Monthly Archives: April 2022

Elon, Mars, Vatican II

I had to smile when I read this.

It’s not only the quite clever, half self-deprecatory, half defying joke; it is, I think, something more profound.

Elon Musk is not a Catholic in any recognisable sense of the word. I don’t know whether he is even baptised. I have no knowledge of any inclination towards Christianity in him. He marries multiple times and makes children with multiple women like he is a savage of some Amazonian tribe. He seemed obsessed with renewable energy. He insistently makes marijuana jokes….

… and even he recognises the damage V II did to the Church, to Beauty, and to Music (the offence to God he has, likely, not recognised).

What this says to me is that V II is such a disaster, that it can be seen almost (to quote another Muskian idee fixe) from Mars. V II is, among the many other disgraces it has brought, a cultural disaster, leading to the impoverishment of our beautiful, beautiful Western Civilisation, in such a way that even people who are nothing to do with the Church notice and lament it!

Musk has, very clearly, the money to do a lot of things.

I can’t imagine how many good things he would accomplished, if God gave him the grace of conversion. I assure you, seeing the way this guy works, that it would be something to behold.

The Slippery Slope

Less and less newborns are apparently baptised; not only in Europe ( where the phenomenon is massive and immediately apparent), but also is the for more Christianised United States.

It seems to me that it is a slippery slope.

Generation O has parents going to church, baptising their children, and caring for their Catholic instruction.

Generation 1 (their children) still baptise their own children and don’t mind giving them a Catholic instruction, but they might not go to Church because of a vast array of excuses, revolving around the fact that God does not really insist on it.

Generation 2 (their children) will likely not even baptise their children, because God lurvs everybody.

At this point, a generation of official heathen is being raised. When asked about their faith, they’ll say that they are Christians, “I suppose”. Christ will be, to them, that cool guy.

It can be that fast. Mere two generations for the almost total obliteration of Christianity.

The remedy is the recovery of the proper Catholic spirit. This starts, of course,, with priests explaining the difference, in the economy of salvation, between being baptised with the baptism of water and not being baptised with the baptism of water.

A difference which I have, by now, never heard in a church for many years.

Each generation mentioned above likely did not recognise the damage that following generation was being prepared for; possibly not even generation 0 after VII told them it’s ok when things are not ok. Nor do many priest understand (or admit) that failure to preach Catholicism in church leads to the children present not seeing any value in going to church (or in the Church; remember, lurv!) when they are adults. Chances are, they will go through concubinage. Chances also are, they will not see the use in baptising their children.

Many of these children will, then, grow as stone cold atheists, whilst Francis II blabbers about world peace and Francis III explains to us all the perverts we have to “accompany”.

It’s a slippery slope. It will only be stopped when Christ comes first again.

The Ticket-Free Freak Show

He was standing at the entrance of the grocery store, in front of one of those little tables offer free sample of some new product. He had a very robust, squarely built body. His broad shoulders, his thick arms, and his trunk like legs screamed a primeval message: this guy is built for battle.

He wore a red dress.

I mean by that a proper, certified authentic, woman’s dress. The dress was, also, well above the knee, ruthlessly revealing the rugby player physique of the guy. It was something either made to measure, or from a shop for obese old women, as the guy’s trunk was, actually, massive.

He was talking with the poor lady at the stand, desperately looking for approval, acceptance, or some form or normality. Sadly, if you are a mad guy trying to transform yourself into a cross between a freak of nature and a circus joke, the only acceptance for you should be, for your own good, in the madhouse.

Meanwhile, the poor woman was trying to talk to him in as normal as possible a way, full knowing that any indication of hilarity in her face would have spelled trouble. Poor woman.

This is now, officially, another job I could never have, or keep for long.

The guy exacted from the poor lady the tribute he was expecting, and then proceeded to walk inside the big grocery store. I could, by this time, see that he was carrying a heavy makeup. He looked the way a tranny prostitute would have looked in the Italian movie Gomorra, an extremely crude representation of the worst and most criminality ridden places – and people – in Italy.

The freak show proceeded to move on inside the store and pretend he was interested in the salads – in reality, I think, desperately trying to be noticed by the patrons of the establishment, and fancying someone was seeing him as a woman -, and I proceeded to move away from that store section, the sensation of disgust and satanic influence now clearly prevailing over the initial amusement at the ticket-free circus freak. It ended there, and I hope the guy does not cross my path again, ever.

If memory serves, what I was looking at was a walking, talking, 80% suicide probability. A tragic reality produced by the toxic combination of the madness of these people and the madness of those encouraging them.

Nowadays, people love to sacrifice at the altar of niceness and political correctness. But they don’t sacrifice lambs. They sacrifice deranged perverts, even more culpable than they are, then their madness is the fruit of a willed self-deception, espoused and fed upon until Satan gets his prize. Satan is, if he is allowed, the only winner in this game. Funnily enough, even he is said to be utterly disgusted by these people.

Go away, buddy, and try never to cross my path again, then your show is one that attracts attention (like a car crash, or a bearded woman) only for a very limited time.

I wish you salvation. But my pint is on the other outcome.


This might be changing soon…

The entire liberal world is in turmoil because of the now impending purchase of Twitter by Elon Musk.

If there was need of a confirmation, this is it: Elon Musk is on our side in one of the most important issues of our time: freedom of expression and the way social media are trying to influence minds and, in fact, world events on a planetary scale.

The issue is not only one of freedom of speech. It is, very obviously, one of religious freedom. When more and more Christian voices are censored as “homophobic”, and kept out of the biggest “distributors” of news links on the planet, it is obvious that Christianity is being slowly marginalised, which will make it easier to switch to outright persecution.

Now, Musk is certainly not perfect, nor is he a paradigm of Christian life. But it is evident enough by now that he cares for freedom of expression deeply. This development is very, very good.

Plus, Truth Social is (slowly) trying to leave the starting blocks, with the legal and technical process now being (slowly) worked through. When Truth Social works as it is intended to work (social media, streaming, TV productions and, one day, internet hosting), it will constitute another massive help for Christianity and, in general, for wholesome thinking all over the West.

Yesterday it was a good day for us, more so than many think. It may well be remembered as the day Elon Musk, acting at “Tesla speed” (yes, it’s a word) and anticipating even Trump, gave the first massive blow to the liberal, globalist, anti-Christian, Great Reset mentality trying to poison the planet.

Congratulations, Mr Musk. May the newly acquired power be utilised for good, and may the Lord prevent you from the temptation of abusing it.

Of Faith, Pride, And Arrogance

“It is better to have an imperfect but humble faith that always returns to Jesus, than a strong but presumptuous faith that makes us proud and arrogant.”

Pope Francis

“It is better to have a strong faith that makes us work on our salvation with fear and trembling, than an atheist Pope who is an enemy of faith and does not believe in Salvation.”


Ah, the Evil Clown. He never ceases to amaze.

This time, he tries with a hint of false dichotomy. No, he is not saying that the only two alternatives are the imperfect but humble faith and the strong but arrogant one. Still, most of the badly instructed listener will understand him in exact that way: that faithful tend to be one of these two types, and if you have a strong faith you are likely to become proud and arrogant.

This is, in fact, Francis’ aim, a theme he has been playing in front of every audience for years: strong faith = bad.

Francis wants you to have a weak faith, because he has none. He wants you to wallow in your weakness, so that he can more easily manipulate you. He wants you to think that people with strong faith are arrogant and proud, because he fears them like the devil fears the holy water.

Francis has not even a weak faith. He has no faith at all. But he thought he could “improve” on the Our Father.

There is no better example of pride and arrogance.

Not All Germans Have Gone Full Adolf 2.0

Mariupol, Azovstal factory. A good depiction of where the Ukraine is today.

Interesting news from Germany.

The article from RT is here. If RT is censored where you live (it is where **I** live, because “democraceee”. A VPN service does the trick…) then the original German article is here.

The RT rendition of the German text is faithful to the original.

The crux: a number of people in Germany (among whom a couple of prominent personalities, plus the usual political sciences people) have asked the German Chancellor Olaf Scholz to refuse to bow to the warmonger and Adolf 2.0 crowd, accept reality, and stop prolonging the suffering of the Ukrainian people.

The secondary arguments (that are: the more the war goes on, the more it risks to expand, the more war crimes are committed by both sides, and the more the Ukraine suffers) are underpinned by a brutal, and very rare to read in the official press, call to look at reality for what it is, not for what the fantasies of the Twitter generals and Facebook heroes would like it to be.

The reality check:

Trotz zwischenzeitlicher Erfolgsmeldungen der ukrainischen Armee: Sie ist der russischen weit unterlegen und hat kaum eine Chance, diesen Krieg zu gewinnen.

Notwithstanding the news of successes the Ukrainian Army has been broadcasting up to now, the Ukrainian Army is vastly inferior to the Russian one and has no real possibility of winning this war.


Mind, the signatories are not Pro-Russian. Quite the contrary, as the usual, obligatory “condemnation” of Russia is at the very opening of the letter. They are merely being realistic, as follows:

  1. Continuing the war only makes the Ukraine suffer for longer.
  2. If Germany keeps sending weapons, Germany helps the Ukraine in their senseless descent down the rabbit hole.
  3. When the weapon deliveries stop, the Ukraine will have to start talking about peace in earnest.
  4. NATO will be able to play a better role, and possibly do more for the Ukraine, if they stop antagonising Russia before every channel of communication is broken.

Of course, the letter does not mention with one word that the Ukrainian regime is the only belligerent Country in this war with a noticeable Nazi influence in its army and Government. Also, no mention of the 14,000 dead caused by 8 years of Ukrainian bombardment of civilians. But hey, these are Germans “intellectuals” writing to a newspaper from Berlin. If they get one thing right, it’s already a success.

Also, they don’t want to accuse their own citizen of managing to be again on the fighting side of their former Chancellor, 1933-1945 (ask yourself whom Adolf would support in this war; exactly….).

This is, sadly, something the Germans are doing with the same stubbornness, and the same chance of victory, of the first time. Not, I hasten to add, out of Nazi feelings; but out of the same herd mentality that gave them the Nazi feelings in the first place.

This voice of reason will remain isolated.

But it’s good to know not everybody has gone full Adolf 2.0.

Of Faith, Couf, And Francis.

I have always been of the opinion that people who believe in God are less obsessed about life risks than people who don’t.

If one thinks that there is nothing after this life, life will be absolutely everything he has. This will often lead to an unhealthy obsession with one’s own life, and with everything even vaguely threatening to end it.

This is, I think, one of the reasons why so many common people are obsessed with the vaccination. The idea of saying to oneself “live healthily, trust in God’s Providence, and don’t take part in mass scale medical experiments” is just not there. The sheep see life differently, because they see death differently.

This is, also, one of the reasons – another is, obviously, corruption at the hands of big pharma; a third is, also obviously, their desire to regiment and control you – why leftist politicians are such great fans of the entire exercise, including Nazi-style compulsion of the most absurd rules. This couf stuff has showed that, with great accuracy, one can predict one’s stance about the vaxx just by knowing the religious outlook.

It was, therefore, no surprise to me to read that the Vatican has decided to be even more fussy than the Italian government, making explicitly clear that their repressive measure will stay in place until the end of April. A place run by an obvious Atheist, the Vatican is just the kind of place which would insist on obsessive, repressive measures meant to control their sheep and shape them to… total sheepishness. Plus, the virtue signalling, always so present in those who, having made of themselves their own god, wish to sacrifice at the altar of themselves.

In the end, you see, everything is meant for them to have power on you and look good in the process. They don’t really believe their rubbish themselves.

Yesterday Orban, an old man, met with Francis, an even older man.

Neither was wearing a mask.

Clickwhoring explained

A short survey of the English media this morning will give you an utterly shocking picture of the degree of not only bias, but utter, shameless propaganda that, by now, pervades the free press of a still democratic country.

Let me assure you that this is not due to government coercion. The UK is no Ukraine, and it still has opposition parties and media free to publish what they want. One needs, therefore, to look for the reasons for this utter degradation elsewhere.

I think that the explanation can be given with only one word:


Once upon a time, the information sources were limited and their income largely assured. An army of subscribers and an even bigger army of affectionate readers ensured that the media outlets could ensure a degree of professionalism without jeopardising their operations. Again, the readers’ options were numbered, and if you abandoned the Daily Telegraph, or the Daily Mirror, there was really no suitable alternative to that particular “brand”.

It is all radically different now. Not only does every reader know a number of alternative sources; he knows that he can find half a dozen more with just a little research.

Then there is the cancer of our time, social media. A vast percentage of news articles are now read by clicking the links posted on Facebook and Twitter. This means that unless you are vastly represented, and the links to your articles are constantly posted, there, you are going exactly nowhere.

This is how clickwhoring is born. When something is in everybody’s mind (say: Ukraine) going against the prevalent narrative will be click suicide for every big outlet. Every reader of, say, publication XYZ will immediately ditch them in disgust and accurately avoid every link to their videos and articles if he gets angered by simple things like, say, the truth.

We see this with the Special Military Operation in the Ukraine very clearly. The mention of simple facts of life, like:

Russia will win this war, because they will do whatever it takes to win it.

Ukraine has suffered heavy losses .

Ukraine has been bombing the Donbas on and off for 8 years, killing 14,000 civilians.

Ukraine is heavily influenced by NeoNazi groups both in the government and in the army.

Russia has achieved air superiority on day one .

The Ukrainian Donbas army is encircled, cut off from fuel and ammo deliveries, and being shot at

Mariopol has been taken by the Russians ten days ago

The poor devils (or poor bastards) in the Azovstal factory have 0 chance of winning. …

will cause the emotionally very involved, often woke Twitter and Facebook readers to immediately cancel and boycott the entire outlet. This, in turn, will cause the number of links posted on Twitter and Facebook to go down drastically. The clicks will collapse and, with them, the revenues.

No traditional media outlet, with his army of journalists, administrators, support staff, HR, perhaps even equality scroungers, and expensive rents to pay can afford that. Their business model will force them to beg for clicks every morning, actually every moment.

The quality information now resides elsewhere, in the army of competent observers, sitting in their own living room with a camera and a laptop, knowing full well that quality will always be enough to make them thrive, because the atomisation of the media market makes the attainment of the micro niche they want all but assured, given constant quality and sufficient patience.

This perfectly explains the phenomenon of, say, military “experts” on CNN – carefully chosen among those looking for government contracts and cable channels money – assuring us how badly Russia is doing, and military observers without interest in licking big media’s boots (like Ridley, or Macgregor) actually telling us how things really are, from their own living room, with the cat walking around.

This is where we are. I think it will only end when enough people understand that social media are not helping them to know facts, but to create for them the bubble they desire.

Clickwhoring is the symptom.

Twitter and Facebook are the real disease.

Why Bishops Betray

So, let us say that I am a Bishop, and that I am on record with saying that I hope that, “one day”, women will be able to be ordained.

Even if I were, say, a Jesuit, there is no damn way I do not know that this will never, ever, happen. In fact, as a Bishop, I would know it even in a Biden-advanced state of mental fog.

Why would I, then, say such a thing, giving scandal worldwide?

Below are my takes. No, ignorance in good faith is not one of them.

One: I am an appeaser and a coward. I know that the audience wants to hear something feminist from me, and I am only too happy to oblige. I know I am lying and giving scandal. But hey, the most important thing is being nice and not upset anyone with inconvenient truths.

Two: I do not believe that God is immutable. I think that God, actually, changes his mind. This means that I have forgotten what my religion, of which I am a very important representative, says about God’s nature. Logic, by the way, says exactly the same as my religion, but hey…

Three: I have lost the faith. I do not believe that there is a God anymore, perhaps I actually never did. I am now desperately searching for purpose for my existence and for the obvious scrounging I am perpetrating against my employer. I decide to find it in social work and fluffy statements. If I cannot believe in God, at least I will please some humans.

Fourth: I have skeletons in the closet. A girlfriend, a boyfriend, a liking for boys. This is, likely, why I was made a Bishop in the first place. I must now do the bidding of my masters, who can destroy me at a moment’s notice.

Fifth: I am a Freemason, or a Satanist. I am a fifth column, a plant inside the Church. I will be slick and gentle, and say all the right things, and undermine the Church and insult Christ as I smile, very kindly, to my audience.

Which one is, you would not likely know. But let me assure you, it would be one of these; then, Jesuit or not, I do know the very basics.

But what am I saying. Don’t ask me why I do this.

Ask Bishop Chow of Hong Kong instead.

Just don’t expect a truthful answer.

“Don’t Hire Gay”, Or: The Problem Starts Before The Grooming

Meet your new teacher, little Johnny….

As a person grown up in a sane world, it is, for me, utterly breathtaking to see how the world has gone mad.

The Floridian legislative puts in place a measure meant to combat child grooming in schools.

Let us stop here, and let us reflect where the issue comes from. Is it because, suddenly, children have started inhaling substances that expose them to grooming? Or because of “climate change”? Or, perhaps, because the Chicago Cubs, winning the World Series in 2016, have suddenly put the entire planet out of whack?

Thought not.

What has happened, is that a growing number of perverts of the homosexual, lesbian, and even trannie persuasion have been allowed access to children.

Now, you might say that not every homo is a pedophile, and I will agree with you on this. However, this is not my issue. My issue is that every pervert is a toxic influence on children.

In a world where homosexuality is not openly stigmatised anymore, how is it surprising that perverts will want to normalise their perversion in the classroom, too? Is this not, in itself, a perversion of a child’s mind?

In addition, some of the perverts will also be paedophiles, as we know from countless statistical evidence that most paedophiles are homosexuals.

Therefore, allowing educators of young minds to be homosexuals is to allow them to pervert the mind of children in all possible ways.

Why am I saying this? Because it seems to me that the debate is missing the elephant in the room. The problem begins before the grooming, it begins with allowing perversion in the classroom.

Put it in a more brutal way: you cannot say that being homosexual is fine, and then proceed to object to children being exposed to it.

If being homosexual is normal, why would children not be exposed to it?

If it’s not normal, why is it allowed in educators?

The real issue here is not the grooming. It’s the underlying issue that facilitates it and aims at the perversion of your children in every way. In other words, the grooming is merely a symptom of a wider problem.

People with unnatural tendencies do NOT belong in a classroom. People persuaded they belong to the opposite sex belong in the MADHOUSE.

Unless we understand this, we will keep running in circle and fighting rearguard battles.

Resurrexit, Sicut Dixit!

Happy Francis-Free Easter!

Maundy Thursday has arrived again and, thankfully, good old Earth still keeps spinning. We are now about to embark in the re-evocation of the most solemn, crushing, glorious events ever lived in the whole history of humanity.

Not for the first time, I am going to spend these days in a completely Francis-free manner. I will avoid every article talking of him. I will ignore everything he says. I will just bury him before he is buried (please, Lord, make it happen soon!).

I do not care if the man dances the tango with a trannie, or washes the feet of a Satanist, or states that if you pray in Latin you are an enemy of Christ, or does something else that is outlandish and utterly foolish, as is his custom.

There is Catholicism, and then there is Francis. Why God allowed such a situation to happen (a pope who is a caricature of what he should be) is, to me, very easily explained: if the earthly Church becomes a caricature of what it should be it is not only fitting, but salutary that the Pope should become a caricature himself. This is the way God punishes the men who misled the earthly Church for their deeds, exposes their shame, and warns the real faithful about the disfiguration that is going on.

I never understood why this should be a problem, or should be so difficult to understand. We are seeing the same now with the trannie athletes. God makes evil people eat their own excrement, and this is right so.

Nor is this the first time. The French Revolution famously ate a lot of its children, prominent and not, until sanity came back. Communism allowed and allows many sons to be punished for the cowardice or indifference of their fathers. The “progressive” father is often punished with drug addicted sons.

We are living in such a time. Francis is the world- and celebrity-addicted son of a church high on Modernism. Still, other than the latter, Frankie cannot be jailed or forced to rehab. We have to wait that he dies, or hope in the astonishing miracle of many Cardinals growing a pair at the same time. The second is not going to happen. The first, oh yeah.

I will ignore the guy all over the Easter days. I will ignore him whatever he says to attract your attention, like the attention-seeking little, old, lewd scoundrel that he is.

I will ignore him, and pray that he dies.

Mariopol: Reason Seems To Prevail

Don’t get me wrong: I am impressed by the resilience and hardiness of the Ukrainian troops. I obviously think they should be treated fairly. I am persuaded that they have fought bravely, and that their fight should be respected.

Still, there is an issue to consider here: there is a clear element of Neonazis in the Ukrainian army. The Azov Battalions are obviously the ones with the worst problem, but Neonazis are present all over the Ukrainian army.

As we all know, Nazis are no snowflakes. When they fight, they fight very hard, and many of them fight to the end. Look at Germany during WW II! If there is a thing Nazi soldiers do well, it is to die fighting. Therefore, I was afraid that the scenario that might be happening is the Nazi elements among the soldiers threatening to kill those who are intentioned or make moves to surrender. This clearly isn’t an easy thing to do when everybody is armed, but you can’t exclude such measures, particularly when a part of the “regular” troops are terrified nineteen years old boys, and the Nazis are hardened soldiers with the benefit of intensive, year long Western training.

Thankfully for everybody, but particularly the Ukrainian soldiers, it seems that this will not be happening. The surrender of more than 1000 soldiers in Mariopol, announced by the Russian army and obviously taken seriously by the Western press, who report it en masse (hint: it means they are factually certain it’s true), indicates to me that reason will prevail in the end, and we will have no senseless massacre in Berlin, 1945 style.

If the news is confirmed (and I really, like you, can’t see why the Russians would invent something like this when even my cat knows they control all Mariopol that counts, and have the residual Ukrainian forces bottled up in two factories and a small section of the port; which, clearly, means the Russians can bomb everybody at their heart’s content without fear of civilian victims), we will soon have videos of the defeated Ukrainian soldiers.

A video saying more than one thousand words, or two thousands Ukrainian lies, and the view of one thousand surrendered soldiers would be very, very different from the usual mediatic lies of this war (the destroyed Ukrainian tanks with, or even without, a “Z” painted over them; the destroyed tanks taken from videogames, and so on). It would be a brutal wake-up call; not for the Twitter people (who will keep believing the Goebbelsian propaganda to the end, and will invent some conspiracy theory afterwards), but for the other soldiers and the Ukrainian civilians, who will, at some point, understand that reality has caught up with them and it is finally time to deal with it.

If the news is confirmed, today is a good day. A senseless massacre does not help anyone and is only an immense waste of lives. When there is no realistic prospect of victory, an army should stop fighting.

Mark Dice Persuades Californians To Ban The Bible

Democracy and freedom of expression (actually, every freedom) are in bad shape.

It is, in fact, intense.

It’s a shocking mixture of conformism, ignorance, and wokeism.

Some people actually get it. Even in California. But not nearly as many as they should.


Lizzo, Or: Meet The Hippo Slut (Warning: Strong Pic!).

Lizzo is, here, caught in a rare pensive moment (and no, this one is *not* the strong pic…)

The link that I am about to post contains a picture that is disturbing in its vulgarity, ugliness, and sheer stupidity. However, as Breitbart posted the picture in order to make an example of this hippo woman, I think I should do the same.

You have the bonus that you have been warned. I wasn’t. This will stay with me for a while.

The link is here.

I don’t know (like, I suspect, most of you) who this Lizzo is. Apparently, she is some “singer” of sort, with more than 10 millions people somewhat interested in seeing what she posts (bad idea!). She is, also, a picture perfect image of all that is wrong with our times. Putting a pic on social media of herself boarding a private jet (she is, unsurprisingly, a climate change “activist”), with her fat, hippo-like, prodigiously ugly, cellulite-plagued backside in full sight, shows all that is wrong with our age. Let us see this in proper order.

  1. She is slutty. God does not give to everyone the grace of beauty, but He gives to every woman sufficient graces not to be a slut. This stuff is degrading. It makes her to that sex-object (for extremely tasteless Black men; then I can really not imagine that anybody else would be interested in that horror) that, actually, feminists go around decrying all the time.
  2. She is vulgar. A slut can be, at least, discreet about it. She can have some remnant of self-esteem. Not this ungulate here. That she thought this kind of stuff could be deemed in any way, shape, or form, appropriate, is a mystery that remains inaccessible to my normal mind. Eleven millions people literally subscribe to this stuff.
  3. She is ugly. Man: she is so, so, so ugly. She is so ugly, Stevie Wonder would be horrified. She is so ugly, ugliness is ashamed of her. It’s like the hippos on Walt Disney’s Fantasia, without any of the grace. It’s like seeing an Attenborough documentary of big animals free to roam in an urban environment.
  4. She gives scandal. It is impossible not to notice that, when we arrive at this level of depravity, every concept of decency has flown out of the window. This is, clearly, a celebration of fornication between people of extremely poor taste. It is, clearly, meant to arouse some deranged male hippo of the tanned variety, then it is impossible to consider any other male (at least of the human species; I could not talk to any real hippo at the moment of publishing this) reacting to the picture with anything else but revulsion. Still, make no mistake: this is (meant to be) every bit sexual as it is ugly.
  5. She plays the woke game. This must be (then it cannot be anything else) an offshoot of that deranged mentality which considers beauty racist, or sexist, or something ending with “ist”, and demands that hippos be considered sexy because of some sort of “equality” that does not leave out anybody. Why I say this? Because we have seen it around (the ugly fatties at Victoria’s Secrets, the male tranny on the cover of Vanity Fair called “beautiful”, the Zeppelins on Sports Illustrated) and we know (from them; we would never come to the idea) that one has a sort of social obligation to consider the ugly, and the perverted, beautiful. I think the same game is being played here, then the above mentioned deranged male hippos of the tanned persuasion must be a very tiny minority of the eleven millions of followers of this walking circus tool.
  6. She is stupid. This is the same level of stupidity that makes the Ciccone singer called “madonna” exhibit her ugliness and age-caused decay for all the world to see, in a desperate look for attention that she (and the hippo here) try to disguise as transgression, but has an extremely short half-life. This kind of stunt makes one recognisable as a vulgar slut forever and, whatever the feminist narrative says, women despise sluts more than men. The cat is out of the bag, and it will not be possible to put it in again. Breitbart know it, and they (pardon the pun) milk it for all it’s worth.

There. I think this is all. We really live in strange and disturbing times. 

I think I will put “Fantasia” on my DVD tonight. 

I need to see some nice hippos. 

A Question

Can somebody explain to me how a Catholic site so bent against anonymity on the Internet was (and still is) led by a guy who did not tell anyone he was homosexual until he was outed?

If a site is committed and, let me say it once again, bent on transparency, should it not be the very first which extends transparency to things way, way, WAY more important than knowing one’s name; like, for example, knowing whether a particular leading guy is, or ever was, a pervert?

And by the by, is this not the same site who keeps showing a very evident lack of transparency as to who their sponsors are? Mind, I have stopped following these matters (and the site) years ago when they went full toxic against almost everyone who breathes; but I still remember the controversy, and it does not seem to me that said site covered itself in transparency, or glory, in that.

It seems to me that there are two weights and two measures here.

I always try to not contribute to controversies among conservative Catholic sites, because it pains me to see atheists and leftists enjoy the show. However, every now and then a good pointer seems in order.

Stay away from toxic sites. They do nothing for Catholicism.

Let’s Talk About Anonymity

Anonymity of Catholic Bloggers

The Antidote

You can do worse than spending your time (admittedly, you will need a lot of it) listening to the daily shows of The Duran. They give you a very realistic, accurate, intelligent analysis of the events in the Ukraine. They talk a lot, and they take time to make the point. They are, however, more to the point than most others on this format.

This particular show (which is one week old today) is particularly illuminating, because it gives to the average, brainwashed Westerner a very accurate – and rather sobering – account of the situation of the Ukraine.

You will need 2 hours of your life to have a full picture. However, it is a good investment considering how much time one has to spend to find a good overall picture of the situation.

The “bong” segment (starting at around 47:30 minutes) is, in fact, quite funny, too. By the by, predictably, Scott Ritter had his Twitter account suspended, because hey…

In short: the Ukrainian army is toast. Toast does not mean that they will be pulverised in the next twelve and a half minutes. It means that they have no chance of recovering from their human and territorial losses, because the Russians now have the situation under control to an extent that their victory is, if certainly away in time (this is not a videogame), all but assured.

A big learning point is, though, the interpretation of the Russian “withdrawal” from the outskirts of Kiev, something so brilliant I must say I was utterly fascinated.

I also fully agree with the analysis of what has likely happened in Bucha.

However, the biggest takeaway from me is a simple one, that is, a useless massacre is going on day after day because of the convergence of the following factors: 1) the inability of a Nazi-riddled Ukrainian army and government to manage the inescapable defeat; 2) the inability of the Western powers to admit that the sanctions have failed, the war will go on, and Russia will win it; 3) the constant propaganda barrage in the West, making it difficult for the very same Western governments to tell their own twitter heroes that it is time to be reasonable now, because people are dying and an entire country will be cut into very little pieces.

Please direct your friends looking for info to this site, and to the site of Patrick Lancaster for news straight from the front.

We are in dire needs of antidotes to the dominant propaganda narrative.

Some Issued Are Never Named

We are informed that more than half of US citizen cannot name all four of their grandparents. As so often, I think there is more to this than meets the eyes.

Certainly, in part this is due to the fact that as the age at which parents give birth to children has become older than, say, 50 years ago, there will be more people who were born after the death of one of their grandparents. Similarly, the mass phenomenon of people dying before 60 because of their love for the donut has certainly contributed to the figures. Still, in past generations people died in war, or in car or work accidents etc, in much greater numbers than today, so I think there is more to it.

I think the greater factor here is single motherhood.

How many people were born in, say, 2001, 2011 and 2021, from a single mother? I bet my pint these are growing percentage numbers. I also think this has, particularly among those of the ethnicity whose lives apparently count more than mine, already reached the second generation. Most boys and girls born either of a single mother, or with one of the parents (or both!) born of a single mother, are unlikely to know the name of all their grandparents and, if they do, some of the male ones are likely to be invented, or uncertain, or merely supposed.

In a nation with more and more bastards (who are, themselves, innocent of blame, but their parents aren’t), there will be less and less family ties and, of course, family lore.

The article I have read (I can’t be bothered posting the link, frankly, but google at your heart’s content if you are happy that way) does, emphatically, not mention the issue. In fact, it seems to me that some issues can never be named, lest a newspaper is called conservative and, as a result, all sorts of insults like homophobic, transphobic, fat phobic, and an awful lot of words ending with “phobic”.

But seriously: the deterioration of the family leads to such a disconnect, that the majority can’t name all four grandparents.

This is what happens when rules of “tolerance” and “feeling good“ (you can’t say “bastard”, Mundabor! It’s a blasphemy against the god of niceness!) are ditched.

Being a bastard is not bad anymore, because there is no stigma attached to anyone. Hence, more single mothers and more bastards. Hence, more people who don’t know I don’t say the name of their grandparents, but the one of their parents.

When a people starts walking away from God, it always ends in a ditch.

Europe In 2022

We are at this point: a 16 years old girl gang raped for an hour by four members of the religion of peace, only the last one in a long series of such episodes.

In broad daylight. In the city centre. In the once civilised Mitteleuropa.

No. This is not fake news.

I can’t wait, now, for the rape victim to go on TV and say that this must not become an occasion for people to open their eyes. They should all remain blind, so that the next girl may undergo the same ordeal as soon as possible. Whether the rape victim will say so – if she says so; which, believe me, is highly probable – out of sincere brainwashing or fear of stating the truth, we will never know.

In the meantime, we get to behold the horrible but fascinating spectacle of an entire Continent slowly self-destructing as its inhabitants prefer to play Twitter and keyboard warriors against “enemies” at a very safe distance.

Archbishop Forte Needs To Apostatise Officially

Say no to clowns…

Archbishop Bruno Forte was, yesterday, making himself beautiful in front of the Chief Rabbi of Rome and other assorted inter religious dialogue people. Therefore, he thought that it would be wise to just ignore Catholic teaching and state that Jews don’t need to convert.

I even have the link.

You really cannot believe this guy. With what face does an Archbishop dare to try to remake Christ in his own image and resemblance, “adapting” it to the “sensitivity” of those who are listening to him!

As always with people who have lost their faith a long, long time ago, the Archbishop throws in the usual worldly excuse meant to make him unassailable, and says that calls to the conversion of Jews should be ceased in order to “purify” of “every form of anti-semitism” the relations between Christians and Jews.

I am asking the Archbishop: was Christ anti-Semitic as he obviously supported 2000 years of calls of Jews to conversion? Were St Peter, St Paul and all others anti-Semitic for doing Christ’s will?

It is not only a total scandal that the Archbishop should do this. What grates me most is the arrogance of talking for the Church when the Christian faith has long been lost, and what has remained is a strange mixture of peace activist, social worker, kindergarten teacher and, clearly, clown.

The Archbishop needs to apostatise officially (he has already abandoned the faith in deeds anyway) and choose for his own way to hell whatever false religion he thinks most suited.

This guy is a buffoon in purple.

He has no place in the Church.

Did Putin Just Win Two Elections?

He taught them all

It seems to me that the Western MSM have now become the PC version of the old Pravda. The distortion, obfuscation, and outright open propaganda are just staggering. Unfortunately, the sheep keep happily grazing all the lies, and bleating with enthusiasm the easy slogans proposed to them.

Luckily, not everybody is a sheep. In Hungary and Serbia, a lot of people apparently aren’t.

In both Countries, the anti-globalist candidates were branded “Putin allies”. In both Countries, the anti-globalist candidates won convincingly. Why, then, do the Western MSM not state that Putin is an election winner? I will tell you why: because if they did, they would have to recognise that their incessant propaganda does not work always, and there are still sufficient people out there with their eyes wide open to the reality of modern information warfare.

This, they prefer not to do. If an anti NWO order candidate, who recognises that Putin is on his side, convincingly wins a democratic election (certainly the case in Hungary, I don’t know exactly how things work in Serbia), they will belittle, insult, or deflect, but they will never admit that a substantial number of voters think that they, the MSM, are part of the problem.

And Vladimir Putin is part of the solution.

Untapped Potential

As I write this, Twitter is rising 20% in pre-market after it was announced that Elon Musk acquired more than 9% of the shares in what is called a “silent” participation.

Musk has been a critic of the platform for a while. In fact, he has been rumoured to be among the investors for Trump’s new social media platform, Truth Social, that is currently in its beta phase.

What does this tell us?

It tells us that market participants recognise that woke-ism destroys immense value. The possibility of Twitter being forced (make no mistake: Elon Musk is no “silent” type: in time, he will put growing pressure on the company to stop censoring) to behave like a decent company was enough to let the share price explode.

Imagine what Twitter could have become, if the woke folks had not hampered its ability to thrive. As it is, Twitter was trading, before today’ announcement, below the IPO price more than eight years ago. Clearly, Elon Musk (a man who, by all his talk about saving the planet etc., has a huge ability to multiply his and his shareholder’s fortunes: Paypal, Tesla, and SpaceX are abundant evidence of that) sees an untapped potential in the end of the woke ideology.

Herein lies a lesson for Walt Disney, Netflix & Co.

Stop with your woke politics, or you will run the risk of being swallowed by people who recognise the potential of the companies you run, after you have been kicked out.

The Lift, The Sciatica, And Who Knows What Else

Bergoglio’s abdomen does appear disproportionately large compared to his head and the rest of his body that can be seen. This could be from ascites, which is accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity in which the organs reside. This happens from blockages of the liver (hepatic) circulation from cancer, cirrhosis, congestive heart failure, kidney failure. This fluid can be removed in a fairly simple procedure for comfort and to relieve pressure on the lungs, but will re-accumulate. He looks weak. In some frames his color appears sallow, but others he’s pink. The limpy gait could just be arthritic knees/hips. He does not look strong or healthy.

Reader Grassroots Gonzo

Read above the comment of Grassroots Gonzo, who appears to be a member of the medical profession, concerning Francis’ look in Malta. We obviously don’t know, but we can see already that the guy is not as healthy as he used to be.

We also now know that, on his way back from Malta, he took the lift to board the plane. It is also confirmed that this was the first time. Again, he does not look in his prime.

The article linked above also makes clear why Francis is limping: sciatica. I think we had read about this before, but it is the first time that I notice such a pronounced limping.

Age leads, most times, to health problems. In his case, I’d say that the obvious increase in weight since his accession to the papacy has certainly not helped him.

I do not wish him any suffering. I sincerely wish him, as I do to everybody, eternal happiness in heaven. But a conversion is, at this point, not really in the cards, and belongs to the realm of the supernatural.

What I wish to the Church, and to all of us, is that we are freed from the evil influence of this evil man.

Sweet Florida

Sweet Florida is the new Sweet Home Alabama

Francis Limps, And Yours Truly Reassures His Readers

These days, I am trying to avoid all news of the Evil Clown. However, I am always awaiting for signs of this always rumoured, but never seen disease. It is now, if memory serves, nine months since the emergency operation which was alleged to have found an incurable cancer and the man was, up to now, just unchanged and, in case, a bit fatter than before.

Francis has now landed in Malta, and the video seems, to me, to have some news. It is clear that the guy limps. It’s not a small limp, either, of the John Wayne sort. It’s impossible not to notice it. I also notice that the cut of the video chosen by the FrancisRegime does not contain and footage of the guy going down the stairs of the aeroplane. It seems to me it would have made the issue even more evident.

I have never seen Francis limp before. I have seen him doing an awful lot of horrible stuff, like separating the hands of the praying boy, but he was never limping whilst doing it.

I am not a doctor, so I can’t say anything here. I also notice the guy is past 85, so a small muscular issue would likely cause him to limp. He is also clearly corpulent, which means that at his age his knees are likely begging for some of the mercy he never has for Catholics. In fact, he looks quite different, now, from the man who was made pope on that fateful day of nine years ago.

Still, I wonder whether this issue could, in some way, be linked to the rumoured cancer?

In case you think that I might be wishing that the guy dies, be reassured that I do. I wish him a painless death, today, now. I wish him salvation, too. But please, Lord, in your Goodness, have the guy saved, but gone, today.

If anybody with a medical background can take a gander at the very short video and comment on whether this might be related to the elusive cancer of which nobody can ever see any evidence, I would be very grateful.

Ah, I forgot.

Francis will be heretical in Malta, and even more heretical on the plane back to Rome.

I will do my best to ignore him, but no guarantees.

You Are Not Alone

The “You are Not Alone” Reblog

Mundabor's Blog

It pains me to read around of the devastation that Francis is causing, and of the feeling some have that all is useless because Amoris Laetitia will inevitably metastasise (I agree with that, though) and we have already entered an age of unprecedented confusion and de facto schism from inside the Church.

Whenever such thoughts assault me, I reflect on the following:

  1. The Church is not a photography of those alive in 2017. It is a community of believers spanning 2000 years. Francis and his ilk are not even on the radar screen. You are not only right, but you are with the vast majority.
  2. If you think these times apocalyptic, you need to read history more. We live in a time of unprecedented peace and wealth, which inter alia means that you can comfortably access two thousand years of Catholic wisdom and digest them from the comfort of your…

View original post 350 more words

It Makes Sense

Look, the video posted here might be a fake. I don’t know Russian, and I would not be able to recognise the place.

But you know what? It makes sense.

It makes total sense that a bunch of desperate fanatics – people who know they have nothing to lose, because the Donbas militia would not be kind to them – would do absolutely all it takes to try to drag the West into the war, or hope that international outrage forces their enemies to retreat.

These are Nazis of the worst sort. These people do not care for the lives of civilians. Hitler did the same. He refused mass evacuation of the populations in Prussia and Silesia, it being his opinions that if they were weak enough to be incapable to stop the Russian advance, they would deserve everything that happens to them. Plus, the massacres would give Goebbels & Co. more ammo for their “fight to the death” message.

It is also absolutely credible that they would shoot from the roofs of houses and schools. This is what the Iraqis did. Then, when the Russians shoot on the schools, they are the war criminals.

Mind, I am sure there will be bastards on both sides. This is kind of civil war (the Ukrainians are, actually, Russians in their matrix, like the Belarusian; and troops from Donbas are fighting on several fronts, which isn’t going to make things prettier after all the Ukrainians have done in Eastern Ukraine in the last years), and this kind of thing is always messy and dirty, more than a normal was already is.

Think with your head.

Think of the Palestinians using ambulances to transport terrorists. Think of the Iraqis shooting at Italian troops from the roof of a hospital, or hiding in mosques.

Think why on earth a bunch of Nazis in Ukraine, who are fanatics on their own and much more assured of a terrible retribution at the hands of their enemies than Palestinians and Iraqis always were, would not do the same.

Oh Ye Of Little Faith!!

Mundabor, Self-Portrait, 2022

Every year I think that, this time, nobody will fall for my April’s fool post to the point of writing a comment. Still, there always seem to be the one or the other who does not pay much attention to the calendar ;).

But really, I thought you thought better of me… 😉 I thought, in fact, that, upon reading yesterday’s blog post, you would have thought “either this blog has been hacked, or there’s something going on here, because Mundabor is not wired this way. Wait, today is….”. Most have, I must say, got it right, and the comments were very funny. Disappointingly, not all.

Well, let me confirm in writing, explicitly, for those of you who have such little faith in me: yes, it was an April’s fool. It was, in fact, an April’s fool so laden with irony and, at times, sarcasm, (freezing the bank accounts of my readers and have their houses repossessed? So that they become “as tolerant as I am”? Really??) that I really thought a serious follower of this blog would immediately get it.

So, now that the 2nd April has come upon us, let me reassure those of you of little faith with some crumbles of useful information.

First: I love being in the minority. I always was, and always will be. Since I was a little child, I always refused to go with the flow. I always despised – even as a child – those who do things they don’t want to do in order to be accepted, or to be with the “cool kids”. But already as a child, I learned that people instinctively know who is a leader and who is a follower. Be of independent mind and say it out loud, and you will see that the so-called “cool kids” seek your approval. This has been, again, my experience since a child, and something that strengthened in me the will not to go with the flow.

I am not even cool. I am uber-cool, and always was. Live with it. That someone should think that I would just throw in the towel and accept to be just another sheep going around bleating “Slava Ukraina” or “gays” or “marriage equaliteee”, I find a tad grating.

Second: I will never sell to the world. Not now, not ever. I cannot promise you that, should real, hard persecution come, God will give me the grace to not bow my head. But one thing I can promise you: I certainly have sufficient grace to not sell out for social advantages or conveniences; again, a reader of this blog should know this darn well by now.

Third: I like my blog. If I were to stop writing, it would be for reasons of health, or changing life circumstances, or some other reason that is nothing of which Christ would disapprove.

I am a warrior ant. Warrior ants don’t care a straw whether the world likes them or not.

Fourth: Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. (Mt 5:11). I don’t expect my Catholicism to be easy. It never was (even in my family) and it never will be (outside of it). I have lost “friends”, and boast of it. Truly, I am incapable of giving a dried fig for people who have lost my esteem. But I, and all of us, know that there is a price to pay, and we need not only to be happy to pay the price, but to try to enjoy it as we do.

We were never told it would be easy. We were, actually, told it would be difficult. We will never be chanting “Kumbaya” in the moonlight together with a bunch of idiots.

I prefer it this way.

Not An Easy Post


It is not easy for me to write this.

However, it has to be.

Everything else would be dishonest. And I do not want to be dishonest.

In the last weeks, particularly after the start of the war in the Ukraine, I started feeling a discomfort that grew with every day. I realised this:

I am always in the minority.

And this makes me angry.

And this makes me ugly.

And this makes me… unkind.

How can 95% of the Brits be wrong, and only myself and a couple of grumpy old men and women right? Could it not be that Ukraine is a freedom-loving democracy, abortion a necessary evil, and a homosexual person born that way?

Why – I asked myself -, why do I always have to be so angry, so isolated, and so unkind?

I look around me, and everybody is so kind. They are so accepting. They are so inclusive, and they are so included. A war breaks out, and they are all there, cheering each other wherever they can, happy to be part of a great group!

Me? I am always in the opposition. Always the angry guy. Always the inflexible guy. Always so unkind.

This, my dear readers, ends today.

I want to be liked; I want to feel part of a group. I want to feel good as I cry “slava Ukraina!” I want my goodness to be seen as I decry all sorts of social, racial, economic, and sexual oppression! I want to look in the mirror and think that I am changing the world!

Therefore, my soon-to-be former friends, I will close this blog, because it is full of people who are just unkind; who don’t understand the gays; who are not inclusive and accepting, and who are intolerant and should, therefore, have their bank account frozen, their mortgage defaulted, and their house repossessed. This will teach them, I am sure, to be as tolerant as I am.

There, I have said it.

This blog ends today.

Mundabor (he/him).

%d bloggers like this: