake his head, and say “tsk, tsk”. There will be no link as we do not encourage bad newspapers here, but you know the issue is getting bigger.
A trannie in the girls' restroom, pretending he is a woman. Isn't this the world that two generations of idiots – even of idiots who call themselves “conservatives”, though they will hasten to tell you they aren't “the religious type” – have created? Why complain now?
Listen, girls: there can be no middle way. Either you decide that a boy claiming to be a woman is a disgusting pervert, or you will have to see his schlong dangling in the shower room. And in doing so, you will have to affirm that the boy – with annexed schlong – is in fact a woman, because he says so.
The mentality of showing understanding and open-minded views must lead to acceptance in everything, because there can't be any half acceptance of an ideology.
If a schlong makes of one a male – which our forefathers, in their unspeakably patriarchal and oppressive mentality, always thought – then the entire construct not only of gender theory, but of acceptance of sexual perversion must be reversed; then if reason and common sense follow their normal course abnormality must be rejected as aberration, and to understand this there isn't even any need of a religion, merely of a brain. But if there is any acceptance of “normality” in perversion, then this supposed normality must be coherently followed, and its consequences drawn from it. Normal is normal. There is no abnormal normality.
It is, therefore, fitting that happily dangling trannie schlongs make their more or less proud entrance in girls' shower rooms. It's the bed they made, and the girls will now have to cope with all the dangling, and affirm it.
I can't wait for the Olympic female disciplines being dominated by trannies. How would Rick Santorum say put it? If they say they are women, then they are women? Well, then! By the bye, I wish that Santorum had one of his daughters pick a Trannie as “BFF”; it would serve him right, and put in his own home some of the disgusting, unspeakable rubbish he wants to ram down the throats on the American people.
The “moderate” chicken are coming home to roost. “Moderate” mothers so understanding of aberrosexuals as long as their little suburban world remain in order will have to pay the price of their stupidity, because it is fitting that this kind of stupidity be paid to the last dime, on theirs and on their descendants' skins. Say hello to Donna, then, the massive “girl” with the huge shoulders and the cavernous voice, throwing her “normality” down your throat and demanding your acceptance and affirmation of her rights. Enjoy every bit of it. Remember? You always said you weren't “narrow-minded”! Enjoy the show, then. Savour it to the last. It will do you good.
In just a little time, you will truly understand a lot of what has been wrong with you, your “understanding” and your “unjudgemental” attitude these last fifty years. Too late, alas! But there's no denying it: it's the bed you made.
Most of my readers are certainly familiar with the concept of supplied jurisdiction, so I will waste time on this. I would like, however, to make some considerations for the “legalist” crowd.
So, you think the SSPX has no supplied jurisdiction, and any confession or marriage celebrated by them is not valid. Why would you, then, go to confession by them after the 8 December and for around one year afterwards? Why would you go to confession to people you consider abusing their priestly role by doing things they are explicitly not allowed to do, and even deceiving the sheep about the validity of their confession or their marriage?
Apart from very rare, rather extreme examples, in which I believe the SSPX priest has jurisdiction even for the Vatican (say: man about to die, no Novus Ordo priest around for the Last Rites) the answer can only be one: because they are so beautifully, authentically Catholic.
Which, truly, answers the question about the supplied jurisdiction once and for all. These are perfectly Catholic priests doing nothing else than perfect (ahem, almost perfect if you ask me) Catholic work. There can be no doubt on their being 100% orthodox. There can be no doubt on their obedience to ecclesiastical authority whenever this does not contravene to a higher loyalty, the one to God. There can be no doubt the metre with which the SSPX measures this higher loyalty is nothing else that Catholic tradition in its purest form, as opposed to the orgy of Neomodernism (or worse) en vogue in Rome.
How can you, therefore, say that these disobedient people are your example of Catholicism, which is, in the end, obedience to the Lord? Are they being obedient to the Lord? Then they most certainly have supplied jurisdiction. Are they not obedient to the Lord? Then you should not approach them during the Year of False Mercy.
Ecclesia Supplet. When a Catholic is not allowed by his bishop or his Pope to do the Catholic thing, he does it nevertheless, with many greetings to the Pope or bishop. Athanasius did it, Eusebius did it, and Marcel also did it. I am pretty sure many others simple priests found themselves in similar situations and did the right thing, particularly during the Arian troubles, because I can't imagine that there weren't many priests ready to say exactly this: Ecclesia supplet. If you are a truly Catholic priests, and your bishop tells you that you must recite a different Creed at Mass – because some of the pewsitters might be offended by the old one – you know exactly what directions you will give to him, and that's that.
The SSPX have supplied jurisdiction, or they haven't. If they have, you certainly don't need Francis to tell you what they can or cannot do. If they cannot they are at least disobedient and probably gravely sinful people, and then you should avoid them anyway.
Pope Francis has addressed the faithful in preparation of the upcoming Year Of False Mercy, instituted from him in order to sabotage Catholic doctrine in every way he can whilst looking oh so pious himself.
The address contains this and that, and is rather uneventful for most of its course. The only difference with Francis' usual allocutions is that one can actually understand what he is talking about; a sure sign, this, that the text has been written by someone else.
However, there is a big surprise in the end:
A final consideration concerns those faithful who for various reasons choose to attend churches officiated by priests of the Fraternity of St Pius X. This Jubilee Year of Mercy excludes no one. From various quarters, several Brother Bishops have told me of their good faith and sacramental practice, combined however with an uneasy situation from the pastoral standpoint. I trust that in the near future solutions may be found to recover full communion with the priests and superiors of the Fraternity. In the meantime, motivated by the need to respond to the good of these faithful, through my own disposition, I establish that those who during the Holy Year of Mercy approach these priests of the Fraternity of St Pius X to celebrate the Sacrament of Reconciliation shall validly and licitly receive the absolution of their sins.
This is big news from a Pollyanna perspective, and as newspapers go. From December and for one year every devout, rosary-counting Catholic who has scruples in that sense will be able to go to confession to an SPPX chapel, safe in the knowledge that that master of Orthodoxy, Francis, might look on him with less hate than usual because of… mercy.
I do not trust this. I do not trust the time, I do not trust the motives, and most importantly I do not trust the person. I fear Francis even when he bears gifts, because a scheming and heretical pope cannot have in mind anything good for Catholicism.
I do not trust the time and the motives, because it seems to me that Francis is opening the war on the sacraments with a manoeuvre aimed at disorienting his enemy. He is “merciful” to the SSPX: how will the conservative Catholics, then, be angry at him when he is “merciful” to adulterers? I smell a huge German rat here, and whilst many German bishops will feign mock opposition or even mock indignation, I am pretty sure they all know where this is going to end, and will play the game for all they're worth. Adultery is well worth an SSPX confession, and they will now shout even louder that once Francis is “merciful” to the “schismatic” SSPX ( I know, I know… slander and false accusations never get old) how can he refuse “mercy” to the oh so acutely suffering concubines and perverts?
But most importantly, I do not trust the person. Not for one second will I think that Francis has suddenly become an orthodox Catholic. Please understand that Francis is not pursuing a less heretical agenda today than he was yesterday. He will not start today to like the rosary-counting Catholics he so much despises. The Evil Clown that went to bed yesterday evening is the same that woke up this morning. Of course he is throwing a bone to the conservative crowd before he serves the sacrilegious entree to his heretical followers, or at least tries to let them have as much of the dish as he can.
I can hear the Pollyannas already, all excited at how oh so comprehensively merciful this Pope is. They are being fooled.
You recognise the orthodox pope from his orthodox actions. This one isn't an orthodox Pope. Therefore, I do not trust his actions even when they would appear in the interest of orthodoxy.
“You are so mistrustful!”, the one or other will say.
“You are so thick!”, will my answer be.
I fear Francis, even when he comes bearing gifts.
The old commenters are generally very good in keeping their comments within the due boundaries. For the others and the new commenters, some words of advice.
I cancel all those comments which:
- are too long
- are not to the point of the blog post
- post links without explanation and presentation of the material posted, such that I cannot be absolutely sure the content is 100% orthodox even if I do not have time or desire to click the link.
- Smell even extremely vaguely of Sedevacantism.
- Are written by people who have disparaged me on other blogs and have the almighty gall to come here to see their comment published.
It’s past midnight now, and I have the impression some people post just in order to see their moniker in print. Some of you are wasting my time, and this blog isn’t written for time wasters.
Please make your comments short, concerning the topic at hand (left and right, and up and down, will be culled), and if you really have to post a link tell me why you do it, what is it all about, and vouch for its catholic orthodoxy with your continued presence on this blog.