If there was a Turncoat World Championship, I think Michael Coren would be a prime candidate for the win, several times in a row. I now begin breakfast wondering whether Coren will still have the same religious affiliation when I finish it. As to his statements, they can slowly be read with a chronometer at hand, measuring the time until he states the exact opposite.
Coren has long joined the long list of Judases of the Catholic faith, but this one has an uncommon satanic energy. The man is sheer unbelievable. He writes a book about Catholics being right, and then leaves the Catholic faith. But he doesn’t say it out loud around, because it’s professionally more lucrative to shut up for a while.
Interestingly, the same man who had defended the Catholic church as the bearer of a Truth that goes beyond individual opinion then proceeds to leave the Church because – says his newly found god, called Michael Coren – the Church is now suddenly wrong. Not, mind, wrong on whether vanilla is better than chocolate. No. Wrong on something the Church has always believed, which is unquestionably part of the Deposit of Faith: sexual perversion.
What kind of man is this? A circus attraction?
Coren now even manages to be kicked out of a wannabe Catholic publication because … he is in favour of abortion!
I am sorry for you, my dear baby. Your father was a rapist, so you (not your father, no; I mean you; yes, you heard me right; I know, I know…; though luck, uh?) will now have to die. Pre-breakfast Michael Coren was, as a Catholic, resolutely opposed to your legalised killing. But that was before breakfast, you see. Post-breakfast Michael Coren thinks you will have to go. Mind, though: your killing is what Michael Coren’s newfound god (called, in case you don’t know, Michael Coren) thinks “compassionate”.
Can you believe this guy? Is he on cocaine? How could he allow himself to be same-sex loved by Satan in such a way, after certainly having been able to fully understand the Catholic message? I know journalism and prostitution are related professions, but this here is extreme. It is first class turn coat excellence. Coren doesn’t contradict himself simply. He must do so in the loudest of ways, and he must still say he is right!
Right… when, exactly? At 10:22 am as a pro-life, pro-sexual sanity Catholic, or at 4:55 pm as a fag-loving, pro-abortion Anglican?
Boy, this one is confused.
Gotta love Rick Santorum’s shameless way of ignoring reality… when it’s convenient to him.
The man has now (rightly so, I add) criticised Pope Francis for playing scientist without being one.
There is a problem, though: this is the same man on record for saying of a Trannie that if he thinks he is a woman, “then he is a woman”; a statement whose very English reveals its blatant absurdity, but which Santorum thought convenient to make because it helps his credentials among those who accept or promote perversion. Ah, and that he would “support” a “marrying” pervert should also not remain unsaid.
Santorum is obviously unwilling to see the glaring contradiction here: a Pope is not allowed to play scientist; but a man is even allowed to play woman and Santorum will say to him that he is a woman just for saying so.
A double standard that applies logic only when it is convenient, and leaves it out in the most stupid (and impious) of ways when being logical become uncomfortable.
Can’t wait for Santorum bid to go down in flames.
There are enough Judas around as it is.
Can you imagine the first community of Pilgrims celebrating the harvest feast together with “couples” of sexual perverts? No? Ever wondered why?
It was, if you ask me, because in the mind of a Christian it seems the utter absurdity to thank God for an abundant harvest as one offends Him by openly giving scandal, or being accomplices to this scandal.
God gives graces of all sorts to men, and then expects them to conform to His laws. Whilst we are all sinners, it is certainly absurd to act in a way that says “Thank you, Lord, for this abundant harvest that will assure our survival in these new territories. Thanks! Have a slap in the face!”
If a Christian does not see Thanksgiving as a profoundly Christian moment, and an eminent Christian festivity, then he can celebrate the Day of Mother Earth, The Week of Auntie Rain, as well.
It's a Christian festivity. Don't allow the atheists and the secular people to say it's not so. For a Christian, it must be so.
Which leads us to the topic touched at the beginning: Faggotry must stay out. This is do always, of course; but particularly so on a day in which, of all things, God's bountiful generosity is gratefully remembered.
I am sure none of you, faithful readers, would dream (or have a nightmare) of inviting the faggot friend of the faggot relative for Thanksgiving. This is not charity. This is complicity In the iniquity.
Similarly, I invite all of you who have been invited to such a place to reflect where their allegiance really lies. I know, there are wheels within wheels, and many could say “but in my case it's different”. Perhaps auntie is 109 years old and has so insisted that you accept the invitation. Perhaps wifey has told you her sister might commit suicide if she sees herself “rejected”. Perhaps the “boyfriend” is dying of AIDS and could, oh, uh, no? Be “converted” at seeing the “warm embrace” of the family…
Many of these scenarios are thinkable. No one works.
Auntie will be helped to die in clear danger of damnation. Sister must stop manipulating people, and take responsibility for her (gravely wrong) actions. “Boyfriend” is helped by making very clear to him that he is bound for hell. You get my drift.
I invite each one of you who, perhaps out of a very misplaced sense of charity, should have accepted such an invitation to say “no”, in the way you consider more appropriate. Have a headache if you really have to, but I invite you to be a real witness of charity by saying why you do not participate. And let the wife or husband go alone, if he or she so wishes. And let there be discusdions, if discusdions have to be had.
But you, dear reader, you will not be another brick in the normalisation of sexual perversion.
Not a long time ago, fathers smashed their daughters on the street, doomed to utter poverty and very possibly prostitution, for much less than open, shameless lesbian scandal. They would chase away and disinherit their first born for something as atrocious as proclaimed, openly celebrated sodomy.
You may say they were too harsh, and I – a man of my time after all – agree with you. But you can't deny that It was a Christian world, that would have never thought it fitting to put one's emotions simply before one's duty to uphold Christian thinking. A Christian father of the Victorian era would take his salvation, and the one of his beloved ones, very seriously instead of wallowing in effeminate sentimentalism.
It is astonishing that our times should be so unChristian, and so effeminate, that even refusing an invitation to an open faggot – and declining to accept such an invitation – should be seen as too much, too harsh, or in any way “uncharitable”.
Read on Rorate Caeli the shocking, but unfortunately not surprising initiative of the archdiocese of São Paulo, with an homosexual agenda only covered by the thinnest of veils; arguably, not covered even by the thinnest of veils.
We see here one of the most typical tactics of these satanical people at work: the condemnation of an abuse to push the acceptance of a use.
Is the case of perverts, the mechanism is very simple: you wait for one or two episodes of violence against them and then, with the excuse of the “violence”, you push for the acceptance of the victim's behaviour.
If, say, a known pedophile were to be found in the morning on the pavement, beaten to unconsciousness, I doubt any “committee” of any progressive diocese would abuse of this episode to openly push the pedophile agenda.
Not so, at least when fags are involved, for the “Justice and Peace Commitee” of the Archdiocese of São Paulo. Their support for sexual perversion is so obvious and so shameless, so brazen in its aggressive pushing of the so-called LGBT agenda, that there is no way in hell Cardinal Scherer can avoid responsibility for this bunch of idiots, arrogantly spending the name of the Church for their own evil ends. One reflects that Scherer is (was) known as a kind of “moderate”, and has all the tragedy of the XXI Church in front of his eyes. But perhaps the Cardinal thinks if he doesn't sign this satanical drivel himself, he'll get away with it.
Read the press release, and behold Satan at work: the “safety” becomes one with the “dignity”, and “dignity” here clearly means “acceptance”. The use of the many adjectives to describe sexual perverts also clearly indicates the detailed and complete acceptance of their “lifestyle”. The “prejudice” clearly refers to the Christian prejudice against perverts (yes, I have prejudices against perverts; I would, for example, never allow them to remain alone with children and adolescent; ask the Church why) and is taken as an excuse to call for the acceptance of their “culture”.
The acceptance of their culture. This is the point to which things have come. This is a “committee” of one of the biggest Archdioceses of the world. Gay mafia (real or honorary) as it breathes and rants.
Cardinal Scherer has the full responsibility for this shame. By simply allowing this bunch of deluded perverts to speak in the name of Holy Mother Church he makes himself their accomplice, and he must accept the paternity of their statement in full. He is in charge of the diocese. He has nowhere to hide.
People like this allegedly “moderate” (probably, “progressives” are to be found directly in the “gay sauna”) Cardinal Scherer have obviously lost the faith a long time ago, because if a shred of fear of the Lord had remained in his obdurate heart he would have most certainly, most certainly never allowed such “committees” to issues such delirious, satanical rants without crushing them stante pede and radically reviewing the way these dratted “committees” work.
It's his committee. It speaks for the Archdiocese. It speaks for him. Cardinal Scherer is being taken by Satan for a walk like the obedient lapdog he is. Can you imagine a Cardinal allowing such things to happen in any one whatsoever of the pre – V II centuries of Church History! You can take your pick!
Once again, we see the gradualism always used by Satan to attack everything that is holy.
The ruin begins when an Archdiocese thinks it needs to have a “Justice and Peace Committee”, thus disgracefully mixing a worldly social agenda with the real aim of the Church, which is the salvation of souls.
This apparently “neutral” committee (hey, who is against “peace”? Or “justice”? Strangely, no one asks for “sword committees”, though Jesus did not come to bring peace, but a sword), then becomes the vehicle used to bring among the people the concept of a certain peace and a certain justice, and from there the step to making of every abomination a matter of “peace and justice” is a very short one.
Let us stop apportioning the blame everywhere but where it belongs. The bucks stops by Cardinal Odilo Scherer.
Unfortunately, with the present structure of power in Rome, I doubt anything will happen. Rather, such abominations will likely become more and more frequent.
In the “age of mercy”, Christ is mercilessly trampled.
The masses applaud.
And so President Putin did what everyone knows, but it is slowly becoming one of the biggest taboos in the otherwise almost completely taboo-free Western societies: linking homosexuality and pedophilia.
You can now make some popcorn and wait for the immancably incensed reaction of the liberal troopers, most of whom would never be as stupid as to allow their own child to spend time alone – not occasionally, much less regularly – with an homosexual.
The figures concerning the unspeakable scandal of pedophile priests speak a clear language: the evidence available, like the Murphy report, indicates the vast majority of those involved (you will have to do your own googling yourself for exact details if you are so inclined) were homosexuals. Now, many of these cases were of consensual sex with adolescents considered “children” in some Countries, but again the numbers are generally clear in creating a strong link, and indicating that a homosexual priest is far more likely to be a pedophile than a heterosexual one.
Putin poses, therefore, an implicit question that the West refuses to answer: how much higher will be the probability of being the victim of pedophile adoptive parent for an unfortunate child “adopted” by an homosexual “couple”, compared to the child adopted by normal people?
Let us reflect: if priesthood is an attractive way for a pedophile to get – at least in the past – near children, isn't adoption the safest way for him to reach his objective? How much easier will it be for him to create an environment favourable to both the crime and its impunity? What more can a pedophile wish than being the adoptive father of his own child, manipulating or terrorising him in all possible and impossible ways?
I dare to make here the very easy prediction that in three or four decades' time the phenomenon of the children abused by homosexual “parents” (parents? Really?) will explode, as the “parents” slowly die or become harmless and the victims slowly realise what was done to them, and why. At that point, either society will have become so rotten that it will ignore or even “celebrate” the matter, or – more probably – an awful lot of people will start to realise that the devil, once he has taken a stronghold in a soul, will use this wretch to make as much damage as it can.
Putin sees this obvious connection, and throws the question – implicitly, but clearly – in the arena. The West keeps ignoring it, basking in the smug feeling of the maddest blindness for the sake of the celebration of its own “tolerance” and “inclusiveness”.
Putin will, of course, not obtain much in the short term, at least not in what concerns the West. But in the long term he might cause one or five people to wake up, and his sterling work in keeping Russia Christian – Schismatic, but Christian – can only be praised.
Oh for someone, only one, leading a great Western Democracy, able to think and act like him…
You wouldn’t believe it, but there are perverts out there asking that Bert & Ernie (pre-schooler audience ) have a so-called same-sex marriage. Millions of very little children should be confronted with sexual perversion from the tenderest age. This is then called (if you are a pervert) to “beat homophobia” and to “express tolerance for gay people”.
I have the impression that the intolerance for perversion must be stepped up, instead. If you let them have their way, these perverts will start corrupting toddlers.
In a move that sounds more dictated from common sense and entrepreneurial instinct that from rebellion to the homo mafia, the sesame workshop has flatly refused to follow the call to the perversion of little children. The argument (rather stupid, if you ask me) is that, wait for this, puppets don’t have sexual orientation. Well no they aren’t supposed to be perverts of course, but if they are called Bert and Ernie instead of, say, Martha & Agatha it is clear that these puppets are male puppets. I mean, no one would say that Miss Piggy can’t fall in love with Kermit because a pig can’t fall in love with a frog.
I do suspect that the reason for the refusal is a different one: to do as the homos demanded would have satisfied 1% of the population, but killed an extremely fortunate children’s program. It’s not that there aren’t alternatives available, and many parents would have reacted as they should.
Therefore, and all the reasoning of the sesame workshop notwithstanding, Bert & Ernie will remain… straight.