Monthly Archives: December 2017
I never liked the expression “God Emperor” referred to Donald Trump; I never did it because, whilst having its obvious roots in the Roman Empire, it does sound vaguely blasphemous to these Christian ears.
However, Trump truly is a guy that seems to keep doing what he does so well (not only running a country, but enraging snowflakes whilst having a lot of fun in the process) with great energy even as a President.
It’s funny and ferocious. It’s sound common sense and ferocious mockery. It’s what other Heads of State don’t do, because they are too dumb and conformist for that, and could never pull it off the way Trump does. Trump is an oasis of sanity in a world run by conformist, incompetent nincompoops, the obvious product of the Age of Madness in which Western democracies have descended.
Dumb voters produce dumb leaders. It’s the bane of democracy.
Trump’s religion is Christianity, not global warming. This would be good enough in itself. But what is even funnier is to see this man having a laugh at the stupid priests of the new religion of non-existing “consensus” and even more absurd (an oxymoron is there ever was one) “settled science”, and enjoying “triggering” all those pothead and assorted retards of the vast Losers’ Galaxy.
Trump has remained Trump. He has not transformed himself into another tofuhead spouting platitudes. He keeps attacking, keeps provoking, and keeps having fun as he teaches Libtards how to think or, more likely, enjoys their inability to do so.
We need more of this on our side, too. The Catholic blog world keeps being too nice, too afraid of “offending”, too much concerned with polite discourse and with the gentlest rules of engagements. Our enemies don’t return the favour. Many more of us should forget the white gloves and start trolling these people relentlessly. If a President of the United States can do it, so can a humble blogger.
Thank God for this exceptional man. God willing, 2018 will bring not only more winning, but a lot of fun, too.
In the second part of my blog post about the sad, sad Libtard Christmas (which is perfectly natural: how can Christmas without Christ be a joyous occasion?) I will touch briefly on an ugly, despicable, hateful dyke at some point in her life considered a comedian.
This very sad individual takes a religion she despises and elect herself as the new Christ, claiming to know who goes to hell and who doesn’t and, possibly even worse, declaring a kind of LiBDykeJudgment on the entire humanity.
Now, let us forget for the moment the intrinsic stupidity of the woman’s ideological stance and let us reflect on the wording itself. If the statement of the woman had been issued from an obvious Christian background, the meaning would be clear: you need to pray, because you’re going to hell unless you repent. But this cannot be in the mind of the female in question, because the concept of Christianity is obviously something she was never introduced to. No, what the sad dyke does is to hiss and spit venom in the most brutal way she knows how, oblivious of any contradiction – as well as the stupidity and arrogance of the statement – as she does so.
What sad, sad being these Libtards are. Look at this woman: her life is obviously shit (old dyke seeing her world crumble around her: go figure), and the pent-up frustration is discharged with extremely hateful tweets showing all the hatred she has in her blood.
As Trump would say: “sad, it’s so sad”.
I wish Rosie O’Donnell salvation. I pray that we will, one day, enjoy together the endless, unfathomable joy of the Divine Presence. But in order to get there she certainly needs to repent for the hateful, arrogant, stupid mockery of Christianity she tweets around, to start looking at the dyke in the mirror and to be filled with righteous horror at what her life, and herself, have become.
Pray for the poor wretch, because that’s what we are. Don’t have much hope that she will avoid hell, because she seems intentioned to get there straight.
What a miserable life Libtards live. When they are not occupied hating, they are busy worrying. Almost as sadly (but not really: it is just what they deserve) there is no shortage of people ready to milk money out of their stupidity.
This pic above is from Al Gore’s Christmas Begging. However, this is nothing even to do with Christmas.
he wishes “happy holidays”. He thinks that these “holidays” are not there to celebrate the birth on earth of Our Lord, but to bring into focus the “most important things in life”. Obviously, by this Ueberloser Gore means in the end… him and his multi-million operation.
let’s check: “family, friendships, and faith in a better tomorrow”. Gore Boy wants to come just after your nearest and dearest, and the faith in not the Christian one, it’s the faith in… him.
What follows is a statement of astonishing falseness, but evidently deemed fitting with the “holidays”. As you keep pumping your money in our coffins, the future of the planet is now bright. Well no; actually, if you are an environmentalist you should be oscillating between despair, madness and suicide at the prospect of other three (nay: make it seven) Trump years. But they, Gore is trying to milk money of the many dumb cows of his religion: a touch of optimism will emboldened them to click on the Paypal link.
And this is, I am afraid, Libtard Christmas: no Christ, no faith, not even hope of a better future, and your own false prophets asking you for money.
my twitter account @Mundabor is still having my posts published, but I was unable to recover the password (hint: when you sign up anonymously you give a lot of bogus information about date of birth etc which you cannot remember anymore later).
I have a second Twitter account, @RealMundabor.
Please follow me on that account if you already follow me on the other account. I have (I think) set the WordPress page so that my posts should be published on the new account, too…
Thanks to all
Alas, Francis is Pope. Has he, therefore, magisterial authority in whatever he pleases? Let us see.
Your Mathematics teachers at school was in possession of all the qualifications and requisites to teach math. He was, to all intents and purposes, a math teacher, the one with the task to teach you how mathematics works. The teacher had the authority to teach you. You listened to what he said and learned the wisdom he imparted because he was the one tasked with the duty of doing so.
The teacher has, in his own sphere of competence, a magisterial authority, an authority to teach, which is why you attend his lesson.
If your teacher had said to you that 2+2=5, would you have said that this is what the teacher says and therefore it must be true, and that you are bound to believe it, or even that everyone in your class must submit and give assent to what the teacher says?
Why not? Because the teaching authority of the teacher can never contradict the truths of the subject matter he is supposed to teach. His teaching authority only applies within the confines of the truths he exposes. The mathematics teacher cannot make a new mathematics, much less demand that you accept it as in any way binding. A math teacher who teaches falseness about mathematics does not change the rules of mathematics, he merely shows that he is a very bad, incompetent, ignorant teacher and should lose his job (also note here: he will still be a mathematics teacher, no matter how incompetent, until he gets fired).
The same basic logic applies to the wrong teaching of a Pope. Yes, the Pope has a magisterial authority. He has the right and duty, like the teacher, to teach the truths of the faith to all Catholics. But exactly as in the case above, the truths he teaches also mark the boundaries of his magisterial authority. A Pope trying to teach you that “in certain cases” adulterers can receive Holy Communion is even more absurd than a teacher trying to persuade you that “in certain cases” two and two can be five. He has no authority to teach falseness. There is no magisterial authority once a pope has put himself outside of the truths which this magisterial authority serve.
This is basic logic (and Christianity) and there is no need of any encyclical letter or solemn pronouncements stating this. The principle of non contradiction demands that it be so, and even before that Christian obedience does. To think that truth can be changed (by anyone, even by Saint Padre Pio; much less by an Argentinian boor) is nothing short of blasphemous even before being absurd.
No, Francis has no magisterial authority to teach anything that is wrong. This is absolutely obvious and as clear as the sun.
The huge scandal here is not that Francis has “changed” anything. Two and two will never be five. The huge scandal is that we have a Pope trying to persuade us that this is the case.
In a beautiful paradox, Judge Moore’s defeats might well have become the catalyst for a huge achievement for the Trump Administration: the Tax Reform.
I will wait that Santa brings me the approval in both House and Senate before rejoicing, as I still struggle to believe this is going to happen. However, as success now appears highly probable I will try to give a short explanation of what I think is happening.
What I think is happening is that Breitbart & Co. have raised the level of danger for the likes of Ryan and McConnell, to the point that their obvious policy of boycott of Trump’s agenda seems linked to an increasingly greater danger, for an increasing number of them, to be kicked out of the next elections already at the Primaries. This is what Bannon & Co. clearly have in mind, and the Alabama primary has shown how powerful they can be. The threat of all-out war to a number of prominent Senators and Representatives becomes the more evident as their obstructionism becomes more obvious. At some point, something’s gotta give and it appears that the desire to harm Trump has given way to the fear of harming themselves. Yes, Bannon & Co. will still go after an awful lot of RINOs’ scalps; but this is exactly the reason why some Republican credentials must be faked at this point; and if Trump profits from it then it is very unfortunate, but not worth the risk of not being reelected.
Also, the de facto soon almost vanishing majority in the Senate has forced everyone to act fast. With McCain still alive and the Republicans officially at 51-49 (but I consider it a factual 50-50, as Cain McCain is very advanced in years and a RINO if ever there was one) there was just no time to lose, and lo and behold, the agreement came very fast in the end.
You don’t believe how fear of losing one’s seat can sharpen one’s mind.
Thank God for Steve Bannon and the hardline Deplorables.
They might have managed to make of the likes of McConnell something resembling Republicans.
The always despicable National UnCatholic Reprobate magazine has a particularly despicable article about a Catholic priest who, as they say, “came out” as a homosexual. I spare you the whiny details, which I am sure you can imagine without reading.
Some bits of sound thinking help you to answer to your friends or relative or acquaintances or work colleagues when trying to inflict on you the satanical, sugary rubbish.
1. Born The Right Way
God does not “do” perversion. He merely allows it. It is absurd to think that God would cause a person to be “born that way”. Everyone is born the right way.
2. Homo By Choice
Everyone is born straight. However, some of them allow themselves to fall into the (disgusting, besides damning) pit of perversion. How do they do it? By (repeatedly) assenting to the disordered thoughts emerging in their mind. It is, in this perspective, not relevant and no excuse that some may live in an environment more conducive to such perversion: say, because “adopted” by inverted “parents”, or the victim of sexual abuse when little. There is never an excuse for what in the end must perforce be a willed choice. People don’t pervert themselves overnight. Such a change in one’s mind and way of thinking must perforce be the result of countless episodes of assent to what one knows to be wrong.
3. Homos Cannot Be Priests
The very idea that an inverted man may be fit for the priesthood speaks volumes about the decay of elementary Catholic (nay: Christian!) thinking in the West. A man called to celibacy and chastity should do so when, clearly, Satan already has such a hold on him that he can pervert him in the very roots of his being. This fake Christianity clearly does not believe in God, and reduces the priest’s role to a purveyor of sugary common places and trite social justice whining. That the hands of a pervert should be allowed to confect, elevate and hold the Host is something only people not believing in Transubstantiation could even imagine.
4. Homosexual Priests Are A Major Source Of Priest Pedophilia
The first John Jay Report and common sense observation of the reality around us tell us a simple fact: that whilst not all homos are paedos, a disproportionate number of paedos are homos. Not only has the first John Jay Report staggering figures about that (Google around), but this is also evident from the daily observation of the cases that make headlines. Normal, straight men are, sinner as they my be, just not of that sort. They like tits, you know.
5. God Cannot Have Been Wrong
The outlandish idea that homosexuality be anything different from what the Church has always believed it is (a perversion so hideous and horrible that even the name was shunned) equates to the belief that God was wrong for 2000 years and starts, encouraged by leftists and atheists the world over, to see reason just now. But if God can change His mind, then He is not perfect, which means that He is no God, which means that there is no God. The contrary is true: there is a God, this God is perfect and immutable, and Truth is just as immutable as its Creator. What was believed since the start must be believed to the end.
I hope that, even in these disgraceful times, this despicable individual is kicked out, defrocked, humiliated and left without any financial support; which would still be a very mild punishment for the open rebellion to that God to Whom he has consecrated his life.