Cannonade Drill On FrancisVatican

download

 

As we get into the Third Sunday of Advent, I have a clear feeling this Christmas will see us more optimistic for the future than any Christmas since 2012. 

Some of you will have read that Bishops Schneider and some others met in Rome on December 5 and discussed the matter of the Dubia.

 The full text of Bishop Schneider’s talk has now been released, and it is a full declaration of war on heresy.  I invite you to read this lengthy talk in its entirety. 

The main points that Bishop Schneider wants to make are, in my opinion, the following: 

  1. This is not the first time in the history of the Church that weak prelates cave in to the desire of powerful others (Kings and Emperors  in the past, Kirchensteuer-payers and public opinion today) to have God’s law set aside. Nihil sub sole novi, cowardice and threats included. 
  2. Faithful prelates will tolerate no compromise with the Heresy of Kasper (and Francis). That door is shut. Francis can forget it just as well as Napoleon had to, though Francis will certainly be able to count on the complicity of many cardinals, just as Napoleon did.

The talk is momentous. There is no way the Four Cardinals do not approve every word, and it is apparent Schneider speaks on their behalf to his audience.  The best evidence of this is a lenghty quote from the absolutely brutal statement from Cardinal Brandmueller (one of the Four)  

“In the case we have examined, this means that that, regarding the dogma of the unity, of the sacramentality, and of the indissolubility of a marriage between two baptized people, there is no way back if not – inevitable and therefore to be rejected – of considering it to be an error which must be corrected. The way of acting of Nicholas I in the dispute regarding the new marriage of Lothair II, as conscious of principle as it was inflexible and fearless, constitutes an important milestone on the road to affirming the doctrine regarding marriage in the Germanic cultural context. The fact that this Pope, like various of his successors on similar occasions, proved himself to be the advocate of the dignity of the person and of the liberty of the weak – in general they were women – has made Nicholas I worthy of the respect of historiographers, of the crown of sanctity, and of the title of ‘Great.’”

Cardinal Brandmueller makes two points here: the first is that there is no other way out from this situation than for Francis to a) retract or b) be corrected. The second is a contrast between a courageous Pope of the past and a cowardly, heretical Pope of the present.

And concerning the heretical Pope of the present, please look at the tone of Bishop Schneider, who openly mocks the heretics of our day  ( for example when he states: “Perhaps they did it for pastoral motives and for advancing the possibility of a pastoral accompaniment and discernment”) in a way that is the nearest to accusing Francis, short of a direct shot.

I can’t see how there can be any retreat from Schneider & Co now. I trust even Francis will have the brains to get that, if it is explained to him slowly a couple of times.

This does not look like an attempt to find a compromise. The terms chosen are such that not acting on them would cause the most grievous loss of face for the party of the Four Cardinals.

If Francis had illusions that this matter may deflate from itself, he can abandon it now. 

M

Advertisements

Posted on December 11, 2016, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Good Shepherds, Traditional Catholicism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1. It was a good psychological move to hold the meeting in Rome.

  2. Yes, I loved how Bishop Schneider applied the ridiculous modernist terms to Henry VIII…that was a kicker! And I also loved how he used the correct term ‘adultery’ rather than the watered down ‘irregular union’ or ‘divorced and remarried’ garbage. He called it what it was. Beautiful speech:+)

    God bless~

  3. ilovevictoriasbows

    Is it in the Evil Clown’s interest to respond or to ignore them? It’s not as if 98% of Catholics know what’s going on or care. If not, Cardinal Burke states, “Then we would have to address that situation. There is, in the tradition of the Church, the practice of correction of the Roman Pontiff.”

    From CatholicHerald: ‘Such an act of formal correction would be extremely unusual. One example is the challenge to Pope John XXII in the 1330s.
    In response, several theologians challenged Pope John. A few were punished, but the Pope backed down…. ‘

    A few were punished (we only have a few). What if the Evil Clown doesn’t back down? Is the formal correction a vote? another letter? Who wins? The Cardinalate is Novus Ordo infested with sodomites, pagans, and very weak men.

  1. Pingback: On The “Brother And Sister Thingy” Again | Mundabor's Blog

%d bloggers like this: