The Court Has No Excuses

This will be, I think, the decisive week. The issue of the biggest vote heist ever seen in a Western Democracy has been going on for weeks now, and I still cannot get rid of the extremely unpleasant, sickening impression that this will not be solved in the most obvious and unavoidable of ways, but will depend on a huge political issue, namely: whether the Supreme Court has the guts to reestablish fairness at the cost of being perceived, by the corrupt media, as the ones who “gave victory to Trump”.

Why do I think that? Cynicism, perhaps, and I know that we *should* have five men and women of integrity in the Court. However, I also reflect on this: firstly, that four men and women (starting with the man we will call, for simplicity, Lolita Express Guy) most certainly do not have this integrity, which makes us only one vote away from the abyss. Secondly, that several lower courts (and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania) have already refused to take on themselves the responsibility of recognising the blindingly obvious. Thirdly, that a lot of RINOs at all level of the Republican Party did not hesitate to be accomplices of this attempted steal, either because of their ideological desire to get rid of Trump or, alternatively, because they want to go back to the old world of political favours and legal enrichment: only look at the personal wealth of the Bidens, Pelosis, Clintons of this world; and do not think for a moment that this is a Democrat specialty, or that it does not happen, on a lower scale, in the lower echelons of power.

What is happening in the united States is something simply inconceivable in Western Europe. Everywhere, we have centralised voting procedures, which create a uniform system that can be easily verified. The idea of the massive breaking of the chain of custody, much less the open intimidation and control suppression, that we have observed in so many places is simply inconceivable.

Happily, since yesterday we have a new element thrown into the mix: the Texas lawsuit for the (obvious, and unquestionable) violation of the Constitution via non-legislative modification of electoral laws bypasses, as far as Trump’s victory is concerned, any consideration of voter fraud. If upheld (and no sanely thinking person can see how it could not, in a fair world) it would not address the astonishing scandals we have witnessed, but it would at least take care that the final outcome for the Presidential election has not been altered by them. It is an extremely elegant, blindingly obvious, very simple approach to the issue of who gets the electors in enough states to settle the matter for Trump. In a normal world, it would be a no-brainer.

I am tempted to say that I do not know what happens now, but I actually do know, and it is this: if five of the Supreme Court Justices have a shred of integrity in them this goes to Trump, big time. If the Court does not have five men and women of integrity, this election will be stolen, with potentially incalculable effects on the future direction of this, at this point, Clown Democratic Republic.

Let us pray it does not come to that. Still, should the worst happen, know that millions of good citizen will not stop fighting for a decent Country.

Alas, if the Supreme Court does not make the only possible decision, it is not at all improbable that, at some point, the people’s desire for fair elections will result in a lot of blood.

Posted on December 9, 2020, in Traditional Catholicism. Bookmark the permalink. 11 Comments.

  1. The Supreme Court is worried that if the Democrats (sic) win the Senate, they will pack the court.

  2. Mercedes Pernice

    Mundabor, I don’t understand the first two (2) sentences of the paragraph beginning with the word, “Happily”. Would you be kind enough to elaborate or rephrase your thoughts on the legal aspect of the Texas case? Thank you.

    • The Texas lawsuit is not directly concerned with fraud. It is concerned with the fact that the four States have changes their electoral laws without following their own Constitutions. The lawsuit could have taken place in the absence of any suspicion of tampering with the votes on election day.
      The consequence of this is that, if the SCOTUS agrees with Texas and either gives the four States to Trump or sends it all to the House, this will decide the victory for Trump, but will not address the brutal voter fraud that has happened. This means that the Dems will do it again, and again, and again…

  3. SCOTUS appears to be intimidated by the mob veto. I hope I’m mistaken.

  4. If you were God, would you consider America to be still worthy of Your protection?

    Or is it time to give her lands up to pillage at the hands of the Philistines / Babylonians / Pagans / Muslims / Atheists ? It’s not like we weren’t adequately warned.

    Indeed, it’s a wonder that God has put up with us for as long as He has. I expect that He counts up all the hours we spend in prayer and Mass and such, and compares this to the count of hours we spend engaged in mortal sin, and finds us wanting.

    Consecrated souls can powerfully tip that balance from justice back to mercy… but how many such souls are left?

  5. I agree that it is scandalous that with all of the documented fraud not one person seems to be held accountable for it. It is the FRAUD that stole this election…it is the FRAUD that deserves the court cases and the jail time. THAT needs to happen for any true justice to exist here in the US. And if the Attorney Generals, FBI, and DOJ refuse to do their job in prosecuting then THEY need to go to jail too. God bless~

  6. In the United States we maintain the illusion that each state is a sovereign state, unto itself, in many matters… whenever that illusion is a convenient one. In terms of voting this has practically been determined that voting, in fact, is not all that important. Saving blind salamanders in caves is important enough for the federal government to get involved. Taking people’s homes so a developer can proceed with a project that might increase a town’s tax base- that is important enough for federal intervention.
    But voting?
    So each state has its own protocols for voting. Identification is required in some… not so much or not at all in others. In some states it is anonymous. In others, not so much. Each state gets to make its own rules. That is the American way. Intervene when money is at stake. Ignore when Rights are being violated.
    And it maintains the fiction of “state’s rights” when that fiction can be used for the power-elite’s benefit.

  7. Of course there has always been some fraud, but now the scale is massive. Societal breakdown proceeds apace, now accelerated by the tyranny of Covid.

    Think of the chaos demonstrated in so many facets of American life—the broken homes of divorce, abortion as birth control, early sexualization of children via the public schools, the media and pornography, the university systems which are largely socialist/Communist, the ascent of sexual perversion with a transgender newscaster or.weatherwoman? on every channel, and finally a Catholicism in profound, almost complete decay with no moral authority in any sphere.

    I’ve been praying mightily that God be merciful and that His justice prevail in this election. Are we too far gone??

  8. M: “Or is “looking moderate” and “not beholden to Trump” more important?”
    Now we know.

%d bloggers like this: