As the real Election Day approaches, it might be useful to remind my readers of what tricks the MSM will try to pull in a last desperate attempt to avoid the Monster Vote.
The first is the last polls before the vote. Whilst they can't tell you Hitlery is 8 points ahead lik in the good old times before the Internet, they can still try to sell you a 3 or 4 point advantage. This will, they certainly think, at least discourage some.
The second will be, I think, the exit polls. Allowed or forbidden (I could not find information about the rules; in Europe they tend to be very strict, with a ban on exit polls before poll closing time; in Italy the enforcement is particularly brutal), I do not doubt the MSM will choose to either pay the fines or hint at a huge Clinton advantage. There are many ways to hint, imply, suggest that Hitlery is going to win big. If the Jwhorenalists are allowed to give exit polls about the actual vote, I think the game will be far more overt. Send your pollster outside the desired polling location and hey presto: the coming, unavoidable Hitlery landslide can be served by lunch time. Many hours left to influence the weak, the dumb, the professional pessimists, and the incurably lazy.
The third will be the calling of the states after the beginning of the count in the Eastern region. As normally the results from high density areas come first, for a while the map of the results that have come in will look good for Hitlery. Watch the Presstitutes downplay the coming Republican ballots and call strategic Eastern Time states for Hitlery, thus declaring the race all but decided. This would, or so they think, discourage Republican voters in states like Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico (yes, I think The Donald wants New Mexico, too).
Lastly, there is the more subtle “punditry” work also done in the last weeks. You read a lot of Presstitudes writing as if Hillary's victory was already in the bag, and it remains the problem of how to deal with a president under investigation (and yes, Hitlery is still under investigation). By creating a narrative of naturally discussed, unavoidable “factual” success for Hitlery, they send an indirect but powerful message to their undecided watchers: don't waste your time, dear….
I know most of my readers are aware of all this, but I still think the first reaction to the Presstitudes calling a big victory for Clinton might be discouraging. Therefore, a word of warning is in order. Please also inform whomever you can of the coming propaganda tricks, so that its effects can be minimised.
The best antidote for Hitlery's and their Presstitutes' poison remains, however, always the same.
Go to vote. Bring other people. Offer drives to the elderly. Encourage the timid. Persuade the undecided.
This victory is perfectly feasible.
Help make of it a landslide that will counter every fraud.
Cardinal Burke has sunk many orders of magnitude in my personal esteem (not that he cares, anyway) when he has publicly refused to denounce Amoris Laetitia, and has slapped in the face those Catholics who are rightly scandalised. Far from me, therefore, praising this man as an example.
However, every little help; and if those Sanctimonious Judases who would give the United States and the West to the worst heathens for the sake of feeling oh so pure don’t listen to me, they might listen to him.
There is some sense remained in this man. He makes very plain that there are two real candidates, and the fantasies of Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck becoming President are not worthy of adult consideration (“have you googled Mickey Mouse? Check it out! He is my candidate! Strongly pro-life, and almost as good as I am!”).
Let us say it with the Cardinal’s words. Emphases mine:
“I think that what we have to do in this time is to look at both candidates to see if one of them will not, at least in some way, advance the common good, both with respect to the good of human life, the good of the family, the freedom of conscience, the care of the poor, and to look at that very carefully,”
“More than likely the judgment will be that neither candidates ideally answers these questions all in the way that we want. But given the nature of our government, can we in conscience support one of the candidates, at least, who, while maybe [he or she] doesn’t support everything that we believe and know is important, will at least support it to a certain extent with the hope that that candidate can be convinced to embrace evermore fully the common good,”
One must have an IQ south of 60 in order not to get what the man is saying. It isn’t even anything particularly brilliant, or new. It’s the simple common sense of anyone who hasn’t been completely blinded by his own arrogance and sanctimoniousness.
Let me repeat again what I have written about those dark souls who refuse to do their duty (and in the worst cases even encourage others to do the same): they betray Christ out of their own love of self, their presumption, their supposed moral superiority that is cowardice and betrayal.
Reblog this post here, or the original article about the Cardinal. Spread the word until there is not one idiot nevertrumper left, that is not red in the face.