Daily Archives: July 11, 2014
In Australia, a feminist (male) judge has just let the world know one day the world (and today, himself) may not have any problem with incest.
I quote from the article:
A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.
Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and “unnatural” but is now widely accepted.
Well, how can you say little perv is wrong?
Homosexuality was regarded (by Christian societies, I add myself) as criminal and unnatural, but it is now widely accepted. When oen forgets Christianity and the only thing that count is self-satisfaction, why would two consenting adults not be allowed to screw the brains out of each other amidst the “celebration” of the wider society? Is anyone being hurt? Are not the two consenting? and most of all: who are we to judge?
The little perv goes on making a Nazi remark, and a feminist one.
The feminist one is the following:
“If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you’d invariably have, they would say it’s unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone.”
There is only one thing more pathetic than a man posing as the defender of “women’s right”: a homosexual man posing as the defender of “women’s rights”. I smell faggotry here, but again it’s just me.
The Nazi remark is reported as follows:
He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.
“Look”, he says, “what are all these antiquated notions? To contracept and abort is perfectly legal, and not “judged” by us enlightened women and women of the XXI century; let the sibling do what they please, and if a byproduct should occur you just get rid of it. Simples”.
You know what? Pervert chappie is right. In a world where abortion is on demand, extremely cheap or completely free, with no questions asked and no stigma of sort attached, there is, if we follow the logic, no reason to think otherwise.
It’s all included in the logic of the acceptance of sodomy: if the logic of accepting what is made among consenting adult is fine, why should the same logic not be applied to siblings, or – and I insist on this issues, because it is perfectly true – dogs, sheep, or mules?
Pervert chappy is totally rotten.
But I must say, he has explained in a very clear way how rotten post-Christian societies are.
Eugenio Scalfari asks Francis if he wants to convert him. Francis answers “Proselytism is solemn nonsense”. The Pollyannas run to explain to us that Proselytism doesn’t mean Proselytism, it means being a nasty guy.
Wannabe Anglican Bishop asks Francis, probably after one grappa too much, to make a video for his Proddie confreres at the great Proddie convention. Francis readily complies. Not one word seeking conversion to the Only Church ( = Proselytism). A lot of fluffy “I am OK, you are OK” instead. The Pollyannas run to explain to us this is all part of a cunning plan, by which you are nice to people, and the Holy Ghost converts them: no unpleasant words necessary.
Francis then proceeds to receive a couple of extremely un-Franciscan Proddie grandees: among them, the ever-smiling Joel Osteen, privately called “this is my Bible”, and Kenneth Copeland, privately called “this is my private jet”. There is no mention whatever to an appeal to conversion. Heretics will remain heretical. Should they convert? No, no, no! The world is delighted at how easy things have become. The Pollyannas run to explain to us that the Pope is just a very nice chap, so the evangelisation thing is slower. The time of mercy, and all that. But look, he really wants to convert them, he really wants!
Francis then receives another bunch of Proddies, and they say he told them they are perfectly fine where they are and there’s no need for conversion. More, he wants to come to their own places to apologise for the Church “hurting” them (Lord! Give me strength!). Think, they wanted to eradicated heresy! What bad Catholics they were!
So, we now have a Pontiff who not only renounces to proselytise, but even goes out of his way to undermine the Church and Catholic doctrine with the Proddies. How many are going to be, pray, converted by such a behaviour?
The Pollyannas will soon be running to tell us… we don’t know exactly but, certainly, a variation of the usual excuses.
The reality on the ground is that the Bishop of Rome is utterly and completely unworthy I do not say of being Pope, but of the habit. A man working every day, and in every way, against the Church of Christ. A man doing the exact contrary of what he is supposed to do, and calling “solemn nonsense” the very core of his job description.
A man, also, of – once again – astonishing hypocrisy, who lambasts economic inequalities and the gap between rich and poor everytime sympathetic ears and journalists are around, and then hobnobs with people who are not only vastly rich – to the point of possessing a private jet -, but who have made their riches through… heresy! But hey: who is he to judge?
A comedian, writing some thirty years ago a parody of an imaginary papacy of the future, could not have imagined even one tenth of the rubbish produced by this man; a man with no shame, no love for the Church, very probably no faith, and no love for anything but his own popularity.
Francis, not Proselytism, is the solemn nonsense.
The, ahem, “lady” clearly works at Burger King. Probably to finance her addiction to Burger King.
You can, though, admire an unexpectedly strong sprint as she flees from the camera.
The language is the usual feminist one.
It is a deep mystery who, no matter how drunk, would ever want to have sex with such a rhino. Therefore, one suspects the young, ahem, lady is fighting for the battle of other women to have all the sex they want without fear of consequences, whilst she gets in trouble for them.
If I had had children at the event, I would have said to them: “see, children? If you eat too much and do not exercise, one day you will become as fat and as stupid as that woman there!”.
They would obviously have started to cry in terror.
A very salutary reaction.
Read here about the trial of the sluts who desecrated Notre Dame.
I do not know you, but I was shocked at knowing that in France you can publicly desecrate a Cathedral and get away with a pittance. Heck, each one of these “initiatives” will most certainly bring in, in donations, a vast multiple of the fine money, as they establish these perverted and godless groups as focal point of the activity of all those who hate Christ and His Church.
It is not known to me whether no jail term was requested because the French law does not foresee the possibility (which seems absurd to me), or because the local clergy is so cowed into submission that they do not dare to ask for it. In both cases, this tell you very clearly that the persecution is clearly coming; and, even if it will take some years, and perhaps many, it will have devastating effects as these bastards are able to act with a minimum of inconvenience, and the comfort of wide publicity and notoriety among those of their ilk.
We really need to wake up. If no jail term are possible for the crime, then the Church should make a holy mess so that the laws are changed, all the while bringing the issue of the growing threat to Christians a wide issue. If jail term are possible, then they must be sought after without any sissified false mercy.
Heaven, the news is reported as if the request for a fine were a kind of victory, or credible reaction of sort.
Christianity in France goes down the drain. The Archdiocese asks that this be punished with a fine.
What a disgrace.