Heroin For The Church: Explaining Francis’ Pontificate.

Francis' Pontificate explained.

Francis’ Pontificate explained.


Firstly a short premise: I do not approve of Sedevacantism. Sedevacantist comments are not allowed. If I see that your comments aim at pushing – overtly or covertly – a Sedevacantist agenda, you will be banned. Some have already tested me in that and you do not read their comments anymore, so there. In these things, one must be a Fascist. Yours Truly does Fascism well.

Having said that, some Sedes have quality sites, to which I link as little as I can, but at times I think are worth linking to.

One of these is Novus Ordo Watch; who, it must be said, make an admirable work (if from the wrong premise) of collection and exposure of Bergoglio’s madness. I am sure many of their readers are not Sedevacantists, and visit the site because of the quality of the content itself.

This time they have some very interesting content from Alessandro Gnocchi, the writing partner of the late Mario Palmaro. Gnocchi writes a comment in response to a reader, and this comment developed to a kind of article in itself.

Your humble correspondent identifies almost completely in what Gnocchi says, with only two small observations:

1. It can be misleading to say that “we cannot say” whether Bergoglio is Pope or not. Bergoglio is the Pope, period. What I think Gnocchi wanted to say is that we are nobody to start questioning the legitimacy of the one whom the Church considers the Pope.

2. I do know why we are being punished with Bergoglio, and Gnocchi says as much implicitly when he says in Bergoglio the (earthly) Church has the Pope she deserves. We are being punished for our sins of arrogance and rebellion to Truth. As I have already stated, it is as if the Lord would ram down our throat a big quantity of the very excrements we thought would be wholesome in smaller doses. If you liked V II, why, you must love Bergoglio!

Please click the site, enjoy the article, and do not be influenced by the Sedevacantist argument.


V II stated, in a way, the principle that Catholic drugs are fine, thinking that this would be limited to the marijuana as everything else was unthinkable. Then a Pope comes who has lived his entire life in this marijuana-filled atmosphere and reasons that hey, we must take this seriously here: if drugs are fine, then… drugs are fine. What follows is injections of heroin like it’s Catholic Junkie Day.

Bergoglio is recognisable as a Catholic only when he reads statements written by Catholics. He himself is as much Catholic as my cat. Can a Pope be as bad as that? Of course he can! Many have certainly become Pope who were atheists in every cell. The Holy Ghost does not assure that the Pope will have fear of the Lord, or believe in Him.

Gnocchi is also right in the disastrous Ratzinger attitude, and in saying that another Ratzinger would, at this point, not stop the decline and decomposition at all.

The day Benedict dies, I do not think he will have to fear for having resigned. But he must live with the fear of being punished for the way he has wasted eight years of Pontificate thinking that a varnish of orthodoxy and Summorum Pontificum would be enough, whilst he proceeded to the most atrocious appointments to please the Modernist crowd around him.






Posted on February 26, 2015, in Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. Mundabor,

    It is terrific to find out that God Almighty is willing to punish His Church with the pope that truly deserves. The majority of the Church’s children wish to have a Pope and a hierarchy in the likeliness of Francis and his cardinals and bishops.

    So, what is the biggest punishment that God is allowing to this apostate worldly church? To let it have its wishes granted.

    What am I asking myself is not whether Bergoglio is Pope or not; neither why we are being punished with this Pope, these bad cardinals, these bad bishops and these bad priests. In these questions I agree with you entirely. What I am really asking myself is if the terrific words “come out of her my people” should apply to these particular days of today. And what is worst: where we Catholics should go if “we come out of her”?

    Just my thoughts…
    In reference to the suggestive tittle of this post, I must confess that this Mundabor’s blog has become a personal daily addiction. Not to the extreme of heroin, but is getting there.

    Thanks, thanks, thanks.

    • Thanks, Miguel!

      The answer to the question is, I think, simple: we stay and fight, as long as our hearts beat. And when they stop doing it we will, hopefully, find the peace and contentment too may people hope to find on this earth, with their appeasement to the world; and they fail anyway.



  2. Dear M,
    I fear that the Amazin’ Man has a serious drug problem: he can’t get the high quality dope that a man of his station in life deserves; hence the whacky behaviour. Surely there must be a Columbian cardinal out there who could come to his aid?

%d bloggers like this: