Pope Weasel And The Just Aspiration Of Communism

Sep 14

Posted by

 

Pope Weasel regaled us – during a recent Angelus in front of the usual three dozen curious who did not want to spend for Ripley’s Believe It Or Not – with a bit of his wisdom:

In addition, in these weeks we are witnessing numerous popular protests all over the world – in many parts – expressing the growing unease of civil society in the face of particularly critical political and social situations. While I urge the demonstrators to present their demands peacefully, without giving in to the temptation of aggression and violence, I appeal to all those with public and governmental responsibilities to listen to the voice of their fellow citizens and to meet their just aspirations, ensuring full respect for human rights and civil liberties

This is, at the same time, ambiguous and subversive, in the same way as Francis generally is.

On the one hand, Francis restricts his appeal to the  just aspirations of the bunch of communists, anarchists, paedophiles, and others who are now manifesting. In theory, they could have no just aspirations (being a bunch of communists, anarchists etc.) at all, and everybody could be happy.

In practice, it is obvious that this is, for as far as a man like Francis would dare to go, an endorsement of the victimhood so much in fashion nowadays among the above mentioned categories.

“I am not saying that being a Communist is officially good”, Francis implies, “but please listen, listen, listen to them!” In this, there is an implicit judgment that white-on-black racism is still a factor (fake news), that the police needs to be reorganised (more fake news), and that Capitalism has somethign fundamentally wrong in itself (fakest news of all).

By the bye, I am awaiting Francis’ strong, definitive condemnation of “cuties”.

Will I get it?

Will I?

 

 

 

 

Posted on September 14, 2020, in Bad Shepherds, Catholicism, Conservative Catholicism, Traditional Catholicism and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 9 Comments.

  1. Andris Amolins | September 14, 2020 at 12:32 pm

    Why do you think Francis was speaking of BLM. AP news agency (among others) have interpreted as referring to the events in Belarus without naming it (https://apnews.com/5e4a77d918b92de198cece4c1ba4b29a). The protesters there are not looting or vandalizing property and are reported even for cleaning the area up after the demonstrations just not to give an additional pretext for the authorities to incriminate them.

  2. Saroop Calvete | September 14, 2020 at 12:51 pm

    Francis has several “cuties” in his entourage: Ricca, Paglia, Coccopalmiero, Pedacchio. Sorry, but these are all Italian surnames. I am sure that they are grooming some minor cuties of their own.

  3. Craig Smith | September 14, 2020 at 2:48 pm

    I imagine this is a foretaste of the upcoming October Encyclical “Fratelli Tutti” – that’s if they can even decide on the translation of the name, with the usual suspects freaking out “all brothers” is exclusionary…. Jesus wept.

  4. Michael Dowd | September 14, 2020 at 3:20 pm

    No. ‘Cuties’ emblematic of how far things have gone astray since the emergence (from hell?) of “Pope” Francis.

  5. snootybaronet | September 14, 2020 at 3:35 pm

    Bergoglio may condemn PedoFlix for discriminating against underage males by not including them in the film.

  6. noahvaile | September 14, 2020 at 10:23 pm

    “By the bye, I am awaiting Francis’ strong, definitive condemnation of “cuties”.”
    Before he can condemn it he has to watch it a few more times and get the director’s cut dvd.
    After all, who is he to judge?

  1. Pingback: Canon212 Update: There Must Be a Canonical Way to Have a Catholic Church With a Catholic Pope – The Stumbling Block