The Other Side Of Jesuitism

 

If you had any doubt about why the Evil Clown met Kim Davis (I explained what the motive was: Jesuitism) we now have a new confirmation. Rorate has the photos of the only official audience given by the Evil Clown during his stay in the United States.

Francis was the rector of a seminary. He might have taught there, though the thought is between hilarious and tragic. He will, in any way, remember many students. Whom do you think did he meet?

A pervert, obviously. A pervert together with his perverted “boyfriend”. The Vatican presser even calls the two perverts “a family”. There’s a lot of smiling, touching and embracing. It’s like a pub in Sodom. 

We see here the other side of his Jesuitism at work. Francis does not want to be seen against anyone, with the only exception of Catholics. But he clearly wants to be seen in favour of the winners. He knows it might not possible to him to do all that he would like to do for them. Still, perverts are clearly having the upper hand, and the Pope wants to be sure he appears to be on their side. Therefore, photographs and journalists… again.

Alas, no photos with Kim Davis, I am told. I have certainly not seen any. The press office even implies it might have been all a damn mistake. Kim Davis is too similar to a Catholic, you see. 

And so there we are, seeing the photos of a Pope kissing perverts and reflecting that this is not even the first time. 

Let me repeat a concept for you. 

This man is pure evil.

M

 

Very Officially Infiltrated

The news came out today. 

A Monsignor working in a non better defined “doctrinal office” (CDF?) was “fired” after revealing he was not only homosexual, but a homo with a “boyfriend”. Full-fledged faggot, then, “out and proud”. The news stop short of saying that full sodomy was going on, but at this point the matter is only relevant to the extent of punishment the two (cough) men will meet in hell unless they repent. A priest can’t be homosexual, much less heretical. That he is also a sodomite, or not, is already past the question whether he has any business at all being a priest.  

Monsignor… Fagniewski was, then, fired. But yours truly asks the following questions:

1. What on earth is a homo priest doing not only in the priesthood, but in an office occupying itself with doctrinal matters of all places? How is it possible that no one knew? Hey, the man even had a “boyfriend”. A surprise? Really?
2. The Vatican justifies giving the boot to Mons… Pervertek with the following words:  “The decision to make such a pointed statement on the eve of the opening of the synod appears very serious and irresponsible, since it aims to subject the synod assembly to undue media pressure”. What? How about the fact that the man is supposed to be a 1) catholic 2) priest? Nothing about that? The problem is, if Lombardi has been quoted correctly, merely a matter of timing, and of “undue pressure”. It beggars belief.

It appears to me the man was very officially infiltrated, and no one had a problem with that. He was kicked out because truth is supposed to perverted in a more subtle way, is all.

St Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle.

M  

 

 

The Happy Few

No, tomorrow is not the day of St Crispin and St Crispinian. Nor is any of us at risk of being slaughtered, or taken hostage. Still, I thought I would post these famous words. They are, I think, very fitting to the battle before us.

We live in disgraceful times. We are outnumbered by senseless idiots playing the sensitive guy and the inclusive girl even as they march towards perdition. But we have received a great grace.

We are the happy few.

M