The Rigged Synod, And What It Means For Us

The Second Attempt to pave a way for heresy within the Church started today. If you have not got that Francis is the leader of the heretics you are most probably either a) entirely stupid, or b) a reprobate.

The best description of the lay of the land as the military operations begin I have read here. If you follow the link you will find a simple but complete description of facts, people, and documents behind this mess.

I must – for the moment – salute with a huge sigh of relief the abundantly leaked, but now officially released rules about the rigging of the 2015 Synod.

If you ask me, Francis got in that tango-head of his that he cannot (I laugh at the expression) “change doctrine” in all but name and officially have the bishops behind him. This is the main issue. This is where it is decided whether he wins or loses. I say he loses.

I think he thought he could do it (“change doctrine” in all but name) last year, which is why he steered the way towards the infamous relatio post disceptationem.

When things went very, very bad he possibly thought he could use the year until the 2015 Synod to move things in his own direction, which is why he insisted on having the most controversial, perverted paragraphs reintroduced by the window after having been kicked out by the door. This move already tells you what a dangerous ass this man is. The stupidest men are always the most dangerous.

The last attempt at seeing how things go was the adoption of the pro-homo and pro-adultery agenda in the Instrumentum Laboris,  the preparatory document of this Synod. The infamous document met (besides being what prompted my relevant blog post to be pinned on the front page since) with such harsh public and private opposition (abundantly leaked in the weeks leading to the Synod) that Francis basically decided to cave in and renounce to every pretense that, whatever he will do, he will do it with the bishops behind him.

The newest announcement means exactly this: Francis has all but admitted he cannot pretend to speak for the Church and get the bishops behind him. If he has any brains left into that pothead of his, he has realised that if he puts that heretical hand into the fire he will get burnt.

What now, Jorge? I think we will have one of the three:

  1. Pope releases a bla-bla, wheelchair-cum-social justice document that goes straight into the rubbish bin, or into the Vatican toilets. Nothing different from the usual rubbish, nothing hinting at any changes. Nulla di fatto.
  2. Pope allows the release of a final document (there will be such a document; I think it is already written; actually, I think several versions of it are already written) containing heretical statements, encouragements, reflections, farts, impure acts, or however you call them, that put into question Catholic Truth. Then he sits at the window and waits for the events to unfold. If the reactions are too strong, he will call the document back with a “tut-tut, children, do not quarrel” among the excited cries of the Pollyannas. If everything goes well (for him), the document will “stay in the air” as something certainly not official, but nevertheless quoted by every adulterer and faggot in the land. The Pollyannas will tell us that this is only a document from ten bishops and cardinals, and certainly deplored by the Pope so cruelly misinformed. As to him, it will not be what he initially wanted, but all he had the courage to do.
  3. This is the nuclear option. The Pope waits for the work to conclude and then, either in the speech accompanying the closing document or some weeks later (before the beginning of the Year of False Mercy, methinks; perhaps on the day he officially starts it), takes on himself the responsibility of announcing urbi et orbi a new “way” of looking at the sacraments and the Catholic sexual morals. At this point a nuclear war ensues, or not. If it ensues, he is finished. If not, he will be destroyed when he dies. He is screwed either way, in this life and in the next.

I personally say to you here (and the events may well, God forbid, cruelly prove me wrong in the next couple of months) that I do not believe for a moment that Francis has the balls for option 3; though I do not doubt it is what he would choose if he had said accessories.

In my eyes, Francis will opt for something that either closely resembles 1 or 2, or is a mixture of the two. The change of the Synod rules is not only an open admission that he wants to avoid this Synod becoming the most spectacular defense of Catholic doctrine seen in recent decades, but also an open admission that he has realised he cannot lead the bishops by the nose like dumb oxes. If he had thought he could, he would not have changed the discussion rules, and would have sought to impose his will during and after the works as he tried to do last year. 

Francis is in the position of a Tsar who sides with the Bolshevists. He may be as much of an autocrat as you wish, but his own nobility will never allow him to sell to the enemy, period. Tsars can be – and were – disposed of, too.

No, I do not think Francis has anywhere near the balls necessary for a full-scale attack on Catholicism. Bitching he can do all right, but revolutions are a different matter altogether.

He will, methinks, content himself with remaining a closeted revolutionary (and a closeted who knows what besides) and an open ass instead.


Posted on October 4, 2015, in Traditional Catholicism. Bookmark the permalink. 17 Comments.

  1. What would Che Guevara do?

    This Pope was picked for a very specific reason by the Cardinals, and it was not popularity. He was chosen to complete the glorious revolution, started when they were young Priests in the ’60’s. He is not acting alone.

    Option 3.

  2. Such. Excellent. Analysis!

    Bravo sir. Funny; I taught Lepanto in CCD this morning, and later at lunch, my husband said to me, “you know what it feels like right now?…like we’re in Europe in 1571, and St. Pius V has just asked/pleaded for everyone to pray the Rosary for victory over the foe…long odds…but against them all, look what God did”. Isn’t it funny that that Our Lady of the Rosary/Victory is this week?….I think no coincidences with God. Everyone…pray the Rosary like you’ve never prayed it before. And when you’ve finished, start it again. Let’s storm Heaven against insurmountable odds, because really, the enemy has no idea Who they’re up against; like Ann B. says, “they don’t believe any of this ____.” Let’s show ’em.
    Pope (and what a pope!) St. Pius V….ora pro nobis.

  3. Remnant Clergy

    Francis is like The old tv show detective Columbo. You think he is stupid but he’s smarter than you. Most of the world will follow him because he will succeed – temporarily – in a major way. The bible says so. And then Jesus will intervene.

  4. I look forward to more trenchant analysis – and please could I ask that you keep us up to speed with the machinations of our very own Cardinal Nichols who is playing some very interesting games at the moment.

  5. Revolutionary change does not require the participation of Bishops. Revolutionary advance occurs despite them. “L’audace, l’audace, toujours l’audace”, stated Napolean and later Patton who used the same philosophy to set the enemy on their heels.

    What I see is the rapid, audacious imposition of a new reality in which any other outcome than transformative change is impossible. The ground under our feet actually shifts as the terms of Catholic reality are relentlessly changed. The very language our Church speaks renders opposition irrelevant. When the revolutionary legal act finally occurs, like his declaration on nullity, (Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus), it is the organic fruit of what has already been accepted by lack of opposition. All we hear is warm, if tepid, applause by those speaking the new language as the steamroller continues its advance.

    Until the College of Cardinals and the Bishops unite against the constant pressure and shifting of the ground beneath them, perhaps inspired by the outrage of the laity, this revolution will not be stopped within our troubled Ark. The aged defenders of the 1962 revolution are desperate to permanently complete this thing while there is still time.

    • I think you got reality wrong.
      There can be no new reality. There can only be diffused heresy. But by its own nature, heresy will always be seen as such by those who really care and, with God’s help, will always be defeated in the end.
      Francis cannot create a new reality. He can merely sell lies.
      How do they say? You can fool someone for a long time, or many for a short time….

  6. Expanding more on what Brian wrote above, it is believed that the “fathers” of Vat. 2 needed that the generation who witnessed the birth of that fatidic council to die out in order to accomplish less resistance or opposition from the younger Catholic generations. To achieve this plot of implementation the strategy was to allow 50 years to pass by in order to accomplish their intended reform more easily. So what we can perceive going on in this synod is the unveiling of that monster they created back in 1965 that was intentionally hidden from us until now: a modernistic the Catholic Church. And I believe this is just the beginning of this nightmare. I can see them and among many things making dramatic changes in the liturgy of the Church.

  7. I believe Jorge will go nuclear, that is what he was elected to do. At least we would see and know our enemies clearly. Btw, watch t.v. or read newspapers, Jorge does not have to be smart when whole swaths of society are so stupid themselves.

    • That’s an interesting point.
      In a stupid world, the smart are easily misunderstood. The idiot immediately connect with the mob. Masaniello comes to mind.

  8. A great analysis, sir! I think it’s option 3. PF will go for it because he’s 78, doesn’t believe in hell, so what does he have to loose? He will do the job that his team got him elected to do, with the result being major pastoral changes which leave doctrine only on paper. Much like Vatican II. How I wish Saint Paul would come down from Heaven and knock some sense into him! But however much the Church is attacked, it can’t be destroyed.

    • Ah, I can answer that, or at least try.
      The man is afraid of dying disgraced, deprived of all the humble helicopters, in an obscure cell in an Argentinian monastery, knowing that his memory will be vilified forever.
      Those who don’t believe in God deify themselves. Francis wants to die popular.

  9. “The Pollyannas will tell us that this is only a document from ten bishops and cardinals, and certainly deplored by the Pope so cruelly misinformed. As to him, it will not be what he initially wanted, but all he had the courage to do.”

    You have studied the methodology of “apologist” Mark Shea and anticipated his response to a “T.” I think you missed your calling!😉

  10. “He does not want to be deprived of the humble helicopters”. Priceless, M.

    Over at Vox Cantoris is a list of signatories (Catholic leaders all–many converts from heresy) imploring the Pope to cleve to and boldly pronounce Catholic Doctrine. Alas, the Weasel Pope is happy to oblige them, it’s his addendums that are to be feared. I do think this Synod will be anticlimactic with the nuclear winter coming this December. I’ll pray only that God’s will be done.

%d bloggers like this: