Whilst you were busy with your turkey – or rather, with your Jihad on its remains – in Egypt more than 300 Muslims were brutally massacred in an attack planned with chilling cruelty. The attach happened in North Sinai, which happens to be near Israel.
Do you think that, therefore, the attack was perpetrated by, say, militant Jews coming from Israel? Or perhaps by the sparsely still existing Christians living in Egypt!
The brutal attack was perpetrated by, actually, Muslims; Muslims who are so fond of the “religion of peace” that they cannot tolerate the breathing of people, belonging to the same “religion of peace”, peacefully attending their own strange rites.
I seriously wonder what Islam would look like if it were a religion of war, strife, violence and massacre instead of a religion of peace. Would we see Muslims constantly massacring each other and, when they take a pause from it, trying to massacre Christians and Jews? Would we see them become such a force for evil that they surge to be the only inspiration of international terrorism? Would we see them engaging in genocide on a vast scale in mixed faith Countries like Nigeria, or in the brutal, systematic persecution and killing of Christians in Countries like Syria and Iraq as they descend to the most brutal enslavement of their own people, sharing their very same religion of (cough) peace?
That Islam be a “religion of peace” must be the most tragic joke, or rather willed and systematically pushed deception, of our time.
The “Gateway Pundit” (recommended reading for Mundabor supporters) has an interesting article concerning the Polish Government. Their position is simple: you don't want Islamic terrorism? Don't import Muslims then!
This is, obviously, common sense. But it makes headlines in a time in which common sense flies out of the window because some overweight German bitch wants you to conform to the Merkelprinzip.
What the Poles got and Western Europe doesn't is this: Muslim immigrants and Islamic terrorism are like, erm, horse and carriage: you can't get one without the other.
Whilst it is certainly true that most Muslims are peaceful people, this is not the way to assess the degree of danger represented by a religion. You can be certain that among the Aztecs most people were peaceful, too, but theirs still was an extremely brutal, cruel, bloody religion.
Islam condones or encourages violence against non-Muslims. It does not matter that it sends ambivalent messages about being both bloody and peaceful: the aggressive, murderous component is there, and the more a Muslim is devout to his religion, the more likely he is to either condone or promote or put in act this violence. Islam also promotes the forced islamisation of a country and the subservience of the non-Muslims, even when they leave you alive.
This is particularly true of the Sunni (have you noticed that Muslim terrorists are, basically, always Sunnis?) because the Shia have, like Catholics, a doctrinal system condemning such acts, whilst the Sunnis are the sola scriptura people of the Muslim world. Unavoidably, some people will get the gist of the violent message of the paedophile so-called prophet and follow his commands to the letter. The more so as, being a sola scriptura types, they are really so dumb as to think they will get himself killed in the morning and screw girls in their porn paradise in the afternoon.
These are all elements we cannot expunge from Islam, because they are intrinsic to it. In the case of the Sunnis (the clear majority of the Muslims) terrorism is literally built in. In the case of the Shiah, the threat of forced islamisation is.
Every sane Westerner would therefore agree, if we lived in sane times, that Islam itself is the problem and the task of European Government must be to peacefully, but certainly, eradicate it. Even more obviously, he would agree that where there are no Muslims none must be imported.
This is common sense. But it appears Western Europeans hate common sense as they hate themselves (or better said, hate their Christian matrix), and they prefer to remain blind to a danger now developing at a faster pace.
To prevent is better than to repress. Every liberal would tell you that. Alas, when it comes to Muslims they want to have the problem first, thinking they will “teddy bear-away” it later.
Not happening, I am afraid. We will either wake up or end up with the ISIS ruling parts of Europe (not Poland, Hungary or Russia) at some point.
The London “Times” had a story today about a list of hundreds British fanatics currently operating in the Middle East, with the SAS tasked with killing or capturing them.
Imagine the fun if many of them are captured. We will have endless litigation about their human rights, the evidence they have done anything wrong, the way they suffer away from their cats, and the like. They will style themselves as freedom fighters. The likes of Jeremy Corbyn will be delighted to support them as directly as they can.
I trust the SAS will do a thorough work of this. I suggest that the accent is on making short shrift with them, taking them down one by one without any effort of capture. When the USA individuate a dangerous enemy, the clear trend is that they do not send troops on the ground to capture him, they send him a gift from the sky.
In the end, isn't “martyrdom” what they themselves want?
Make them happy, say I. Fulfill their wish. Grant them their greatest desire.
You see? We can find common ground with our enemies…
New terror attack in London, with news confused as I write this. Can’t wait for the first idiot who says the attack is “not religious in nature”. Ramadan plays, of course, no role at all.
Once again: in a Country that does not arm its citizens, every killing run with a white van will go on for longer.
But no: it it seems more important to get killed without being able to defend oneself. There will be torrents of hashtags, and PC tweets from leftist tw@ts like there is no tomorrow.
Really, can’t wait for the teddy bears.
You see them at trains stations, or in shopping malls, or near tourist destinations. Armed policemen. This is historically unusual in a Country like England, where the policeman is often unarmed. But these ones sport not only pistols, but short-ish guns looking like rifles or carbines to me.
The weapons look the part, though the policemen don’t. They smile at children, make an effort to be extra friendly, and generally endeavour to look non-threatening to the populace. But the message is clear: I want you to feel reassured by my smiling, armed presence.
Your typical UK terrorist would likely not try to go on a shooting spree. Too risky to get the weapons and to provide for the necessary training (whatever they told you in the movies, shooting people ain’t so easy). Rather, they would use devices like trucks, cars, or bomb vests. No training needed, and the results are pretty much assured. Not much a rifle can do against it, either. It will stop the terrorist at some point, but only when said terrorist has mowed down a dozen or three according to the distance of the friendly policeman. As to the self-exploding bastards: when they’re up in the air, that’s it.
Yours truly observes the smiling, rifle-carrying policemen and cannot avoid two considerations:
- Either it is useful to have a gun or it isn’t. If it is useful I, as a law-abiding citizen, want to be free to carry one. If it isn’t useful, then the police should wear smiles instead of rifles. But you see, they do carry the rifles. It works, then.
- The willed, planned immigration of millions with a different religion from our own has caused this. This immigration was pushed by largely Labour governments, and by weak and stupid Tory Governments, in the Fifties to Seventies. It is clear that the aim was to de-Christianise England. Have an awful lot of Hindus, Sikh and Muslims coming in and at some point Christianity will cease to be the defining moral system of the Country, and the Religion Of Man will take its place. It worked, though I must say the so-called Church of England and our very own priests have helped a lot. But it also means to import the problems always linked to importing Muslims. Then where there are many Muslims you know trouble can’t be far away.
And this is where we are now, with smiling policemen sporting pistols and rifles I am not allowed to carry; because I cannot save my life on my own, you see, the job being forcibly contracted to a friendly professional who will likely arrive there to protect me after I am dead.
This Country is braced for a good dose of religion of peace. But it is a strong Country, and it will react at some point.
As to the Germans, God save them; though clearly they don’t deserve it in the least.
Follow the link to the little girl spouting Islamic hate and… beheading a doll.
You know this is not “madness”. You know these people aren’t “disturbed”, though certainly they are disturbing.
They are devout Muslims, following with great orthodoxy the teaching of their religion; zealous enough not only to give their lives for it, but to instill the same hatred in their little children, girls not excepted.
It is high time to recognise that these here are the zealous Muslims. These are are the ones who take their religion seriously.
A peaceful Muslim isn’t such because Islam is a religion of peace. He is such because he is a bad Muslim. And religion having the potential to become the most powerful motivating factor in the life of the people, there is no saying how many of these bad Muslims will become devout Muslims one day, and how many of their children and nephews.
Religion is a life-changing force. There is no saying who will blow himself in the air in three years time, who is only interested in football, stock exchange and bicycling today. Every ever so tepid Muslim (millions of those in the UK, and out of personal experience most of them not more, or even less serious about their religion than our non-practising Catholics are about theirs) carries in himself the germs of an extremely destructive disease. It’s incubating now, but it could explode one day, or be transmitted down the line.
It is astonishing how all over the world countless zealous, devout Muslims show with their lives how a devout Muslim acts, and we insist in telling them what their religion is supposed to say and be.
This is the blind leading the blind.
It may well end in the beheading of a lot of blind.
I am not sure if I am losing count but if I remember correctly, after the massacre in Nice we had the following:
In a peaceful Bavarian German small-ish city, a mad Mohammedam tried to hack a dozen people to death on a train.
In a beautiful German city, a deranged Mohammedan killed nine people and sent another twenty or more to hospital before sending himself to hell with the Akhbar-Express. A million+ city paralysed for several hours.
In a small Bavarian city, another Mohammedan on the vigil of having his ass kicked out to Bulgaria decided it was better to blow himself out in the air during a crowded open-air festival. Luckily, he was too stingy to buy the entry ticket. But hey, he could afford the smartphone on which he had his own jihad-mini video. Truly desperate, these “migrants”. One feels like crying.
Now, only two of the three had an obvious Islamist background; but… can you see a trend here?
And wait, I forgot! There was the other chap who chopped his own wife to pieces with a machete, in broad daylight, also in Germany, in the hours before the last attack (Anspach, in case you have struggled following). Was he Buddhist? Hindu? Jew? Christian? Alas, no prize for getting it right….
The machete guy would have made the news the entire day, if another Mohammedan madman hadn't stolen the scene. And by the by, where the heck do they get their machetes from?
I am almost afraid to visit the site of the ARD now.
However, if I did, I can't imagine I would read of some pious Catholic trying to hack a couple of dozen Muslims to pieces.
I wonder why?
It appears the “religion of peace” striked again. The radio this morning was still pathetically talking of “possible” terrorist motivation (perhaps the lorry driver was having a heart attack? We shouldn't be prejudiced, you know…), but reality is slowly setting in.
I am informed the French police is currently following 11,000 (you read it correctly: that's eleven thousand) terrorist suspects in France, and I don't think there is any of them who is not a Mohammedan.
You have stupidly incubated a huge problem for decades, and the French poulets are now coming home to roost.
There must be consequences for folly; it is the way the Lord has organised the world. Individually, a life of drugs, alcoholism, gambling, or gluttony will make one's life miserable. Collectively, the immense folly of thinking that millions of Muslims can be peacefully “integrated” in a European Country will, in time, cause a tribute in blood and fear to be paid. God has organised the world so, that this kind of folly is paid on this world before it is paid (possibly far more harshly) in the next.
France is paying now, and Britain will pay in time. The tribute of blood will rise until the pain of the massacres is bigger than the desire of the population at large to keep believing in the stupid tale of the integration. Only at that point measures will be taken, and political correctness be stuffed.
We are not there, by far. Many, many more will have to die. Pray for the dead, that they may rest in peace. Pray for the living, that they can see reason before this becomes outright carnage in 30-years-war style.
Keep paying the price of your folly, former douce France.
You have made this bed. Now you will have to lie in it.
No reasonable person can have any doubt that most people in Nazi Germany were, actually, very nice. They greeted their neighbours, helped old women to cross the road, loved their dear ones, and were all round regular guys and gals. You can also be sure that in many of them the ideology wasn’t the primary aspect of their lives, which actually revolved – as everywhere – around family, friends, personal interests and a more or less pronounced amount of religion.
However, they also had something in common: to a littler or greater extent, they all subscribed to an extremely dangerous, racist, destructive, anti-Christian ideology; an ideology whose less savoury aspects they just set aside in the same way as the garden variety Pollyanna looks the other side when Pope Francis goes in full Evil Clown mode once again.
We know how it ended. The Holocaust, kept away from the eyes of the German Nation, was nothing more than the consequent application to its logical end of those very principles the good guys and gals approved. We also know that the most fanatical Nazis weren’t those of the first hour, but those of the last: the boys (and girls!) of the Hitlerjugend, raised without knowing anything else than bling loyalty to Hitler and accustomed since they could remember to set their life at naught against the Fuehrer and his ideals.
We can make a solid parallelism with the Nazism of our time: Islam.
Granted: most Muslims are certainly sincerely peaceful and, due to their imperfect attachment to their religion, prefer to look only at its savoury aspects and conveniently disregard the bad ones. But the fact remains that they are still objectively supporting, with their religious allegiance, the bloodiest, most cruel killing machine on the planet. Their childish desire to ignore the immense potential for violence inbuilt in their religion – so much so, that strong orthodoxy must, in fact, be a call to violence – changes nothing in the fact that they are still, objectively, helping this potential to explode.
Yes, they are nice guys and gals. Many of us know some of them. Still, they are, like the Good Nazis, part of an abominable system of violence and oppression; like the Good Nazis, they wilfully ignore the obvious, huge problems caused by their own religion; and as in the case of the Hitlerjugend, they are breeding a new generation of people who only know fanaticism, and put it before their own lives without thinking twice.
It is time to understand – and to say out loud – that to say that Islam is a huge problem, and a religion fomenting violence and hatred of all sort, does not mean to criminalise millions of decent people. It means to look at the facts without the rosa coloured spectacles of political correctness.
Yeah, I know. There are a lot of sincerely Good Muslims.
There were a lot of sincerely Good Nazis, too.
I am alarmed at reading around that our first enemy would be Western Atheism, or Secularism.
The first enemy is Islam. And the second. And the third.
Secularism might try to silence you. Islam will cut your head.
Secularism aborts its children. Islam produces a lot of them, and uses them as a way to power. Therefore, Secularism sits on its own time bomb, but helping Islam means importing a huge bomb within our shores,; and make no mistake, this bomb will be used against us.
Secularism still has, in the West, basic concepts of piety and respect. Islam will cut your throat and make a video of it, and make seven year old children execute you.
Secular democracies tend to revert or correct their wrong position after a while. Abortion is under attack after only one generation and a half. Islam becomes a nightmare that only… a Western power can take down, and it needs an awful lot of ass-kicking.
You can always try to reason with an Atheist. You can never reason with an Islamist. The first one’s attitude is one of wrong reasoning; the second one’s is refusal to reason.
Islam is a self-detonating bomb. Given enough traction, Islam leads to militant Islamism like twilight leads to dusk.
It is madness to think we may have more in common with a Muslim than with an Atheist. The Atheist is, when all is said and done, us minus the faith. The Muslim is the contrary of us. Even the most hardened Atheist can easily convert, when he start thinking with lucidity. He will find his place in the Western World without any problem. But the Islamist will be prevented by his very religion to do so. To him, the Western World will never be an option. to him, the West itself is the enemy.
In all this, niceness (or: the “good Muslims”) is neither here nor there. Islam tends to self-radicalisation. At some point, the “nice Muslims” are made to shut up, or die. You can bet your last shirt that their children won’t be so nice. It will need a Western Power to frighten them (Iran), keep them under control (Western Colonisation), or kick their ass altogether (Afghanistan, Iraq).
Compared to Islam, Secularism is a walk in the park. The French Revolution destroyed the Church in France, but after around a decade she was there again, tall and strong. The African Mediterranean coast conquered by the Mohammedans in the VII Century is largely Mohammedan to this very day.
There is no similarity whatever between Islam and Christianity. Islam is to Christianity what sodomy is to marital intercourse.
Similarly, there can be no identification between modern democracies and French Revolution. The American Colonies and the British Institutions were beautiful modern examples of the first, when no one even knew what the second is.
The first, second, and third enemy is Islam. Secularism is a problem, and it can be a threat to our freedom. But Islamists will cut your very throat, and let their many children watch.
We will deal with Secularism all right, as we always did. They are aborting themselves fast anyway. To defeat Secularism we only need sensible shepherds and functioning freedoms. To defeat the Muslims among us we might, at some point and if the blind attitude does not change, need a bloodbath of biblical proportions.
No Pope of the sane past has ever considered Mohammedans allied against Secularism.
The first, the second, and the third enemy is Islam.