Blog Archives

Pro-Homo Weprin Destroyed In Race To Replace Weiner

This is really, really good news.

The allegedly oh so liberal, sex-and-the-wiener New York has soundly defeated the democratic candidate, the soi-disant orthodox Jew, but liberal pro-homo candidate Weprin and sent a daily communicant, Catholic Republican to replace Anthony Weiner.

If you liked this, you’ll love the 2012 elections.

Weprin was literally steamrolled, losing with a 8% difference in a district formerly considered solidly under Democratic influence.

No, it is not that the voters in New York have suddenly become right-wing Catholic Republicans. It is rather that the anger at the treason of the democratic and republican prostitutes who have sold themselves for the sake of electoral campaign money was strong enough to overcome partisan disagreements, and persuaded an awful lot of voters to side with Christian values in the midst of a Sodom offensive.

Please note that this vote humiliates a Democratic candidate in a rather safe democratic district. What will happen to the republican rats, I do not even want to think…

This result will now echo all over the United States and send a very clear message to what happens to the Jezebels of liberal politics.

I have said already often in the past that the Christian giants only needs to be properly awaken to destroy every secular/liberal/sodomite enemy on his way. No better proof than today’s.

I know it sounds trite, but it never sounded so true: if we could make it there, we’re gonna make it anywhere!


So-called “Same sex marriages” (ugh!) on their way to become a major issue in 2012 race

The liberal teacher couldn't explain why Cinderella didn't fell in love with the step sisters.

This is National Organisation for Marriage‘s Brian Brown:

“When the Iowa Supreme Court did the unthinkable in 2009 and invented a right to gay marriage in Iowa’s state constitution, they set off a powerful voter reaction that is still unfolding. First, voters threw out all three Supreme Court justices who faced voters in the retention election, including the Chief Justice. Next, Iowa voters will elect a presidential candidate who has pledged to take concrete steps to preserve marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Finally, Iowa voters will elect a pro-marriage majority that will put forward a proposed constitutional amendment reversing the activist decision by the Supreme Court.”

Of course, you may say that the NOM has all interest to amplify the real situation on the ground, but from what can be seen from the other side of the Pond he is not very far from the mark, though perhaps a bit premature if we extend his statement to the US as a whole.

Still, it is rather probable that NY’s decision on institutionalised sodomy will have nationally sa bit of the effect that the 2009’s decision of Iowa’s Supreme Court had – and is still having – locally.

As it happens so often, it is only when shocking things happen that we understand the scale of the attack brought to Christianity as the basis of Western civilisation. Paradoxically, the decision of the State of NY might have contributed to the awakening of too many people whose only reaction to homo propaganda was indifference or a kind of benevolent smugness.


“Why Marriage Matters”: NOM Leaflets

The National Organisation for Marriage has an interesting page, “Why Marriage Matters”.

The page explains to Protestants, Catholics and Jews why marriage is directly relevant to them, and why they should mobilise to defend it.

The leaflet for Catholics (in English) is here.

Whilst you could print the .pdf file in two pages and the work is therefore rather concise in nature, this is something that can be forwarded to friends and colleagues in the US and have, in fact, a concrete chance of being actually read.

The arguments are of rather practical nature and should therefore make the matter accessible even to those (the majority among Catholics) who don’t have a solid formation on the matter. I personally would use different, more “militant” arguments, but it seems to me that the NOM approach is simple and accessible for everyone.

This might a good idea for an email.


Pro-Marriage Demonstrations a Great Success

Not for perverts.

In the press release of the National Organisation for Marriage, NOM’s president Brian Brown said:

“The crowd in Manhattan was so large the NYPD asked us to begin our march early so that we could relieve overcrowding at the gathering site. By the time we reached the United Nation’s plaza, nearly 10,000 people were present. This shows that a new era in the debate about same-sex marriage has begun. It’s not about what politicians think is best, it’s about demanding that the People be given their right to be heard.”

I think that this admirably sums up what I wanted to say with this blog post:

1) the rally was a great success, not only above expectations but (as you could read yesterday for the first NOM press releases) with people spontaneously joining the march;

2) the Christian side is now officially on the offensive, and my impression is that the politicians who prostituted themselves will be able to run, but not to hide;

3) the cry for a vote in NY is not going to go away, and when it is given the population’s awareness will be high enough to ensure victory.

More in general, it is an illusion for a politician to think that he can politically survive (particularly after having betrayed and sold his backside vote) by espousing the cause of around 1% of the population. It can work only until the common man wakes up; but when this happens, said politician is utterly done for.

Similarly, he who thinks that this movement is now going to quietly die after the first emotional wave following the vote is clearly in denial. This is going to stay and organisations like NOM, the religious organisations like the Only Church and the Protestant communities and the many people who aren’t particularly religious, but are conservative enough to care for the basic instruments of a functioning society will care for it. Against them, a small minority of (how is the word again? “Gay”? No, it can’t be. Oh yes, now I remember…) perverts and their lapdogs, the liberals. When the country wakes up they haven’t the shadow of a chance, as social “liberalism” is clearly in the minority.

In the meantime, the legal challenge to the law goes on. Whilst I wouldn’t bet my pint on its success, this is another sign that this is a fight not going to disappear from the radar screen.


%d bloggers like this: