One read rubbish like this, and struggles to remain calm.
One of the most abused tricks of Francis is to make a false parallelism between perceived sinners (who aren’t such in reality) and real ones.
The bleeding woman wasn’t sinning because she was bleeding, nor was her bleeding indication that God despised her. This is what the Jews believed, but we aren’t Jews. For us Christians bleeding is not a sin, period.
Adultery, however, is another cup of tea entirely. The adulterers are gravely sinning, and that’s that.
To extend unconditional acceptance (without repentance even) to public sinners because Jesus destroyed a Jewish prejudice is to make a stupid argument. And Christianity does not know this unconditional acceptance the man goes preaching around. This is below Dalai Lama level.
But then again Francis never goes for the argument. He always goes for the easy emotions. He has the argumentative cogency of a child of six claiming that as kitten are sweet, they will go to heaven because hey, God is mercy.
Disgusting, old, lewd man. It creeps me that he embraces children.
Pray for the end of this pontificate and the election of Pope Pius XIII.