Kobe, Part III

After my first post on Kobe Bryant, I have been informed that his name apparently means something that might be Christian, or might mean something else i some language. Well, let us spend two words on it, shall we?

Firstly, I have not invented that Mr Bryant was called after the beef. I have read it around from professional journalists.

Fake news? Maybe, but when one is called Kobe, I think the journalist in question can be forgiven for it. 

Secondly, and most importantly, the point I made is that the guy went around all his life without a recognisable Christian name. Whether his name meant tortoise, or Jakob, or “He who goes to Mass every cloudy Wednesday afternoon with a smile on his face” is fully besides the point. As the name is given to give testimony of one’s Christian name, it should be recognisable as such.  

If I call my son “Lamborghini”, and have to explain to the world that it means “he who prays a lot in the morning” in some obscure African dialect, I have obviously failed in giving testimony of my Christian faith. Rather, I have either chose the name “Lamborghini” because I like fast cars, and want to attach to it some obscure Christian meaning, or – at the very least, and without a doubt – I have indulged in this damn habit of our times of thinking that common names are not good enough, and I must give my son a snowflake name before raising him telling him all the time what a unique, wonderful snowflake he is. We all know this happens all the time, and we all know that the obscure Christian meaning, if any, is obviously not the reason why the name was given; then the first duty of a name is to make the person with that name recognisable (as a person and, in this case, a Christian).

The problem with the word Kobe is not whether it means beef, or cat, or John The Baptist. It is that it is not recognisable as a Christian name and therefore does not give witness of the Christian faith.

Therefore, the point stays; and the blog post, too.


Posted on January 29, 2020, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism. Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.

  1. A number of my liberal friends have granddaughters with names like Sloane and Whitney. Madison is another one. My guess is they choose masculine sounding names so the girls will come across as stronger and tougher than if they had more feminine names. It’s a way of downplaying they’re femininity.

  2. Agreed. Our duty to witness the faith extends to the naming of our children. It’s also a great help to that child as they would have a patron saint to love and rely on in this vale of tears:+) God bless~

  3. sixlittlerabbits

    Agree completely that children deserve Christian names. I find it particularly offensive when little girls today are given names ending in -son, and nicknames that are usually male, such as “Billie.” What could their parents be thinking?

%d bloggers like this: