The Three Bisops’ Statement: More Than Meowing, Less Than It Is Needed



Update: 2 further Bishops have joined the original three

———–

 

Three Bishops, from very remote parts of the Christian world, have published an official declaration of allegiance to the Depositum Fidei and condemnation of novelties, even if proposed or supported from the very top. There is a clear, but implicit criticism of the Pope. I cannot post the links now but they are everywhere.

My enthusiasm is somewhat limited, but this is certainly a positive development anyway. We now have three bishops instead of one openly and solemnly criticising AL's fake theology.

Three Bishops and four two Cardinals over the entire Catholic world, with many others certainly choosing to shut up out of pure cowardice.

None of them, mind, calls the Pope a heretic. None demand that he recants or resigns or is deposed by a Council. Francis is implicitly criticised (by the Bishops; the Cardinals haven't gone beyond “doubting” as far as official pronouncements are concerned), but not in the least openly challenged. No one even openly accuses him of willingly spreading heretical, and be it that materially heretical, statements. Saying that something is wrong without addressing what this logically entails is like the doctor telling the patient what his body is doing, but stopping short of informing said patient that he has cancer.

The laity remains firmly in front in the battle against this Papacy. The bishops remain largely, with few exceptions, silent. Most Cardinals are also silent, with the faint echo of a timid meowing here and there.

Yes, this is a positive development as every time a bishop speaks and says something Catholic it is ground for rejoicing. But several bishops' conferences have expressed, albeit in less solemn terms and without the veiled accusations to the Pope, the same concept: rules can't change, and that's the end of it. Therefore, this declaration isn't earth-shattering. It is good. But we need more.

We need for our bishops and cardinals to call a heretic a heretic and let the fireworks begin. Reaffirmations of doctrinal points, or even implicit criticism of their subversion, without an open accusation and denounciation of the Pope who is clearly behind them aren't terribly helpful, merely a good start.

The surgeon does not excise a tumor by telling it that it is bad. He takes the scalpel and gets rid of it.

We need for our bishops and cardinals to do their job and call for either a retraction or the scalpel (the council). The Church has cancer and we can't just limit ourselves to state that this is different from being in rude health.

But at least, this statement goes beyond the faint meowing of the (dead or living) Kitten Cardinals.

M

 

 

Posted on January 3, 2018, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism. Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. The difference between the kittens and the recent signed statement is that where the kittens asked a set of questions, to which I have no doubt they knew the pope’s answer to, the recent action of the Kazakhstani bishops was to issue a statement reaffirming the bi-millennial teaching of the Church and backhandedly indicting the pope of heresy. Perhaps it is the beginning of the end of this papacy? I sincerely hope so.

  2. Meowing is also more than nothing, and I know you may disagree….
    We need much more, but Meowing, Correctio Fidelis, , Weinandy’s letter , this statement (in chronological order), this blog and others ( for example Sandro’s Magister, Specola, 1P5 ), with all their defects, are helping.
    May the Lord intervene, and this papacy be closed, and not only this papacy.

%d bloggers like this: