Daily Archives: September 2, 2016

More Help From Our Lord To Understand FrancisFraud



The Albanian-British singer Rita Ora is flying to the Vatican to take part to a concert linked to the imminent canonisation of Mother Theresa, though clearly she is so much into the entire thing that she thinks Mother Theresa has already been canonised.

We should be thankful for all these little breaks. Every time something unspeakably stupid like this happens, Our Lord allows us to understand what is going on: he is punishing us with an overdose of that same stupidity we have inflicted on His Church. However, he also allows us to clearly understand that what is happening is wrong, a just punishment for our refusal to do what is right.

We have been receiving these signals for many decades now, and already since the time of JP II the unholy mingling of pop concert and religion has been a way Our Lord told us: “see? Do you understand *hiw wrong this is*? What about doing something against it?”.

Not much was done, and we are now punished far more harshly. Utterly deserved. We had it coming.

As we pray for the end of this Pontificate and the election of a catholic pope (small “c” at this point already a big improvement), we must always bear in mind that God inflicts some popes, so that His Justice may be satisfied; but he allows us to see that we are being punished, so that His Mercy may shine on us.

Read all these news – now clearly heaping ridicule on the already fully discredited FrancisChurch – as just as many ways of helping us to understand the error of our ways, realise the utter dirt now covering the Church and start doing our bit – with our prayers and our actions – to collectively deserve the cleanup that will, one day, most certainly arrive.

Thank you, Francis, for showing us with such clarity what an unmitigated godless, evil ass you are. If you had managed to be a tad more subtle you would have caused a far greater damage.

For now, the Lord is protecting us from a Pope that his both His enemy and smart. Unless there is a strong reaction to Francis, I am not sure this terrifying scenario will not happen at some point.

Pray for a catholic pope. We have had enough of this tool.



Why “Green” Is “Gay”


Shut up, dear….


Nice blog post on the Moonbattery blog about the WaPo discovering how masculinity is dangerous to the planet. It is that kind of fake “research” that leads you to very sad reflections about how much money is wasted in modern universities.

Yours truly would like to add his own two cents to the issue. It won’t please everyone. But hey, this blog never does. 

Environ-mentalism is emotional tosh. However, it is emotional tosh on a planetary scale. Therefore, it tends to attract more easily women, who on the one hand have a stronger instinct for nurturing and protecting, and on the other end are more prone to emoting.

Men go out, earn bread for their families, cut trees, wage wars, discover continents, invent new things. Women stay home, cook for their men, keep the house clean, are naturally caring and nurturing. No amount of emancipation tosh will ever erase this fundamentally different hard-wiring of the sexes, which remains true as a (beautiful) reality of nature and, in fact, corresponds to the deepest, most intimate aspirations of both of them. This, irrespective of rare exceptions in one sense (Joan of Arc, Margaret Thatcher) or the other (Barack Obama, Jimmy Carter).

This has always been so. It will always be so. The great P.G. Wodehouse expressed this difference and used it to comic effect in his usual wonderful way:

when a girl suddenly asks you out of a blue sky if you don’t sometimes feel that the stars are God’s daisy-chain, you begin to think a bit.

The problem is not the feminine tendency to emote more than men do. This is a beautiful, God-given trait of the (once) gentle sex. The problem is the absence of men who are men enough to tell them to shut up and go back to the kitchen when they start emoting about the “environment”.

Women have always been the emoting sex. However, they had around them men who were able and willing (being men) to control and keep in check their bouts of emotionalism. Both sexes knew this, and understood the added value of the other. Women knew (being women) that they needed men to keep their emotionalism in check. Men knew (being men) that it was their duty to keep said emotionalism in check.  Therefore, women’s emotional overflow remained, on the whole, one of the harmless, somewhat endearing sort.

This equilibrium, this natural collaboration of the sexes went to the dogs when men stopped being masculine and started to want to “think like a woman” (= fag) or “discover their feminine side” (= fag), or in any way try to ingratiate women to themselves ( = weakling) rather than being the Tarzans of their Janes; something which, believe it or not, most Janes would like an awful lot, though they might not admit it.

This is why we have this dying, but still pernicious environ-mentalism. The emotional appeal of the unspeakable tosh is not countered – on the individual level, which is what counts in the end – by thinking men willing to assert their natural authority over their women and tell them to stop emoting, start thinking, and think of dinner instead. On the contrary: a generation of single mothers has created an army of half men who, literally, think like a woman and, raised without an importance male presence around, were never able to grow into their natural role of naturally assertive, naturally leading, men.

The problem of environ-mentalism is, at its roots, a problem of diffused effeminacy among men, and betrayal of femininity among women (yes, the one goes with the other). It is a collective short-circuit in the ability of entire nations to put in place a proper, healthy relationship between the sexes. It is a complete failing of reason in the face of a tidal wave of feminism, effeminacy, and outright faggotry.   

The solution is the return to healthy inter-sex relationship: manly men willing to lead the life of their women, and feminine women eager to accept the leadership of their men.

You don’t read such things often. Therefore, it is the more important that you read them here. 









%d bloggers like this: