It fills this old heart with joy to see how Francis’ PervChurch is now retreating on all fronts after the pathetic, completely asinine attempt to counter Vigano’ with silence from above and slander from below has gloriously – though very predictably – backfired.
Every day we have more signs of a crumbling wall. It is as if Francis and his old cronies were trying to hold the huge, crumbling wall with their own backs. Hey, Frankie: holding walls is (cough) “not Christian”, eh?
We are now informed that Cardinal Wuerl is going to fly to Rome to discuss his future with His Evil Clowness. Wait: was he not there last week, or thereabout? Has he not presented his resignation three years ago anyway? Oh, I understand… what has changed is that the first time Francis was still thinking that it was possible to hold the “nothing to see here” line, but now he has realised that Wuerl must be jumped from the window; therefore, he tries to do it in as dignified and PR effective a way as possible.
It will be another epic fail. At this point there is nothing Francis can do to take the stink of shit out of him. His pathetic attempts – which will come, be assured of that – to say that he was not informed will be met with rage and laughter, particularly on the back of his defence of Bishop Barros and his stonewalling after Vigano’s accusations.
Decent Catholics now root for the Attorneys General all over the US. The time for mafia commissions investigating the mafia has gone. Let all be uncovered, let those who need to go to jail go to jail, let priests, Bishops and, if appropriate, Cardinals see a jail cell from inside. It will be a much more effective remedy against the satanic homopaedomafia than one thousand “internal” committees with “lay participation”.
And please, please: let this, in time, become a RICO matter; then it seems clear enough that what was at play here was a net of powerful people promoting each other to protect each other.
The solution for PervChurch is not “introspection”.
It is carpet bombing.
You will need some prayer before seeing this. It is the astonishing tale of satanic cruelty, perpetrated for decades, to deaf children in both Italy and Argentina, by the same priests shuffled from one Continent to another and allowed to keep abusing children wherever they are sent.
Besides the astonishing evil showed by Don Piccoli, even in his now apparently rather deranged state, what stuns here is the concrete possibility that these abuses are continuing to this very day, and the even more probable possibility that they have been occurring within the 20 years of the statute of limitation, with the Italian justice inactive and the Vatican (this means: Pope Francis) actively covering this up.
Concerning Francis, the cover up appears to be confirmed by a letter from Archbishop Becciu, who states he has discussed the matter with him, with measures being examined.
In pure Francis-style, nothing happened.
Francis can, in this matter, not saying that Becciu did not inform him properly. He spoke with emissaries of the victims himself, with pictures and witnesses proving it.
One perfectly reads the mind of the Evil Clown: past investigations covered by the statute of limitation and no new investigations currently ongoing, ergo: who cares a straw if children have been atrociously abused up to a few years ago and possibly are still abused.
Who is he to judge?
Pray for the poor children. Reflect that it is only the advancement of cures for deafness that allowed them to denounce the abuses of which they were victims.
Pray, in your charity, also for the criminal priests involved and the Evil Clown who clearly protected them. We will also go to our judgment one day, and we do not want the devil to get one more soul than God has decreed he should get.
And now if you excuse me, I feel sick.
As Yours Truly had predicted, the attempt of the Evil Clown to hush the scandal is failing miserably. In fact, it is clearly backfiring, as the cover up line called from the very top has helped to amplify the scandal and to keep the discussion firmly on the lines drawn by Archbishop Vigano’: the homo corruption had the protection of the highest rank in the Church, and the Pope should go just like his homopaedoabetting Cardinals.
Still, Francis will, I think, not resign. Let us see why.
Firstly, the man has no shame. More than five years of Pontificate have shown us that the level of brazenness he possesses is basically unknown among public figures in the Northern Emisphere, and likely equalled only by South American politicians and amateur military rulers. The way he tried to present himself as the poor lamb of a persecuted Church he exhibited in the last weeks is fully in tune with the character.
Secondly, the man clearly loves power above all things. He will always prefer to be in charge and hatred than to be forgotten and at least halfway respected for a late, but decent decision. He clearly does not believe in God, and will therefore not have that kind of motivation, either.
Lastly, I think the fear of jail (and be that in a ptivate home dye to hus advanced age) also plays a role. Who is a former Pope? A simple bishop? Would he enjoy diplomatic immunity? If yes, who says that his successor is not to deprive him of it, and just deliver him to the Italian or the US Justice as the criminal enabler of a vast paedophile ring? A ring he might have not literally led, but enabled for years in order to profit from the net of alliances it provided him before becoming Pope, and to which he was inextricably linked after March 2013? Stranger things happened at sea, and I have seen in my lifetime Nicolae Ceaucescu going from a strong leadership to the execution wall in a matter of hours. The extradition of a disgraced ex-pope, possibly even defrocked and reduced to a common criminal, is a more than realistic outcome in this scenario.
No, Francis will not abdicate. He will die in disgrace and swear horribly against us all as he does so. But this is the more reason to incinerate his Pontificate and make of it such a planetary embarrassment that, when the time comes, the Cardinals will give us someone who, bad as he will most certainly be, will nevertheless represent a great progress compared to this Nuclear Catastrophe; with the added bonus of some of the homo mafia in the meantime made harmless, or defrocked, or in jail.
This Pontificate will burn.
The Bride of Christ will go on as long as the sun rises.
I might have lost something, but last time I looked the Attorney Generals of the States of New York, New Jersey and New Mexico had announced a sweeping investigation concerning all the activities of all the Catholic dioceses in their own State concerning the dealing with abuse cases. I do not doubt that more States will follow.
I wonder if Francis is so stupid that he does not understand that at this point there is nothing he can do to stop the road roller. However, Francis’ problem is now not only one of understanding, but one of complicity.
As the various investigations involve and (not unlikely) destroy people like Wuerl, “Bad Tobin” and Farrell – all of them prime candidates for the road roller; all of them Cardinals; the last two given the red hat by Francis! – more and more people will be tempted to ease their burden with both the US justice and the public opinion by revealing the involvement of the Vatican in the cover ups, and the indirect encouragement of illegal behaviour put in place by looking the other way and pretending it never happened, as it was obviously the case with Francis and McCarrick.
Furthermore, if (and I am eagerly awaiting the day) things go so far that RICO charges are brought against several Prelates, it is very reasonable to assume that the one or other will start to sing like a canary bird just to avoid dying in jail, revealing everything about a net of protection of homopaedopriests straddling the Atlantic Ocean and going all the way to Rome. Even a man as stupid and as far away from reality like Francis would, at that point, understand that he is finished as a religious figure whether he abdicates or not. I wonder whether the likes of Paglia and Coccopalmerio enjoy diplomatic immunity? And what happens to Francis is he abdicates and comes back to be a normal bishop? Will he be arrested and estradited to the United States as a member of an organised criminal organisation?
Be it as it may, I see a huge road roller now starting to move; and whilst it will take years before it has completed its work, the fallout will start impacting the Vatican very soon. The investigations will provide wonderful career opportunities for several AGs, opening to them a possible path to US Senate seat, gubernatorial appointments, perhaps one day even more! There is no way the States involved will let this fall to help the liberal narrative or in exchange of some short-term favour. This are the investigation of a lifetime.
Francis, who was so stupid that he went on record saying “I will not say a single word on this” after Vigano’s accusations and surrounded himself with obvious homos like Ricca and (make no mistake) Paglia and Coccopalmerio, will find it very difficult to persuade anyone that he is anything better than a miserable, godless scoundrel. He dug his trench himself, now it will be very difficult to get out of it; the liberal press may try to let the scandal go away, but with several AGs working on this the probabilities are very little that the road roller does not roll directly over Francis’ belly.
The road roller will very likely flatten this Pontificate to a thin sheet of excrement.
I wonder when Francis gets it.
I’d love to see his face when he does.
Angry Dems have made of Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing a circus. Main attractions, a Muslim “feminist” activist and an actress looking for more notoriety and contracts.
Still, all this inordinate screaming tells me something else: defeat is very probable for the Democrats. So much so, that they feel the need to transform Senators into street activist and Alinskyite agitators in order to try to mitigate the backlash coming on them by a great number of nutcases more and more removed from the basic reality of things.
I would be very surprised if Kavanaugh were not to be confirmed for lack of votes. I also have no doubt that if Kavanaugh were forced to renounce because of some old tape or tweet, Trump would give us a more conservative one than him and raise hell in the weeks to the elections. Actually, if I were (quod Deus avertat!) a Democrat, I would wish this issue not to be part of them at all.
Screaming losers. But losers still.
This article on First Things starts pretty well, but then degenerates into an almost endless bloviation about the weakness and dirt of the Church. The author, obviously a case of bad conversion, needs to reflect on a couple of things, and I would like to help him in that.
Firstly, the Church is not the “soaring baldacchini of Bernini”, and J.S. Bach was actually a Protestant. Whilst the Church is aesthetically wonderful, she is not and cannot be reduced to that.
She is the Bride of Christ.
When the principles are properly understood, the rest follows. The Church is beautiful in Her Indefectibility and in Her being the absolute Embodiment of Truth. She is also a bearer and creator of beauty, harmony and wonder throughout history, but this is not the substance of what She is.
The Church is, also, run by humans, and she says nowhere (nor has any Bernini’s baldacchino ever denied) that her leaders will not be bad, or very bad, or outright evil, in whatever measure God’s Providence may allow.
God allows bastards to run the Church, as He did several times in the past. The Church still survives (as she always did in the past) and will, one day, shine again in Her Majesty, revealing all Her beauty and shining in all Her glory to the Elects. A better demonstration of Her Divine origin and scope cannot be found.
This, my friends, is the Church.
She is not even Sparta. She is infinitely stronger than that.
Not Wuerl, nor McCarrick, nor the Evil Clown, nor all the other bastards can ever be what defines Her. Actually, we look at the devastation brought on the Church by those and countless other evil men, and we still all know that the Church will survive them as She has survived everything else; and we are lost in wonder, amazed at Her strength and magnificence, still shining below the thick strata of homopaedo mud.
The glorious churches you see everywhere in Rome are not there to state that the Church will never have McCarricks and Bergoglios among Her clergy. They are there to scream that She will survive all of them, that She will sweep them aside and shine on, as glorious and magnificent as ever; as the Bride of Christ no bastard will ever be able to destroy, though the Lord may allow them to sully and scratch her.
If you don’t understand this of the Church, you have understood nothing. If you understand this, no McCarrick will ever make you doubt Her.
Shine on, Holy Mother Church! We know you are as beautiful as ever, as strong and as glorious as your thousand churches, as solemn as your Masses, and that you will always remain so.
Wuerl and Co. make me think of vagrants shitting on a huge, beautiful monument.
Yes, what they do is disgusting, dirty and stinky.
But their shit does not really change anything permanent in the beauty and greatness of the monument, and in a Divinely Instituted one at that.
This here is truly shocking even for FrancisChurch.
Let this sink in: two homosexual priests from the diocese of Cardinal Cupich feel so protected and safe with a homo-abiding Cardinal as their Ordinary that they forget all sense of I do not say decency (they clearly had none before) but even prudence.
Therefore, and certainly in a sort of uberperverted behaviour going beyond even the sodomitical habit, they park their car in a busy street in Palm Beach, near a children’s playground, and start to perform oral sex in a car without tinted glass.
It is not only the disgrace of sodomitical priests at play here. There is so much more. There is a clear sense of expected impunity; there is an obvious desire not only for sodomitical sex but for a public one, and – these two here being what they are – the additional kick they likely got from being near children also came into play.
It does not end there, either. The police was called and they were so engaged in their “public performance” that they did not even notice the officers, who had to tap on the window to make the two aware of their presence.
Who knows what goes on in the head of these people. Obviously dressed in civilian clothes (you see, we do not care for formalities much these days…) they possibly thought that the police would have just ordered them to go away; or perhaps their homo addiction is so strong that they just did not care about the consequences. However, I cannot avoid thinking that people who do such things on a public street do so because they are accustomed to an extremely high degree of impunity for homosexual behaviour in their own diocese. Even homo priests don’t get up in the morning and decide to do such things. Methinks, it takes a long time of impunity and of boundaries pushed further and further, with the ordinary turning a blind eye to all sort of things.
These are men with consecrated hands, who can serve Mass and stay near children. The mind boggles.
Cardinal Cupich has taken (no doubt, only because forced by the publicity) some disciplinary measure, albeit the defrocking of the two does not seem to be in the cards for now.
Still, the Cardinal can’t be allowed to get away with so little. It is obvious that his attitude towards homosexuality is directly linked to the behaviour of his priests; priests who feel that their sodomitical behaviour is covered up and, if not positively encouraged, certainly not condemned by their own Bishop.
Two priest caught in a blowjob in a busy street, in broad daylight, near a children’s playground.
We must live in the Age of Francis.
In the last day or so two stories have emerged which them proved to be “fake news”: the one with the financial irregularities in Bergoglio ‘s old diocese and the one with the homosexuality and paedophilia of his Private Secretary.
As both of them turned to be false, yours truly cannot avoid suspecting that the fake news have been, actually, planted by Vatican operatives in order to murk the waters, with the homopaedo apparatus then screaming to the skies that you see, it’s all calumnies!
If this is so, sorry to burst these idiots ‘ bubble but it does not work that way.
Firstly, I will continue to publish everything that Gloria TV deems fit to publish; and if the occasional goose slip through, tough luck….
Secondly, the news has been published because it is highly credible. A Vatican in which it is credible that the Private Secretary of the Pope may be homosexual is discredited enough whether the actual news turns out to be true or not; bearing in mind, of course, that if not the fact should be published with the due relevance, as I have done in my blog. I even cancelled the blog post, though I doubt that I have an obligation to do so.
Thirdly, these people are stupid if they think that thousands of Catholic blogs will now say: “oh, we have published a couple of stories that turned out to be fake. Better concede defeat and forget the whole affair then”…
The world has changed. This is never going away, no matter what diversionary tactics may be thought out by these PR prelates in their gay saunas.
We stay on the ball.
The Homopaedogate should really become a feeding frenzy, at least if we had some journalistic integrity remained here and there.
It should be, at this point, like fishing in a barrel: how many bishops and Cardinals, how many Vatican Monsignors have been disseminating evidence of their behaviour in the last years, certain or impunity? How many “saunas” around the Vatican (apparently there are several of those: market economy at work…) have “secrets” that can be very easily unlocked? How many Vigano’ situations have happened in the past? In the modern world, written communication is everywhere in paper or electronic form, and no intelligence agency can manage (provided at the Vatican they even cared) to destroy all of it, including all email communications.
Then there is all the stuff that must have emerged outside of Catholic channels: say, investigations about other matters that chanced to involve a homo priest, of journalistic research let die because not explosive enough.
Then there is all the stuff that can be easily unearthed by talking to decent people who knew about situations and rumours and can put one in the right direction.
Seriously, this kind of investigative journalism does not require any investigative talent.
This should be a turkey shooting by now; and perhaps the shooting has already started, and we are merely waiting for the couple of days or weeks necessary to deliver a neat package.
I am pretty sure more will emerge. If you think of this, a Vatican that dares to employ a Father James Martin in the light of day must have so much rubbish going on in the dark that it is hard to even imagine it.
Come on, decent investigative journalists still remaining: this does not seem to be rocket science at all.
Dramatic news from the United States, where Cardinal Wuerl is allegedly planning to leave the country fearing arrest in a RICO investigation.
Every decent Catholic must hope that, this time, there will be no shielding of Cardinals by shipping them to the Vatican, as The Not-So-Great did. One needs to have enough confidence in the fundamental integrity of the US justice system to allow this to happen. If anyone thinks that the Vatican has a better justice system (with the Pope at its head) than the US, he is living in FantasyPaedoLand.
We must also hope that handcuffs are locked in on clerical wrists for the following reasons:
- We need to show the non-Catholic world that Catholics are at the vanguard of this movement to purify the Church.
- We need the pressure given by decades in jail (RICO is, basically, serious organised criminality. There is no way Wuerl could die a free man if found a ringleader) to force people who know to sing like canary birds. I do not think anything short of hasndcuffs would have the same devastating effect.
- We need to know how much Rome knew, and how many episodes are such that Francis that does not even have halfway plausible deniability. I mean, just look at who runs the very roof under which he lives!
- We need to have an example set for many other Countries, like Italy, where massive investigations might soon be underway; the more so as the US investigation might assume (as it will will very probably do) the character of an international investigation against a multinational ring of complicity and abetting of crime.
Don’t ask me to have any compassion for Wuerl and his own. Don’t ask me to abuse the obvious truism that everyone is innocent until found guilty to hope that there should be no serious investigations to find whether someone (or rather, who) is guilty. Do not even begin with the usual rubbish, that this “damages the Church”.
This does not damage the Church. This actually cleans it. What this scandal will damage is the vast net of homopaedo prelates and priests, and those who aid and abet them.
Pray for Archbishop Vigano’; the man who, more than any other, has given propulsion to this issue and, calling the Pope by name, has given a fully new dynamic to the matter.
Actually, make of the man your battle cry.
I have listened very attentively to the video posted on Father Z’s blog.
I have no doubt about what the people are chanting:
I needed to listen to it many times and I am persuaded that:
The first letter is a “v”
The accent is clearly on the last syllable.
“Italo” (a beautiful Baptism name, beloved of Right-wing Italians btw) would never have the accent at the end (the accent is on the first vowel, unlike Italia which has it on the second). Besides, the v seems audible enough to me.
Then let’s go thinking about this rationally: there is simply no reason why the faithful would start to chant the first name of the bishop of Lucca, beautiful as Lucca is, days after Vigano’ s name is being repeated around the world. Even that would be a huge slight to the Pontiff, but it just does not make sense.
The only thing that makes sense is that the Roman people, never known for timidity or Papolatry, have had enough.
“Vigano’ ” is way more effective than words like “abdicazione” or “dimissioni”. It is a spontaneous battle cry everyone immediately relates to. It is impossible to miscontrue its meaning. And it’s so damn Catholic no one chanting it can be confused with the atheist crowd.
We have our battle cry.
I hope it will resound by every public gathering where a Bishop or a Cardinal speaks to the sheep. Let it resound by every public function and blabla talk, cameras or no cameras.
The sheep are fed up with being fleeced by perverts, predators and their willing accomplices.
You can read on Church Militant that two “terrified Cardinals” have anonymously confirmed to them that Vigano’ s allegations are entirely true.
I read the article and I was terrified. Really, our Cowardinals are such pussies that, even in the middle of a raging scandal and with many bishops asking for hard measures, they don’t have the guts to openly denounce Francis even if they perfectly well know that the accusations against him are true.
This explains a lot: from the drug fuelled homosexual orgies to the decades long cover up of paedophile protection, besides the countless heresies Francis was allowed to spit out of his lewd mouth in all these years.
This also explains why Francis, in another typical action of his, had the gut to appear in front of journalists and say, in so many words, “now you behave like good boys and make this disappear”. A Pope afraid of consequences from his own Cardinals would never say such things. Cardinals who have been able to shut up in front of his heresies will clearly not find the guts to speak and accuse him of aiding paedos.
This is the state we are in.
I have no doubt that those two Cowardinals who have contacted Church Militant even think that they are being courageous, of sort, and that they will avoid hell because they said anonymously to a press outlet how atrocious the situation is, instead of actually acting to put an end to it. May God forgive them their astonishing betrayal. This is like the policeman witnessing a rape in front of his eyes and doing nothing, and then sending an anonymous letter to a newspaper saying that rapes occur in his precinct.
It is, literally, the job of the Cardinals to act in this situation. They have, literally, no other job.
Cardinal is now officially synonymous of “useless coward, scrounger of church money, and good for nothing”.
I admit that I have forgotten my crystal ball home today; however, what is happening reminds me a lot of the Summer of 1989 in, say, the German Democratic Republic.
Old, discredited member of the Communist hierarchy went on condemning the hysterics of the unwashed peasants, and seeing conspiracies everywhere. Meanwhile, it was clear that the problem was out, and it was not possible to make it disappear.
The Evil Clown and his Evil Minions are behaving in the same way now. Stupid, inordinate attacks against Archbishop Vigano’ have only consolidated his prestige and reputation, and those bishops and Cardinals now rallying around Pope Francis The Heretic are clearly desperately trying to save themselves, as they know that their career – in some cases, their very habit – is now in danger.
This will not go away, and it is somewhere between stupid and retarded (which is: in the region of Francis’ IQ) to think that the end of summer will bring this away with some new event or controversy.
Even if the entire leftist press were to let this fall – and I doubt it very much, as for many of them anticlericalism is not a strategic choice, but a reflex – the conservative press and the almost entire Catholic blogdom would keep pounding on this like there is no tomorrow. Breitbart alone is enough to keep this going forever and believe me, they are not going to give Francis any respite for as long as he is Pope.
Yes, this reminds me of the Summer of 1989 as the dynamic in play is the same; but it is impossible to predict the outcome, and I for myself think it improbable that Francis will be persuaded to abdicate.
What we must work towards is the incineration, the thermonuclear destruction of this disgraceful Pontificate; doing, in this way, all we can to encourage the Cardinals to give us one in the mould of Vigano’ (or as much as one can be found) as our next Pontiff when the time comes. How ironic, by the way, that the Evil Clown was said to have been chosen to fight against corruption in the Vatican!
God works in mysterious ways. Things are happening now that would not have been realistically imagined six months ago.
We are already on the winning side. But the fight must be fought nevertheless.
Let us nuke this Pontificate and have it remembered in infamy in one thousand years.
If Francis does not resign, show him what fun it is for him to stay.
Not for the first time, I read around of oh poor Benedict being the victim in the situation he himself contributed to create. Let me open some people’s big, blue eyes to reality.
Benedict, always the man for half measures, orders McCarrick to retire to a life of prayer and penance, but he is not man enough to have the fact widely known. It is difficult both to retire to a life of penance in secret, and to enforce such an outlandish order. It is also not surprising that such “orders” are then regularly disobeyed, as there cannot be much discipline when the one in charge has no guts to enforce it. But seriously: one who orders a punishment he does not want the world to know is clearly not ordering, but meowing. Particularly so, when it is well known how weak the man is at enforcing everything, from Summorum Pontificum to loyalty in his own domestics.
Benedict is, albeit without the evil intent of a Francis, every bit a part of the problem. The very thought that a Cardinal with a decades-long history of predatory homosexual behaviour should not be made an example in front of the entire world, setting the tone for how things are done, gives you the measure of the lack of effectiveness – nay: sheer lack of balls – of the man.
Also, if we want to talk about those who “knew and did nothing”, let us reflect on this: when Benedict received the famous 300 pages report on homosexuality – a report whose importance we begin only now to fully grasp – he was pretty much the most informed man of the entire Church about the homosexual scourge ravaging it.
What he did then was, actually, worse than nothing: he fled his post knowing – because he had read the report and was way more informed than everyone of us – that his successor would likely be either one of the homo mafia or one of their puppets. Then he lavished praise on the man they elected.
Please stop defending the man just because he looks so defenceless and is not an evil guy by character: the events now unfolding under our eyes make very clear that Benedict knew the entire scale of the homosexual evil going on around him, and the only things he could oppose to it was “secret punishments” or outright flight.
Benedict in indefensible, and the only good aspect of his situation is that, having validly resigned, he cannot be reinstalled on the papal throne, thus allowing him to make more damage out of sheer weakness and very German gregarious spirit.
Benedict, too, should use the time remaining to him to retire to a life of prayer and penance, and no damn Francis-praising interviews; reflecting on the huge evil his cowardice has inflicted on all of us and on the Church of Christ.
As I am, like everyone, digesting the scope of the events, I would like to offer some reflections about some issues related to Archbishop Vigano’s historic j’accuse: 1. why now, 2. what now and 3. why this, and not the rest, has become an existential threat for Francis’ Pontificate.
Archbishop Vigano’ was the Apostolic Nuncio to the United States from 2011 to 2016. He had more information than most. He might have been approached by the police, or he might have been advised to release an affidavit in anticipation of such an approach. It is easy to think that he was abundantly disgusted by Francis’ behaviour, but did not find the strength (remember: Archbishop = coward) to either go public with this or, more likely, leak the story outside; something, by the way, which would not have had anywhere near the devastating effect it will have now.
My first take (and we will likely know more in the near future) is that the man got so enraged when he read the latest, hypocritical Francis’ statement that he decided that enough is enough and he would blow the whistle. However, the very fact that this is a declaration under oath leads me to think that this is, again, a move meant either to react or to anticipate questions that have been, or would be posed to him as a person informed about the facts.
I am pleased to see that the man has some basic decency, albeit I notice that the current scandal allows him to attack with the minimum of danger to his own position. Still, as my estimation of the current average archbishop goes, this one seems to score above average.
I think one of the two has happened: either the Archbishop (who, methinks, lives in Rome and is in any way certainly not isolated and in contact with many of his colleagues) has informed others of his intentions and knows of others who will follow up on his accusations (not unlikely, if you reflect about the amount of credible allegations of cover up for his friends and allies that a man so stupid and so arrogant like Francis must have left around in five and a half year of Pontificate); or he has decided to go with this alone and allow event to unfold as they may, again knowing that his speaking out loud, without warning and without the time to even threaten or demote him, is way less dangerous now than it would have been years ago. It boggles the mind that the Vatican leaks like a sieve, and explosive information like this one does not find its way to, say, Breitbart or even (if you really want to play it hard) an anti-clerical outlet like, say, the “New Yorker”.
This is the depressing part of the whole story: Francis has been offending Christ, the Church and Her Sacraments in every possible way for years, and no Archbishop besides the retired Gracida called for his deposition; besides, Gracida himself called for his deposition as invalidly elected, not because of his actions as a Pope.
This tells me that in today’s Church Christ is of so little consequence, and the world of such great importance, that a Pope who has offended Christ in a way infinitely more grave than every offence made to man (we need to repeat this, lest we lose all perspective) might be brought down not by his countless heretical statements, but by his inability to comply with the standards of the world. The fact, I add, that the standard of the world in matter of paedophilia are quite OK (those in matter of homosexuality, which is at the root of the issue, clearly aren’t) does not make the consideration less sad.
If Francis resigns on this (his pontificate is, by now, destroyed anyway) history will remember that a Pope able to stun the Catholic world with years of constant heretical statements was brought down by… his cover-up of sexual scandals.
It seems that the world Francis loves so much wants to kill him with its own weapon.
God works in mysterious ways.
Francis might now abdicate, or not. Cardinals and Archbishops might finally find the courage to ask him to step aside, or not.
But make no mistake: this Pontificate is now officially nuked. Francis might decide to preside over the heap of ashes until he croaks, but his ability to damage the Church in the eyes of every decent Catholic is now damaged beyond repair. There is no way to recover from this, though I think he is so stupid he does not get it.
Be gone, Francis; and if not, be your pontificate totally incinerated. To you we say, as (allegedly) that great Pope of the past said to other heretics:
Ab Illo Benedicaris In Cuius Honore Cremaberis
“Be blessed by him in whose honour you shall be burned”
I never thought I would see this in my lifetime.
Archbishop Vigano’ asks for the Pope’s abdication, together with the resignation of:
This is not an interview. This is an eleven page affidavit, that is: a declaration given under oath.
The Archbishop’s revelations are so explosive that not even the adjective “explosive” is sufficient to describe them. They are very detailed, up to the date when the Archbishop informed Francis of McCarrick’s long history of abuse (in 2013!! Nowhere to hide, Frankie boy!).
Read the article. Then read it again. Cardinal Bertone is also hit by a maverick, but he is now, as McCarrick, emeritus at age 83; though I hope he will be punished strongly anyway.
I can easily imagine that other Prelates will now speak. The fact is, Francis has now been outed, and the “smoking gun” that is the accusation of no less than an Archbishop, based on his personal experience with Francis, and given under oath, makes a defence of Francis very, very difficult to mount.
Also, imagine the level of scrutiny that will be unleashed on every Cardinal and Archbishop daring to accuse the whistleblower(s) of damaging the Church and all that rubbish we have heard too often in the past.
Finally, finally, f.i.n.a.l.l.y. a member of the higher echelons has moved; and, cowards as they all are, I can easily imagine that he is the first one of a handful who will now accuse him one by one, and make his position more and more difficult. Actually, I can not imagine that the Archbishop has not agreed with others to keep the pressure up, in a sort of #metoo movement. We will see in the next days and weeks whether the Archbishop acted alone (perhaps fearing of being poisoned, and I say this in jest but not too much) or is the first one of a Demolition Brigade awaited for too long.
My dear readers, tell everyone you know that Francis must go. Scream it from the rooftops. Let you cry be heard on the Moon.
This pontificate must be incinerated.
And it will still nothing compared to the punishment awaiting this guy and his accomplices unless he, and they, repent.
This shocking photograph is from the big, fat, nuCatholic FrancisCircus called the “world meeting of families”.
No less than a Cardinal is giving no less than the keynote address.
Look for yourselves.
This is where the “dialogue with the world” ends. This is what happens when “aggiornamento” means allowing homos to enter the Seminaries. This is the unavoidable outcome when families decide that the best thing to do for them is to stay away from clergymen of every colour. This is the result when rabid pro-homo speakers, themselves wearing the habit, are invited to speak to such events.
Burn, FrancisChurch, burn.
We, the Catholics, will look at your destruction and stoke up the fire that consumes you.
Because we know that the Church is Indefectible, and when the thick strata of mud of almost 60 years of V II (now topped by the stinking manure that is the current pontificate) is removed we will see again the radiant, wonderful, Church that Christ established below it. As hard and as beautiful as a diamond, One and Holy as She has always been and will ever be, ultimately untouched by all the strata of mud (or manure) that evil men may throw over Her, as they have done often in the past and will do at times in the future, until time ends.
This stupid bunch of homos think they can persuade us that the Church has changed, that the diamond is now a vulgar stone painted in rainbow colours.
Let the picture above tell the story of what fools they are.
I didn’t have a single abusive priest or nun in 12 years of Catholic education. This horror has ownership, and the deed’s many names include Wuerl. And with Monday’s “everybody is to blame” mea non-culpa from Pope Francis, his name is on it too. Wuerl needs to resign. And the church [sic] would be better off with two retired popes and a new man absolutely dedicated to supporting the reformers, not suppressing them.
But the issue I would like to comment on today is not the details about Cardinal (for how long?) Wuerl and Pope Francis’ at the very least least stellar incompetence and stupidity.
It is the fact that five and a half years into this disgraceful Pontificate, the stupidity of the man has managed to turn against him the very icons of the secular culture whose approval he always sought. The man is the Anti-Midas: if he touches gold, it becomes shit.
The man is so stupid that he had the gall to denounce a culture of abuse and coverup in Chile, after being very publicly a part of the culture of coverup until weeks before his denunciation, and not after months of ferocious criticism. It is not only that his hypocrisy is mind-boggling; it is that his incompetence, and the incompetence of the people around him, makes a Banana Republic seem Switzerland.
When the scandal exploded, Francis did what he always does when events overcome the ability of his little brain to function: he shut up. Then he decided to still say nothing, but left the Vatican PR office to pen the most unbelievable press release, centred around the concept that only a minority of the claims were after 2002 and the Church is doing her job all right on the whole, thank you very much.
When the outrage was heard on Mars, and the fact that the Pope was still shutting up was angrily noted on Saturn, he released the Manifesto of the Banana Republic of Francislandia; which, not entirely surprisingly, stated that the remedy for Church abuse is “more solidarity”. It is like a Marxist seamless garment theory: however shitty we are, the cure for that is Socialism.
Hey, there is too much war and Capitalism in the world. This is why our priests are bad.
A snippet, chosen at random, if you don’t believe me:
Together with those efforts, every one of the baptized should feel involved in the ecclesial and social change that we so greatly need. This change calls for a personal and communal conversion that makes us see things as the Lord does. For as Saint John Paul II liked to say: “If we have truly started out anew from the contemplation of Christ, we must learn to see him especially in the faces of those with whom he wished to be identified” (Novo Millennio Ineunte, 49). To see things as the Lord does, to be where the Lord wants us to be, to experience a conversion of heart in his presence. To do so, prayer and penance will help. I invite the entire holy faithful People of God to a penitential exercise of prayer and fasting, following the Lord’s command. This can awaken our conscience and arouse our solidarity and commitment to a culture of care that says “never again” to every form of abuse.
You couldn’t make this up.
And so it happens that even the Washington Post has decided to publish an article stating that it would actually be wise if the man were to step aside; and no, such articles are never published by mistake, and they never are the opinion of one man. This is a clear editorial policy and signals that Francis has just flown out of the window at WaPo.
How the dumb have fallen. But also: how dumb did they have to be, in order to be ditched by people who would want nothing more than the continuation of Francis’ policy of destruction of everything Catholic around him.
The Dictator of the Free State of Bananas has become Pope, and it appears the homo mafia who put him there aren’t much smarter than he is, either.
The appointment of Cardinal Wuerl to the Congregation for Bishops is a good occasion to refresh our memory concerning the good Father Guarnizo.
Matt Walsh: “Homosexuals must be banned from the priesthood — no exception. They must be banned. I said this has to be ruthless, brutal, uncompromising and so that’s one of those steps. Every homosexual priest — banned.”
Good statement. However, homo clergy are – officially – banned from the Church already, as homosexuality is – and has always been – not compatible with the priesthood.
Only an age as stupid as the Age of Insanity can come to the point of even beginning to believe that a person afflicted by this horrible perversion may have his hands consecrated, and everything should be fine provided he is celibate. Such a thinking shows a desensitisation for perversion that is, in itself, a sign of the vast perversion of sane thinking now reigning among the mainstream.
There is no place for priests in the Church. A priest is supposed to be – as much as possible – a holy man, and a pervert can never be a holy man, as Satan is ravaging him from the inside. Would anyone think that a person with an incestuous tendency can be a priest, provided he does not sleep with his mother? Seriously, what do these people have in their supposedly Catholic heads instead of a brain?
We need priest who know to speak out, as it is very reasonable to assume a lot of priests know a lot more than the average pewsitter about the Seminary time of their now-colleagues. We need journalists to publish credible and substantiated allegations. We need to force our clergy to purge as many homo priests and bishops as possible; not out of their own courage (which they don’t have) but because of the immense pressure coming from a laity now booing them at every step, not giving them every money, insulting them with everyone they know, denouncing them as the unworthy, miserable pariah and rejects they are; we need to create a climate in which it is too risky for a homosexual to think of the Ecclesiastical career, because if the events of 2018 start even a half serious purge and cause a number of prominent heads to fall there will be no saying when the next purge comes, and what its severity will be.
Every homosexual priest, banned.
Start getting used to the idea, and promote sanity within the Church again.
I disagree that petitions don’t work. They create a climate. Francis certainly despises the petitioners, but if the petition makes headlines that is another headline against this Venezuelan Pontificate.
Please sign the petition. Exert pressure in any way you can. Don’t give the scoundrel any respite.
And so the secular press and people are likely trying to capitalise on the newest scandals to attack not the criminal behaviour of single individuals, but the Church as an Institution.
Let them. That’s all they know, and all they always do.
We, however, must not be deceived into thinking that we must, for this reason, run to the defence of the bishops. We must, like a martial arts fighter, use the energy of the adversary for our purpose.
Let the calls for full enquiries and imprisonment of the culprit spread aĺl over the West. Let us, actually, help and amplify the call. It will show to honest people the world over that the problem is not the Church qua Church, but some evil individuals we ourselves, as we first of all, want to get rid of.
Get this: we have nothing to fear from the movement if we put ourselves at its head. It will be the great crusade for the cleansing of the Church, Her enemies will be but helpers and spectators.
And always, always, relentlessly, without cease, insist on this: the paedophilia crisis is a crisis of homosexual infiltration in the first place. Get rid of homo priests, get rid of paedo scandals. Simple as that.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I seem to remember that then-Cardinal Ratzinger issued a new discipline for cases of suspected paedophilia in or around 2000 or 2002. The new discipline mandated that all cases of suspected paedophilia be referred to Rome, to be investigated from there away from the protection afforded by the local cabals.
Now raise your gaze above Pennsylvania, and let it rest from sea to shining sea (or, if you prefer, above the fruited plain). It is clear that Pennsylvania is not an island, completely cut off from what happens in the rest of the Country. PA must perforce be the tip of a vast iceberg.
Now let us reflect a moment: how many cases of disobedience to the Ratzinger rule must have been in this time? How many Bishops must have been involved? How many of them have become Archbishops, or Cardinals? How many of them are homosexual, or were blackmailed by those who are?
And let us also be clear on one thing: if we thought that the problem had been largely eradicated ten-fifteen years ago, but then discover this was not the case, how many other cases must be going on now, as I write this?
Where there are homosexual priests, there must be paedophile priests, then even if not every homo is a paedo, most paedos are homos. Has the number of homosexual priests decreased in the last fifteen years? Can anyone say that the phenomenon of homosexual priesthood has been eradicated? Does the oh so friendly parish priest in the church near you make the impression of having the required dose of testosterone? Thought not…
I begin to suspect that the organisation of the Church in the US (and in who knows in how many other countries) harbours a vast net of paedophiles operating either in the shadow or in the half-light, and with many that should see either too incompetent to see, or too cowards to do anything, or blackmailed themselves.
Let us say, to make an example, that a Cardinal (let us say, to make an example: Wuerl) is not a paedo, but he is still a homo. He knows that he can be crushed every day. He is confronted with paedophiles among those of his same tribe. Will he be the relentless persecutor of child abusers? Or will he limit himself to do the bare minimum to have some defence in future, whilst not causing his own demise by the hand of the paedo cabal? How many situations like this one must there be all over the West, if we consider the number of people in purple and red we can clearly see can be legitimately suspected of homosexuality? Do you really think that, say, Cardinal Coccopalmerio is normal?
And what about the former Archbishop of Buenos Aires? Was his conduct whilst there, and before being there, above suspicion? Thought not…
No. This problem cannot be addressed by the same people who created it. We need to see guilty priests, bishops and cardinals rot in jail.
This might, in time, be deterrent enough. Then when the official structures have become so corrupted that they cannot reform themselves from the inside, Providence will provide the way how they can be reformed from the outside.
I read around of people who oppose the most recent FrancisHeresy about the Capital Punishment whilst still being factually opposed to it in a somewhat lesser way.
Let us make something clear: the problem with the word “inadmissible” is nothing to do with whether this lack of legitimacy is proclaimed for all situations or not. Rather, it is to do with the rejection of its fundamental legitimacy.
Pope Francis denies that the Capital Punishment is legitimate in principle; in which, I think, lies a heresy as big as the Leonine Walls, and which would have been recognised immediately and without hesitation by everyone in past Christian times. But it really isn’t much helped if one says that he opposes Francis for declaring the Capital Punishment an Evil, whilst still thinking that it should have no place in modern societies. There is simply no way this can be reconciled with Catholic doctrine.
To state that modern psychology or reeducation methods make Capital Punishment superfluous is tantamount to saying that modern, worldly remedies reach parts of the human nature that Christianity could never reach and taught were non-existent. It also sends a clear message that not only Capital Punishment, but every other teaching of the Church can be sabotaged because modern psychology gas allowed us a deeper insight into human nature, as can be easily applied to, say, suicide, gluttony, or adultery.
Honestly, I don’t care much for supposed defences of orthodoxy that are deeply embedded in V II thinking, which undermines this orthodoxy in the first place. Francis’ disgraceful pontificate must serve as an encouragement to recover the real roots of Catholic thinking, not merely to walk a couple of step back in what is and remains the wrong direction.
The solution to blatant heresy is the truth of all times, not the veiled heresy of past decades. Enough with the poison of V II. We need to go back to basics and accept them without compromises.
The Grand Jury report about the abuses in Pennsylvania was released yesterday, and it makes you sick. It makes you, literally, ashamed of being in the same Church as the dozen of bishops and other Church personnel whose complicity or utter incompetence was absolutely necessary for evil on such a scale to happen.
In Erie, a 7-year-old boy was sexually abused by a priest who then told him he should go to confession and confess his “sins” to that same priest.
Another boy was repeatedly raped from ages 13 to 15 by a priest who bore down so hard on the boy’s back that it caused severe spine injuries. He became addicted to painkillers and later died of an overdose.
One victim in Pittsburgh was forced to pose naked as Christ on the cross while priests photographed him with a Polaroid camera. Priests gave the boy and others gold cross necklaces to mark them as being “groomed” for abuse.
What can one say. Breathtakingly evil. In our midst. Perpetrated by priests, acted out by consecrated hands.
Their Bishops have become Cardinals.
Do not be, for a moment, deceived by the fact that the oldest of the abuses appear to have been perpetrated during the Age of Sanity. The Age of Sanity was not the Garden of Eden, either, nor is any intelligent person going to claim with you that we went from perfection to Vatican II. However, every sane person will recognise the profound difference between occasional evil acts in a sane Church, and the explosion of evil that must follow the infiltration of the Church through an obviously great number of homosexuals.
Hopefully, heads will roll on this, albeit prosecution will be rare in the cases exposed (which, is you ask me, isn’t wrong: if a man of 83 says were to say he has been abused after having shut up all his life, including decades of rabid anti-Catholic propaganda and lots of money to be made with lawsuits, I for myself would take it with three pinches of salt).
However, to us the bigger problem is not the abuses allegedly perpetrated in 1941, or 1957, and never denounced up to now. It is the presence of homosexual clergy at all levels of the Hierarchy.
Until we realise that this demonic infestation is at the root of the problem, the problem will never go away.
It is to us, the faithful, to reclaim that our priest be decent straight guys as it used to be until the Age of Insanity. Then the vast part of this and many other problems will be eliminated; then every homosexual priest, paedophile or not, is and must be at war with the Church in many other issues, and become a social justice warrior, enemy of capital punishment and foe of the sacrament as he tries to recycle himself into a half decent being in the eyes of the world, well-knowing the scumbag he is in the eyes of the Lord.
It is also to us, the faithful, to educate those around us about the obvious connection between homosexuality and paedophilia. Decades of priest abuse statistics have shown beyond any doubt that not all homosexuals are paedophiles, but most paedophiles are homosexual. Search the first John Jay Report if you have any doubt (the second doesn’t count, as we were already in the age of rampant political correctness and no priest was identified as homosexual who did not identify himself as such; go figure).
This, the homosexuality within the clergy, is the elephant in the room. When the elephant is dealt with, things will improve. Until this is done, things will remain the same.
If we do not oppose evil, we feed it tacitly, says Pope Francis the Heretic.
Well, I wholeheartedly agree.
It is not enough to just stay silent in front of Francis’ heresies, and go on thinking one has done enough. It is not enough for a priest to simply ignore Francis’ dissemination of confusion without instancably reiterate Catholic teaching. It is not enough for a Bishop to avoid condemning heretical statements from members of the Clergy.
We need to not only ignore this minion of Satan, but to actively oppose him. We need to warn other Catholics of the real and present danger for the Faith he represents. We need to shred this satanical Papacy to pieces in such a way that, with God’s help, the Cardinals will give us a halfway decent Pope when this one croaks, as I hope he does today.
This Papacy is merely the continuation of a rebellion started with Vatican II. It is the deserved punishment for our collective arrogance. The one who wants to stop being punished must behave in such a way that the punishment is seen as not necessary anymore. The punishment will end when we, those who still believe, will mount a reaction such that it deserves us its termination. But we must demand a return to sanity as we, collectively speaking, were the ones happy to see the Church adapt to the world and pander to it.
You see? I agreed with Francis!
Hopefully, for the last time before he dies a painless death.
This here is Politico, therefore the entire article is disgustingly biased. However, even Libtards do not manage to escape the contact with facts, at least every now and then.
In this case, the facts are impossible to ignore: Italians simply do not care a straw of what Francis says and thinks, and prefer to follow a man that is, by all his flaws, infinitely more Catholic than him: Matteo Salvini, the Italian Trump, currently Making Italy Great Again.
Francis, being a damn Argentinian Commie, does not get the nature of the Italians, one of whose more evident traits is a robust pragmatism and avoidance of bigotry. The shockingly anti-Catholic message of the Evil Clown has been ignored even before his descent to Pope Francis the Heretic. Now, that there is an extremely stark contrast between political and papal approach, they are clearly choosing sanity and common sense.
The article recognises another important fact: the opposition to Francis and the support for the Lega comes, exactly, from the strata of the population which more closely identify (at least culturally) with Catholicism. This again gives the full measure of Francis’ failure. It is not that he carries the shrinking Catholic part of the Country, but fails to make inroads among the indifferent, the tepid and the Atheists. Quite the contrary is the case!
What a sad destiny for man too stupid to understand that he has broken the toy that the Papacy has put in his hands. Had he been more nuanced, moderate, or “between the lines”, he could have JP IIed through his Pontificate, playing the conservative guy as he sabotaged the Church one little step at a time. But this is not Francis. Francis is too arrogant, too boorish, and too damn stupid to understand simple things. In the meantime, Salvini has announced the end of the madness of “Parent 1” and “Parent 2”, and is (together with his excellent Family Minister, Fontana) moving against homo adoption. Can’t remember the Pope expressing himself with the same energy and asking the same decisive action. And he is, well, the Pope.
We are now to the point that it is reasonable to state that Francis’ rants actually help Salvini get the Catholic vote.
Yes, this is the Papacy of Francis.
Just as incompetent as a South American military dictatorship. With the addition of sodomy.
The Argentinian Senate has rejected a proposal to legalise abortion in the first 14 weeks. Boy, they do “obsess about abortion”over there, don’t they?
I will go out on a limb now and state what many others think: on the balance, Pope Francis would have preferred that the law had been approved.
Whilst the man emits, every now and then, some noises in defence of the unborn, they always sound like lip service: too little, too late, too faint. Way less than the minimum that can be expected by a Pope. This, obviously, from a man capable of criticising Catholics for “obsessing about abortion”. I don’t know you, but I think there are robust dots to be connected here.
We enjoy this victory today, and prepare for more battles to come. Battles which, in these astonishing times of ours, will be fought without the Pope.