After Roe vs Wade

The expectation for Trump’s Supreme Court nominee is enormous, and it will not be an easy battle considering the numbers in the Senate. Today I will, optimistically, assume that Trump gets his way and a conservative, sanely pro-life, Originalist judge is appointed by the Senate.

It has been rightly said that, if Roe vs Wade is overturned, the matter will go back to the States. This is true, but it is not the whole story.

How can it be that an Originalist majority of Supreme Court Justice finds that the Founding Fathers did not intend at all to enter into the matter of abortion, considering the possibility of a holocaust of unborn children something to be left to the States? We are talking of the very basis of Christian convivence here, not of the technical separation of competences between Washington and the States.

If Trump gets his appointment, I think in a matter of a few years Roe will be overturned. But this would not be enough, and one can reasonably hope that, in time – and particularly if we get a solid 6-3 one day – the Supreme Court will go on to state the right to life for the unborn child.

It seems to me that what is at stake here is way more than the overturning of a Nazi decision. It is the decision that Nazism is not a part of the fabric of the Country that the Founding Fathers had in mind.

Hope, pray and fast for the countless unborn children who are still slaughtered by “my body, my chouce” Nazi sluts and all their helpers and enablers.


Posted on July 2, 2018, in Traditional Catholicism. Bookmark the permalink. 8 Comments.

  1. Read the 14th Amendment. It leaves no room for the individual states to tolerate the killing of babies. States that refuse to conform to the 14th Amendment should be expelled from the Union.

  2. A wretched, morally dubious article was issued by Catholic News Seevice over the weekend . CNS is seemingly wringing its hands over the possibility that Roe will be overturned, enumerating every situation in which a woman won’t be supported by our wicked, wicked society in her pregnancy. Bizzare sentimentalism, like our bishops.

    I think there will be civil war in the States should Roe be threatened. Yes, things are that far gone.

    • Correct me if I am wrong, but most of the guns are owned by the right people. I can’t think such a civil war would last for long.. 😉

  3. Because of the assumptions that underly the Roe v. Wade (and companion Doe v. Bolton) decisions, the Life at Conception Act (Sen. Rand Paul) could solve the “send it back to the states” issue that would otherwise arise on a repeal of Roe/Doe. Of course, this would require 60 pro-life votes in the Senate, but stranger things have happened with God’s Grace.

  4. Nuclear option only applies to judicial nominees.

  5. For all the legal and jurisprudential defects and deficiencies of Roe, read Yale Prof John Hart Ely’s article ROE V WADE THE WAGEs OF CRYING WOLF. Roe clear and simple was 7 guys outvoting all the people of 48 states-and this is how the LPDLWTs do it when they do not have popular support-they get a judge to create a new “right to abortion” or “right to marriage” to subvert the will of the people in our representative democracy. But then when it appears that others may have the voting majority of what they have created in the frankensteincourt, then all of a sudden, they want to play by different rules. Guy McClung, Texas
    LPDLWTs = liberal, progressive, democrat, left wing totalitarians [how many baby puppy redundancies can you find there?]

%d bloggers like this: