Monthly Archives: July 2019
Attorney General William Barr announced a few days ago that federal executions will be resumed in a matter of months. Predictably, ouf heretic Bishops went into heretical meltdown mode.
You all know what the depositum fidei teaches on this, and how Francis playing with catechisms does not change iota unum about what the Church teaches. Therefore, I will leave this part aside and move to more interesting considerations.
After decades of tasteless platitudes, our Bishops have made themselves utterly irrelevant. No one listens to them, because no one respects them. No one respects them because, as individuals, they normally do not deserve any respect.
Therefore, their whining and meowing about Barr will be, like all the rest of what they say, ignored by the public at large, shifting between 0 and 12 voters nationwide in the run to the 2020 election.
I truly hope that Capital Punishment will figure among the 2020 issues as prominently as the Wall did in 2016. That time, both the Evil Clown and a troop of irrelevant bishops thundered against Trump and his wall, with the result that… Latinos voted Republican in record numbers. This time, renewed attention for Capital Punshment will help to expose them as heretical buffoons who really only get anything right concerning Catholic doctrine if it’s not controversial, or else by mistake.
Go on and defy them all, AG Barr. Let’s see if the Bishops make of this the subject of constant meowing in 2020.
It will deliver Florida to Trump by 200,000 votes.
There is an article on wnd about suicide and the attitude of Californians about it.
The article seems, to me, confused, and missing an important point.
It is confused, because the author claims that everybody who wants to commit suicide should be free to do so, in his own time. But every Christian knows that this is an extremely nebulous vision of life.
Our life isn’t ours, it belongs to God. We have no right to take it. Similarly, it is the duty of every government to do God’s work and prevent such behaviour. Legislation making of attempted suicide a crime (and, which is perfectly right and logical, of suicide itself, though in this case the enforcement chances seem… slim) serves exactly this purpose: to remind everyone that life is bigger than both the individual and his governing authorities.
In addition to this, the article misses one important point: the corruption clearly pervading public works in the US and in many other parts of the US.
$220 million for a protective net under a bridge? Are you kidding me? How many minority consultants, gender equality consultants, consultants’ consultants is this going to pay for? How much of this money will find its way in generous donations, from the companies contracted with works and materials, to charities and institutions linked to the Democratic party? Is there a sane person thinking that this is not going to feed the party apparatus in thousand legal and, who knows, a couple of illegals ways?
It would be nice to ask a public comptroller (or any public expense watchdog) in, say, Texas, how much such works would cost to them. I am pretty sure the differences in, say, security legislation, contracting procedures, and the like, would be staggering. Yes, San Francisco is an expensive tarmac to do anything. No, I don’t buy it anyway.
Always going on with the comparison, one would ask for how many orphanages, and how many little orphans, would such a budget provide. “An awful lot, for an awfully long time” is the answer. A State government that considers abortion a sort of religious tenet does not want to spend (as it is clear that in California this would be a public task, too) for the children that would result from banning abortion. Instead, it prefers to kill the babies and spend untold sums of money to let the suicides created by a godless suicide get rid of themselves… somewhere else.
Money spent? $220,000,000 if everything goes according to plan.
Lives saved? Zippo.
Congratulations, Californians. And keep paying those taxes. The Democrats need them to feed off of them.
P.s. It would be nice to see what happens if people jump and land on the net below.
Cost of rescue per wannabe suicide? Likely, 1 million a pop…..
Good news these last days as President Trump got a huge victory on the Wall and the Brexit climate has changed dramatically in just a few days. It is as if all that has gone wrong in three yours could largely be righted in the next year or so.
We need not to forget that heads of state can be helped to do their job if our helped, a part of the providential plan for them, inspire them to make the right decisions.
Trump and, even more so, Johnson face insidious months and difficult decisions. Please, in your charity, pray that they might be guided to do the right thing. Both of them, but Johnson is the one in the particularly difficult spot right now.
God knows they are not perfect (believe me, Boris is worse than Trump) , but these are the people God has given us to work with.
My rosary today is for BoJo.
I invite you to follow my example.
This article gives an interesting panorama of different cultural reactions to the contact with alternative cultures, brought to us by our unjustly persecuted guests.
The French seem to have a rather robust way of making their point known. The Italians are also quite passionate.
In Germany, however, the entire place must be closed, because the level of testosterone (and, likely, the confidence that the police would persecute those who defend the victims) did not allow for any other reaction.
Oh, how fascinating it is to see different cultures coming into contact with “the other”! Quite an enrichment, adding to the beautiful diversity of our European continent.
I am sure Pope Francis will be quite pleased.
Of course, I reject all violence etc.
You could not make this up.
Governor Andrew Cuomo has signed a bill banning the declawing of cats.
This would be (in its own tragic way) already comical enough as it is. What makes it worse (and, in a way, tragically hilarious) is that the Governor has the guts to, literally, call the practice “inhumane”.
I have some news for the Governor:
Cats are animals.
Babies in the womb are humans.
It is really indicative of how twisted the mind of these people is, that they think it supremely cruel to deprive a cat of his claws, but do not think twice about depriving a human being of his life. Also, this satanic thinking unavoidably gives to a cat a status more dignified, more worthy of protection and, ultimately, more human than the one of an unborn baby. Think of this: the claws of a cat are, to the Governor, more worth than the life of a baby. The cruelty staggers the mind.
Who does this guy think he is, Moloch?
Mind, Cuomo will keep having a brilliant career in the Democratic party when his tenure as Governor comes to an end. Even a candidature to the Presidency is not out of the question. I am sure that countless dumb feminists will heartily approve of his “humanity” towards cats as they scream in the streets, donning their strange hats, about their alleged right to kill a… human in their womb.
We really live in a world that has lost not only the sense of right and wrong, but all sense of decency. It must be so when people forget Christ, because without Christ fluffy feelings are called goodness, justice and equaliteee.
This man, born a Catholic, stinks of reprobation from the other side of the ocean. Still, in your charity, pray for his soul, and for the souls of the countless innocents he is fine with seeing slaughtered.
The satanic America Magazine has gone full homo with an article titled, if you can believe it, “the Catholic case for Communism”. No link.
I have perused the extremely stupid bloviations of the author of the article (may the Lord have mercy on him, though I have my doubts) and would like to make a point or three of my own in the time I have at my disposal.
- There is no “good communist”. Even in the case where a person might think he is moved by the desire to help the suffering world, Communism is godless at its very roots. Therefore, a person who embraces communism has been infected by the same evil. If I want the end of the suffering of the baby seal but do not believe in God, I am not good, in that I lack the fundamental ingredient of true goodness. What I have is merely… fluffy feelings. A Communist, who embraces a demonstrably evil, ideologically godless movement, is much worse than that.
- The desire to see the end of economic inequality is not goodness, it is envy. God has made rich and poor, and Christianity has never condemned the rich qua rich. The desire to put an end to economic disparity is, again, a godless endeavour. By the grace of God you are born rich. By the grace of God you are born poor. By the grace of God you are given those opportunities that allow you to, if you so wish, improve your condition. But always, a Christian recognises that he must not desire other people’s stuff. To all of us, God gives those graces that are good for us. We do not resent the graces given to others, we are grateful for those given to us, be they material (like financial prosperity) or immaterial (health, beauty, intelligence, resilience, inventiveness etc.). Communists are envious people first, second, third, and last.
- Communists are no labourers for peace, nor are they agents of economic justice. To depict them in this way shows a complete ignorance of the root of both true peace and true justice: Christ. Communism has brought death and devastation without end. It had to be so, because a godless “religion” must perforce transform itself into a killing machine as its devotees will have all the determination of the Christian without any of God’s goodness. In Italy we had one of the most atrocious examples, as it is proven beyond doubt that, towards the end of WWII, Communist partisans killed as many anticommunist partisans as they could, in order to make a Communist revolution easier in the unstable phase that would follow the end of the conflict. Make no mistake, those partisans killing other partisans did so because they followed their godless religion, and “wanted a better world”. Come to that, you can say the same of Dr Goebbels, too…
- Catholicism and Communism do not have a “complicated relationship”. They are, literally, like the devil and the holy water: totally antithetical. To even suggest otherwise indicates a total lack of faith in Christ. The continuous attempt of the article to minimise the evil of Communism and try to discover similarities is the work of the devil.
I could go on for much longer, but firstly I do not have the time, and secondly even perusing the damn article made my blood boil, so I will leave it at this.
Communism is of Satan.
Those who don’t see it are of Satan, too.
By all means, do it. Heck, I am sure you pray even for Francis when you have your stomach in order.
But do not forget that we are in a fight, and in this fight the enemy is exactly Dr Wen and the people like her.
The one or other can be converted by kindness. But Jerusalem wasn’t retaken by kindness. More importantly, the kindness should be reserved to those who deserve it (for example, because they begin to question their baby killing beliefs), not given unconditionally to every baby killing machine.
We have been losing for too long because we try to be civil, as we are attacked mercilessly. Enough.
Suddenly, Dr Wen’s refusal to include trannies in her own particular brand of aggressive, baby-killing feminism should be seen as a positive. I frankly doubt it. Similarly, it is not clear to me how having lost a baby of her own would make her in any way, shape or form more predisposed to conversion, seen that after losing her baby she found it acceptable to sit at the top of the greatest baby-killing machine in the United States.
That event doesn’t make her better. In case, it makes her more callous. Surely, the doctors carrying experiments in Auschwitz loved their children, too?
The likes of Dr Wen should – whilst we pray for their conversion – be left in no doubt as to what decent people think of them.
When the prodigal daughter comes back to the Christian household, the fat calf will be prepared for her. But for now, she is the enemy; a baby killing individual that presided over a monstrous organisation, and was kicked out of it because she was simply not political enough for them, and because her particular brand of feminism does not include the latest feminist craze.
There is a time for peace and a time for war; there is a time for kindness and a time for harshness.
Hitler deserved no kindness.
Nor does Dr Wen.
There was an article somewhere around the net, minimising the effect of a repeal of Roe vs Wade, and basically sending the message that the decrease in baby killing after a repeal would likely be lower than the decrease of abortion in USA in the last 12 years or so. I would like to say my two words on this.
Wrong and right are not measured by the kilogram. Any discussion about the practical implications of a repeal of Roe vs Wade is made redundant by the fact that this repeal must come anyway, for basic reasons of civilisation alone.
Yes, it has been already pointed out that a simple repeal would, in itself, merely put the matter back to the States. But already this would mean that more than two dozen states would either immediately, or very soon after the decision, introduce a total ban. Already for this, I think the impact would be much bigger than 12 or 13% already from the start.
However, the big effect of a repeal of Roe vs Wade would be the slow, but assured change of the public attitude towards abortion. I have mentioned many times already a wise Italian saying: the laws of one generation are the morals of the following one. A repeal of Roe vs Wade would help the next generation to completely eradicate abortion from the USA as a legal practice (of course there might be some illegal one here and there; there will also be robberies and murders here and there, life never plays in absolutes). Plus, the moral pressure on European Countries would be massive, and when we get a catholic Pope again would have a devastating effect on the abortionist’s camp all over Europe.
The struggle never ends. You fight a battle at a time, knowing that after that battle others will follow. It is just the way it works.
I do not know whether we will see Roe vs Wade repealed in my lifetime, but the chances aren’t bad. What, I think, the next generation will see is, after the repeal, a declaration of the Supreme Court about the unconstitutional nature of any state law allowing abortion. In order to do this, we need to change the hearts and mind of the nation, because it has not been seen often in the past that the Supreme Court defies the popular opinion: they upheld slavery in the time of slavery, abortion in the time of sexual licence, and so-called gay marriage in the time of sexual perversion.
We need to try to have Roe vs Wade repealed as a first, extremely important step; leverage on that to bring on our side a growing percentage of the public opinion in USA and Europe; and then push for a total ban everywhere, with many other African and Asian Countries likely preceding us on this, once they do not have to fear the sanctions of the West anymore.
I was reading this article about a tele-conversation between Jordan Peterson and FrancisBishop Barron. let me tell you first that I am not a fan of the first, and keenly dislike the second.
In the interview, Bishop Barron says something extremely disquieting, unworthy of a priest and outright creepy. Speaking of the way to assist the sinner and help him to repent, the FrancisBishop states:
“We have to accompany people all the way down [to the bottom before they can ascend],”
I have checked this part in the video, and he does not retract, or even correct, the statement. Actually he doubles down, in that he makes clear that he really intends this damn “accompaniment” in the damned Francis sense.
It is impossible to stress strongly enough how utterly and completely wrong this is. This is the satanic vision of a Church that sees Herself as a kind of gentle nurse, staying with you as you sink in a pit of drug addiction, alcoholism, sexual perversion or whatever that is, perhaps gently encouraging you to “grow out” of your way, but still making clear that the nurse is there watching you as you insert the needle.
Just a second after Peterson had (with a surprising petulant voice, I must say) complained that the Church “does not give hell” anymore to the faithful, Barron replies with a concept that is the most apt to accompany the sinner all the way to hell under the pretence of mercy; after which, every pretence to also give some strong warning can only be a travesty, as in the nurse who watches you as you insert the needle and then says to you that what you have done is… quite suboptimal.
Let us keep the metaphor alive, and let us say that the role of the Church is to slap the drug addict in the face, so hard that his head goes round and round for a good quarter of an hour; then have the slap followed by a vivid description of hell; then round everything up with another massive slap, ad abundantiam, so that the message remains.
This is why the Church excludes from communion public concubines and those in mortal sin. It’s Her way to make your head go round and round for a quarter of an hour, so that you get the message.
I am sick and tired of these damn, effeminate nurses. When I was a little child, we children were intimidated at the mere sight of the priest, walking around in his cassock, tall and solemn like he is Pharaoh. Why were we? Because we knew that the man was the very embodiment of what we knew to be unshakeable truths of life: death, judgement, and the atrocity of hell.
As we grew up, we had around us priests we did not wear a cassock, would or could not be seen as the embodiment of any authority, and probably did not believe in hell, either. We did not respect these weak, little men. We saw them as useless losers, unable to even do their job. We knew they were expected to be leaders of men. We saw that they had reduced themselves to … nurses.
A priest cannot escape giving his sheep a strong warning about hell. Hell must be the cornerstone of everything he does, because helping his sheep to avoid it and the only reason why he has the job in the first place. By all means, let him talk a lot about Incarnation, Redemption, Salvation, and the life of grace. But let him always, always point out to the only thing that counts in life: avoiding hell.
Barron is not part of the solution. He is part of the problem. He should stop brown-nosing Francis and, as they say, get a pair. Perhaps, one day he might, who knows, even become a worthy bishop.
Planned Parenthood, the giant US baby-killing machine, has decided to get rid of her CEO of 10 months (incidentally: woman, and minority; just sayin’…) because not hard enough on the baby-killing line.
Killing babies is a pure health care issue, says the not-so-good doctor.
My foot, replies Planned Babycide’s Board: killing babies is a big money machine, there are elections coming, and a lot of dough is at stake!
Therefore, the smiling baby-killer has been ousted in favour of baby-killers with a more aggressive attitude. More talk of “reproductive health”, “women’s rights”, and other dumb stuff meant to hide the brutal, atrocious reality of baby-killing is to be expected.
I welcome the development.
Planned Parenthood need to be exposed, and the best way to achieve this aim is allow the baby butchers to actually expose themselves as aggressively as they can.
Good riddance, smiling baby-killers.
Moloch wants someone even worse than you.
Oh, the unintended effects of love of poverty!
In Italy, every taxpayer can decide whether to give 0.8% of his tax bill to the Church or to the Government to be spent for charitable purposes. Therefore, it is not a question of “to give or not to give”. it is merely a question of deciding the direction of certain funds.
Traditionally, the Church has had a lot of support from this. This is because there were many people, even agnostics, even atheists, who appreciated the work of the Church (in Italy rabid atheism really has no traction) and wanted to support it.
It says here that, since Francis has become Pope, the Church has lost two million “8 pro mill supporters”.
Now let us reflect a moment. Can this come from the progressive loss of faith of the Italian population? Perhaps yes, a bit. But 2 million over, let us say, 40 million taxpayers lost in six years is brutal. Also, it does not match with what I said before: the well known fact that many who are not church people and do not even believe in God chose to support the Church because they liked their work on the ground.
The answer is, I think, much simpler.
A lot of people (Catholics, or not) are getting fed up of supporting a Church that promotes illegality, the destruction of Italy’s traditional social fabric, socialism in various forms, and perversion in all forms.
Therefore, they show Francis the longest finger they have when they have to “tick” the 8 pro mill box. Well done!
FrancisChurch must be starved. This will allow our dear FrancisPrelates and FrancisPriests to practice what they preach at least a bit, and it will show even to the most stupid among the perverts who seem to run the show nowadays that the strategy simply, and literally, does not pay.
We need to close the money tap on these people. Yes, just priests will suffer; but a good priest expects to suffer. Yes, there will be closures of some churches whose priests do a lot for the local youth; but then again, this will help to pose questions as to why this is happening.
This bubo needs to rupture. Francis must be exposed as a toxic enemy of Christ, who is perverting the Church in every aspect of Her activity. And it must be clear that the Italians, and hopefully Catholics in other Countries, are not going to stand for this.
Italians are showing, by the millions, that Francis isn’t worth of their money. Kudos to them, and let us hope that others (particularly in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, the Kirchensteuer Countries) will follow the example.
The Democratic primaries for 2020 are promising to be epic fun. The field is now so vast that I doubt there is anyone who can remember all the candidates by heart. Also, the trend toward fake candidatures only meant to gain visibility, seen also in the UK, is continuing unabated.
The Two terms mayor of New York isn’t managing to get 1%, showing to the entire Country the extent of his incompetence. Fauxcahontas is getting traction. The feminist who made a career sucking whatever it was to a powerful man in California is struggling in her own, extremely woke home state. The creepy old guy who can’t stay away from girls’ hair makes one gaffe after another. The old socialist who made such a good symphaty run in 2016 is way below expectations. We now also have the nutcase Billionaire, and it will be fun to see how this pans out.
Very many of them are White and Men, two mortal sins among the activists. But pretty much all of them are so much on the left, that their candidature would have been considered a wasteful, expensive joke until 2012. Creepy Joe himself is veering to the left like there is no tomorrow, trying to stay afloat in the ocean of wokeness.
This is an ideal situation for Trump. However this ends, and if no moderate candidate dares to show up, this will be months and months of Leftist Freak Show, likely damaging in an irreparable way everyone who gets the nomination , however strong his attempts to steer a centrist image after the Democrtic Convention.
Trump will exploit this mercilessly. He will call out their leftist policies day in and day out. He will attract huge attention on himself just by mocking the nutcases. He will appear moderate compared to them. And he will, as he always does, control the narrative every step of the way.
This show is going to be fun.
Trump is just getting started.
A pretend “catholic” magazine (no link) has an article of pathetic excuses as to why Francis is so terrorised of his own people that he is not planning to visit Argentina any time soon.
In pure hack style, an entire people is insulted in order to prepare you for the news that they hate the Pope: egocentric, arrogant, bloody know-it-all is how they are introduced to you before telling you what they think of the Evil Clown. What they think is highly predictable: leftist, and “even” (on which planet do these people live!) “not Catholic enough”.
You don’t say…
These people are, obviously, uninformed, the hack hurries to let us know. They haven’t read his documents. No shit, Sherlock! As if a practical, working man had time to read the endless blabla of the Evil Clown to know what a tool he is, and his almost daily proclamations weren’t enough.
And woe one of the practical, hard working people should tell him something imprecise. It makes the entire nation uninformed, see?
At this point the attempts to defend Francis are becoming almost more ludicrous and pathetic than Francis himself. So many people have leant out of the window defending his subversive work, that they are now forced to desperate attempts at PR for a man that no PR agency in the world could ever save from ignominy. Nor does Francis understand the lesson, and tries to soften the tones or dial down his own anti-Capitalistic, anti-Catholic propaganda. No, he is just as arrogant and self-centred as the fake catholic hack accuses the Argentinians to be.
Francis’ Pontificate has had, up to now, two distinct phases.
The first is the Wheelchair Phase: basking in the approval of the masses with stupid gestures like paying for his own hotel and embracing every wheelchair in sight. This could not go on for long, because – as your humble correspondent predicted years ago – at some point the stupidity of the man would be enough to squander the immense patrimony of goodwill given to a Pope.
When this happened, you saw the other Francis, and the Pram Phase started. Uncaring of the ferocious criticism levelled at him from theologians, professors and simple people, the man reacted by increasing the frequency and the tone of his anti-catholic interventions. It is fair to say that by 2016 we were clearly in phase 2.
But this man is truly, truly stupid, and a third phase might be coming upon us soon, courtesy of his immense childishness and lack of intellect: the Amazonian Phase. In this phase, we are supposed to go looking for savages, asking them what their cult of the forest and their dialogue with the trees can teach us about God, that Christ somehow forgot to tell us. There must be, deep within the forest, a Special Revelation that wasn’t revealed to us up to now, and that we will all have to follow lest we are deemed “ossified”. What wonderful new tenets this Second Revelation will bring is easy to see already: married priests, rabid anti-Capitalism, faggotry all around, and a general understanding of sexual matters very much in line with the one of the above mentioned tree-worshipping savages.
Please, God, make the man die soon. No, not resign, because after the traumatic experience of the Three Tenors I doubt we could survive the Three Popes without extensive, collective brain damage.
Please, make him die. Repentant, if You so decree, and I wish him salvation with all my heart still. But please, make him die.
Please, make him die today.
I think many have learnt the lesson already.
What you read here is, alas, very much in line with the thinking of too many Germans. If you don’t conform to every form of indoctrination your rulers have decided that is good for you, you should have your children taken away from you and given to the Nazi propaganda Apparatus, so that it can make good MiniNazis out of them.
I begin to suspect that either the Germans have not been bombed long enough during WWII, or else that they need to be bombed every 100 years or so, to dial their tendencies back every time they become too strong.
Be it as it may, the event is another symptom of an extremely worrying trait of the German mind; a trait I could witness very often during the years I lived there.
Kind, honest, efficient and generally of good heart, the Germans have a huge, collective shortcoming: their extreme gregariousness makes them easy pray of every evil ideology that becomes mainstream. If you don’t think like the rest of the sheep, you must be evil.
This is how Hitler’s Germany used to operate, and how Merkel’s Germany operates today. None of them really imposes the conformity to the rules on their people. The Germans are extremely good at doing it themselves.
When you understand this, you understand a lot of German history. You understand how the average Nazi German could be so kind to his neighbour, whilst considering a given that, say, Russians are Untermenschen. I thank God the Germans classed the Italians as Aryans. Had it gone the other way, I wonder whether I would have been born at all.
I make an easy prediction here. The German gregariousness, coupled with the great economic power of their Country, will cause them to be crushed again in this generation or the next; unless, that it, Muslims don’t care for it first, which I highly doubt.
Am deutschen Wesen soll die Welt Genesen: “The world shall be made whole through the German way of being”. This old slogan, often mocked nowadays, continues to live and prosper in modern times, promoted by the very people who mock the allegedly old ways of the Country. From environmental policies to economics, and from illegal immigration to sexual perversion, once the German mainstream has chosen sides, the pressure to make the others conform to the German way of doing things mounts slowly but irresistibly, until a chastisement comes that makes them think better of it… for a while.
Mind, it is not desire of domination. It is authentic thinking that what they believe is better for you. It is difficult to explain to an Anglo-Saxon or a Southern European, because they come from a different cultural environment. But live the day to day “German-ness” for a number of years and you will understand what I mean.
You might say that we have many examples of PC madness in other Countries, too, the UK being one of the most prominent. But having lived in both Countries, I can assure you that the Brits have “freedom antibodies” that the Germans simply lack.
Europe needs to defend itself from the good intentions of the Germans; one day, I think it will. Let us hope, for them and for us all, that it will not have to be through a conflict that utterly crushes them, likely curing their “German Ways” once and for all.
The rag Daily Mail (yes, the one with the half naked women, the dirty gossip and other low pleasures for the dumb among the working class) has an article that tries to be sympathetic to the Evil Clown, also known as Pope Francis. I also have a link to Euronews, which at least does not have the half naked women and lurid articles.
What has the man done, to deserve to be defended by such august authorities?
He has invited the faithful to pray for illegals trying to enter Italy.
The reaction was, how shall I put it, robustly Italian. Some translations:
“Enough! Please stop with this and put on another record” (this is an Italian expression, reserved to those who always talk about the same stuff)
“Later, when you have a moment between a preaching on the migrants and a sermon on the migrants, tell us something on the abused children and the destroyed families of Bibbiano” (this is a scandal about the fostering of children)
“If, perhaps, after 4 years spent only talking about migrants, you could tell us some words about Jesus, Mary, the Resurrection, the Holy Ghost, Hell, and the Gospels, I swear that we would not be offended”.
“You have broken”*. (You should be) kicked in the ass up to Avignon!”
“Go to do” **. To look at your face gives me…….” (image is cut here, I think it goes on with “nausea” or the like).
Now that we have examined the vox populi, let us dare a little sociological examination of the event.
Up to very few years ago, it would have been unthinkable that a Pope is bombarded with insults on Twitter. If this had happened, the insults would not have come from Catholics. Moreover, any insults would have been countered by an immensely strong reaction in defence of the (Catholic) Pope. In short, anti-Catholic criticisms to a Catholic Pope would not make the news.
This here is different. These tweets come from people who, Catholic or not, see in Francis just what he is: a propagandist for the destruction of Europe. Hence, the treatment reserved to people Italians do not respect (the colourful expression above) or the polite observation that a Pope should actually be Catholic.
What is happening is the brutal fact that the Evil Clown has lost face. He has lost face on a massive scale. This is not anymore a small number of Catholics enraged at the antics of the man. This is the entire Italian Nation realising what a tool he is, and not thinking that the man is worth of respect. Some of the expressions you read are reserved to people considered common muck, or nothing more than scoundrels.
The game is up. The people are angry. The tolerance threshold for a tool like Francis is getting lower.
I can see the day when he is either pelted with foul tomatoes (less probable, because the police would intervene instantly) or booed and insulted by the Catholic masses on St Peter’s Square.
He can’t say he didn’t have it coming. Sawing and reaping comes to mind.
Poor, poor Frankie: how far away the wheelchairs seem now!
* less impolite version of “you have broken our balls”, a colourful expression meaning “you are being really annoying now”.
** less impolite, shortened version of “go f@kk yourself”.
The very stupid and always obscene Daily Mail (therefore, no link) reports of a Catholic priest now deciding that he is a “she”.
I will spare you the drooling of the stupid rag, the obsessive description of the poor madman as “she”, the usual rubbish about being “trapped” in the body of another sex, and the like.
I only ask this: how could this tool be made a priest in the first place? How could it be that no one noticed his obvious deviation? Who are the people responsible for him passing the various steps of the path that leads to ordination? Will the “Catholic” press pick up on this story?
This sad basket case is now 37: it is realistic that he was a real priest, not merely in a seminary training to become one, for 6 years. More questions arise: why has his bishop not noticed? Why has, in fact, no one noticed? The better question might actually be: who has noticed? And what happened then?
If this was 1 April I would think this is an April Fish, but I am afraid it isn’t: it is the reality of the Catholic Church in England in the early XXI Century.
When Pius XIII becomes Pope, he will have to purge the seminaries and hierarchy in this Country like it’s Torquemada Time.
The second most disgusting thing? “Father” has now adopted a daughter. The Country is really going down the drain.
The most disgusting thing of them all? A rag with a mass audience encouraging the madness, every bit of it.
Wake up, Europe.
You have become a sad parody of the Christian continent you once were.
The arrest of Jeffrey Epstein will show whether the US prosecutors have what it takes. I am confident it will, because a brilliant, decade-long political career can be achieved based on this alone. On the other hand, you already know the vast net of connections and, not unlikely, accomplices and enablers of Mr Epstein will do all they can to stop this investigation in its tracks.
Let us think of the Clinton Clan alone. How many times did Bill Clinton fly to “Lolita Island” on Jeffrey Epstein’s own jet? Ten? Twenty? How many other very rich and very influential people were there? Did Clinton “dip the biscuit” with the local young, or very young, women? How many illegal instances were there? Is it really thinkable that Clinton was not meant to provide political protection to Epstein, and to the other friends, in exchange for luxury treatment and sexual favours?
How young were the girls? Were there also women of age? Were they “escorts”? How could Clinton not know the exact scale of illegal behaviour that was going on there?
Boy, this will be interesting.
My take (for now) is that a billionaire with Mr Epstein’s proclivities will buy an island belonging to a nation where the age of consent is low (let us say fourteen, or fifteen). Therefore, if he went below that, he is deep into long term jail territory, and Bill Clinton might not be much better situated than him. Also, if Epstein got his girls through various organisations pimping them, he can be, and I think he is, accused of trafficking together with these organisations. Still, I would not focus on the trafficking charges. I would focus on what was going on in the island, under the lustful eyes of Mr Forty-Two himself.
It’s likely going to be a bloodbath. Epstein, who was already in jail and cannot expect any mercy, will likely sing like a canary, drawing an awful number of prominent rich Democrats down with himself. The pickings are, I think, too rich for just sweeping this under the carpet. The incorrucf press (mainly, the right wing one) will set itself in motion, and soon whistleblowing and leakings of all sorts will be underway. I honestly cannot see how this can be stopped.
It will obviously take a while, as in the case of the paedophile cover up scandals. But as in these cases, the wheel is likely too big to be stopped once it has start to roll.
Get the popcorn.
The Clinton Clan is about to fight not to get the Presidency, but to stay out of jail.
A constant criticism of us who want to die in the same religion as our Catholic ancestor died is that we are”angry”, “vitriolic”, or in any other form “not nice”.
These are, I m sure, the same people who would be totally enraged at knowing that someone, who – let us say – once piddled against a tree less than a lot of feet from a school, or slept with an extremely horny and slutty 17.9 years old girl somewhere where the age of consent is 18 and was judged a “sex offender”, lives at less than very many miles from their sacred abode.
Screw forgiveness and understanding. In what matters to me, I make no prisoners.
What angers us gives a very good picture of what is important to us. If your salvation is the most important thing to you, the ravaging of your religion and the continued assault to Christian values will enrage you infinitely more than inflation, insurance prices, government inefficiency, damn inequality, damn world peace, damn so-called global warming, and even criminality and everyday security. If you don’t get why, you are reading the wrong blog and, if I were you, I would be worried for my salvation.
It’s not something we choose to do. We are angry simply because we care.
I can’t just decide to “relax” as Francis disfigures Holy Mother Church and tries to make a mockery of Her Sacraments. In order to do that, I would have to simply become another person or, actually, lose my faith!
Conversely, I have strong doubts about the faith of all those who, upon hearing of us rightfully angry faithful, focus their attention on our (justified) anger rather than on our (justified) motives for being angry.
Nor does it help to say that they “agree” with us on so many issues (who doesn’t like a beautiful Tridentine Mass?) , but that we disqualify ourselves because of our “vitriolic” attitude. The argument is self-defeating. It actually shows the total disingenuousness, or outright bad faith, or else complete inability to grasp the issue of those who make it.
Be angry, my dear reader. Let your vitriol corrode the old, rusty, fragile structure of HomoChurch. Shoot at Vatican II with the AR15 at every occasion. Let everyone listening to you feel your righteous anger! Let them feel the strength of your faith.
Niceness at all costs is for the lukewarm, the conformist, the fearful and the effeminate.
As for us, we will choose the vitriol.
A lesbian lives with another lesbian.
They allowed to adopt a foster daughter.
The foster daughter “identifies” as a boy.
The two lesbians bitch around because they cannot send the girl to boys’ summer camp
This truly gives you the measure of how far we have come on our road towards collective madness.
It has come to the point when even TV channels with a mass audience are terrified (because I am afraid, at least in part, this is what it is) not to report about the grievances of these mental hospital tools lest the HomoNazis start a war against them, and actually report about it in a way that prevents every suspicion that they are not “feeling” for the “plight” of these satanical people.
This would have been considered utter madness only a few decades ago. It is now mainstream reading for the daily brainwashing of the gregarious, unthinking masses.
We need to put an end to this and I must say, President Trump is not doing anywhere near what he should.
Another sign, perhaps, of the madness of the times.
I have written just yesterday a post wishing, like so many times in the past, that the Lord may take out the Evil Clown as soon as may be.
Alas, it wasn’t to be yesterday. But we can hope.
In the meantime, yesterday the news was published of the appointment of seven (read: seven) women to the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life.
I understand the Congregation now has 16 members; of whom five Cardinals, fours Bishops, and seven women.
This will be fun.
Pope Evil never ceases to show how much he hates the Church. Every day, he thinks how he can demolish a piece of what She is, and substitute it for a piece of FrancisChurch, a satanic mixture of arrogance, incompetence, corruption, social envy, faithlessness, homosexuality, paedophilia and, clearly, feminism.
If this man could become a dervish, or a shaman, he would do it.
Just to spite you.
What can the remaining faithful do against this scourge?
Remain faithful to the truth that has always been taught. Nourish yourself from the immense patrimony of Church tradition. Pray every day that this disgrace may cease to do damage today, by death or conversion (whichever comes first, but please today). Add this latest innovation to the list of things that need to be reverted back to sanity when the Evil Clown finally (as they say in Italy) stretches his paws. Do not accept compromises and and keep fighting every future Pope who, under the pretence of getting rid of the most extreme forms of FrancisMadness, keeps some of his “innovations” in place and continues the wrecking of the Church, albeit in a more intelligent way than this idiot is doing. Pray more, and do penance. Reflect that this man is the way given to you by Providence to actually, by His Grace, save yourself by way of sheer contrast, no matter how many will merit hell by following him.
Most of all, reflect that his V II predecessors, including JP II, carried the germs that have now given us this satanic disease.
This madness will have an end when the root of the problems is eradicated, and the root is the Second Vatican Council.
Every day, our Lord shows us the slippery slope originated by thinking that the truth can be “updated”, and that the Church can or should be “adapted” to the times.
You start with John XXIII, you end exactly where we are now.
If this cretin is to have a function, it should be this: the mass realisation that such a scale of evil would never have happened, if V II had not opened the door for it in the first place.
Die soon, Pope Feminist.
The only good you do is an involuntary one, and it is to remind Catholics of the beauty of the faith you have betrayed.
The Vatican is rumoured to be mulling sweeping reforms of the Curial administration. It may be trivial, but it isn’t. In fact, it is, like everybody the Evil Clown thinks and does, the work of the devil.
The informing principles of the reform appear to be these:
1. The Dicasteries would be deprived of the ability to release regulations and interpretations in matters pertaining to Church teaching. They would become, in a way, mere administration organs without a real capacity to lead.
2. This frees the way for the real aim of the reform: not being entitled with this ability to direct, the Dicasteries would be able to be run, if the Evil Clown so decides (which he will), by laymen; actually, even by women.
The damage would be incalculable.
All decisions in matter of church teaching would be directly depending on the Pope. This is a huge centralisation of power, that makes not only of Francis, but of the one who controls the flux of information to him extremely powerful people with the ability to run everything on their own, obviously not without chaos as the system would, probably, soon collapse under the amount of decision making Francis wants to have in his hands. It is, in a word, Hitler and Bormann, version 2.0.
The way the faithful see the Church would also be radically altered. The Church would become an institution run by laymen, for everyone to see. Sister Feminist and Mrs Busybody would get, at least at the beginning before they are forgotten, an immense amount of publicity. The claim of a church run by the laity would be, in actual fact, an administrative reality. The call for further changes, like female priests, would be deafening.
Francis talks a great deal about decentralisation of power, but he is a power-crazed, incompetent megalomaniac with an unquenchable thirst for control. This reform would, if carried out, allow him to satisfy his power mania, whilst looking as the historic modernisator and reformer of the Church.
We can only hope that the Lord takes him out before he carries out such a plan.
Please pray for the end of this pontificate, today. It is bad enough to have a faithless Pope, but this one really wants to do as much damage as he can.
You ask me if I see any signs that the Vatican, under Pope Francis, is taking proper steps to address the serious issues of abuse. My answer is simple: Pope Francis himself is covering up abuse right now, as he did for McCarrick.
These are the terrible words of probably the most prestigious, credible voice today that has once worked in the Vatican: Archbishop Vigano’.
This alone gives you the state of the mass media today, considering that a comparatively small outlets like LifeSiteNews has no qualms in publishing material that has either scared the legal eagles at the WaPo or, more likely, has displeased their internal political censors.
The allegations are terrible. The first is a case of abuse of seminaries, squashed with the persecution of the whistle blower and the consecration to priest of the homosexual, long-term molester. The other one is the appointment to a very high position of a prelate from Honduras, clearly linked to the notorious Cardinal Maradiaga, notwithstanding an atrociously damning report sent to the Vatican, and of which it is completely unrealistic to think that Francis was not informed, or wanted to be informed but wasn’t.
The picture that emerges is this: the Vatican has long become a nest of homosexual, predatory vipers, whilst Francis not only looks, but encourages the process.
It is very clear that if Francis is not a closeted homosexual himself (which appears increasingly more probable, as a normal person would instinctively recoil from the contact with so many people of that sort), he is a man in a symbiotic relationship with them, keeping them afloat at all levels of the hierarchy after they propelled him to the very top in the past, and now help him to push his socialist and sacrament-destroying agenda at every step.
The extent of the evil going on in the Vatican becomes more and more terrifying as the years go by.
Clearly, our esteemed Cardinals have nothing to say against it, apart from, very likely, trying to get information to Archbishop Vigano’ in order to appease their conscience; then it seems very clear that scandals like the ones Vigano’ mentioned cannot but have reached a selected but not irrelevant number of powerful ears, before they reached him.
The smoke of Satan coming from the Vatican indicates that Satan is having a huge barbecue. Francis is there at the grill, dishing satanic steaks left and right to all those who want to eat them, and to many who wouldn’t want but, actually, do.
God bless Archbishop Vigano’: a man obviously so respected that he still manages to be a contact point for the cowardly “resistance” in the Vatican, and so uncomfortable for the powers that be that the Washington Post censors him, lest he makes Francis look too bad.
Freedom is God-given. This elementary truth, so ingrained in the psyche of right thinking Americans, has an obvious corollary, that is too often neglected in repressive Europe: the freedom to have weapons (particularly: guns) to defend both oneself and one’s loved ones, and that god-given freedom itself.
The Lefties understand this: some of them (the naive and unthinking majority) confusedly, and some of them (the manipulating, scheming minority) clearly.
Real freedom is the freedom that comes from God, and what comes from God can never be taken away. But if you don’t believe in God, you will not recognise a universal, God-given right to bear and carry arms, because you will not recognise the general principle of a God-given freedom in the first place.
Leftists want a controlled society, a society in which freedom is limited to what the Lefties themselves consider appropriate for their subjects. It is no surprise that this would become, as it unavoidably has to, limitation of the right to speak your mind. It is even more evident that what is at the very root of freedom, the ability to actually defend it, will be targeted first.
We see this everywhere. Left is godlessness and gun control, and gun control is godlessness and leftist thinking.
The whoring singer (and she is a bad singer at that) who offends the name of the Blessed Virgin for her stage antics has just finished to give a concert for the conclusion of that series of promotions of depravity that they called pride month, or something like that.
Unsurprisingly, gun control featured heavily in her promotion of perversion.
It really is one and the same: hate God, hate freedoms, hate guns.
Anti Gun is anti God. If Lefties don’t understand it, they feel it, instinctively. Their rebellion to a superior order and their desire to substitute it for a man-made control nightmare must perforce go through the suppression of the God-given freedoms that underpin not only society, but religious thinking itself. Man-made wannabe utopias never have place for God; either officially so (as in all Communist dictatorships) or as a fake one produced for the use of the oppressors, like the Goddess Reason or the Nazi mystique inspired by Pre-Christian beliefs.
Anti Gun is Anti God.
Think of this whenever you read of some deranged whore promoting her man-made, childish, freakish, total control utopia, where the Helotes are kept – for their own good, of course – at a short leash by the enlightened minority of progressive minds who take drugs, become alcoholic, indulge in all sorts of perversion and, in more than some cases, commit suicide.
Athanasius is a pious Bishop in the time of the Arian heresy. The controversy is raging, and our Athanasius is deeply afflicted by it.
He would like for this to stop. Alas, it seems that even the Pope is on the wrong side. Certainly, the vast majority of his peers are. Some say, ninety percent.
What is a pious bishop to do? Denounce the heresy and go against the Pope?
He would be excommunicated, don’t you know? He would be forced to go into exile. He might even be killed!
And the schism, the schism! The Church would be torn asunder! And for what? There is obviously no chance of prevailing. An open conflict would only consolidate the heresy, make it even more official!
The numbers are just not there, says the good, pious bishop to himself. It will never work. He would only be doing the work of the devil.
And then there is the matter of the disobedience. He would be disobeying the Pope! How can a Bishop disobey the Pope? This can’t be right, surely? Surely?
And so our good, pious Bishop Athanasius kept praying, and did nothing. Well, he uttered here and there some words about this or that issue; but in the essentials, he did nothing. The unity of Mother Church must be preserved, you see.
Let us put everything in the hands of the Lord.
He will sort it out.
Say it again?
Are you sure?
You are saying that Athanasius did, in fact, exactly the contrary of what I have stated?
Openly fighting heresy, not fearing excommunication, exile, threats to his life? Appointing his own Bishops? Not looking at all at how many were on his side, because Christ was on his side? Not caring one bit whether the fight between right and wrong would cause a schism, because it is infinitely preferable that the Church is right than that the Church is united in heresy?
Are you sure?
Oh well, I suppose the book I have just read, History of Arianism, Francispress, 2019, foreword by Cardinal Cupich, must have been somewhat inaccurate….
It is now July and, not hnprefctably, we had a couple of really warm days in good old Albion. As always, this will be occasion for another round of headline enviroterrorism.
An important talking point is, it seems to me, regularly missing in the debate concerning so-called global warming: the complete and utter godlesness of it.
An omnipotent Creator would have made the planet (and the around one billion galaxies that adorn it ) in order to be destroyed by… His Creatures going about living their lives? Without even polluting anything? He would create an environment for them, which requires that they… stop reproducing at the current rate, and actually calls for the killing of His Creatures in their mother’s womb? “Go forth, contracept and, if required, abort?” He would make a planet so unfit for purpose, that life on earth would be – ultimately – terminated through its inherent flaws rather than because of God’s decision?
An atheist might, if he is very dumb, swallow the lie whole. He will believe that the word is about to end like Asterix’ villagers believe the sky is about to fall on their head. They are merely ignorant children following the kind of superstition popular in their day and age. But a Christian? What does believing in all the “twelve years” rubbish say about his faith? If he is not smart enough to understand that all the enviroterrorism of “An Inconvenient Truth” is already 13 years old and New York and Miami are doing mighty fine, will he understand that God does not make a faulty planet?
The only conclusion I can draw is that any enviro-nutcase is simply not a Christian. He may be so shallow that he does not see his own faithlessness, but faithless is he nevertheless. The new worshippers at the altar of superstition disguised as “science” have nothing Christian in them, whatever they may believe.
Please use the God argument whenever you discuss the issue. It is a powerful one. It forces everyone thinking he is a Christian to stop and reflect.
If, after reflection, your opponent shows no change of heart, then you know that there was no Christianity in him anyway.
This “man made global warming”- hysteria is a leftist ruse to fundamentally reshape the West into an atheist, socialist utopia. It will never succeed, but it will do a lot of damage in the meantime.
Please make use of the unassailable God Argument whenever you can. You never know, the one or other might be – or get in time – less stupid than you thought.