Defensive Carry In The Time of Jesus

Roman-Gladius-700x467

 

Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. 37For I say unto you, that this that is written must yet be accomplished in me, And he was reckoned among the transgressors: for the things concerning me have an end. 38And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he said unto them, It is enough.

We are not told if the Disciples were carrying open or concealed. I suspect they did both according to the occasion. On this particular occasion, only two out of eleven (Judas already gone, and he would not count anyway) were actually carrying. On other occasions they must have been more, because it is obvious that the Disciples here count the armed ones among them on that particular day.

Of these two, one would make a defensive use of his sword before long. 

These swords were, methinks, like the Roman gladius: a short but lethal sword, easy to carry and to use for short quarters combat, and therefore very apt for a defensive urban use. They clearly weren’t daggers, either. The word sword is not equivocal.    

Our Lord does not object to his disciples’ carrying in the least. Actually, he says to them they should carry more. No, actually I think he says all of them should carry.  Their right to keep and bear arms should, very obviously,  not be infringed. The Second Amendment is so very evangelical. 

Thought I would mention this blatant disregard of Our Lord for any form of arm control and, in fact, strong encouragement to defensive carry.

I am sure Hillary & Co. are very disappointed. 

M

 

Advertisements

Posted on May 19, 2017, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. sixlittlerabbits

    Dear Mundabor, thank you for elucidating the meaning of this Gospel passage.

    “Pacifist” Servant of God Dorothy Day must be rolling over in her grave. Although her successors at the Marxist “Catholic” Worker assure us that she studied Scripture–usually daily–she seems not to have encountered the above passage or the one in Paul’s Epistle to the Romans 13:1-4 on obeying the Emperor.

    Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Pope Francis, and Barack Obama are three of her most ardent admirers. Her youngest granddaughter, Kate Hennessy, is on a major speaking tour to promote “Granny’s” cause for canonization, while Kate seeks “Darshan” for herself and tells audiences that, at age 56, she has been “returning to the Church for the past 30 years…. I’m in this process of discerning my faith and I’ll probably be in this process for the rest of my life. I hope I’m in this process for the rest of my life.” (http://dorothydayworker.blogspot.com/2017/04/coming-to-parish-near-you-kate-hennessy.html)

  2. Could He be more explicit? Sell your cloak and buy one… This Is Not A Parable people! Plus, His “It is enough” statement was because that night was already ordained. It was for after then that all should look to having a purse and being armed. P.S. He told Peter to PUT his sword away, not throw it away.

Leave a reply. Please be concise and to the point.

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: