He is absolutely right in seeing in what is happening not the wishful thinking of a tiny minority of madmen, but a distinctive trait of the contemporary, official Western culture .
He is, also, right in calling the indoctrination of children (and, clearly, the perversion of their minds that go with that) a crime against humanity.
In fact, the events of the last few years have eloquently showed how madness gets to power: with the indifference, or the desire to be nice, or the silence, or the cowardice, or – worst of all – the conformism of the majority.
A lot of people are just too stupid to understand the implications of their actions. Here in England, a lot of people now use “they” who, ten years ago, would have said the generic “him”. At times they even use “they” just to show you they are hip. “I have a girlfriend. They work in finance”. I immediately challenge and mock those who address me in this way (“oh, you mean you don’t know if she has a vagina?”), but if they speak to me in that manner, it means it made them look well elsewhere.
The dictatorship of these monstrous people will, if it comes, be based on exactly this: the acquiescence and desire of acceptance of the normal people.
Putin is right also in this, that it is not Russia’s job to save the West from self-destruction. It is our job, and the best way to do it is to react strongly to any attempt, no matter how small or even unintended, to pollute our minds.
Be strong. Be assertive. Make people understand that strong disapprobation is linked to gender theory conformism. Then explains to them why this is so. This will open their eyes to what they are, probably unwittingly, doing.
Bruce Jenner has, as a former track runner, condemned the fact that a boy has been allowed to get a place in State track running competition by running among women rather than among men. Breitbart – not linked to, as they keep misgendering Bruce Jenner – informs us that the boy would, if he had run among the people of his sex, have arrived last. Among the girls he arrived second, likely deciding not to crush the opposition in order to attract less flack on himself. I wonder if he will find other boys in the State finals. I am sure there are scholarships to be scrounged with this.
Now, there is no innocent in all this. Bruce Jenner is merely a madman criticising others for giving signs of even bigger mental instability than himself. However, most others support this kind of degeneracy out of pure calculation (leftists bent on destroying every vestige of decency, assorted fags and dykes hoping to look less disordered, and boys gunning for the scrounging of victories and scholarships). Bruce Jenner, instead, had himself mutilated [edit: it appears he still has his appendages, but you get the point….] just to make the absurd point that he thinks he is a woman.
But it’s really worse than that. This is not only the kettle calling the pot black. This is the arsonist criticising the fires that others have startedafter him. The hypocrisy is staggering as it comes from a man who has been a driving force of the madness we are seeing today. The guy cannot decide that he is a woman, but other boys aren’t. It’s self-serving and hypocritical in the extreme.
Of course, Bruce Jenner has a clear agenda here: to make for himself a conservative reputation as the most conservative Trannie in the village.
Sorry, Bruce. You can’t be a trannie and a conservative. You can only be as monstrous politically as you are physically.
But then again, this guy is most likely merely looking for validation, desperately craving the approval he knows he does not give to himself. And in fact, what Bruce Jenner is screaming from the rooftops is exactly this: he himself does not believe, nor did he ever believe, that he is a woman.
And if he is not a woman, he can only be a monstrously deformed individual.
Sorry, just stating the facts here. As even Bruce Jenner appears to clearly see.
I do not see a happy ending in Bruce’s cautionary tale. I see a suicide with subsequent hell as the most likely outcome, and hell as a foregone conclusion, barring conversion, if he dies of natural causes.
But no, I think suicide is the most likely outcome. Satan is clearly closing in on the guy, trying to make the cognitive dissonance in his head explode.
Pray for all the victims and those persecuted by these maniacs.
Some days ago I had written, in my innocence, that of course the LA Dodgers would, upon being informed of who they are, disinvite the blasphemous group of perverts.
They don’t want to become the next Bud Light, I wrote.
What this says to me is that this is more alarming than the original post. This is a deliberate woke provocation made in full knowledge of the facts by an obviously pro-pervert organisation now clearly meant to shove perversion and blasphemy down their fans’ throat.
We will see how this pans out, but it seems to me that there is now a full scale attack on Christian values and decency, probably motivated by the hope that there is “strength in numbers” and people will not have the rage or the discipline to boycott everyone that goes trannie/pervie/woke.
Make no mistake: this will end up perverting the masses, little by little, until every perversion is normalised.
Would the LA Fudgers, only twenty years ago, have dared to organise a faggofeast? Twenty years later not only they have the blasphemous trannies, but – which is likely worse – the faggofest has been entirely normalised!
If things go on this way, give it another twenty years and the trannies will be everywhere, with the p-p-professional Catholics now screaming against the invitation of the incestuous whilst not even mentioning either the faggots or the trannies.
Meanwhile, Russia becomes more and more Christian, strengthens its education system, improves its military technology advantage with the unites states, and prepares itself to give the woke West a lesson it will never forget.
One can see, once again, a clear parallel to the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, killed by the debauchery and sissification of its people. The big difference is, most likely, that social processes that once took centuries now go much faster. Just look at what has happened in the “Kinzhal Vs Patriot” duel last week in the Ukraine to see how fast the cards can change in the military technology game.
Will the US recover? Sad to say, likely not. The 2024 elections will be most likely stolen and the perversion of the American society will continue apace, until a big shock comes which, hopefully, reverses the course. This shock will likely be the outbreak of armed confrontation between the mainstream and the woke troops, or a humiliating military defeat, courtesy of China or Russia, that opens the eyes about what degeneracy leads to.
The LA Fudgers incarnate what a vocal, aggressive, bigoted minority is doing to the once great USA.
As long as the Conservatives – or, actually, the normal people – are worried about appearing “moderate” and “reasonable”, there is no way of winning this.
Donald Trump will gloriously sail to the 2024 Republican nomination.
The problem will be what happens next.
It seems to me that the third world electoral system of the United States is simply not equipped to ensure a fair election. What saved the system up to not long ago was the widespread interest among Americans that the elections be fair.
This is not the case anymore. It is obvious that millions of Trump haters will prefer, every day of the week, that the election is stolen from him rather than seeing him win, whilst a much bigger number of Democrats prefers to look the other way and pretend that things are “broadly” OK. When the correctness of the electoral process is not considered foundational, democracies die.
The issue is also not easily fixable. The problem is that the Democrats control all the ratholes, the ghetto-cities, in the United States, and these ghetto-cities can be manipulated to flip a number of very important states – Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia – in the desired direction.
In these ghetto-cities there will be no scarcity of people willing and ready to manipulate the elections and produce a huge amount of fake ballots. They will do this out of ideological bigotry, financial gain, or desire to carry favour with the power structures of those cities, so that the latter may greatly advance the careers of those making such “favours” to them and provide all sort of jobs and privileges to their family members.
These are almost all states whose power structures – from the governors to the local mayors and chiefs of police – would not hesitate to arrest or disperse, with various claims of “intimidation”, those picketing the entrances of the ballot places to prevent the ingress of people carrying huge quantities of papers in grey bags. As the election is a local affair, and the named cities not a favourable environment for honest people, the provocations followed by accusations of “racist violence” would be a very easy trick to pull. Short of sheer anti-tyrannical violence, I can’t see how this can change.
Trump has, I think, not addressed this issue sufficiently forcefully. He might think that the 2020 situation made fraud easier because of the easing of voting rules (= of voting fraud) in some States, but it seems to me that the issue is more endemic than occasional. Trump needs to organise pickets and encourage the formation of ballot militias now, instead of crying “fraud” when it is very late as happened in 2020. Plus, we now know that – in another huge break of failsafes – the Supreme Court will not intervene to save the election from a bunch of criminals, and the population at large will, as a whole, accept what the social media tell them. The only thing that has changed in Trump’s favour is Twitter, but Twitter is not enough if the ballots have been stuffed already.
The 2022 elections have worsened the issue. People are now accustomed to have winners of important races announced weeks after the day of the vote. This opens an immensely wide gate to manipulators.
Mind, I do not doubt that the US will continue to work, broadly, as an efficient First World country. Tribunals will work as usual, the public administration will keep going on at all levels, the fire brigades will keep protecting people, etc. But if the level of the fundamental decisions is compromised, all the rest can only be lipstick on a Democrat pig.
This impacts the Country on a broader scale. As the United States are seen as a bunch of jokesters, their “moral lead” in the West – so it still existed – evaporates. The process is exacerbated by the fact that the rigged elections produce rigged ideologies, with perversion now pushed everywhere. So you have a bunch of perverted jokesters trying to tell everybody how they have to behave, after they have stolen the elections themselves.
This is the stuff out of which empires die.
It seems to me that the American people should make of this the first issue of the upcoming election. If this issue is not tackled and solved, at some point the country will descend to a numb state of banana republic manipulation – broadly accepted because people have families and mortgages – or, more likely, to something very similar to a brutal civil war, which will cause the side with the 300 million rifles to win and the side with the blue hair to lose.
America is ill. Its illness is very dangerous and potentially deadly. If the Country develops the necessary antibodies, the positive effects will be felt in a number of areas. If it doesn’t, expect more trannies, and more aggressive ones, around your children.
Unless you are a Ukraine supporter (and in that case I really don’t envy you, as the cognitive dissonance must be getting bigger by the week; this, besides the fact that you are supporting a bunch of Nazis), you remember very well all the statements made by Zelenki & Co. about the importance of the “Zelensky line” in general, and of Bakhmut in particular.
Zelenky flew to Washington months ago, bringing there a Ukrainian flag with the signature of Bakhmut soldiers. He repeatedly stated that Bakhmut was a fortress impossible to take. When it appeared clear to the Ukrainian top echelons that Bakhmut would be lost, the place suddenly became “strategically insignificant” (a total absurdity: Bakhmut lies over a beautiful mini-hill dominating the Russian-held landscape to the east, and is an important communication knot) and still, Zelensky did not want to let it go, justifying his stubbornness with the argument that, once Bakhmut falls, the Russians would use the UN and “the world” to try to “freeze” the conflict. Besides being dumb, the argument once again proved how important Bakhmut always was, as nobody would fear a diplomatic offensive meant to end a conflict after the capture of a ” strategically insignificant place”.
If you want to know at what point the derangement has come (unless they are prevalently bots, which at this point would be better for my confidence in humanity), you only need to go to places like R/Ukraine on Reddit. A parallel reality seems to operate there, with commenters seriously discussing the imminent end of Wagner after its encirclement by Ukrainian forces on the very morning of the day when Wagner announced the final victory in Bakhmut. Again, there might be a strong bot activity. But boy, if the bots have to spread such outlandish news, it means that there is no refuge in reality anymore for the Ukronazis.
Meanwhile – and, if you ask me, in another show of desperation and fear – one notices that, after Medvedev’s tweet to Zelenski and Co. following the drone that flew over the Kremlin, Zelenski has not dared to go back to the Ukraine yet. I cannot avoid thinking that the guy starts to fear that the gentle Russians, who always allow anybody who is… nobody to visit him from foreign Capitals, will not forgive the drone affair, and already have a nice high-penetration missile with his name written on it, patiently awaiting his return to Kiev.
Mr Z, a man with a real sense for comedy, even visited Francis, a guy who can’t even take part in a secret peace initiative without resisting the temptation to brag about it in public. Zelenski seems to think that, as he is persecuting Orthodox priests, he will get a pass with Catholics.
Not here, T-shirt boy. Not here.
So, where are we now? Two of the three main bastions of the “Zelenski line” (Soledar and Bakhmut), have fallen, and the third (Seversk) look more and more like a big cauldron in the making and is, obviously, now completely untenable. As Colonel Douglas McGregor never ceases to remind everybody, the Ukrainians will never have a comparable position in this direction, because Krematorsk and Slaviansk are much less fortunate from a defensive point of view and west of them there is… pampa all the way to the Great River. It does not look good for Mr Cocaine.
Meanwhile, the reckless defence of Bakhmut (in part, surely, because of its position; in part, undoubtedly, because of stubborness and PR thinking whilst soldiers die) cost the Ukrainian a staggering amount of killed and maimed in action; a number which, when all his said and done, I think will hover around 35k to 50k. I am talking Bakhmut alone. The total dead and maimed for the Ukrainian at this point must surely exceed 300k.
I don’t think Zelenski finances suffered in the meanwhile. In fact, I think they are now in extremely good health.
Pray that this carnage ends soon, in a way that protects Russia and allows enough humiliation for the West to make it palatable after accounting for the incessant propaganda that will try to cover the defeat. Not all Ukrainians are Nazis (though they are culpable of looking the other way when they see those who are), and everybody has a mother.
I know what kind of people will accept the invitation…
Let us say there is a famous British TV presenter. Let us, further, say that this presenter, married with children, “came out” as one of the Elton John persuasion some years ago.
Now let us imagine that this guy has a brother, and that this guy’s brother is trialled and condemned to 12 years in jail for a year long abuse of a minor involving sexual acts with said minor.
What persuasion had the brother of said presenter? I think I barely need to tell you , but still: the same Elton John persuasion of his famous brother.
As I write this, I am sure that thousands of smart Brits are thinking what you and I are thinking: homosexuality and pedophilia are intimately linked. Not, mind, in the sense that most homosexuals are pedophiles, but in the sense that most pedophiles are homosexuals. Ask the Church, which has a substantial experience of this. Or the so-called Church of England. Or the British education system.
We, the Thinking Christians, know perfectly well why: sexual perversion isn’t a “born that way” “character” of a person, like being blond, or having a big nose. It is, on the contrary, the result of the homosexual person consenting to having his brain depraved by the devil through numerous acts of assent to evil.
This being so, it follows that perversion is not a kind of limited, circumscribed, “this is the last station” journey. It is rather so, that the devil will, once he has made inroads into a depraved mind, keep depraving it as much as he can, igniting in the already depraved mind of his intended prey all sorts of forbidden desires, the more disgusting the better.
Heck: these people can literally eat excrement! Is it so surprising that depravity would then target the real epitome of innocence, children? No, it’s not. I’d say that, as a rule, this must sound very reasonable, and something that in sane times would be instantly recognised. In this particular case, we know the victim is a “he” (means: surprise surprise, the culprit is a fag), though we are not told what kind of “minor” he is (spoiler alert: a 15 years and 11 months old, extremely horny, 90 kg heavy, extremely depraved gym rat homo boy is a “child” in newspaper speak). However, we know in this case that the forbidden acts happened in a two year lifespan, which makes the age of the victim fourteen, at the oldest, when the criminal activity begun.
I have this mental image here, that pedophilia hovers around the mind of many homosexuals, like a Russian drone over a Ukrainian trench, as the devil and his demons are patiently working on them. In this example: two homo brothers, one a pedo. Makes a 50% incidence of pedophilia among the family perverts. What a beautiful rainbow, nicht wahr?
(Also very much worth asking: what kind of flipping family is this one? What were papa’s, or uncle’s, proclivities? What did mama, or auntie, know? Could it be that perversion was already in the family, making the Devil’s work an easier one?).
Another consideration is this: having said all that has preceded, what kind of depraved minds could even conceive that homosexuals can “adopt” children? Does it need a genius to understand how many victims are being created by legislative decree?
But then again, the persuasion of Elton John has allied itself with the Church of Nice, and the Church of Atheism. I don’t even think that the results are under everybody’s eyes. I think that the results are monstrously wrong, and we will see them emerge on a terrifying scale in the decades to come.
Meanwhile, June is coming, when another so-called “pride month” will contribute to the perversion of the mind of the stupid, both straight and pervs.
The P-p-professional Catholics were in full show today, as the LA Dodgers disinvited from their “pride night” that blasphemous bunch of perverts going around and mocking the Catholic faith. The P-p-professional Catholics actually took a victory lap, because perverts’ night could not have some perverts among the participants.
There was – that I can read about, at least; means if there was, it wasn’t forceful – any condemnation of perverts’ night per se. No, the P-p-professional Catholics are evidently fully ok with such events, that have now become mainstream also thanks to their lame defence of Christian values. But they will rejoice to the skies when the ultra freaks are kept out.
What a lame show. The ultra freaks are such freaks, that it was unthinkable that the Dodgers, once informed of who they are, would have not disinvited them. It does not need any P-p-professional Catholic for that. Two or three concerned parents would most likely have been enough, as the Dodgers most certainly don’t want to be the next Bud Light.
In fact, the very term “pride night” is not criticised. It is simply accepted uncritically, because hey, blasphemous trannie bad, but sodomite normal.
This is how these organisation works. Living of the money they receive, they need to advertise victories when there are none, so that the money keeps flowing.
The months since the start of the Special Military Operation have showed with brutal efficiency why the traditional press is dying. The scale of disinformation is off the chart. It is only natural that alternative channels of information (from blogs to Substack mailing list, to video channels) are now making the bigger part of the information sources of thinking people.
The press does the same old prostitution job, masked behind a fake layer of trustworthiness.
Last example: the Western press is now reporting the “six Kinzhal missiles” the Ukrainians claim they have shot down quite recently. The “fact checkers” by now (I think) employed by every newspaper will let the lie pass because, well, it is true that the Ukrainians claim the victories. But uncritically reporting a propaganda lie is not information, it’s a lie masked as fact.
Anybody who knows anything about the Kinzhal knows that the only way a Patriot missile can take one of those down is by sheer luck, “needle in a haystack” fashion. The idea that six have been taken down on the same day is bad comedy. In fact, even the idea that one has been taken down pushes very hard at the boundaries of reality.
But then again the Ukrainians had to admit a huge loss of ammo and other equipment, likely in the order of hundreds of millions of euros in value, just days ago, with a series of explosions in one single location that caused a huge mushroom-like smoke column. This was tantamount to the admission that their air defence is in dire straits, because it’s unthinkable that such a weapon stash would not be protected with the very best the Ukrainians have. So what do they do when they are forced to admit that the Russians run circles around them? They lie even more, and now want you to believe their extremely expensive, vintage missile system – which has been already humiliated by Iranians drowning in sanctions, and Yemeni fighters in sandals – can take down a Kinzhal. The Official Press is, as always, eager to help.
The mechanism is the one I have already described: modern mass media are the slaves of the narrative they think their pro-Ukrainian readers want to read. They feel obliged to do it because their revenue depends, in a shockingly big proportion, from the Ukraine fanboys retweeting, sharing and forwarding their articles. An outfit like the “Guardian” will see certainly more than half of the revenue of every Ukraine article go away, unless they keep their pro-Ukrainian customers satisfied.
Compare and contrast with the new information channels.
A two-person outfit like The Duran has no overhead costs. They broadcast from their living rooms. A guy like Judge Napolitano will interview his (smart) colonels from his home office. Guys like iEarlGrey and The New Atlas will rely only on the reputation of trustworthiness they get, and know that this will allow them to weather any emotional storm among their readers. If they chase public opinion, they will soon disappear. If they are truthful they will have ups and downs, but will prosper in the end as their non-existent overhead allows them to weather any storm, and make good money in the process.
It goes without saying that other pressures apply. In the UK, the Government pays subsidies to the traditional press. Do you think they will defy the hands that feeds them by exposing every day the monstrous lies of the British Government? Me neither.
Of course, the “fact checking” forms will be satisfied.
“Vladimir Putin, whom many say has cancer, is reportedly desperately looking for a way out from the situation in Crimea. ‘He really is contemplating suicide, but in reality, he could be killed before he can do even that’, a source familiar with the Kremlin disclosed to us”.
I am sure this will get past every fact checker. You only need to show him that it is true that some say Putin has cancer, & Co. What remains out of all this, is integrity.
It goes for everything else. “Cardinal Pell, who was accused of sexual abuse of minors before he died, was considered by some of his fellow Cardinals a devastating influence on the Church”.
It really is very easy.
In the long term, this has led – and will continue to lead – to loss of readers, as more and more realise there is no need for a propaganda outlet with a prestigious name to know what’s happening. Micro-companies with quality material will take their eyeballs, their time, and the relevant revenue.
The mass media will go, unless they change, the way of Budweiser Light.
Her resemblance to a pig is just one of the reasons why Mohammedans don’t like her.
Dr Steve Thurley has a very interesting video about a squabble between young Mohammedan high school students and the usual suspects of the pervo persuasion.
The demographics are interesting, and this is one of those episodes which, in an unbloody manner, tell people where things are going. Belgium is islamising itself fast, and has nothing of the no-nonsense approach of, say, Danemark.
They are making their own bed. It will be interesting to watch.
In this particular episode, a number of boys go out of school during the pause to tell the perverts out there what they think of them. It was the appetiser. For the main course, the People Of Father Georgina will have to wait a decade or two.
This also signals – as I have noted many times already – the destructive, self-defeating nature of European Neo-Marxism.
Marxists want to coalesce and weaponise all those they see as “oppressed” (every conceivable minority) against those they see as “oppressors” (the mainstream, non-Marxist population). In doing so, they are bound to stir every possible conflict: first of all, the one between “oppressed” Muslims and “oppressed” pervos.
The latter conflict is as inevitable as it will be brutal, because Muslims don’t have anything of the Christian gentleness, and proceed against abomination with Old Testament decisiveness instead. As they feel stronger, they will gradually make the pervos understand there is no place for them in Belgium. Some Muslims might, in the past, have welcomed perversion as a way to undermine the West; but this attitude had to die when perversion becomes something that tries to infiltrate their schools, their children, and their way of life rather than remaining the preserve of elitist Whites far removed from them economically, socially, and even geographically.
Belgium, the Country of many excellent beers, is brewing a very strong beverage for the pervotroops. The process will continue unabated, because the social relevance of the Mohammedans dwarfs that of the pervos. Brutally put: there aren’t nearly enough fags in Belgium to clean all those toilets.
Do not expect blood in the streets, “fairy” hunts, or the like. Expect, instead, a constantly growing climate of intimidation that will gradually, quietly, and very effectively do in the future what Christian feelings, social control and legislation used to do in decades past. “Pride” parades and the likes will gradually disappear, and the pervos will be forced to go back to the dirty closets whence they came. The others, left or right, will not care. They will all look the other way, and be glad that nobody tries to pervert their children in the open, under the sun, even exposing them to the lust of trannies.
The next danger (an increasingly strong Muslim influence, at some point able to threaten not only an isolated fringe despised by very many, but the mainstream) will be for us to tackle. That conflict, too, is coming, and (bar a rapid assimilation and westernisation of the Muslims, which is somewhat in the cards, but not assured) will not be pretty, at all.
When that time comes (not in my lifetime, I think; but not many decades after my departure) it will decide the future of Europe. But the pervo troops, they will long have been defeated by that time.
What can I say: in everything, I try to see the work of Providence. And it seems to me that God, in His inscrutable, providential Goodness, allows some evil not only to exist, but to operate against another evil.
The Belgian episode is, if you ask me, another example of this Providence at work.
Of course, this being possibly the wokest Country in the West, the Nazi attitude must be clothed in good-ism. There has to be some social justice profile to it. Woke people are so dumb that they are accustomed to believe that a woman can be a man, so it is certainly possible to do it.
If you don’t understand French, you will need a translator, but the gist I can give you myself: it is “unacceptable” to “force” people who are already in an “unjust social position” to wait that things improve. This, in an article published in the journal of medical ethics. Go figure.
Things would go like this.
“I want to die”.
“Why?”
“I am poor”.
“Oh, I am so sorry for the injustice of your situation! Please wait here and the doctor will be with you with the injection in just a few minutes. Bye”.
Of course, it would soon be worse than this. As always in the case of euthanasia, massive pressure would be applied on certain categories to “choose” to off themselves. It is the obvious, unavoidable result of the slippery slope. At some point, euthanasia will be made compulsory, as the victim’s “consent” will be assumed or deemed mandatory. Hey, they do it with animals, too, and woke people already worship animals to the point that many of them don’t want a cow or a pig to die, so there…
I will spell it for you what you are already thinking: the fallen human nature is such, that without the guiding light of religion there is no limit to the atrocities humans might perpetrate. When it’s uncomfortable, said humans will, then, simply proceed to explain to themselves why the evil is, in fact, good.
When Christ is lost, everything is lost.
This monstrous Kayla Wiebe woman is a perfect example.
I am, I think, one of the few people making a connection between the spread of fatness and the march of sexual perversion; or, more in general, between perversion and the lack of discipline and permissive attitude of which fatness is the most evident signal (a distant second would be tattoos).
I sit on the bus, looking at just another grotesquely fat young girl of, say, 21. Without knowing her, I understand the high probability that the fattie squeezed in the bus seat is in favour of so-called gay marriage, gender theory, affirming lesbians, and the like.
Why is that? Insecurity, and need of acceptance.
Fattie knows that she is vulnerable to brutal criticism. Much as she can have persuaded herself that it’s not her fault that she is a voting hippo, she still knows, deep down, that: a. She is, and b. Everybody else knows it, too. It’s like the trannie fantasy: you can pretend as much as you like that George is now Henrietta, but everybody knows the truth.
Fattie is now terrified of being excluded. Without the discipline to stay away from the fries and donuts, without parents “judging” her and teaching her discipline, without knowing what the word “gluttony” even means, and without any guidance from teachers either rotten in their brain or terrified of saying one single word, she knows she is going to remain the no-circus-ticket cannon woman.
She will react seeking all “inclusion” she can. I include you, so you include me. The mainstream ideas propagated by the msm will never be challenged. She will never dare to criticise any sexual behaviour – except when it’s socially safe: pedophilia – lest she is told about her behaviour. She will become a beacon of “inclusiviteee”.
The person without the money for the cinema will want free tickets for all.
Suddenly, nobody – unless he is Trump – can do anything wrong: tattoos, purple hair and ignoring that Georgina has a penis will become an untouchable moral imperative, because fattie knows that her very social life is at stake. In order for her to keep ingesting rubbish food, others must be allowed to live rubbish lives.
It works for boys, too; but less so, then boys are more self-assured and physical appearance is less important to them. Still, the basic mechanism will be the same.
Once upon a time, there was a received set of values, which did not allow challenges without punishment. A woman called herself a “free spirit”, the other girls called her a slut. Men would use her and throw her away. It was a system of brutal sanctions for wrong behaviour. This system of values has been dismantled, because the very guardians of the system (the boys and the girls, their parents, their teachers) have renounced to their role of social controllers. This they have done, in countless cases, because they are fat, their parents are fat, their daughters are fat, there is no priest worthy of the name around, and their teachers are fat, leftists, or terrified.
No moral values in one thing leads to no moral values in other things. It’s a slippery slope.
Our ancestors knew it. They enforced a social system of sanctions and exclusion.
Today, it’s just an endless row of letters followed by a plus.
“Indietrismo” is the new word some speech writer in the Vatican has coined to allow Francis to express his dislike for people who are, you know, Catholics.
It means “backward-ism”, and we understand that, in the eyes of Francis, is meant as an insult.
You see, not to put too fine a point on it, the old, lewd, fat, bitter guy is angry with the people who want to go back to Catholicism, back to proper liturgy, back to proper doctrine, back to precise and correct theology, back to actually practising the sacraments, back to proper prayer, back to doing penance, and back to all that other stuff that, actually – and to the chagrin of the old, lewd guy – makes a Catholic.
I find this backward-ism, in fact, really good. It seems I am not the only one, either. The SSPX has just consecrated a $42m church, which shows that the movement is in rude health.
It appears, in fact, that the people who want to go back to sanity are, in great part, young; whilst those who think that the Blessed Virgin might have felt betrayed at the foot of the cross are, in fact, old, fat, bitter, ignorant and very, very stupid like the Evil Clown itself. Hence, his complaining in the company of decrepit, dying Jesuits who think it’s 1969, and who have by now hopefully forgotten that they are atheists, heretics, homosexuals, or all of the above. No worries, though. They will be reminded soon enough.
Back is the new forward, whilst the decrepit heretics who think themselves progressives are those who want to bring us back to pre-Christian times, when people worshipped trees and totems and animals just as the Francistroops worship the climate, the forest, and retarded girls from Sweden.
The guy is losing, and he knows it. He is losing and it makes him angry. He has already understood that, when he is six feet under, he will be ridiculed just as much as he will be condemned. For a big, fat ego like the guy’s it’s a kick on the teeth even if he is an atheist. Hence, the bitterness.
We just had a coronation.
Let’s hope we’ll soon have a new one; and that, this time, the new king will be better than the old one.
I have not watched Charles’ coronation. Firstly, I am allergic to Welby, and secondly, I was mindful of what happened to Elizabeth’s funeral.
This Country seem to be so, that the same people who sanction abominations like the so-called same sex marriage also enjoy the pomp and circumstance of Royal ceremonies, and make themselves beautiful giving a fake show of Christian allegiance, and nobody calls them out for their hypocrisy. This likely happens because everybody knows it’s only a show.
Therefore, those self-important, self-appointed representatives of Catholicism in England, who say that the ceremony was a reaffirmation of Christian values, have understood exactly zippo of what this was all about: the respect of traditional forms now largely devoid of significance.
The Romans did that, too, and they still had solemn appointment of the Pontifex Maximus and other religious as well as political figures (even of tribunes, consuls, etc.) long after these appointment had ceased to have but a symbolic role, a tribute to a past long gone.
State organisations want to perpetuate themselves. If they threw away today the traditions of yesterday, people would start to wonder why more radical modernisations should not be introduced. The British Government has divested itself of its Empire, but it has remained the same: there was never a breach, or a revolution, or a dramatic change like the Weimar Republic when the Empire was euthanised. Hence, the same kings and queens, and the same solemn funerals and celebrations, and the same pomp that the tourists like so much, and is so reassuring to the average citizen.
But look a bit deeper, and you will see a Country changed beyond recognition since Elizabeth’s coronation, and in which Christianity is, de facto, the preserve of a minority of the population, all others thinking that it is absolutely fine to be a pervert (they don’t even use that word anymore, they say “gay”) and so on. Plus, the millions of Muslims and of the members of other religions, some of them actually believing in it (let me reassure my readers that, in the UK, most Muslims are pretty much as disinterested in Islam as the official Christians are in Christianity, and are twenty years behind us at the most).
So no, the Coronation has not “reaffirmed” absolutely anything, and in order to believe that one needs a big injection of copium.
Olodimir Elenski * has reached a new low, and has created a dangerous precedent, with his wannabe assassination attempt of Vladimir Putin.
This was, truly, a stupid thing to do, no matter how big the pressure on said Elenski.
What goes around comes around. With the only difference, in this case, that the Russian “coming around” will be, if Putin chooses to retaliate, vastly more deadly and precise than the two Mickey Mouse drones hoping to get past the Kremlin’s defences (spoiler: they didn’t).
It really is very, very dumb. Most Ukrainian drones are neutralised by electronic countermeasures. Some of those who aren’t are taken down by the air defence system. Only a handful reach the intended target. It’s not happening with the Kremlin and, even if by a fortunate coincidence some damage would be done, it would be extremely unlikely to cause Putin more than a nuisance.
Russia, however, can strike very hard, anywhere. If Putin now gives an execution order against Elenski, Elenski will go down. Today, tomorrow, or in ten years, but down will he go. Ask his spiritual predecessor, Stepan Bandera, what happens when you land on the laundry list of the Russian secret services. You get hunted down, found, and killed.
Nor can the others sleep well at night now. If – not unlikely – the Brits have been on the Ukrainian side on this with intelligence or tech assistance, you can be sure they will pay a price for this. It will, however, not be made in the open, for all the world to see. It will be made in the dark, and only the intended recipients of the message will receive it. The same goes for the Scholz and Macron of this world. Putin pays big attention to precedent, and he knows that, whenever he wants, he can bitch slap France, Germany, or Britain without any meaningful consequence.
Also, the places in the Ukraine where NATO intelligence and coordination personnel are hiding will now, methinks, be targeted harder. Don’t kid yourself: the Russians know a lot about their whereabouts and are certainly trying to avoid breaking more porcelain than necessary. But the porcelain will be smashed if needs be.
This was a very, very dumb thing to do. It will not even work as a distraction from the lack (up to now) of the famous “Ukrainian offensive” that keeps being promised to us. In fact, people will ask what this so victorious, strong army is waiting for.
Alas, the “victorious offensive to liberate Crimea” is as much of a fantasy as the attempt at the Kremlin. Even Western sources are now saying not much will come out of it. It will be an exercise in futility, but a very bloody one.
Trying to raise the morale of the troops with murderous stunts will not work.
*V and Z are banned on this forum in solidarity with the Ukraine. Or not. You decide.
Francis is, or so he says, part of a “mission” to end the war in the Ukraine. The mission is, says the Frankie, “not yet public”, which is why he makes public that there is a non-public mission underway.
You see, there is a reason why such missions are not public. The most likely is that the components of such mission want to reach an agreement among them before going public with both the mission and the proposal. This way, the peace proposal will have more weight and both warring parties might look at it attentively.
It is really like Francis that he could not shut up about the Vatican being part of such a mission, and would reveal to the world what must evidently stay hidden. But hey, he got to feel important on the moment.
Also, he peeved the Ukrainians who, predictably, said that they know nothing about it. Makes sense, of course, for the reasons explained above. Whatever is happening, is happening behind the scenes, with the participation of actors who are either powerful (like China, the US, Germany or the EU) and therefore with the power to contribute to shape the events, or useless dreamers (like religious leaders, the Dalai Lama, this or that Rabbi or Mufti), able only to feel good with themselves and signal virtue. In both cases, it is clear that Francis spilled the beans on something about which he should have shut up.
It really is like this guy. First, second, third and fourth most important thing in everything. Virtue signalling everywhere. What a great guy.
Independently from Francis, it is my opinion that it will be very difficult to move Russia to accept peace on anything else than their own terms. They have, in fact, made clear some days ago that even China will not sway them. They will do their own thing and will accept the peace they want at the time they want. At that time, they will of course allow everybody to validate Russia’s choice by calling it their peace plan.
If you now excuse me, I have to dash.
I am on a mission to save humanity from heresy.
The mission is now underway, but it’s not yet public.
An Italian Priest has been suspended a divinis for having dared to publish a 1300-Pages mammoth book about Francis’ heresies, with particular reference to Amoris Laetitia.
Don Tullio Rotondo, the courageous and, actually, Catholic priest, has been suspended by his own bishop.
This means that this was not, say, the CDF suspending Father for being heretical, something which would have been extremely fun to watch. It is, instead, his own pastor suspending him for being Catholic.
I wonder how many, certainly, heretical books have been published by religious in the Sixties and Seventies (and later, too) without the relevant Ordinary emitting the faintest peep. But no, in the time of “who am I to judge” Catholics are very, very rapidly condemned.
I cannot imagine the Bishop’s decision having been taken without some phone calls from the Vatican, giving him some useful hints as to what to do. I say this because I cannot imagine the Evil Clown reacting to the book with anything other than a tirade filled with expletives. But again, it’s very difficult to challenge the courageous Don Tullio to an orthodoxy contest when you are the heretic. Therefore, let us call the bishop (who, likely, desired nothing more than being left alone, as most of them do) and order him to kick the priest where it hurts.
This is so Francis it actually screams “c@zzo!!”
Sadly for the bishop – and the clown – this Don Tullio seems the kind of guy who embraces persecution in the name of Christ and it is, in fact, consoling that there are V II priests able to behave in this way.
Note here that Don Tullio does not say that Francis is not the Pope. He states – correctly so – that the guy spreads heresy. He does not flee from reality, he gives it a long, hard stare in the face, and then says what he sees.
I don’t think that Bishop Cibotti is being Ultramontanist. I think he is just being a coward. In fact, the suspension a divinis is not entering, from what I can see, the controversy. It is simply justified with Don Tullio’ alleged disobedience, seen that Don Tullio prefers to obey to Christ first. A tough guy, this one. I hope he keeps resisting. I also hope he will evolve his thinking and embrace Traditionalism.
But look: what is this to do with tolerance and inclusion? Why not choose peace instead of confrontation? Why this ossified reaction to a man simply following the Spirit?
The Bishop (a Francis appointment) knows why; he is just too coward to tell you.
The conclusion of all this is: Pachamama Good, Christ Bad. Clearly, neither Francis nor this Cibotti guy believe in the Judgment. If they did, they would believe in a very different way.
First, two words about these people: the “Anglicans” are a small group of heretics, originally from England. Their heresy was long fairly limited to their own country, but the expansion of the British Empire caused them to also expand in the colonies. There were some of these people in the US, too, but I think they called themselves “Presbyterians”. (EDIT: Episcopalians!!].
They are not extinct yet, but they are trying very hard for sure. I also think the Presbyterians [see above] have a different command structure. These people split all the time, you know…
The English “founders” of the heresy are also doing their best to disappear and, in a suicidal move much redolent of the habits of the Lemmings, have decided to bless sexual perversion. They don’t call it that way, of course, but actions speak louder than words.
That did not go well with the other heretics; who, albeit wrong, at least still believe in God. They gathered and decided to break communion with the English. Problem is, they are 85% of the worldwide Anglicans.
Ouch! The Leadership of an organisation being kicked out by 85% of the members of that organisation is something I never heard before. It really means a failure of… leadership, of basic understanding, of simple common sense.
This failure is readily explained with two elements: loss of faith and elitist, quasi-racist attitude.
The first is self-evident: if you have a shred of fear of the Lord remaining, you don’t bless sexual perversion. But this is exactly the thing you do if your faith has died and feel-good “inclusiveness” has taken its place. The sect members in England believe in the new god of inclusiveness and niceness. The 85% believe, with all their faults, in the real one.
The second is also apparent: there can be no doubt the English “Anglicans” knew this was coming. There is also no doubt that, under normal circumstances, such a divisive, massively unpopular proposal would not have gone forward. But you see, the white and bent guys and gals in England clearly think very little of the black and straight members of the sect. Come on, who do these people think they are? Shall we submit to a bunch (actually, a multitude) of coloured guys telling us, the original article, what to do and not to do? Ppppfff!!
And so it came to pass that the Anglican Communion was… not Anglican anymore, because it is now completely separated from its English origin.
I admit, I find these inter-sect squabbles eerily funny. It’s like watching a cat fight (with real cats) without any of the violence and screeching. The world isn’t noticing, of course, because of how irrelevant they are; but yours truly does, and dutifully reports.
Conformity to the world has always been, is, and ever shall be, the death knell for every Protestant outfit.
Pope Clown has made further modifications to the (don’t laugh) “synodal process”.
I think he might have done us a favour.
The new measures are more cosmetic “inclusion”, with the participation of women and lay men instead of bishops only, but with Francis making all decisions himself anyway. The result of this is that the synod becomes indistinguishable from a Sunday afternoon “meet the faithful” exercise, at the end of which Francis excrements at his pleasure; and will, therefore, be discounted even more by the faithful than a normal synod would have been.
Every idiot understands that religion is not dependent on what people, particularly lay people, think, or vote. A Catholic idiot understands it even faster than a non-Catholic one, because of the natural role of the hierarchy in the life of the Church.
The casual Catholic reader who is informed that a new “synod” (of which he never knew what it was in the first place) with the vote of women and laymen, has approved this and that, will forget in three seconds what it was all about and move to more interesting and relevant things in life like sports, politics, the history of the semicolon, or watching paint dry.
Francis is making his circus-church like the world. In this way, his circus-church becomes indistinguishable from the world and, basically, invisible. This is, in the current circumstances, the best that can be hoped for and allow for the perennial teaching of the Church to be spread more easily.
As the next measure, I suggest that Francis organises, together with women and lay people, a tombola, a karaoke, and a cooking contest.
When I read this article, and followed the link, I could not avoid thinking that the have become a civilisation of monsters. Of course, it’s they who are the monsters, but they still live among us.
It is so atrocious, on so many level. Words like “early onset gender dysphoria” can only be imagined by people who have taken leave from basic logic and, I would say, humanity.
A lot of people are monstrous here: the equipe of surgeons attempting the Frankenstein operation; the doctors who prescribed the hormone blocking drugs; the parents of the young mad guy who clearly approved of the hormone treatment and, finally, the madman himself, who, after reaching 18, certainly gave his consent to this mad, extremely tragic parody of God, where they all together (the mad boy, his monstrous parents and the monstrous surgeons) all try to remake reality according to their mad and extremely degenerate fantasies.
Let that sink in: young man dies because, when attempting to make a fake vagina out of his prick, it was necessary to perform a second – and fatal – operation to take the tissue from elsewhere when it turned out his chemically castrated prick was too little to make the fake vagina. The linked article says this is good, because you know, “girls” with “early onset” “gender dysphoria” really like to think they have a “vagina”.
Monstrous.
However, the monstrosity goes further than this. The lawmakers who have allowed this, and the voters who are conscious of this and do not react (you would be surprised how many people, even here in Europe, have been unaware of this stuff, as it was pretty much a hush-hush exercise to please extreme minorities) need to accept the blame, too. But then again, these voters are guaranteed to be in favour of abortion and gender theory, both ranking high on the monstrosity scale.
It is no surprise the Russians consider us a bunch of perverted madmen. Whilst we are not – by far not – all like this, these are the “values” our societies are propagating, and this is the social order the Ukraine is protecting on our behalf ( whereby we do the paying, and they do the dying). The globalist, one-world, perfectly Christ-free cabal trying to run all of us is all in favour of this kind of rubbish. You need to be weaned off Christianity, you see. In order to do this, an entirely new set of “values” is necessary.
Enter “gender dysphoria”, and other monstrous world for a society of monsters.
Don’t take it on me because you’re dumb, arrogant, and so very ugly….
I am old enough to remember the days of the coming ice age. I must confess, though, that I had forgotten about it, as it was all happening when I was a child and then simply fell from the radar. It was “important” enough that it had made it to my Ministry of Education approved textbooks, though (yes: in my time, your government told you what text books you had to form yourself on).
I was reminded of the fact – and of the textbooks – by Lomborg’s “the skeptical environmentalist”, a book whose validity is confirmed by the astonishing amount of mud his opponents threw on him.
The link above shows how widespread the madness was in 1970. It also shows that, there as now, the prophets of doom were at the service of a fundamentally anti-capitalist attitude, a collectivist utopia that couldn’t be called communism, but was – and is – exactly the old Marxist rubbish, albeit with some cosmetic variation to make it more palatable. There will always be people who believe this stuff. They are those in search of purpose and self-validation for their inflated ego.
Climate change was then, and it is now, a religion for atheists. It gives people the satisfaction of the basic need of feeling good with themselves, and – in Anglo Saxon Countries at least – of that other basic need, virtue signalling. This is why the obvious recognition that nothing of what Al Gore predicted has happened – or is even happening – does not have any effect of the proponent of his theory.
It is not, not it ever was, about the planet.
It is, and it always will be, about themselves.
Sects don’t need validation. They are like the plant of the “little shop of horrors”. They demand more and more food, until things get to a crisis point. When the bubble – or the plant – finally explodes, the sect members will look for the next sect. They will need to, because sect membership validates their entire existence.
Besides the real science – and the real common sense, and the real religious spirit – the defeat of the climate loons goes through an extremely effective weapon that I never cease to employ or to recommend: public ridicule and ferocious mocking. It is beyond me how we have become so brainwashed – even many so-called conservatives – that not even an elephant-sized target like the extremely dumb, extremely bigoted, ugly beyond belief, and otherworldly arrogant “how dare you”- girl was – metaphorically speaking – instantly incinerated. We are too nice to our enemies, lest we should not be considered good by the same people we despise.
The climate change hoax will be destroyed not by facts, but by laughter. Laughter goes head-on against the very reason why the loons abandon themselves to their lunacy: recognition and self-aggrandisement. This is true everywhere, but particularly so in the Anglo Saxon Countries, where social recognition is so openly, desperately, shamelessly craved.
This strangely equine-looking female (this seems a common theme among woke harridans; think of Sarah Jessica Parker!) is the gal just fired from Anheuser-Busch for being so colossally stupid that she managed to cause long-lasting damage to the brand she was supposed to promote.
You see here all the ingredients of the problems we have today: she starts by whinnying that she is a “business woman”, as if this was something special, or making her a panda bear. Then she starts talking about the job she “has to do”, and you start to understand that it can only go wrong. Three children, all three by surrogates. At least she is straight. Probably she is slightly sad about it.
Note the rainbow-stuff behind her back, clearly strategically placed to show that, whilst White and Privileged, she is completely on board with the dominant leftist culture.
Then the woman starts to whinny in earnest about her strategy, and you understand that not only she should be fired, but those responsible for choosing her for the job, too.
Anheuser-Busch must attract young people or die, she says. Who are, in the mind of this woman, “young people”? Fags, dykes, trannies and their “supporters”, that’s who she thinks they are! There is no other logical way to interpret her words in light of her actions. That countless young people, out there on Planet Sanity, are totally eked out not only by the above mentioned categories, but by skeletally thin, equine-faced women talking about “inclusion” is something she is just unable to grasp.
The vocabulary is staggering: “evolve and elevate”. It makes AB customers look like unevolved, brutish people unworthy of the consideration of Woke Fury. You can certainly say that AB customers don’t understand anything about beer, but the idea that most of them are decent, hard-working people does not touch this woman even lightly. No: in her mind, these are flyover country people, and therefore not the ones paying for her job, but people she is actually ashamed of.
“Evolve and elevate” then unavoidably means (how could you get this wrong) “inclusivity” and “shifting the tone”. Her mind is so perverted, her ideology so dirty, that in her mind, putting a trannie in an ad “feels brighter and lighter and different”.
Brighter.
Lighter.
Different.
Let that sink in.
But let us see how this goes on, because in one short minute, this woman really shows how far down madness lane these people have gone.
“Representation is sort of the heart of evolution”. The current clients of AB are ignorant rednecks and hicks. I am way more evolved than they are. Literally the next stage of human evolution. I need to elevate these brutes my stage of evolution.
“You gotta see people who reflect you in the work”. I am woke, and therefore better. Everybody must see I am more evolved than the miserable clients of this company. I will put a trannie in an ad, and everybody will see I am so woke there are rainbows magically appearing in the sky whenever I whinny.
“Brand of fratty, kind of out of touch humour”. You can see the contempt for Straight America coming out of these obviously carefully chosen, and still catastrophic words. You can also hear the woman interviewing her giggling in the background, because she understood what Fury here really means. She really despises AB’s customers, but she can’s say “MAGA guys”, or “white supremacists” (which is what she clearly thinks). She just wants to cancel them. They don’t count. This is why the poor deluded equine thinks that a trannie will appeal to “men and women”. Heck, her choice of testimonial clearly shows that she doesn’t even know who is a woman and who is a man!
This horse broke his leg exclusively due to his stupidity;
and when a horse breaks a leg, you know what happens next…
The news reached me just now that the “person” (more on that in a second) responsible for the trannified Anheuser-Busch campaign has taken a “leave of absence”, code for “she is out”, particularly considering her successor already has a name.
Whilst I dry my tears over the departure of such an admirably woke “person”, let me make the following considerations:
Anheuser-Busch must not be forgiven. Enough with allowing these people to go all woke and then saying “nah, it’s fine” when they backpedal. They must now pay a price in the years to come, so that others may learn. Again, doing it differently means a near-zero risk for any sortie into woke territory.
Is this Alissa Heinerscheid woman straight? Because you see, it’s not uncommon that behind these cases of xtreme-woking hides someone that is, actually, one of the tribe! They just don’t say it out loud when it’s not convenient to them! This gal here is so deranged, that she thinks that an advertising campaign with a trannie will “appeal to women and to men”. Who thinks like that? Newsflash: pervs appeals to neither women nor men, at least outside of the vastly shitted-on (but still extremely expensive) walkways of San Francisco, and people there don’t drink Anheuser-Busch.
Budweiser is rubbish, by the way. If you think differently, allow me to assure you that you don’t know beer and you need to enlarge your horizons. There is now absolutely no reason to drink that dirty water anymore. Go visit a specialised shop and introduce yourself to the wonderful world of German, Belgian or English beers. Heck, some parts of the US have microbreweries everywhere. A different beer planet, and you’ll drink way less of it, which will be very good news for your beer belly reduction campaign.
The governance of US public companies is very sick and extremely dysfunctional. The distance between the final owners (that is: the end-investors, like the employees and savers who put their money in the pension and investment funds) and the employees running both the companies themselves and those who should examine their work (the above-mentioned funds) has now assumed a planet-size scale. In short, this means that woke executives in companies and investment funds are using the savings of God-fearing, hard-working Americans to push their own satanic agenda. The remedy to this is individual investors walking away from funds that do not challenge stupid behaviour, and putting pressure on their pension funds to do the same.
This is clearly a victory, and another slap in the face of the xtreme-woking tribe. But we cannot afford to relax. They will keep doing this again and again, like they did with so-called “gay marriage”. As long as ther eis little risk – for the company of the executives they employ – in engaging in this kind of behaviour, this is what they will continue to do.
“He” just realised Russia is crushing “his” favourite “gheis”.
The months go by and even the most obdurate Pollyannas begin to understand that Russia is winning, and it is winning big. The cognitive dissonance must make their ears whistle, and they need to plant their fingers more and more firmly inside them, hoping not to hear it anymore. It really is sad to see.
In this situation, it is fascinating to observe what the Western Mass media do to try and extricate themselves from the horrible situation in which they have put themselves. They have lied to everybody, in the most shameful way ever seen, for almost 15 months now, and they need to get out of this with some shred of reputation left.
I am seeing two main narratives to explain the (if you believed the narrative in the first place) inexplicable:
A) The Russians have horrendous casualties , and
B) The Russian army has learned fast.
Both these excuses are lame. Let us see why.
A)
Even the BBC-gathered data (and I cannot imagine a broadcaster worse than this one, possibly not even CNN) clearly and constantly indicate a number of killed in action of around 11% of the Ukrainian killed in action, that is: 9 to 1. Even the biased, leaked Pentagon documents have to admit a 7:1 ratio. The BBC numbers are the result of extensive internet research (local newspapers, social media, and the like) covering funerals and obituaries all over Russia. After months of results, the evidence is now overwhelming: the Russians are paying an extremely low price for the losses they are inflicting to the Ukrainians.
Plus, the alleged underpinning of the Russians “high casualties” have never materialised. There are no video of Russian “multiple waves” Mass attacks. There are no videos of Russians attacking armed with their trench shovels, as it has been assured was the case. It seems like there is no shortage of drone, guns or shells, either (as shown from the constant tragic videos from the Ukrainian front). There are no videos of immense Russian cemeteries full of flags, as I see almost daily for the Ukraine. In short, the facts on the ground are, literally, shelling into the West’s consciousness that Russia’s army is in rude health.
B) The claim is in blatant contradiction to the narrative pushed for 15 months, and for many years before that. If the Russian army is terminally incompetent, incapable and ossified, they will certainly never learn how it’s done in 15 months, because you don’t change your army’s culture in such a ridiculously short time.
Learning how to adapt drone use to what is observed on the battleground, or changing some of their BTG, Battalion Tactical Groups (a Russian invention btw) to “shock troops” suited for a more nimble type of assault operations is, quite on the contrary of what the West wants you to believe, clear evidence of a highly evolved, very flexible, competently led armed force.
This was evident from day one to everybody who had eyes to see. Even the supposed “defeat” in the supposed “battle of Kiev” (both as real as the eponymous “ghost”) showed an Army able to master both the “deep penetration” assault (worked wonderfully in Crimea in 2014, did not work in the Ukraine in 2022; but hey, these are gambles you decide to make, accepting they might not work) and the positional, attrition campaign run very successful from the start. Again, this is a sophisticated army, led by obviously smart commanders as seen in September during the wasteful, almost suicidal, Ukrainian “offensive”, and lacking, well, nothing of import.
——-
As I write this, the Russian side controls more than 80% of Bakhmut, the theatre of an extremely stupid Ukrainian massacre of self-immolation that will be remembered in 100 years. Slowly, methodically, and as safely as possible, they will take all they want to take, and they will not care one straw for the high-pitched screaming of transitioning British journalists, or condescending, lesbian American ones.
Russia is winning. But it’s not happening at videogame speed, which makes a videogame generation very slow in understanding simple facts on the ground. Ukraine 2022 is not Kuwait 1991. It’s a different beast, requiring a different conduct.
As a rule, heretical Bishops try to disguise their heresies under a thin veneer of Catholicism, making it look like they are being actually orthodox, at least to those of low IQ, high ignorance, or high interest in believing what the heretical guy says.
Every now and then, though, someone comes around who is such a scoundrel, such a sellout to the world, such a worthless piece of Francis, that he does not even bother to conceal the fundamental heresy of his very being.
Today’s scoundrel is Bishop Overbeck, an individual about whom I have already written in the past.
As you will see if you follow the link, Overbeck does not mince words: the change the Church is living now is bigger than the Protestant heresy. One only needs to be able to make 2+2 to understand that this guy is very plainly saying “we are heretical, we are proud of it, and you will have to get along with our heretical programme”.
The first two statements are self-evident. The third one is made explicit by another bomb dropped by this clown: he explains that if you want to defend tradition, you need to ask yourself whether you are still within the Church. Because you see, clown bishop has decided that the Church is now fundamentally different, and you therefore cannot follow the church of yesteryear and think you are within the boundaries of Overbeck’s fantasy creation.
Of course I am in unity with the Church, you cucking fretin! It’s exactly you who have just put yourself out of it, you fumb duck!! You can go to hell without me!
(If you think these words are too gentle, let me know in the comments and I will reflect whether to make my anger more explicit).
Unsurprisingly, clown bishop is also an enemy of Russia. Makes sense: even the Schismatics over there are infinitely more orthodox than this tool here. In fact, I think I can class it, seeing the declarations, as not unlikely that this guy has some big skeleton in the …. closet (as in: closet), it being not probable that a man without such skeletons would declare his heretical mentality and intent with such open hatred for the Church as he/she/it did.
I would, here, normally appeal for the defrocking of the guy, so he can seek gainful employment by the Lutheran Church Of The Latter Day Faggots. Alas, he will not be defrocked. An appointment to Cardinal is way more likely than that, at least as long as Francis breathes. In fact, who knows, the little Judas might have tried to position himself for a red hat, a place in the – likely – last train going out of Francisstation.
There is a God, and He judges everything and leaves nothing unpunished.
Whoopi Goldberg does not know what she says. Likely because she is unable to think.
Her “argument” seems very linear. I respect that you think abortion is the killing of a baby, but I ask you to respect that I disagree and allow me to act accordingly, because America.
Let us now make exactly the same “argument” in a different topic: I respect that you think that slavery is unjust and against human rights, but I ask you to respect that I disagree and allow me to act accordingly, because America.
Now substitute again for pedophilia, incest, and bestiality. Tax evasion, and drunk driving. Drug dealing, weapons trafficking, and domestic violence.
You see where I am going with this. The protection of life is an absolute. If, in a certain situation, a life is considered worthy of protection (for example: the unborn child will be considered such, the wilful murderer won’t), this protection must be accorded always, not according to opinion because “America”. Fundamental issues of right and wrong cannot be left to individual “opinions” that one must “respect” by not enforcing the decision on the issue on them. You don’t get to decide, together with your doctor, if you are killing someone or not.
The argument is so obvious that in no generation before ours such a stupid thinking was employed. You could be in favour or against a certain punishment for, say, drunk driving, but the idea of allowing a different treatment to some because you are “respecting their opinion” about it was not there.
The (biological) woman does not understand simple things. I think she is so ugly – both inside and out – that her brain fled in horror several decades ago, and was substituted for a Chinese knock-off found on EBay, that this Frankenstein dyke has been trying to use since. And if things did not go in that way, it was not for her brain’s lack of trying.
I wonder how many among the old harridans watching the show got the obvious flaw in the “reasoning”. Very few, I would say.
But then again, this is why they keep watching her.
Christian identity is protected by simply being proud of it, and showing it to the world outside. It is protected by erecting several crosses for each one that is vandalised. It is protected by giving visible signs of our faith in words and in deeds (the cross on the forehead on Ash Wednesday, not eating meat on Fridays, wearing cross pendants on our neck, etc.)
I was, now many years ago, very impressed by the vast number of crosses you see around in rural France and in (Catholic) parts of Southern Germany. Some of them are several metres high, many others are put in strategic places like crossroads or road curves (where your car will have to brake and be much slower). Some of them were three metres high, some more than that, very many two metres or more. It was something I did not know from Italy, though in Italy we also have small “mini shrines” (we call them “edicole”, but “shrine” is the translation I got), normally dedicated to the Blessed Virgin, in small villages or on the roadside, or on homes’ external walls.
These are powerful statements. The car driver, truck driver, motorcyclist, cyclist or even passer by are irresistibly attracted to the tall, slender figure of the crucifix. It can never leave one indifferent. In fact, I remember some of those crucifixes set against the sunset, or throwing a very long shadow, in extremely powerful moments (I suspect that this is done on purpose, the crucifix set in such a location that it has a certain angle to the road and the sun in summer…).
How much did such a crucifix cost? It certainly went in the thousands dollars of today’s money, but there were evidently many landowners, in the rural France of the past, ready to fork the money and to sacrifice those few square metres of arable land in order to have a visible sign of their faith on their own land. This is, in fact, a favourite “big lottery win fantasy” of mine: the purchase of hundreds of mini-plots in rural Central Europe and the erection of crucifixes on them. Dear Lord, if you are listening, you know what would need to happen next for that to happen…
Signs are important. It’ s not always “what we feel inside”.
Top secret DoD documents have been leaked and, predictably, Bidenland is freaking out.
This is understandable as the documents clearly state what the readers of this blog have known for a very long time: Ukraine has had atrocious losses, is running out of ammo and missiles fast, lies to its allies about the extent of its problems, and appears sheer unlikely to make any significant or permanent gains when they start that suicide operation called “Spring Offensive”.
In short: the document states in very clearly formulated bureaucratese that Russia is winning big, the Ukraine is being torn to pieces, and the time of reckoning is coming fast.
None of this is new to you, dear readers, because I have informed you regularly and because the information is readily available to people who prefer reality to listening to what they want to hear.
The leaks are, however, a total loss of face for all – not only the US – Western Governments, now outed as a bunch of shameless liars. They also show the extent to which senior officials like Austin and Milley lie to their own Parliament, something for which they would go to jail if the US were not rapidly descending to the status of Mickey Mouse Democracy.
How often have you read an article whose title started with “desperate Putin” or “desperate Russia”? How many times has the guy died of cancer, got Alzheimer, or been deposed by a coup already? How many times has Russia been about to “run out” of… everything? Have Milley and Austin not given to their own elected representatives a completely different picture from what they knew to be the real situation on the ground?
What about Van Der Lying, Borrell and all the other European trombones? They did not have access to the information? Really? Or is it – at the very minimum – so, that they controlled the information that comes to their desk to such an extent, that they were able to be “officially” briefed only in terms acceptable to them?
Mind, they are not the only culprits. Same as in Nazi Germany or in COVID Europe, this kind of collective gaslighting is only possible with the willing collaboration of the population at large. They are gaslighted because they want to be. The proof of this will be in the pudding of nothing happening to Milley, or Austin, or von der Lying.
After all the lies, this is where we are now, with Ukrainians killed in action likely exceeding 200,000 at this point and even the obviously biased leaked document – whose writers were certainly under pressure to be as economical with bad news as possible – admitting a seven to one killing ratio in favour of Russia, a stunning admission of brutal defeat even if the real ratio is likely more similar to nine to one.
I am curious to see how the media will choose to slowly allow the leaked information to filter to their dumb readership. The awakening cannot happen overnight. Rather, Dumb Readers will have to be gradually acquainted with reality, so that it appears to the dumber among them that they have been told the truth all along.
The smart readers, meanwhile, were getting their information from places like this one.
How the heck these people are allowed to be bishops is beyond me. Why is this guy allowed to hire an openly faggoty fag guy to be “in charge of worship”?
And as we are there, we should pose the next question that comes to mind: what the heck is the “office for worship”? What need there is of all these “offices” made to procure comfortable jobs to one’s friends. Heck: who should be in charge of worship, if not, very directly, the bishop himself?
What does bishop Stowe do all day if he has no time to care for the worship of his parishioners? How were these things done in those blessed times before Vatican II, when parishes were more numerous and administration less bloated?
There is an entire Faggocracy that is getting fat with Peter’s pence. They have become so brazen now that they even hire their own, shamelessly, under the sun, and boast of it!
This guy Stowe needs to be defrocked and thrown on the street.
I think I know what his next job would be, but I don’t want to write it here because I am read by women.
And on the very odd chance that this Stowe guy is not homosexual himself, one wonders: what kind of kompromat does the faggot mafia have on him, to force him to take on one of their own in such a way?
Every time that someone asks you what, in the end, is wrong with Vatican II, answer mentioning this darn guy.
Boy, I miss the good old times. God has given me a different lot, and I had to grow up and live in a time of shameless “celebration” of sexual perversion, carried out by bishops!
Who made this clown a priest? Who made him a bishop? They will answer – or have answered – for this.
Don’t be a keyboard warrior, says Frankie. They displease him too much.
Frankie would want to go on peddling his environ-mental cum social justice fake gospel of globalism, without any fear of being outed, every day, as the pathetic clown he is.
Ridiculed at every step, exposed as peddler of catholic fake news, constantly reminded of what he should actually do as a job, Frankie must hate us with all the rage his failing health still allows him.
The very claim is contradictory. If being a keyboard warrior is bad, why does he invite the press on his trips? Are they not supposed to do exactly the same as the people Francis criticises?
Oh wait, the journalists are supposed to actually act as his propaganda outlet. They are not bad. Proper Catholics are!
I really wish that this boor had a bit of I don’t say class – he’ll never get there – but at least sense about it. We anger you, Frankie? At least be smart and don’t show it so openly! But no, the bitching must go on, because it makes him feel good on the moment, and who cares if he looks even dumber than everyone thought at the end of the rant.
Unscripted Francis then proceeds to shoot himself in the foot again, criticising us for defending what “has always been done this way”. That’s exactly the problem, Sherlock.
The keyboard warriors would not criticise him, if he defended Church tradition. They criticise him because he sabotages it, or at least tries, in that quite arrogant, unbearable, stupid way of his.
I am a proud Keyboard Warrior. Thousands, like me, fight their little fight for Catholicism with a keyboard, helping to confirm fellow Catholics in the faith – and, with God’s grace, perhaps even help the one or other getting nearer to it – and exposing, as well as they are able to, all the lies of the circus tools like Francis and his bunch of sycophants, heretics, and faggots. Francis certainly wishes we would limit our protests to friends and family.
Not happening, Bozo.
I really wonder now: is this man really so thick that he still has not understood that his little game is up, and has been for many years? Or, rather, he knows that everybody understands that the keyboard warriors are the Catholics, and he is the problem?
Whilst I think the man obtuse, he is not outright dumb. I can well imagine he knows perfectly well that the keyboard warriors have made him look a clown for many years now. Fact is, the guy just can’t deny himself the petty satisfaction of a petty rant.
Now with one foot in the grave, there is no sign whatsoever that this man is, in the very last stretch of a disgraceful existence, approaching anything remotely resembling conversion. He seems intentioned to die just as he has lived: hating us all, with a passion.
Go on this way, Frankie boy. Your day cannot be too far away now.
Methinks, on that day you will hate us all even more, and for all eternity.
God willing, 2023 will see a much-awaited Conclave. I am afraid that, when that moment comes, we will be bombarded with the usual “pious” (but not so much, really) superstition that the Pope is chosen by the Holy Ghost.
As the current unworthy occupier of the throne (and many before him) abundantly show, this is most emphatically not the case. In fact, this superstition is dangerous for the faith.
The Pope is elected by the Cardinals. The Cardinals have a moral duty to pray that they may make a good choice, and have times set aside for that in their schedule. This is not really dissimilar from the habit, that every Catholic should have, of praying before every important decision, letting his future conduct be, as far as practicable, “proofed” or “steeled” by his continued praying activity. In fact, in those days the entire Church is called to pray with and for the Cardinals, that they may choose wisely.
If the Holy Ghost made the choice, the Cardinals would simply play chess, or ping-pong, waiting for the “spirit” to “speak”. In fact, they would hardly need to be in a conclave, because conclaves exist exactly in order to avoid the political pressure which, in itself, demonstrates the very human character that was always an obvious trait of the process.
Nor is it “pious” to think that the Holy Ghost has picked all the long list of heretical, dissolute, weak and, in many ways, utterly ungodly popes of the past. In fact, this “pious” belief seems rather blasphemous to me.
Of course, God can do everything. God can guide the Cardinals – whether knowingly or not – towards the choice of an excellent, world-changing champion of Catholicism. God can turn things for the better in any matter, at any time, same as in our daily lives. But God will also allow evil to happen, for Providential reasons of His own which might well remains inscrutable to us for the rest of our earthly existence. The Second Vatican Council in general, and the election of Pope Francis in particular, are a brutal reminder of this reality.
So, the Cardinals elect the Pope, and I think we all agree that the quality of Cardinals in the next conclave will be utterly abysmal. In fact, it cannot be excluded (though I would not bet my pint), that the next conclave will give us a pope just as bad as Frankie, or a worse one if this one also happens to be intelligent. We could have a Francis II, and a Francis III after him. Why? Because it’s the Cardinals who elect the pope.
The “pious” superstition is also very dangerous. You think the Holy Ghost picks the Pope, then you have to explain to yourself how could God pick so many bad popes. This leads to either loss of faith or loss of reality. It’s a dead end leading to a childish rebellion to the challenges of our time, and God knows whether we live in a time of challenges.
Why, then, am I eagerly awaiting for the new “habemus papam”? Because whilst I am prepared for the worse and already spiritually training for the fight against the heresies of Francis II Protofaggot, I still see the next conclave as a big occasion to see a noticeable change for the better. If the change comes, so much the better. If it doesn’t, well it means that to continue the fight is the task allotted to us.
Other generations had to live in times of war, famine, or pestilence. I am writing this in the comfort of XXI Century England.
I still think my lot is – by God’s grace – preferable to theirs.
Fra Filippo Lippi, "Madonna delle Rocce", particular
Daily Offering to the Immaculate Heart of Mary
The Francis Papers
Why This Blog
Pope Pius XII in Prayer
Five Million Pageviews
Non Praevalebunt
“What Catholics Once were…”
"What Catholics once were, we are. If we are wrong, then Catholics through the ages have been wrong.
We are what you once were. We believe what you once believed.
We worship as you once worshipped. If we are wrong now, you were wrong then. If you were right then, we are right now".
Pope XII: “Suicide Of Altering the Faith In Her Liturgy…..”
"I am worried by the Blessed Virgin's messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in Her liturgy, Her theology and Her soul. … I hear all around me innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the Church, reject Her ornaments and make Her feel remorse for Her historical past.
"A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to believe that man has become God. In our churches, Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits them. Like Mary Magdalene, weeping before the empty tomb, they will ask, 'Where have they taken Him?'"
Eugenio Pacelli, future Pius XII.
Roche, "Pie XII Devant L'Historie", p. 52-53
G.K. Chesterton: Malice & Spite
"If a critic tells a particular lie, that particular lie can be pointed out. If he misses a specific point, that point can be explained. If he is really wrong in this or that, it will be on this or that that the insulted person will eagerly pounce. But “malice and spite” are vague words which will never be used except when there is really nothing to pounce on. If a man says that I am a dwarf, I can invite him to measure me. If he says I am a cannibal, I can invite him to dinner. If he says I am a coward, I can hit him. If he says I am a miser, I can give him half-a-sovereign. But if he says I am fat and lazy (which is true), the best I can answer is that he speaks out of malice and spite. Whenever we see that phrase, we may be almost certain that somebody has told the truth about somebody else."
The Illustrated London News, 13 November 1909.
G.K. Chesterton: Dogma & Authority
The modern world will accept no dogmas upon any authority; but it will accept any dogmas on no authority. Say that a thing is so, according to the Pope or the Bible, and it will be dismissed as a superstition without examination. But preface your remark merely with “they say” or “don’t you know that?” or try (and fail) to remember the name of some professor mentioned in some newspaper; and the keen rationalism of the modern mind will accept every word you say.
G.K. Chesterton: Progress & Fashion
The world is what the saints and the prophets saw it was; it is not merely getting better or merely getting worse; there is one thing that the world does; it wobbles. Left to itself, it does not get anywhere; though if helped by real reformers of the right religion and philosophy, it may get better in many respects, and sometimes for considerable periods. But in itself it is not a progress; it is not even a process; it is the fashion of this world that passeth away. Life in itself is not a ladder; it is a see-saw.
G.K. Chesterton: Tradition
“Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about.”
Ronald Reagan & The Unborn Children
"NOW THEREFORE, I, RONALD REAGAN, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim and declare the unalienable Personhood of every American, from the moment of conception until natural death, and I do proclaim, ordain, and declare that I will take care that the Constitution and laws of the United States are faithfully executed for the protection of America's unborn children. Upon this act, sincerely believed to be an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution, I invoke the considerate judgment of mankind and the gracious favor of Almighty God. I also proclaim Sunday, January 17, 1988, as a national Sanctity of Human Life Day. I call upon the citizens of this blessed land to gather on that day in their homes and places of worship to give thanks for the gift of life they enjoy and to reaffirm their commitment to the dignity of every human being and sanctity of every human life".
Ronald Reagan
Presidential Proclamation of "National Sanctity of Human Life Day", January 14, 1988
George W. Bush & Those Waiting To Be Born
“All human life is a gift from our creator that is sacred, unique and worthy of protection. On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, our country recognizes that each person, including every person waiting to be born, has a special place and purpose in this world”. [...]
“The most basic duty of government is to protect the life of the innocent. [...]
“The sanctity of life is written in the hearts of all men and women. On this day and throughout the year, we aspire to build a society in which every child is welcome in life and protected in law. We also encourage more of our fellow Americans to join our just and noble cause. History tells us that with a cause rooted in our deepest principles and appealing to the best instincts of our citizens, we will prevail.”
George W. Bush
Presidential proclamation of "National Sanctity of Human Life Day", January 18, 2009
Protect the Seal of Confession!
Tabula Delenda est
var sc_project=6182792;
var sc_invisible=1;
var sc_security="7b5a1350";
var scJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ?
"https://secure." : "http://www.");
document.write("");
Mundabor's Blog 
You must be logged in to post a comment.