Meet The Canonisations Carpet Bombing

Unavoidably (as he was the last one still missing from the roll call) Albino Luciani, who was elected Pope with the name John Paul I, will be canonised next year.

It must have seemed strange to the geniuses populating the Vatican corridors (and to Francis, who was never a genius, not even in jokes) that there should have remained *one* Pope who, having been elected during the Wonderful Age Of The Spirit Of Surprises, would not be another SpiritSaint.

Hence, we have now what is possibly the greatest string of canonised popes since the first fifty or so; popes who, it might be wise to remember, died, almost all of them, as martyrs. Today, as a contrast, people say that the future Pope Saint Benedict XVI could have been forced to abdicate with the threat of harm or death, as if this wasn’t very possibly the greatest shame in the world. Boy, how the standards have fallen….

But let us leave future Pope Saint Benedict XVI, whom the Redskins know as “Runs Before Wolfs”, aside, and let us reflect on what this means for us as faithful.

First, and as I have stated now many times, the centuries-long theological debate whether canonisations are infallible is now unavoidably, definitively, and brutally obviously settled: they aren’t. The blatant abuse of the instrument for obvious political reasons makes this evident even to my cat; albeit I am ready to bet that, out there, some hardcore Pollyanna is still ready to marvel at the quantity of Saints that V II produces (she might have her motives, though… Perhaps she contracepts? Queer son? “Catholic divorce”? Questions, questions…).

Second, this is a big, fat, Argentinian show of desperation. Francis and his minions notice that V II as an institution is on its way to become more controversial among Catholics than the EU is among Italians. The way they react is trying to get the authority argument out of the drawer (or should I say: the closet) and carpet bomb the faithful with V II canonisations, in a way saying: “You see? This movement is sanctioned by Heaven and wanted by God! How can you ever doubt it?”

It will work only with the hardened Pollyannas, and I fear that many of these Pollyannas will keep many of the Francisboys company in hell. All the others can well see through the canonisation noise and properly judge it for what it is: a propaganda machine. They have, by now, abundantly discovered that the Argentinian Emperor has no clothes and is, in fact, fat, lewd, arrogant, stupid, and with not a shred of faith in him.

Pius XII is Venerable. Pius IX is Blessed. Paul VI should be a Saint? Meaning: God would want you to know that Paul VI went straight to heaven, but doesn’t feel this necessary for those, and for so many others, saintly Popes? With the recent Popes all, with the partial exception of said JP I, also extremely controversial for their degree of Catholicism? How is this logical?

Mind, I don’t think this is a move Francis makes because he wants to become Pope Saint Francis The Ass. I don’t think he even believes in God! He does it because he wants to abuse the Church to promote his Marxist social justice agenda, and in order to do that he has to abuse the canonisation instrument. Nothing new under the sun, anyway. Pope Saint JP II The Buddha Lover did the same, albeit Francis does everything in that astonishingly stupid way that is so typical of his.

What do we do with this? As always, we apply proper Catholicism to an UnCatholic age. The carpet bombing of SpiritSaints is a fraud like everything Francis tries to sell you. We use this guy to actually improve and deepen our knowledge of Catholicism. We wait patiently (and it might well be that not so much patience is required now) that the guy goes to his punishment.

Popes come and go.

Truth remains, invincible.

Posted on August 28, 2021, in Bad Shepherds, Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.

  1. I am praying for Saint Marcel Lefebvre! I believe in miracles!

  2. Many catholics wring their hands and search for a theological statement on the validity of canonizations, while the truth stares directly at them. I’ve seen too many photos of JPII’s Assisi nonsense, his blessing by the Great Thumb, and all manner of other unquestionably non-Catholic performances. I don’t need a theologian to tell me that St. Peter might not have met him immediately at his demise. As you point out, the first popes to be declared saints were mainly martyrs. The rest of us will have a bit of a wait, if we are that lucky.

  3. I want the conciliar Popes to have saved their souls, and if that aspect of canonization is infallible, I don’t have a problem believing it. But paragons of heroic virtue? Not everyone who makes it to heaven deserves to be venerated as a saint.

    I have known people who venerate John XXIII, and they have all been liberals. I know nobody who has a devotion to Paul VI, and in fact would bet serious money that Archbishop Lefebvre, whom he suspended, has a far bigger cultus than he does. The canonization of John Paul II is a classic example of why enough time for the dying down of emotion and partisanship ought to elapse before a cause for sainthood should even be opened. As for John Paul I, how many people even remember him, much less invoke him? I didn’t even know until now that he had a cause for canonization. A cursory bit of internet research turns up something that is described as a failed miracle toward his beatification. Looks like that won’t matter. (Modernists don’t even believe in miracles.)

    Currently working my way through Dr. Kwasniewski’s so-far-excellent book on the infallibility of canonizations in hopes of making sense of it all.

  4. I for one wish that the Church would get out of the canonization business altogether. When all this started, it was thought that a more “scientific” process would ensure that cults would not develop around unworthy candidates, as sometimes happened when simple popular acclaim decided the question. It would be difficult to maintain that the modern process has really improved on the traditional method. This is not something that the Church needs to do, so why not stop doing it?

    • In the last centuries, they gathered all the data and then let it all sleep for a couple of centuries, then they looked at it again without the passions of the day. It was a smart method.
      The Church should not stop canonisations, because they are one of the way by which faithful are reminded that God keeps putting on earth exceptionally good souls who can be an example to all of us. If the Church stopped canonisations, saints would be seen as “those ancient people” the likes of which don’t exist anymore.

  5. Checking out JP1’s Wiki entry. He has plenty in common with Francis. How can Francis not canonise him?

    1) Implement Vatican 2? Check.

    2) Dialogue with everyone? Check.

    3) Confused messages on sexual morality, e.g. divorce and artificial insemination? Check.

    4) Religion of Peace? Check. Muslims in Rome have right to build mosque.

    5) Religious freedom? Check. See 4.

    6) Women priests? Very waffly and long winded….sort of against, but you get the feeling that the door may be ajar…..

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_John_Paul_I

  1. Pingback: CATHOLIC HEADLINES 8.29.21 – The Stumbling Block