I knew feminists are hard cases of resentful, bitter ugliness – I have written about it in the past -, but this article actually drives home the extent of the madness.
It was already evident that by every feminist – feminism is, as an “ism”, unavoidably angry bitches – lesbianism can’t be far away, as it is in the nature of such an hostility toward the other sex to refuse any contact with it; or more probably, the other’s sex utter refusal to touch a feminist with a barge pole slowly pushes the already abnormal angry nutcases from latent dykedom into an outright one.
What is amusingly tragic is the concept that every God-given intercourse of the God-given way – yes, the one used in order to make children; dykes not excluded – would now have to be classified as rape. Which clearly means – if words have a meaning – that it should be outlawed and punished with a jail term.
From here it gets obviously funnier and funnier. How do these dykes imagine the continuation of the species, assuming they do not hate themselves so much as to wish their own (good!) and the human race’s (bad!) extinction? With artificial insemination of an all-lesbian, rape-free couple, one thinks. But how to obtain the necessary ingredient of healthy male sperm, considering no sane man would be interested in giving his semen so that two dykes can pervert a child? By raping the males, perhaps? Or, perchance, by keeping them in slave farms until they get to the appropriate age? And which dyke “couple” would, then, not prefer to abort the baby in the womb upon knowing it’s going to be a boy, instead of giving birth to another exemplar of the hated, violent, penis-armed, raping oppressor?
I am sure the dykes have some theory about that. I would not be surprised.
I am more surprised that they are allowed to vote, and not locked in some psychiatric institution where something useful could, if at all possible, be done for them.
Obama’s vanguard, no doubt.
In a story that would have been unthinkable only one generation ago (probably not even good for a fantasy novel, as too disgustingly and shockingly vulgar) we now have to deal with the consequences of the perverted madness of the last decades, and of what happens when someone sees the light.
In this case there is a lesbian living together with her “partner”. They “adopt” a child, but… no, wait; only one of the lesbians does it, the other is merely the “significant other” (oh, the times we live in…) of the (oh, the times we live in…) “mother”. Therefore, the poor girl was given in adoption to one person, not two. The two lesbians had, though, contracted a so-called “civil marriage”.
In a dramatic turn of event, the “mother” repents of her lesbian lifestyle and leaves the other woman who had – let us say it once again – not adopted the child. I suspect here that a lesbian must be able to be double of a bitch, because the non-mother now asked for, and obtained, a shared custody right for the poor girl. So let us say it once again: the lesbian who did not adopt the child can now share custody rights with the daughter of a (now) fully committed Christian woman.
At this time the matter becomes serious, because the Mennonite community to which the converted ex-lesbian belongs to does not even conceive the possibility the poor girl may be, so to speak, put again into the jaws of the perversion from which she has just come out. Courageously – if illegally – they help mother and daughter to escape to Nicaragua to subtract her daughter to the terrible destiny the “enlightened” judges have prepared for her.
The matter is now an international case with criminal law and civil law ramifications – the lesbian bitch is suing pretty much everyone, it appears – and it is rather interesting because last time I looked Nicaragua was a bit more Catholic than the United States, and the concept of a daughter having to share possibly even half (and certainly too much) of her childhood and adolescence with a lesbian woman hated by her now Christian mother had not been entirely digested yet.
We will see how this pans out. Allow me here to express my admiration for the Mennonite pastor (and others, but particularly him) lucidly putting his freedom at risk in order to help a young girl not to live in the midst of abomination. Put in front of the choice between following God’s law and running the risk of going to jail, or following the law of man and continuous a peaceful life he did not hesitate to choose the former, nor seems the local (Nicaraguan) community less determined. These people may be Protestants as much as you like but boy, they have guts I would personally find beyond my strenght.
Good luck and our prayers to all of them, and of course to the young girl.
I have written some time ago about the great potential for trouble coming from perverted “relationships” and the utter failure to deliver on their promises of “normality”.
This here – (taken from the excellent site of John Smeaton, though the real link is from a disgusting “poof & lesbian” site) may be only an isolated case, but I think it is rather indicative of a mentality. A drunk lesbian punched her pregnant ex-girlfriend with a view – as she, according to the site, herself admits – to kill the baby. She was drunk, apparently (what a lady, btw); but as they say, in vino veritas.
I might be biased or naive here, but I can scarcely imagine a concluded heterosexual relationship in which the man punches her ex-girlfriend in her stomach with an aim to kill the baby she is now having from another man. I also cannot remember ever reading of a thing like that.
It seems to me that here the extreme selfishness so typical of these perverted relationships plays a role; that the hugely inflated “me”-attitude that persuades one that whatever he does – and is – is right, even if it is perverted to the extreme, is the same mentality which then considers utterly consequential to strike in order to kill whatever would come between one’s ego and the attainment of one’s desires. The drunkenness is here, I would say, rather what let the woman forget the legal implications of her act, that what formed her evil intention in the first place. Rather, the evil intention must be the obvious consequence of the extreme self-centredness of people with such behaviour.
It is no less than astonishing that the woman’s treatment has been so mild. In my book, this is an attempted homicide. I also wonder whether a man would have been treated, in the same situation, with the same mildness.
Thankfully, we are informed that the lesbian in question wants to “put this matter behind her”. How very kind of her.
I should now quote the one with the hell and the woman scorned; but I’m afraid lesbians go beyond that.