Do Not Make Excuses For Cardinal Erdo.

The certificate was delivered to the Cardinal in the early afternoon of today.

 

Read on Rorate Caeli the astonishing affirmations of Cardinal Erdo, the man who openly and sarcastically dismissed the most scandalous passages of the document as… something he does not understand. But by all means, you can ask Archbishop Faggot near him; he is the one who penned the document, after all. Erdo is merely the idiot who signed it.

Have these men lost every sense of dignity? The document carries his own signature, for heaven’s sake! He signed it, he answers for it! He should have refused to sign a document that could not be signed. He should have taken in on itself to say very publicly “this document is not mine, and if the Pope authorises his publication he takes full responsibility for it”. Nothing if this has happened.

Instead, Cardinal Erdo has been a coward twice. A coward the first time, when he yielded to the pressure and accepted to sanction an obviously scandalous document. A coward the second time, when he did not have the courage – in front of the storm of journalists, asking what the hell was happening – to stay behind what he has decided to be, by the very definition of the concept, answerable for.

If these sissies are the defenders of orthodoxy, we truly are in for a ride.

Mundabor

“Thus I Promise, This I Swear, So Help Me God”.

The “Obsolete, my foot!” reblog…

Mundabor's Blog

Extremely narrow-minded and obsessed with orthodoxy: Pope St. Pius X

The Oath Against Modernism.

St. Pius X, pray for us!

——

To be sworn to by all clergy, pastors, confessors, preachers, religious superiors, and professors in philosophical-theological seminaries.

I . . . . firmly embrace and accept each and every definition that has been set forth and declared by the unerring teaching authority of the Church, especially those principal truths which are directly opposed to the errors of this day. And first of all, I profess that God, the origin and end of all things, can be known with certainty by the natural light of reason from the created world (see Rom. 1:90), that is, from the visible works of creation, as a cause from its effects, and that, therefore, his existence can also be demonstrated: Secondly, I accept and acknowledge the external proofs of revelation, that is, divine acts…

View original post 831 more words

Pope Francis Declares God’s Laws Obsolete, Appoints Himself In His Place

John Henry Fuseli: “The Nightmare”.

 

At this point, I seriously think TMAHICH might be on cocaine; so uncontrolled, totally unhinged has he become in his madness, and in his endless vanity. 

The Catholic Herald does not even try to conceal with some thin veil of blabla the utter blasphemy of this evil old man. Opening phrase: 

If laws do not lead people to Christ then they are obsolete, Pope Francis said in his morning homily.

The expressions he chose are beyond belief. In short: as Jesus went beyond the Mosaic law… Francis now goes beyond Jesus’ law! 

Why? Because of poor sales, you see.

 

The arrogance of this vecchio malvissuto is truly beyond the wildest hopes of lifelong satanists.  Try this: 

The scholars were safeguarding the law “out of love, to be faithful to God,” the Pope said, but “they were closed up right there,” and forgot all the ways God has acted in history.

“They forgot that God is the God of the law, but is also the God of surprises,” he said.

The “God of surprises” means that this madman now thinks he can say: “surprise! It hasn’t worked, because you don’t go to mass and live in concubinage! Not that there’s much wrong with concubinage, of course! But this shows that God’s laws don’t work, do they? We need new ones, then! Christianity 2.0, released By Francis, The Humble Servant of God”. 

“God is always new; he never denies himself, he never says that what he had said is wrong, but he always surprises us,” 

What the heck this means, no one knows. The man has never heard of the principle of non-contradiction. A child of six can talk, and think better than this. But have those who listen to him the intelligence of a child of six?

And once again, TMAHIC sends a very clear message: “In case you think I am not behind the excrement of the bishops yesterday, think again! I am already beyond that! I am beyond Christianity! I am the New God, who declares the old obsolete!” 

Unhinged. On cocaine. Permanently drunk. Sold to Satan. 

I do not know exactly what is wrong with this man. But it is extremely disquieting to see him open his mouth; because every time he opens it, the shit of the devil comes out of it in great quantity, and its stench fills the planet.

Servus servorum diaboli. The first of the servants of Satan. This is what this man is, and I would not sleep at night if, running a Catholic blog, I would not tell you the gravity of the evil, and the extent of the evil menace this man represents, and it is inconceivable to me how anyone could not see. 

Make no mistake: he will never try to proclaim any dogma in contrast with Tradition. Nor will he, I think, formally proclaim any heresy. At this point, frankly, it would be a liberation. But he will not do it. He knows perfectly well to what extent he can go and maintain his prerogative as Pope. He knows all too well that as long as he does not put himself in the position of invalidating his very position as Pope, he will be allowed to defecate on the Church every time he pleases: in “off-the cuff” comments, improvised homilies, visit to jails, and all those other occasion where the dear humble Pope can be said to have been, in the end, just a tad imprudent. That he does it one thousand times will never worry the Pollyannas. 

The day this man dies will be a great day in the history not only of the Church, but of humanity. A day of liberation from a great plague. 

Let us pray that the day we are freed from this evil man (no, in front of these antics I do not think anyone can still think he is simply deluded, or stupid; I have tried to keep the possibility open for as long as I could, because he is the Pope; but no, no, no, no! This is pure evil at work) the Cardinals will learn the lesson and appoint a good Pope.  

I will not cease praying for the conversion of this evil man, as it is my duty of Catholic. My duty of Catholic is to recognise that this man is, for very bad or for even worse, the man God has allowed to become Pope (not “chosen”; allowed to; like he allows rape, murder, and genocide) to punish us for our horrible sins. 

But starting from today, I will also pray for his painless death if he does not repent (whichever comes first…), as the Church has always said we are allowed to do if we think the Pope is a great disgrace for the Church and a danger for countless souls. 

I invite you, for the good of the Church, to do the same. 

Mundabor

“Elaborating Realistic Paths Of Affective Growth”: Mundabor’s “Merciful” Musing.

Francis’ Pontificate as seen by Joachim Beuckelaer…

 

Moved to tears by the new religion introduced yesterday to stunned Catholicism (and, actually, Christianity) the world over, Yours Truly, who always wanted to be part of the Avantgarde and among the first movers in every new development, has decided to elaborate on what the Satanic Synod has told us yesterday, and offer paths of further reflection for the benefits of the followers of the new religion; obviously starting with the bishops who are responsible for that document, a real milestone in the birth of the Religion Of Mercy. 

1. On our relationship with pedophiles

The question of pedophilia leads me to a serious reflection on how to elaborate realistic paths of affective growth for them. Pedophiles have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community: are we capable of welcoming these people, guaranteeing to them a fraternal space in our communities? Often they wish to encounter a Church that offers them a welcoming home. Are our communities capable of providing that, accepting and valuing their sexual orientation, without compromising Catholic doctrine on the protection of children?

See also point 2.

2. On the affective growth of dog-mounters.

The Church affirms that unions between people and dogs – of the same or opposite sex – cannot be considered on the same footing as matrimony between man and woman. Nor is it acceptable that pressure be brought to bear on pastors or international bodies to make financial aid dependent on the introduction of regulations inspired by canine love ideology. Still, without denying the moral problems connected to human-canine unions, it has to be noted that there are cases in which mutual aid to the point of sacrifice (well known in dogs, but present in men, too) constitutes a precious material support in the life of the canine partner, and a very important emotional support – to the point of sacrifice: shelter, food,, vaccinations, holidays, and so on – in the life of the human one. Furthermore, the Church pays special attention to the children who live with couples in canine partnership, emphasizing that the needs and rights of the little ones must always be given priority to those of the dog. See also point 1.

3. On  our inclusion of incestuous couple.

See points 1 and 2.

—-

There. I have it.

I hope my contribution will be eagerly accepted.

I like this new religion. It looks like I will be able to do whatever I please, and woe to those who do not “include” me.

Hey, I am neither a faggot, nor a pedophile, nor a dog-mounter, nor a mother-you-know-what.

Just consider how many gifts and qualities I have to offer to the community?

By the way (cough): I  prefer young, thin, blonde, and buxom.

Any takers, girls?

Can’t wait for the welcome…

M

Akita And The Synod, 10 October 1973 And 13 October 2014

Akita, 13 October 1973. The Blessed Virgin to Sister Agnes Sasagawa:

“My dear daughter, listen well to what I have to say to you. You will inform your superior.”

After a short silence:

“As I told you, if men do not repent and better themselves, the Father will inflict a terrible punishment on all humanity. It will be a punishment greater than the deluge, such as one will never seen before. Fire will fall from the sky and will wipe out a great part of humanity, the good as well as the bad, sparing neither priests nor faithful. The survivors will find themselves so desolate that they will envy the dead. The only arms which will remain for you will be the Rosary and the Sign left by My Son. Each day recite the prayers of the Rosary. With the Rosary, pray for the Pope, the bishops and priests.”

“The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against bishops. The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres…churches and altars sacked; the Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord.

“The demon will be especially implacable against souls consecrated to God. The thought of the loss of so many souls is the cause of my sadness. If sins increase in number and gravity, there will be no longer pardon for them”

“With courage, speak to your superior. He will know how to encourage each one of you to pray and to accomplish works of reparation.”

“It is Bishop Ito, who directs your community.”

And She smiled and then said:

“You have still something to ask? Today is the last time that I will speak to you in living voice. From now on you will obey the one sent to you and your superior.”

“Pray very much the prayers of the Rosary. I alone am able still to save you from the calamities which approach. Those who place their confidence in me will be saved.”

 

Rome, 13 October 2014. Relatio post Disceptationem: the Synod’s Bishop to the Catholic world: 

A new sensitivity in today’s pastoral consists in grasping the positive reality of civil weddings and, having pointed out our differences, of cohabitation. It is necessary that in the ecclesial proposal, while clearly presenting the ideal, we also indicate the constructive elements in those situations that do not yet or no longer correspond to that ideal.

It was also noted that in many countries an “an increasing number live together ad experimentum, in unions which have not been religiously or civilly recognized” (Instrumentum Laboris, 81). In Africa this occurs especially in traditional marriages, agreed between families and often celebrated in different stages. Faced by these situations, the Church is called on to be “the house of the Father, with doors always wide open […] where there is a place for everyone, with all their problems” (Evangelii Gaudium, 47) and to move towards those who feel the need to take up again their path of faith, even if it is not possible to celebrate a religious marriage.

In the West as well there is an increasingly large number of those who, having lived together for a long period of time, ask to be married in the Church. Simple cohabitation is often a choice inspired by a general attitude, which is opposed to institutions and definitive undertakings, but also while waiting for a secure existence (a steady job and income). In other countries common-law marriages are very numerous, not because of a rejection of Christian values as regards the family and matrimony, but, above all, because getting married is a luxury, so that material poverty encourages people to live in common-law marriages. Furthermore in such unions it is possible to grasp authentic family values or at least the wish for them. Pastoral accompaniment should always start from these positive aspects.

All these situations have to be dealt with in a constructive manner, seeking to transform them into opportunities to walk towards the fullness of marriage and the family in the light of the Gospel. They need to be welcomed and accompanied with patience and delicacy. With a view to this, the attractive testimony of authentic Christian families is important, as subjects for the evangelization of the family.
Caring for wounded families (the separated, the divorced who have not remarried, the divorced who have remarried)

What rang out clearly in the Synod was the necessity for courageous pastoral choices. Reconfirming forcefully the fidelity to the Gospel of the family, the Synodal Fathers, felt the urgent need for new pastoral paths, that begin with the effective reality of familial fragilities, recognizing that they, more often than not, are more “endured” than freely chosen. These are situations that are diverse because of personal as well as cultural and socio-economic factors. It is not wise to think of unique solutions or those inspired by a logic of “all or nothing”….

Each damaged family first of all should be listened to with respect and love, becoming companions on the journey as Christ did with the disciples of the road to Emmaus. In a particular way the words of Pope Francis apply in these situations: «The Church will have to initiate everyone – priests, religious and laity – into this “art of accompaniment”, which teaches us to remove our sandals before the sacred ground of the other (cf. Ex 3,5). The pace of this accompaniment must be steady and reassuring, reflecting our closeness and our compassionate gaze which also heals, liberates and encourages growth in the Christian life» (Evangelii Gaudium, 169).

Various Fathers underlined the necessity to make the recognition of cases of nullity more accessible and flexible….

As regards matrimonial suits, the speeding-up of the procedure, requested by many, as well as the preparation of a sufficient number of operators, clerics and lay people, dedicating themselves to this, requires an increase in the responsibilities of the diocesan bishop, who in his diocese might charge a specially trained priest who would be able to offer the parties advice on the validity of their marriage….

In the same way the situation of the divorced who have remarried demands a careful discernment and an accompaniment full of respect, avoiding any language or behavior that might make them feel discriminated against. For the Christian community looking after them is not a weakening of its faith and its testimony to the indissolubility of marriage, but rather it expresses precisely its charity in its caring.

As regards the possibility of partaking of the sacraments of Penance and the Eucharist, some argued in favor of the present regulations because of their theological foundation, others were in favor of a greater opening on very precise conditions when dealing with situations that cannot be resolved without creating new injustices and suffering. For some, partaking of the sacraments might occur were it preceded by a penitential path – under the responsibility of the diocesan bishop –, and with a clear undertaking in favor of the children. This would not be a general possibility, but the fruit of a discernment applied on a case-by-case basis, according to a law of gradualness, that takes into consideration the distinction between state of sin, state of grace and the attenuating circumstances.

[…]

Homosexuals have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community: are we capable of welcoming these people, guaranteeing to them a fraternal space in our communities? Often they wish to encounter a Church that offers them a welcoming home. Are our communities capable of providing that, accepting and valuing their sexual orientation, without compromising Catholic doctrine on the family and matrimony?

The question of homosexuality leads to a serious reflection on how to elaborate realistic paths of affective growth and human and evangelical maturity integrating the sexual dimension: it appears therefore as an important educative challenge. The Church furthermore affirms that unions between people of the same sex cannot be considered on the same footing as matrimony between man and woman. Nor is it acceptable that pressure be brought to bear on pastors or that international bodies make financial aid dependent on the introduction of regulations inspired by gender ideology.

Without denying the moral problems connected to homosexual unions it has to be noted that there are cases in which mutual aid to the point of sacrifice constitutes a precious support in the life of the partners. Furthermore, the Church pays special attention to the children who live with couples of the same sex, emphasizing that the needs and rights of the little ones must always be given priority.

—–

It is as if the Devil himself had appeared to the Bishops and Cardinals.

M

 

Synod: Francis And Satan Are Dancing The Tango, Part Two

 

 

 

Continuing our short comment over the satanic abomination published by the Vatican yesterday, we find the argument of sexual perversion introduced. 

This is, make no mistake, the clear indication that the Homomafia is now running the show at the Vatican, helped by the man who, whether a homosexual himself or not, decided they were not a problem because they don’t go around with the “Vatican Gay Lobby ID card”. Today, for a change, I will abandon the “what they really said” method.

If you ever wondered why Francis buried in the sand the famous 300 page report, you can cease wondering now.

So, there it goes:

Homosexuals have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community: are we capable of welcoming these people, guaranteeing to them a fraternal space in our communities? Often they wish to encounter a Church that offers them a welcoming home. Are our communities capable of providing that, accepting and valuing their sexual orientation, without compromising Catholic doctrine on the family and matrimony?

The smell of brimstone is strong in this one.

I have never heard of “homo detector” devices being put at the entrance of churches, and when it “beeps” people being chased away by ushers crying: “Go away!” “No homosexuals in our church!”

The Church has never forbidden the approach to the altar to pedophiles, homosexuals, murderers, incestuous people, and people screwing animals.

What the Church has always said, is that these are abominations. Therefore, on the one hand no pervert is allowed to act on his perversion, and on the other hand no pervert is allowed to give scandal by advertising it.

Which introduces the problem of “welcoming”. The soul is welcome to contrition and repentance. The homo is not welcome as homo. He is not welcome if, in any way whatsoever, he wants to have his perversion accepted, “valued”, “evaluated”, “appraised” or “appreciated” in any way whatsoever; because this would be welcoming scandal, not souls, and leading souls to hell, not heaven. 

The question of homosexuality leads to a serious reflection on how to elaborate realistic paths of affective growth and human and evangelical maturity integrating the sexual dimension: it appears therefore as an important educative challenge.

Homosexuality isn’t a “question”. It’s a sexual perversion. It leads people to hell. Its obvious (not “natural”; actually, unnatural) byproduct, sodomy, cries to heaven for vengeance. It’s in the same ballpark as screwing one’s dog, or one’s father, or one’s little nephew. That’s it. Live with it.

Still, our little Satan’s whores now dare to tell us that such perversion should move us to “elaborate a realistic path of affective growth”. This means, for all but the stupid, that the pervs are encouraged in their “feelings” for each other. The “integration of the sexual dimension” is, and cannot be read in any other way, an acceptance of sodomy, perhaps waiting that two sodomites who are told how much sodomy accompanies them in their “affective growth” then suddenly cease to commit sodomy because… because… no one knows why. The end is another bomb, as the “educative challenge” seem to be addressed not to the homos, but to the Catholic people, who must be “educated” to the “welcoming” of sodomites in their midst. 

The Church furthermore affirms that unions between people of the same sex cannot be considered on the same footing as matrimony between man and woman. Nor is it acceptable that pressure be brought to bear on pastors or that international bodies make financial aid dependent on the introduction of regulations inspired by gender ideology.

The little bastards get very sneaky here: as they repeat, with a very low voice, that the sacrament of marriage and two sodomites or lesbians living together in sin aren’t quite the same thing, they effectively put homosexual “couples” almost on the same sexual footing as the sacrament of matrimony. The defence of the doctrine is here reduced to saying that Holy matrimony is still on a better footing than two sodomites living together! O you Angels in heaven, do you hear them??

The gravity of this is immense.

But fear not: there will be Pollyannas around so happy to write that the little whores have “upheld Catholic doctrine”.

Without denying the moral problems connected to homosexual unions it has to be noted that there are cases in which mutual aid to the point of sacrifice constitutes a precious support in the life of the partners. Furthermore, the Church pays special attention to the children who live with couples of the same sex, emphasizing that the needs and rights of the little ones must always be given priority.

More whoring. Open sodomitical scandal is nothing more than a “problem”. Does it lead to damnation? Well, looky here: some faggots make a living out of other faggots! Isn’t this a beautiful “sacrifice” from, say, the old man who pays for the young pervert? I am so moved I want to cry. Do you have a handkerchief?

About the children, we are told that even their adoption from fags and lesbians is now a-ok! Lord, protect us and the little ones from these devils!

————–

I say it once again: there is nowhere to hide. No level of imbecility can justify anyone in pretending that

1. this is not atrociously satanic, and

2. this is not orchestrated by TMAHICH

TMAHICH is the man who put the liberal whores in the team in charge of writing this abomination. TMAHICH is the man who wanted both this Synod and the way it is going. TMAHICH is the man attacking Catholicism at every step, in every way he can.

In a way, and shocking as it is to say this, the situation is not entirely bad. I mean, it is obviously atrocious, but the upside of it is that the mask has fallen. Those who accept to pretend that the mask is still there have abundantly deserved to be punished for their folly, because they obviously value their quiet life and the desire to avoid uncomfortable questions infinitely more than Christ.

Francis here, Christ there. Francis is comfortable and easy, Christ is uncomfortable and difficult.

Pick your side, and pay the price.

Mundabor

 

Synod: Instructions For Very Bad Popes

The “prophetic Mundabor” reblog…

Mundabor's Blog

“Pastoral” device armed…

And so you are now, dear reader, a Pope. A Very Bad One. I mean, one of those Gandhi-cum-Dalai Lama people unable to go beyond the most banal platitudes, but so much in love with themselves they will do everything to please the world that lavishes praises on them.

One of the problems you have, my dear reader turned bad Pope, is the army of divorced Catholics who live with their lovers. This bothers you. Not, mind, because they live with their lovers; rather, because they lament your Church’s (and, by extension, yours) lack of approval for their behaviour. You like approval. These people are very loud. They think like the world, and the world likes them, and you want to be liked by the world. Ergo, you must do something for them.

Now: being a bad Pope, you also think that all these old notions of…

View original post 990 more words

Serves You Right, Pollyannas!

 

Serves you right, Pollyannas.

What is happening under your eyes is nothing more than what you yourself deserved. You asked for it in all possible ways. You would not be satisfied until it hits you in the face. You are, in fact, the main cause of it happening: with your silence, your ignorance of reality, your being comfortable, cowardly accomplices, and groupies of that man.

Did you think that you could ignore and minimise the “off-the-cuff” comments of The Most Astonishing Hypocrite In Church History, and he would stop at that? Did you really think that one able to stay many years in seminary and get out of it thinking that the Blessed Virgin might have thought she was deceived was not a man entirely made of rubbish? Did you not know that when you give the devil your hand, he will go for all the rest? 

I do not pity you. You are not an object of pity more than an Auschwitz helper. You have seen the abomination and have accompanied it every step of the way, with little screams of excitement at the wonderful, humble Pope. You didn’t do it, but it’s you who helped to make it happen.

And now there you are, Pollyannas. Satan is making an open bid for your souls. All of them. 

I do not think that very many of you will manage to save yourselves from him. You are so far away from Christ now, you would not see Him if he came back and slapped you in the face; because hey, Christ is luv, so this must be a hallucination.

You must pray. Of course you must pray. I wish salvation to everyone of you. But I am under no illusion that Satan’s harvest will be very rich among you. This is a disgraced generation, and the centuries to come will see the disgrace of its thinking, and fully grasp the disgrace of its Popes. And when it happens you, the Pollyannas, will rightly be seen as the most useful tools of Satan, the pretend-pious comfortable men and women who decided to shut their eyes very hard, and not to see what was happening all around them.

Your bed. Lie in it.

Truly, Pollyannas: serves you right. 

Mundabor