The “Daily Homograph” (or, if you prefer, “Homo Telegraph”) informs us without a hint of reproach or disapproval that, after the “successful” introduction of around 70 “gender choices” in the US (one wonders how difficult it must have been; but again, for a “Homo Telegraph” journalist an awful lot must be difficult), Facebook has now introduced the same nonsensical “options” in the UK.
The same? Well, not really. As for these people “gender” is something they can shape as they please, the UK “gender choices” will be “limited” to 50, to take account of the different ways in which perversion and idiocy express themselves in the country. This will leave idiots and perverts with only 48 ways to let the world know they are perverts, or idiots. I find it limiting compared to the 70 or more ways available to their counterparts the other side of the Pond; but hey: if they “feel” that way who am I to, erm, judge?
You must think yours truly is utterly and completely opposed to the idea, but on second thoughts it has its advantages. I do not remember exactly how Facebook works, and when I forgot the password I let the thing go the way of the Dodo. I had only used it to post my blog posts, so it was no great loss. Still, I remember and have read around you can “befriend” or “unfriend” people. This means every Facebook member can immediately spot the perverts and idiots simply by looking at which kind of people they choose as “friends”, or at how they define their “gender” themselves.
Very practical, I would say.
Still, if Facebook belonged to me I would make the system even more practical, and reduce the “gender choices” to four; undoubtedly encompassing all the US choices, let alone the “limited” UK ones. They would be:
All the “genders”, in four simple choices.
Read on Rorate Caeli the shocking, but unfortunately not surprising initiative of the archdiocese of São Paulo, with an homosexual agenda only covered by the thinnest of veils; arguably, not covered even by the thinnest of veils.
We see here one of the most typical tactics of these satanical people at work: the condemnation of an abuse to push the acceptance of a use.
Is the case of perverts, the mechanism is very simple: you wait for one or two episodes of violence against them and then, with the excuse of the “violence”, you push for the acceptance of the victim's behaviour.
If, say, a known pedophile were to be found in the morning on the pavement, beaten to unconsciousness, I doubt any “committee” of any progressive diocese would abuse of this episode to openly push the pedophile agenda.
Not so, at least when fags are involved, for the “Justice and Peace Commitee” of the Archdiocese of São Paulo. Their support for sexual perversion is so obvious and so shameless, so brazen in its aggressive pushing of the so-called LGBT agenda, that there is no way in hell Cardinal Scherer can avoid responsibility for this bunch of idiots, arrogantly spending the name of the Church for their own evil ends. One reflects that Scherer is (was) known as a kind of “moderate”, and has all the tragedy of the XXI Church in front of his eyes. But perhaps the Cardinal thinks if he doesn't sign this satanical drivel himself, he'll get away with it.
Read the press release, and behold Satan at work: the “safety” becomes one with the “dignity”, and “dignity” here clearly means “acceptance”. The use of the many adjectives to describe sexual perverts also clearly indicates the detailed and complete acceptance of their “lifestyle”. The “prejudice” clearly refers to the Christian prejudice against perverts (yes, I have prejudices against perverts; I would, for example, never allow them to remain alone with children and adolescent; ask the Church why) and is taken as an excuse to call for the acceptance of their “culture”.
The acceptance of their culture. This is the point to which things have come. This is a “committee” of one of the biggest Archdioceses of the world. Gay mafia (real or honorary) as it breathes and rants.
Cardinal Scherer has the full responsibility for this shame. By simply allowing this bunch of deluded perverts to speak in the name of Holy Mother Church he makes himself their accomplice, and he must accept the paternity of their statement in full. He is in charge of the diocese. He has nowhere to hide.
People like this allegedly “moderate” (probably, “progressives” are to be found directly in the “gay sauna”) Cardinal Scherer have obviously lost the faith a long time ago, because if a shred of fear of the Lord had remained in his obdurate heart he would have most certainly, most certainly never allowed such “committees” to issues such delirious, satanical rants without crushing them stante pede and radically reviewing the way these dratted “committees” work.
It's his committee. It speaks for the Archdiocese. It speaks for him. Cardinal Scherer is being taken by Satan for a walk like the obedient lapdog he is. Can you imagine a Cardinal allowing such things to happen in any one whatsoever of the pre – V II centuries of Church History! You can take your pick!
Once again, we see the gradualism always used by Satan to attack everything that is holy.
The ruin begins when an Archdiocese thinks it needs to have a “Justice and Peace Committee”, thus disgracefully mixing a worldly social agenda with the real aim of the Church, which is the salvation of souls.
This apparently “neutral” committee (hey, who is against “peace”? Or “justice”? Strangely, no one asks for “sword committees”, though Jesus did not come to bring peace, but a sword), then becomes the vehicle used to bring among the people the concept of a certain peace and a certain justice, and from there the step to making of every abomination a matter of “peace and justice” is a very short one.
Let us stop apportioning the blame everywhere but where it belongs. The bucks stops by Cardinal Odilo Scherer.
Unfortunately, with the present structure of power in Rome, I doubt anything will happen. Rather, such abominations will likely become more and more frequent.
In the “age of mercy”, Christ is mercilessly trampled.
The masses applaud.
Why, oh why have we to cope with a joke called Vincent “Quisling” Nichols when the US have so many Bishops who could be sent here to relieve us of our misery?
You can read here what has happened in Minnesota, where Bishop Nienstedt has refused to give communion to a group of militant homos wanting not only to receive communion notwithstanding their open rebellion to the Church, but even do so wearing a visible sign of their revolt, rainbow buttons and sashes.
The decision of Bishop Nierstedt would be to commend unconditionally, and a rare good news worthy of being shouted out loud, if the fact had not been tainted by a grave episode of scandal after the mass, when a priest obviously squarely on the pro-Homo side has hastily celebrated a Mass for the homosexualists, during which they were allowed to (try to) receive communion by the same priest.
It is now the clear duty of Bishop Nienstedt to bring his disobedient priest rapidly and clearly into line, then isolated episodes of orthodoxy are – whilst always commendable in themselves – much diminished in their importance and in their teaching value if dissent is allowed to flourish among the very priests of an orthodox Bishop.