Infinite Shamelessness

Apr 9

Posted by

Infinite faggotry

I have tried to read the newest excrementation, or declaration, or whatever document it is, about the alleged infinite dignity of the human person. They quote the United Nation at the very start. I have stopped reading there, as I am not a follower of the United Nations religion.

Still, already from a general perspective, it is quite evident what this infinite here and infinite there aims at: the divinisation of the human being.

It is not Christian (much less Catholic) tradition to say that a person has “infinite dignity”. Why? Because it hasn’t.

A person can lose his right to live through his culpable action, and therefore be sent to the scaffold. A person can be part of an army fighting against ours in a just war, and therefore get a bullet in his head. A person can be found guilty of conduct unbecoming to a clergyman, and therefore be smashed on the street. A person can be guilty of depraved behaviour, and therefore (again) executed (the treatment yours truly would inflict to, say, child rapists) or jailed (the treatment yours truly would reserve to scandalous sodomites).

When the person is seen as the carrier of something “infinite” qua person, this person becomes, in a way, untouchable, and I wonder how such a person can, with this reasoning, be condemned to hell if, qua person, he is the bearer of such glory.

I have, as stated, not read, nor will I read, the excrementation. I don’t know what Kissing Faggot and Fat Faggot have tried to smuggle with the excuse of all this infinite stuff. However, already this “infinite” adjective does not pass the smell test.

With the V II church, and more so with the acute manifestation of the disease, the frankiechurch, we see this constant levelling of every traditional religious concept to the prejudices and feel-good feelings of the world out there, which makes the initial mention of the United Station not casual, but programmatic.

Infinite dignity, my foot.

In Catholic times, death on the stake awaited those who played with the truths of the Church. Believe it or not, this treatment was perfectly in line with the infinite nature of the soul possessed by the condemned heretic and making, ipso facto, the carrier of that soul worthy of the punishment.

As to the person, he was burned to a crisp.

Amazingly, Catholicism in those times did not consist in stupid regurgitation of worldly prejudices and fashions.

Posted on April 9, 2024, in Bad Shepherds, Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Dissent, Traditional Catholicism. Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.

  1. Paul Jackson | April 9, 2024 at 9:23 am

    Like you, I could only read a few lines of this drivel, to see that it repeatedly refers to UN. I stopped reading the document, too. I suggest not to read the document, as it will sow confusion and doubt. But counting and categorising the references in the footnotes carries no such risk.

    I counted at least 63 of the 116 references – 54% – were to Bergoglio or to documents produced during his putative pontificate. There may well have been more, since the referencing is sloppy and many lack dates.

    UN appears at least three times in footnotes.

    Conversely, I counted not a single reference to Holy Scripture in the footnotes, even though there were obvious concepts and phrases in the short segments of text I did read that should have been referenced to Holy Scripture, such as men and women being created in the image and likeness of God.

    In short, it appeared to be largely self-referential, deferential to UN and indifferent to Holy Scripture.

  2. Mary K | April 10, 2024 at 1:13 am

    I also attempted a reading. The entire thing was loaded with various errors, at least the first few paragraphs I made my way through. However, hope springs eternal, I’ve heard, and I hope and pray that these clowns will make themselves too obviously erroneous that no one will take them seriously.