Will The Kitten Start To Scratch?
Only hours after I have written my blog post about some Cardinals’ (far too slow) reaction to Amoris Laetitia, Cardinal Burke has doubled down in an interview with Edward Pentin.
The interview is very clear on one point: there is no intention of stopping here, and this matter will be pursued further. I quote:
[Q]What happens if the Holy Father does not respond to your act of justice and charity and fails to give the clarification of the Church’s teaching that you hope to achieve?
[A] Then we would have to address that situation. There is, in the Tradition of the Church, the practice of correction of the Roman Pontiff. It is something that is clearly quite rare. But if there is no response to these questions, then I would say that it would be a question of taking a formal act of correction of a serious error.
A “formal act of correction of a serious error” can only be a formal declaration concerning the heretical content of Amoris Laetitia. If this happens (it is still a big “if”), then we would have a big step in the right direction, because there is no way Francis can save face when one or more Cardinals declare one of his documents heretical. His pontificate would be in tatters, destroyed for all eternity.
Note here that, the perennial teaching of the Church being easily discernible, this declaration would be much different than, say, a bunch of homo Jesuits declaring a hypothetical Pope Pius XIII a “heretic” because he doesn’t follow the Gospel of Fidel. In both cases every sound Catholic, even of the thicker sort, would immediately recognise who is right and who is wrong.
The question is now whether the Cardinals will let actions follow words. I am healthily sceptical on this, because I can’t but notice that the widespread revolt of the Bishops during the first synod (aka the day the pussycat roared) was followed by the most scandalous silence when Amoris Laetitia was published. However, I must say this is a new situation, and a couple of people are now leaning very far out of the window. We should pray that they have the strength to continue on this path, and that other pussycats (basically all bishops and cardinals, with a handful of exception) find a backbone somewhere and start doing their job.
We shall see how this pans out. We have been betrayed when Amoris Laetitia was published, and I therefore will suspend my judgment until I see real action taken. The real action is what should have happened in April: a formal, official, public denunciation of the heretical content of Amoris Laetitia. If you look at the recent past, you have The Abbe’ de Nantes’ Liber Accusations in Paulum Sextum, Liber Accusationis Secundus (against JP II) and the third Liber Accusationis against the new Catechism as useful guides.
If you ask me, nothing less will suffice.
We have had a situation of officially proclaimed heresy since April. Finally, timidly, something starts to happen. And once again it was the outrage of the Catholic laity, and the openly proclaimed condemnation of our cowardly clergy, that paved the way for this action.
I’d say we are past the kittens’ meowing. Clearly, there are some angry cats around.
But I still can’t see any serious scratching.
Posted on November 17, 2016, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged Amoris Laetitia, Cardinal Burke, Pope Francis. Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.
We must push and pray that the Cardinals in question be courageous.
Skeptical indeed! The response from Burke is very non-committal.
“…then I would say that it would be a question…”.
Notice he does NOT say exactly what will happen, but says it is a question of something TO happen.
Cautiously optimistic at best!
It might be diplomacy, it might be the desire not to burn all bridges.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. The proof of the orthodox cardinal is in him denouncing heresy without ifs or buts.
M, those previous ‘Libers’ were unknown to me and something in particular caught my eye. Please forgive my naïveté, but I’m still a recovering V2 Catholic (though I never knew what that was!). It was the ‘common priesthood’ clause. That always sounded wrong to me, but I brushed it off as something too complex for me. A few months ago, a very NO Catholic told one of my sons that he could bless holy water, as he is a priest, too, because of his baptism. I shook my head at him behind her back (didn’t confront as I had no information to go on), and was really quite horrified that she’d said that.
So thank you for the links…I’m always learning something here. 🙂